Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise of lutheranism
The Development of Lutheranism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
German peasants faced monetary injustices and oppression from their lords during the 16th century which sparked revolts to occur in 1524. The peasants sought to overthrow the feudal system as they realized that they were being treated unjustly by their lords with the unsuitable compensation they were receiving for their labor and the heavy taxes that were being placed on them. Religious teachings such as of those of Martin Luther were also a motive behind the revolts. The primary causes of the German peasants’ revolts were based off of economic and religious factors. These revolts provoked many responses by figures of nobility and citizens that varied from disapproval to those of sympathy.
A major factor that caused the peasant revolts
…show more content…
were the economic problems and oppression that the peasants faced against their lords. Remarks made in The Twelve Articles of the Swabian Peasants from Sebastian Lotzer and Christoph Schappler expresses the peasants’ feelings about the lords’ unfair treatment towards them and their demand for economic equality based on the agreement they made (doc 2). Lotzer and Schappler say that the lords should stop forcing the peasants into labor without paying them for their efforts. They also claimed that the peasants should help the lords when it is necessary; however the services forced on the peasants should not harm or deprive the peasant in any form and should pay them an equal amount that would reflect based on their work efforts. Coming from Lotzer, who was not only a lay preacher but also a craftsperson, this may have reflected on his own personal experiences of being put under labor with an unsuitable compensation meaning that he too faced the oppression and monetary injustices that the peasants’ faced with their lords, making his remarks biased as he could say this to get back at the lords for putting him under such labor without compensation. In a secret report to the Archbishop of Würzburg, Lorenz Fries wrote about the peasants’ belief in brotherhood and equality hence they believed that the rich nobiles should share their wealth with the poor lower classes (doc 8). This report emphasized the peasants’ desire for equality economically as they thought it was just and fair that the rich should share with the poor. Lorenz Fries is writing this secret report to the an archbishop, a person of nobility who may be a victim of the peasant revolts, because then he can include some of his own personal thoughts and honest opinions into it knowing that the information inside the report and the receiver of the report would be unknown to the public as it would not be published. In a letter to Duke Albert of Prussia, Caspar Nützel writes about the peasants being oppressed and abused by their lords and how excessive the lords have overworked the peasants and have treated them unfairly (doc 9). Nützel emphasizes the role that the lords should play; he writes that the lords should defend and rule the peasants rather than trying to swindle them. Nützel was a town councilor, which made him a government official, his emphasis on the excessive unfair treatment towards the peasants gave the revolts a sense of justification as it made sense for the peasants to revolt after all that they've been through. His position of high status would affect him as the peasants would try to target him; however knowing that he has sided with the peasants, they may leave him alone, thus he may have said this to prevent peasants from attacking him. Another reason as to why the peasant revolts occurred was due to religious teachings.
In a report to Duke Ludwig of Bavaria from Leonhard Von Eck, the Chancellor of Bavaria, he writes that the source of the revolts comes from Lutheran teachings (doc 1). He wrote that the peasants’ tactics of revolting were based off of Lutheran and biblical teachings, thus the motive behind the peasants’ violent actions were religiously influenced. Leonhard was the Chancellor of Bavaria, a predominantly Catholic region, thus he himself may have been a Catholic, which would be reasonable as to why he would blame Lutheran teachings for being a main source in causing the revolts. At the time Catholics rejected Lutheran teachings because it went against Catholic teachings and did not believe that the pope held any divine authority. It would only make sense for Leonhard to say that Lutheran teachings were to blame because it went against his own religion. Seeing as the actions of the peasants’ were influenced by religious teachings, in an open letter to the people of Allstedt, Thomas Müntzer justifies the actions of the peasants and the revolt as “God’s will” (doc 6). Thomas was a theologian and a preacher and so he wrote an open letter to the people because he has a major influence on the people as they will listen to him and most likely support what he will say. Thomas’ message was to support the peasants and so he knew the influence he had on the public hence why he wrote an open letter telling people to support the peasants knowing that there will be individuals who are willing to support them as
well. The responses towards the revolts varied from one individual to another. Martin Luther disapproved of the peasants’ revolts in Against the Murdering, Thieving Hordes of Peasants where he describes the actions of the peasants to be of that like mad dogs and blames the revolts on Thomas Müntzer (doc 7). The main reason why Martin Luther disapproved of the revolts was because his teachings were the source behind the motives of the peasants’ actions and he did not want his name or works to be associated with the peasants as people may think that he is the one who started the revolts. In a report by Pastor Johann Herolt, he reports about the events that occurred at Weinsburg saying that the townsfolk were peasant supporters (doc 5). Although the townsfolk were not committed to the peasants, they still open up the gates for them and let them in. As a Pastor, Johann Herolt most likely reported this because his job is to understand people and try to relate with them on a spiritual and emotional level. When he describes that the people were not committed to the peasants yet they still opened up the doors for them he's trying to show that he was able to understand the townsfolk decision to open up the doors for them as they sympathized with the peasants knowing the hardships they've gone through under the harsh treatment of their lords. Ultimately economic and religious factors were the primary causes of the peasants’ revolts in German states. The desire to be free from serfdom and have economic equality made the peasants revolt against higher nobility. The peasants revolted using violent tactics because it was based off religious teachings that they followed which made them revolt. Many people had different outlooks on the revolts, some disapproved of the revolt while others sympathized with the peasants.
