More handpicked essays just for you.
Contribution of Nationalism to World War 1
Impact of Treaty of Versailles on Germany
Impact of Treaty of Versailles on Germany
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contribution of Nationalism to World War 1
However, to a great extent nationalism can hinder a nation’s purist for national interest. Take Germany during world war one and the treaty of Versailles for an example. With Germany’s nationalism and military branches support they allied with Austria-Hungary and took up arms to help defend against potential treats that may occur from the assignation of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the declaration of war against Serbia. Germany took arms because it would mean an increase in their national interests of power, security, and an even greater increase in their national interests if they won. However, this rising of arms led to many other nations taking up arms especially in retaliation to the Germans plan called Schilieffen. Nonetheless, in the
Q6. Nationalism was both known as a unifying and a disunifying force, your opinion depended on your perspective and background knowledge of the topic. Nationalism could be seen as a uniting force by bringing those together who believed in a single "nationality," or ancestors. Those who believed that nationalism was a unifying force also refused to be loyal to a king or queen, but they did remain loyal to those whom shared a common bond. Naturally, there were other who had different beliefs towards the topic. There were people who believed of nationalism as a disunifying force die to the fact that it would disrupt their wants to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
Nationalism is a devotion and loyalty to one’s own nation, with primary emphasis on furthering its interests as opposed to those of other countries. This feeling widely spread throughout Europe during the 19th and 10th centuries and caused many problems. The Slavic people of Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted to break away from Austria-Hungary and unify with other Slavic nations. Russia as a Slavic nation backed up the two countries in this matter, therefore causing tensions between Austria-Hungary and itself. Nationalism was also a source of anger between France and Germany as France resented its defeat in the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871).
When you mention the name of former fuhrer of Germany Adolf Hitler, you usually are met with a reaction of disgust and terror. Memories of the holocaust and other nightmares of World War Two are brought to light and you wonder : " How could that have happened?" Well, that question cannot be answered in a few words, rather there is a complex list of ideas as to why this was allowed to happen and why people supported Hitler in the first place. The main reason is that Germany, at that point in time, needed change, and Adolf Hitler was symbolic of that needed change.
Growing out of the romantic movement of the 19th century, there were many factors and various groups that contributed to the rise of German nationalism. With the nation fragmented, and Europe in social turmoil, the German people were lusting for spiritual and emotional unity that Enlightenment thinking could not provide. The population turned to existing religious groups, romantic thinkers, and secular political religions to fill the emotional gap that existed in a modernizing Europe.
Many people across the globe argue that nationalism within Canada is simply not feasible. It is said that we as a people, differ so greatly with our diverse cultures, religions, and backgrounds that we cannot come together and exist together as a strong, united nation. In his book, Lament for a Nation, George Grant tells the reader that “…as Canadians we attempted a ridiculous task in trying to build a conservative nation in the age of progress, on a continent we share with the most dynamic nation on earth. The current history is against us.” (1965) Originally directed towards the Bomarc Missile Crisis, the book argues that whatever nationalism Canada had was destroyed by globalization as well as the powerful American sphere of influence. Although it is true that the book was initially written as a response to the events that took place in the late 1950s, many of the points are still valid today.
The rise of European nationalism in the 19th Century brought with it an overabundance amount of change that would definitively modify the course of history. The rise of nationalism in one country would rouse greater nationalism in another, which would in turn, motivate even greater nationalism in the first, progressively intensifying the cycle that eventually concluded in a World War. Nationalism as an ideology produced international competition which inspired absolute allegiance to an individual’s nation state. The ideology was fueled by industrial commerce and imperialistic developments which led to nation-states pursuits of outcompeting rival nations.
Prior to and after WWI the world saw a rise in nationalistic sentiments. The Middle East was not immune to this new ideology. Although Arab Nationalism had a start in the Ottoman Empire, its rise among the masses did not begin until after WWI. While a total rise in Arab Nationalism became apparent on the Arabian Peninsula, a separate nationalist movement began in Palestine as a way to combat a unique and repressive situation. In Palestine the British mandate, along with British support, and the world's support for Zionist immigration into Palestine, caused a number of European Zionists to move into the country. These factors created an agitated atmosphere among Palestinians. Although there was more than one factor in creating a Palestinian-centered Arab Nationalism, the mounting Zionist immigration was among the most prevalent of forces.
Nationalism, the love and support of one's country, has always existed. In this era, however, it was to take part in the creation of one of the most famous wars in history. Since so much pride was devoted to countries, it made the possibilities of peace between past rivals less probable. It also meant that most nations, especially the great powers, would rather fight a war than back down from a rival's diplomatic provocation. In effect, nationalism was also a contributing factor to the alliance system. No country feels comfortable being in a war alone, and with the growing militaries in almost every country, allies provided much comfort.
Nationalism is way of thinking both political and socially to create a community united by: history, ethnicity, religions, common culture, and language. Numerous effects occurred while establishing a Nationalist community, some effects were a long term impact on Nationalism, and other was short term impacts on Nationalism.
Nationalism as the Most Important Cause of German Unification Nationalism is generally defined as the feeling of loyalty shared by a group of people united by race, language, and culture. It is a stronger belief than patriotism, the sentiment of loyalty towards one’s nation, as it is the belief that shared characteristics of a. common people are valuable and need to be preserved by creation. and maintenance of a nation state. In respect to German Unification. which was carried out between 1864 and 1871, historians have often described the process as a product of nationalism.
...powerful forces in binding people together, nationalism is a powerful force capable of inducing people to act collectively, share burdens, and even make sacrifices for the nation’s common good. As a result, it promotes the stability of democracies.
“Nationalism involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms, i.e. a nation,” (Nationalism). Nationalism can lead to beliefs that one’s state is naturally better than all other states. This is not good. It allows government to control people through their sense of nationalism. Both World War I and World War II can be linked back to nationalism. Nationalism is bad because it allows government control, it causes bad feelings of superiority, and the negative nationalism’s downsides.
In their respective articles, both Daniel Walther and Isabel Hull address the German imperialistic theme pertaining to the implementation and presence of Deutschtum (i.e., German cultural characteristics) and the German way of life in German colonies in Africa, primarily in German Southwest Africa. It can be understood that this was done in order to establish German influence and superiority in its colonies abroad. Walther looks at how the education model in African colonies sought to cultivate young, nationalistic Germans at an early age, even though they were growing up away from the fatherland. Conversely, Hull addresses this theme as it pertains to how Germans in Africa attempted to use Germany’s military culture to address the Herero and
Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and geographic proximity ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. In the following essay I will describe many of the consequences of nationalism on European identity, as well as some of the conflicts that it created.
War alone is an ugly thing, but a world war is a whole different story. A world war is a grimy, cold, and destructive event. It is about countries from worlds apart forced to choose one of two sides. The selfishness of the three main powers from World War I inevitably lead to World War II. The unfairness of the Treaty of Versailles forced Germany into a corner, which only intensified and fueled their hatred. Italy and Japan’s choice to build an alliance with Germany was fueled by our exclusion of them during the Paris Peace Conference. This turn of events is what lead to World War II.