Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
North korean nuclear problem essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: North korean nuclear problem essay
When George W. Bush became president in 2001, his administration decided to postpone negotiations with North Korea and displayed doubt about Pyongyang sticking to the Agreed Framework (2). In 2002, Bush’s administration claimed that North Korea was secretly improving their uranium, but Pyongyang denied this claim (2). In that same year, the fuel oil shipments that were accepted to while President Clinton was in office were suspended. By the end of 2002, the Agreed Framework had been ended (2). By January 2003, the relationship between the U.S. and North Korea was at its worst point when North Korea’s official removed from the Non Proliferation Treaty (2). Four months later, U.S. officials conveyed that North Korea admitted to having at least one nuclear weapon …show more content…
(2). Later in 2003, the Bush administration made it clear that they wanted to reconnect with North Korea by joining the Six Party Talks (2). The Six Party Talks included South Korea, Japan, Russia, and China (2).
In 2005, a comment was made by the Six Party Talks in which North Korea decided to abandon its nuclear weapons program, accept IAEA inspections, and rejoin the Non Proliferation Treaty while maintaining the right to peaceful nuclear energy (2). The other countries decided to provide energy assistance and discuss giving North Korea light water reactors. In July 2006, the development was stopped when North Korea was irritated by the U.S. targeting its financial assets and pace of the light water reactor project (2). In October 2006, North Korea performed its first nuclear test and the U.S. answered by requiring North Korea to end testing its nuclear weapons and to abandon its missile program. A spokesperson from North Korea’s government stated that the test was “entirely attributable to United States threats, sanctions and pressure.” (2). The spokesperson also accused the Bush administration of replying to North Korea’s “patient and sincere efforts with sanctions and blockades” (2). In July 2007, North Korea closed its nuclear facilities at Yongbyon in return for fuel oil and separation from the U.S list of state sponsors of terrorism
(2). In 2009, President Barack Obama started his first term with addressing “leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict” that “we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your first” (2). North Korea attempted to launch a satellite in space by launching a Unha 2 rocket, but it failed. On May 24, North Korea held a second nuclear test to help “settle the scientific and technological problems” in increasing the strength of its nuclear weapons (2). In December 2011, North Korean leader Kim Jong-il died after serving for 17 years and his youngest son, Kim Jong-un was then named the leader of North Korea (2). A year later, North Korea successfully launched the Unha-3 rocket by placing an object into orbit (2). The Unha-3 rocket was similar to a missile and could reach as far as California (2). Between 2013 and 2016, North Korea completed three more nuclear tests (2). In September 2016, North Korea commented that it tested its first hydrogen bomb (2). In 2017, President Trump had stated that “if the U.S. was forced to defend itself or its allies, it would have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea” (2). Trump stated that the North Korean leader was “on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime” (2). Kim Jong-un responded to Trump’s comment by stating that he is “mentally deranged and that he would pay dearly for threatening to destroy North Korea” (2). He also responded to Trump’s comment by saying that “have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last” (2). Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association stated that “North Korea has typically responded to threats with threats, to provocation with provocations” (2). Davenport also stated that “in part North Korea is responding to the dangerous and bellicose rhetoric of President Trump” (2). On the Fourth of July, North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, powerful enough to reach Los Angeles in thirty minutes (5). Kim Jong-un stated that the launch was a “Fourth of July gift” to the Trump administration (4). In reply, Trump stated that he wants to increase spending on missile defense by “many billions of dollars” (4). On September 3, North Korea tested the largest nuclear weapon it had ever tested before (4). In March 2018, Kim Jong-un had reportedly invited Trump to meet for negotiations about North Korea’s nuclear program (2). The White House has confirmed that Trump had accepted this invitation by Kim Jong-un. Trump tweeted that “great progress being made but sanctions will remain until an agreement is reached.” (2). On April 20, North Korea reported that it would discontinue nuclear testing and shut down the site where its six previous nuclear tests happened (2). This would be the first time a meeting between a U.S. president and North Korean leader would take place. The White House has stated that “President trump wants Kim to take specific steps toward eliminating his nuclear weapons before any sit-down” (3). The United States is in a commanding position in these negotiations because Kim’s intentions don’t directly threaten our national security (6). The U.S. is in a dominant position because Trump has no pressure to have to make a deal and the U.S. has military superiority over North Korea (6). Also, as a result of military superiority, Trump will demand a lot from Kim while offering little in exchange (6). Kim will experience pressure to make a deal and as a result, will make the process for making a deal longer (6). The longer it takes for sanctions to be given, the higher the risk that Kim will lose power (6).