The Weimer Republic, is the democratic government established in Germany in 1918 that ruled for fifteen years after the collapse of the German empire after the First World War.The republic consisted of moderates from the Social Democratic Party as well as their liberal allies, which included the German Democratic Party, and the Catholic Center Party. The Weimer Republic sought political democracy, which they believed was attainable by the elimination of war, revolutionary terror, and capitalism. Despite their clear goal, the Weimer Republic faced backlash by the radicals of society, which included communists, National Socialists, and the Nazi Party led by Adolf Hitler. THESIS: The Weimer Republic’s instability in the period of 1918-1933 is
The causes of the peasants’ revolt included lack of compensation for services, feelings of spiritual inequality, lords refusing peasant freedom without reimbursement, and the peasants’ manipulation of Lutheran principles; while the responses to the revolt incorporated negativity, violence, and authority
Leonhard Von Eck was a German chancellor, or head of government of Bavaria, therefore held a high status and role in society, revealing him as a probable reliable source (doc 1). As chancellor, Von Eck regulated order in society and was accustomed to the behavior of the peasants during this time period. He states that “the peasants are blinded, led astray, and made witless”, which displayed their lack of knowledge (doc 1). Ignorance of the peasants revealed that they, themselves are not dependable, thus, not reliable. Von Eck demonstrates this idea through the quote, “they could change their minds within an hour.” However, Von Eck showed accuracy as he emphasizes facts instead of opinions. His purpose in writing this report was to express his disagreements about Protestantism and how the “Word of God”, “the Gospel” in addition to “brotherly love”, were critical influences in their religious lives. Their “blindness” as Von Eck states, was caused by the utmost control of the Catholic Church. The Peasant Parliament of Swabia in March of 1525, implied the demands of the peasants as a unified faction. (doc 3) The Parliament stressed that as “poor serfs”, they have distressed and
In late 1524, German peasants believed that they were being mistreated and, therefore, created a revolt against the government. To this, the government responded in violence by killing over 100,000 rebels. These German peasant revolts were mainly caused by economic issues and the widespread belief and misuse of the Lutheran ideology. In response to this revolt, some key figures acted cooperative, while others acted in a violent and non-sympathetic manner.
Political greed and desire for land by the German princes and the education of Free Cities resulted in immense support from vast crowds which allowed for the Protestant Reformation to occur. As did the social developments included in Martin Luther’s, author of the 95 Theses, ideas of women rights, bibles/masses, and availability of literature. This developments resulted in certain groups, genders, and classes converting to Protestantism, which allowed the Protestant Reformation to establish.
“Under the outward appearance of the gospel, they honor and serve the devil, thus deserving death in body and soul ten times over.” Luther’s brutal words against the rebelling peasants of Germany in 1525 reveal the complex reality of the Reformation. Suppression of the rebellion by the German aristocracy was swift and violent, leaving over 70,000 German peasants dead. The rebellion targeted the social and political oppression of the peasantry in the early 16th century. The peasants found new justification for revolt in the promising words of Martin Luther. Luther proclaimed a new kind of freedom for the Christian soul and the peasants applied his idea to their own circumstances. However a dichotomy emerged between spiritual freedom and worldly freedom. Luther argued that good Christians were spiritually free but still subject to temporal laws. The kingdom of God and the kingdom of man were separate spheres. Luther rejected attempts to integrate spiritual freedom into the temporal sphere [Luther turned against the peasants’ revolt of 1525 because the demands of the peasants went against his doctrine of Christian freedom, which stressed the spiritual freedom of Christians and concordant obedience to temporal authority. By using scripture as a justification for rebellion, the peasants not only blasphemed God’s name but also acted against the natural order mandated by God.