On the brink of two different wars, two United States’ Presidents rose up to the challenge of calming the American people and fighting for the belief of justice. A day after devastation on December 7, 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt gives his “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation”. At the beginning of a terrorist crisis in 2001, George W. Bush announces a “‘War on Terror’ Declaration”. Both Presidents have many similarities in common, yet their differences set them apart with uniqueness. These two speeches, separate by nearly sixty years, weave an outright and assertive tone into their diction and detail.
Meetings were held with North Korea and the U.S. would always demand that North Korea remove those nuclear weapons, but every time they would decline. Kim Jong-Il’s health started to descend and that left him to give his power to his son, Kim Jong-Un. After his father’s death in 2011, Kim Jong-Un continued doing nuclear tests, even if that meant that North Korea wouldn’t be accepted into the international community. In conclusion, it can be said that dictatorship still exists to this day and that still many people aren’t free.
Party polarization is the idea that a party’s individual stance on a given issue or person is more likely to be liberal or conservative. Typically the rise of political uniformity has been more noticeable among people who are the most politically active, but as of late, the vast majority of the American public is spilt down the middle. The broad gap between liberals and conservatives is growing rapidly through the years. Which brings on questions of why there is a cultural division? While it is agreed by most political scientists that the media, elected officials, and interest groups are polarized on given issues, in James Q. Wilson’s article How Divided Are We? he discusses the factors that contribute to the division not only to those major
system produces conflicts between the Congress and the President and promotes very outdated beliefs that stem from the Constitution. A vast majority of the American population has the stern belief that the Constitution does not need to be changed in any way, shape, or form. This belief, however, is keeping the country from progressing along with other countries around the world. These single parties are holding control of multiple branches of government at once and monopolizing the power during their respective terms. The government “faces an incapacity to govern since each party works as a majority party” and believes there is no reason for innovation (Dulio & Thurber, 2000). The two parties are seemingly always clashing about one thing or the other, making it difficult for things to get accomplished, and proves the thesis correct that the two-party system is ineffective for a growing country.
In the United States we are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum; even further divided into political parties such as Republicans, on the right, and Democrats, on the left side. These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics such as the economy, separation of church and state, abortion, and gun control.
Recently, the debate of whether bipartisanship has completely left this country incapacitated due to the lack of cooperation between Senators and House members with conflicting opinions has grown especially due to the Clinton Impeachment Debates. Many individuals feel that the only reason William Jefferson Clinton was impeached in the House was due to the fact that the majority of the House is republicans. This research proposal will attempt to define if the concept of bipartisanship does exist. If it does exist, what are the contributing factors to it (convincing individuals, convincing corporations, money, the Senators or House member’s families)? These can be considered to be the independent variables. Presently, the Internet consists of numerous, almost uncountable, sources on bipartisanship. Many magazines and newspapers are major contributors to this subject as well. The amount of scandal contributing to this particular issue creates a level of curiosity that intrigues all aspects of this society. When the public seems to want press on a particular issue, they seem to get it.
North Korea Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web. The Web. 02 Apr. 2014.
方玥雯[Fang Yue Wen] (2009). 北韓核武研發與東北亞安全:2002-2007. [The North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons and the Security in Northeast Asia: 2002-2007] in台灣[Taiwan]: 國立政治大學[National Cheungchi University] Retrieved 18 July, 2013 from http://nccuir.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37029
In public, Reagan condemned authoritarian nations such as the Soviet Union, but in 1981, he was negotiating with an authoritarian leader. This is contradictory to what is thought of as Reagan’s strong and unyielding foreign policy against those who go against the American model. In his summit meeting with President Chun Doo Hwan in February 1981, Reagan was essentially establishing a new policy of engagement with South Korea by building a close relationship of cooperation and reliance with President
This conflict began developing in 1994 when North Korea announced its intentions to withdraw from the NPT. This led to the US and North Korea signing the Agreed Framework. Under this agreement, North Korea agreed to stop its illicit plutonium production in exchange for increased aid from the United States. While this agreement broke down in 2002, the Six-Party Talks restarted the efforts to stop North Korea from gaining nuclear weapons, involving the aforementioned North Korean, South Korea, Japan, China, Russia, and the United States. This le...
Relations between the United States and North Korea have been unstable since the second world war and with each passing decade the relations have become more tense. The U.S has never have formal international relations with North Korea , however the conflict has caused much controversy in U.S foreign policy. North Korea has been the receiver of millions of dollars in U.S aid and the target of many U.S sanctions. This is due to the fact that North Korea is one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet, that uses unjust techniques such as murder, torture, and starvation to get their citizens to be obedient. They restrict contact from their citizens to the outside world, through censorship of technology and rarely allowing visitors to the country. The root of the US-North Korea conflict however ,has been on the basis of nuclear weapons and North Korea threatening to use those weapons against the U.S and neighboring South Korea. The U.S and other nations have been working for the last few decades to stop the regime from purchasing and utilizing destructive nuclear weapons.
Kim, Yongho and Yi, Yurim “Security Dilemmas and Signaling during the North Korean Nuclear Standoff”, Asian Perspective, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2005, pp. 73-97
Since its origin in 1948, North Korea has been isolated and heavily armed, with hostile relations with South Korea and Western countries. It has developed a capability to produce short- and medium-range missiles, chemical weapons, and possibly biological and nuclear weapons. In December 2002, Pyongyang lifted the freeze on its plutonium-based nuclear weapons program and expelled IAEA inspectors who had been monitoring the freeze under the Agreed Framework of October 1994. As the Bush administration was arguing its case at the United Nations for disarming Iraq, the world has been hit with alarming news of a more menacing threat: North Korea has an advanced nuclear weapons program that, U.S. officials believe, has already produced one or two nuclear bombs. As the most recent standoff with North Korea over nuclear missile-testing approaches the decompression point, the United States needs to own up to a central truth: The region of Northeast Asia will never be fully secure until the communist dictatorship of North Korea passes from the scene. After threatening to test a new, long-range missile, Pyongyang says it is willing to negotiate with "the hostile nations" opposing it. But whether the North will actually forgo its test launch is anyone's guess. North Korea first became embroiled with nuclear politics during the Korean War. Although nuclear weapons were never used in Korea, American political leaders and military commanders threatened to use nuclear weapons to end the Korean War on terms favorable to the United States. In 1958, the United States deployed nuclear weapons to South Korea for the first time, and the weapons remained there until President George Bush ordered their withdrawal in 1991. North Korean government stateme...
The nuclear program of Iran was launched in the 1950’s with the help of the United States (Roe 2007). Iran’s first nuclear power plant, Bushehr I, was initiated with major assistance from the Russian government in 2006. Moreover, Iran has also indicated that it will seek to establish additional nuclear power plants and uranium mines in the future (RIA Novosti 2011). Following this announcement, the United Nations Security Council imposed legally binding sanctions on Iran and froze the assets of those heavily involved with the development of the nuclear program. Over the years, these sanctions were expanded and reinforced by those of individual nations, such as the United States(BBC 2012). While Iran claims that its nuclear program is purely for peaceful purposes, such as energy production, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) November 2011 report acknowledged the opposite. This report details Iran’s research directed towards the development of nuclear weapon capacity and nuclear payload integration into missile delivery systems (IAEA 2011, 8), supporting the United States and European Union’s fears. Tensions have run high in the world after this announcement, leading to even more crippling sanctions against Ira...
Pyongyang had a hard time after the publication of UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) report and received international pressure over that. DPRK itself denied the result of the report and intended to give moral justification over the country sovereignty intervention in the name of human right promote and protection. DPRK stated that the result of the COI obtained from the testimonies of the people who leave DPRK and stayed in ROK, International Expert and the Human Right Organization which decided to stayed anonymous and that’s mean is lack of investigation and low evidence.