After the emancipation of the Russian Peasantry, land was given to the peasants. This was between 1861 and 1866, but because the nobility had lost their land when the peasants were given land, the peasants had to pay a tax until 1905. As the years passed, the land allotted to each person decreased from 13.8 acres to 7.3 acres as the population increased. Due to this increase in population and decrease in land, a series of famines struck the rural areas. As the peasants mainly occupied the rural areas, they were perceived to be living in poor conditions by the Russian people, and as response to their conditions, peasants started taking a stand, and voicing their opinions; change was proposed in the end when peasants were given more freedom,
For example, two of the largest peasant rebellions in 1381 and 1549 occurred in Norfolk. Both these struggles were mainly concerned with the growing political power of the Lords in Norfolk and local grievances such as enclosure. He also states continuity from the Medieval and Early Modern period because society was structured in a similar way, which means that there is some cross-over in the causes of the rebellions. It is unclear as to how many of those involved in the Kett’s rebellion understood it’s connection to the Peasant’s Revolt, but a main similarity is that they show that peasants could revolt and form an uprising equal in size to those which had gentry involvement. Furthermore, Wood draws attention to the traditional nature of popular protest and rebellion between the Western Rebellion 1549 and the Pilgrimage of Grace 1536 due to the shared religious grievances. This would suggest that the subordinate groups in Early Modern England had similar grievances which could be found in various rebellions, supporting the belief that rebellion and popular protest was the only way for them to get their voices heard. It also suggests that members of authority did not pass legislation to help deal with grievances such as taxation, enclosure and religious instability which may imply that they did not perceive these issues as being particularly serious
The political organization and religion aspects during the 16th century influenced Protestant Reformation to occur in Germany. Martin Luther’s writings reflect on his views and perspectives of German politics and religion at the time. Martin Luther’s ideas in the Letter to the Christian Nobility of the German Nation and The Statement of Grievances mentions Martin Luther’s thoughts about how corrupt the church is, why the corruption in the church needs to end, and what Martin Luther’s ideas are to change the way of the church.
Just outside the boundaries of the Roman empire of the first and second centuries, beyond the Rhine River, and occupying the area of Central Europe of what is today Germany, lived the tribes of the Germanic people. In Germania, the Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus gave an account of the lifestyles and organization of these peculiar barbarians. These descendants of modern Germans proved peculiar in that they adopted many qualities typical of barbaric cultures, yet they simultaneously practiced virtues more befitting of advanced civilizations, values more ethical than even the Roman empire of the time. The German warriors had a rigid code that defined how to live honorable lives and shameful acts to avoid committing, and the warriors also adhered to strict tradition in their relationship with their king or chief.
Being German-American is a very personal thing. We want and we find external independence here, a free middle-class way of life, uninhibited progress in industrial development, in short, political freedom. To this extent we are completely American. We build our houses the way Americans do, but inside there is a German hearth that glows. We wear an American hat, but under its brim German eyes peer forth from a German face. We love our wives with German fidelity. . . We live according to what is customary in America, but we hold dear our German customs and traditions. We speak English, but we think and feel in German. Our reason speaks with the words of an Anglo-American, but our hearts understand only our mother tongue. While our eyes are fixed on an American horizon, in our souls the dear old German sky arches upward. Our entire emotional lives are, in a word, German, and anything that would satisfy our inner longing must appear in German attire [Cincinnati Volksfreund, Nov. 13, 1 848]. (Adams)
The wealthy had a very shortsighted opinion on the poor and saw none of their problems in the peasantry. They saw the peasants as living a life of no problems and a carefree life.(Doc 7) Jean Maillefer is a self made man so to him the peasants are simply people who don’t try to improve their circumstance. Instead they simple beg and make their livelihood off of others labor. They did not particularly enjoy these habits of the peasantry. They believed that the poor are a threat to the social order and refrained from providing necessary help.The German Peasants revolt builds the powerful opinion of Nobility, when it came to helping the peasantry. The Noble response to the poor can be considered to be heavily reminiscent of this revolt. The German princes knew that idle men can be very dangerous so often anyone left without work could be employed to make sure everyone was too busy to think about their plight. In order to maintain their social status, and political ideas the nobles continuously stopped the peasants from gaining power, and having them stay
Germany is a country of its own uniqueness and beauty. The country is located to the North of Europe, north east of France, west of Poland and below Denmark. Unification in
Luther was very respected by the peasants because of his thoughts and honesty about the biblical text. Luther believed and saw first hand how other people of “God” were using indulgences to take the money of the religiously uneducated in return for what they claimed was forgiveness and less time spent in purgatory for either themselves or relatives. Luther was blamed for the deaths of many of the peasants because after he had disappeared they had began an uprising to follow what they thought were his beliefs and because of this many of them lost their lives (it was estimated in the film that between 50,000 and 100,000 peasants and knights died.) The peasants that fought and were slaughtered were fighting alongside one of Luther’s friend’s which had taken what Luther had said and used it to rally the peasants into an uprising even though Luther did not mean it the way that it was understood. Luther did not have much power outside the peasant population with exception to the few of his fellow clergymen which mainly only helped to hide and transport him. The majority of the clergymen seemed to be rather envious of Luther for being able to stand up for what he believed in even though this meant he was in opposition to many different leaders of the time and putting his life on the line. Even though some supported his beliefs they would not stand next to him.
Death wasn't a stranger to D.H. Lawrence so perhaps its fitting that the poem I've chosen to explicate, Bavarian Gentians (1932), was published posthumously after the author and poet succumbed