Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Imperialism introduction Essay
Impact of colonization on the native indians
Shooting an elephant symbolism imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Imperialism introduction Essay
George Orwell, born in India, now a British writer is known for his essays and novels. George Orwell wrote the essay “Shooting an Elephant” to express the time he went through in Burma as a British officer during the imperialism time period. Orwell represents the evil of imperialism, and the impact it had on the Burmese and the British Empire through symbolism such as the rifle, the elephant, and Orwell himself.
First Orwell uses the rifle to symbolize power and strength. One way the rifle represents power is by the noise of the shots. Orwell states, “I thought the noise might be useful in terrorem” (324). When the Burmese hear the shots, they stop in their steps because they know the British are around. The Burmese know the British will harm them if they don’t do what the British want, because the British have all the power. Another way the rifle is represented by power is by the British Empire.
…show more content…
The British Empire is losing its power when Orwell does what the Burmese wants by shooting the elephant. Orwell says, “the whole population of the quarter flocked out of the houses and followed me” (325). Shooting the elephant was not Orwell’s plan, but whenever everyone started to follow him, he felt the pressure and now he has to shoot him. By doing this, he shows that he isn’t following the British Empire much anymore. The rifle also symbolizes strength by the three shots fired at the elephant. The first shot only knocked the elephant to his knees. This symbolizes that the Burmese will not give up when someone shoots them down. Orwell shoots the elephant again, but this time the elephant stands up. This shows that the Burmese will stand stronger when they get shot at again. When Orwell shoots the elephant again, he finally falls to his knees, but is not dead. Orwell says, “that was the shot that did it for him…it was obvious the elephant would never rise again, but he was not dead” (329). No matter how many times imperialism shot at the Burmese, they got strong because they had everything to lose. They may fall but they will never give up. One of the best symbols Orwell used is the elephant.
The elephant represents the innocence, slow death, and the colonized people. All of these things show how imperialism changes everything around them, and sometimes it takes people a while to realize it. Innocence shows that imperialism hides things, and that it’s hard to realize what is going on. Orwell is so young that he doesn’t realize the negative impact the British had on the Burmese. Orwell says, “I as young and ill-educated” (323). The slow death represents that everything around them is dying, including the people who enforce imperialism on others. The slow death symbolizes the ideals of the British Empire are slowly dying. Orwell says, “I did not even know that the British Empire is dying” (323). Imperialism had major effects on the colonized people of Burma. They are no longer allowed to do what they use to do before the British came in. Now they have to follow the British ideals and not their own. Soon they will get tired of being pushed around and rebel against the British Empire, and fight for their
freedom. Lastly but not least, Orwell uses himself to symbolize the evil of imperialism. Orwell shows himself as evil for showing himself as weak. Even though he was born into it, Orwell does not want to be a Burmese because of the way they are being treated. Orwell says, “I had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner I checked up my job and got out of it the better.” (323) However Orwell shows his goodness to show the evil of imperialism. He expresses how much he wants to help the Burmese and set them free, but he doesn’t want to treat like them because he feels for them. Orwell says, “all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British.” (323) Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. Orwell uses three symbols to represent the evil of imperialism, and how it destroys the creators of it. Also, he shows the guilt he has for abandoning his culture, but he also shows the loyalty he has for wanting to help them. Also the loyalty he has for the British, he tries to stay with their ideals as long as he can.
Every day, each individual will look back on decisions he or she have made and mature from those experiences. Though it takes time to realize these choices, the morals and knowledge obtained from them are priceless. In George Orwell’s nonfictional essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, a young Orwell was stationed in Burma for the British imperial forces, tasked to deal with an elephant who destroyed various parts of the village Moulmein while its owner was away. Backed by second thoughts and a crowd of thousands, he finds himself shooting the elephant and reflecting that it was not justified; however, it was a choice pushed by his duty and the people. Written with a fusion of his young and old self’s outlook on shooting the elephant, Orwell’s essay is a sensational read that captivates his audience and leaves them questioning his decision.
When he finial find the elephant Orwell say “I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him.” But when he lays his eyes on the crowd he changes his stance to “but I did not want to shoot the elephant.”(Orwell 199). He felt guilty for shooting the elephant when he describe that the elephant worth more alive than dead, but despite the many reason not to shoot the elephant, he took a shot. Orwell describes “when I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the kick …I fired again into the same spot…I fired a third time. That was the shot that did it for him.”(199) the shooting of the elephant represent the Burma people trying to stay alive and over powering by the
George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is a short story that not only shows cultural divides and how they affect our actions, but also how that cultural prejudice may also affect other parties, even if, in this story, that other party may only be an elephant. Orwell shows the play for power between the Burmese and the narrator, a white British police-officer. It shows the severe prejudice between the British who had claimed Burma, and the Burmese who held a deep resentment of the British occupation. Three messages, or three themes, from Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” are prejudice, cultural divide, and power.
The essay “Shooting an Elephant,” was written by George Orwell. Orwell was a British author best known for his essays and novels. In “Shooting an Elephant,” the title essay of his 1950 collection, Orwell is a British Police Officer in Lower Burma. After an elephant comes rampaging through the village in must, killing an Indian man, Orwell is looked upon to take care of the problem. The intense scene causes Orwell to make a crucial decision, reflecting on the vicious imperialism with the military in Burma during this time. The author portrays his feelings through the theme of the narrative with feelings such as, guilt, hate, and pressured.
In George Orwell novel, “Shooting an Elephant” he expresses his fear and indefinite feelings of shooting an elephant so that he can impress the natives of his town as a white man. Orwell’s purpose is to convey the white men of his town that holding a rifle in his hand means that he is self-reliant and can impress the natives. He creates a inside imagery of a convinced feeling and encouragement by the thousands of people that crowded the streets just to see him shot a elephant. By doing so, he builds the confidence from the town people that followed him as a way to show that natives what they expect from him. In George Orwell’s novel “Shooting an Elephant”, he gives the reader a observable understanding through his use of words using his imagery, tone words, and figurative language.
With the usage of effective diction in his essay, Orwell excellently conveys his emotions and message to his readers. He often uses the word “natives” for the Burmese: “Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd” (15). By doing so, he shows his emotions and respect towards the Burmese because calling them “natives” suggests that he agrees on the fact that they are the true owner of Burma and not the British Empire. Also, by frequently using the word “natives”, Orwell reminds his readers the existence of imperialism in Burma so that the readers do not simply hang on to the elephant but also get the message incorporated in the essay. The body of the elephant is compared to machinery as Orwell thinks that killing an elephant “is comparable to destroying a huge and costly piece of machinery” (15). This comparison makes the readers realize that the British Empire is also like a huge piece of machinery, so the death of it would be a serious matter to both oppressor and people being oppressed. When Orwell wa...
Orwell speaks of how he is so against imperialism, but gives in to the natives by shooting the elephant to prove he is strong and to avoid humiliation. He implies that he does not want to be thought of as British, but he does not want to be thought the fool either. Orwell makes his decision to shoot the elephant appear to be reasonable but underneath it all he questions his actions just as he questions those of the British. He despised both the British Empire as well as the Burmese natives, making everything more complicated and complex. In his essy he shows us that the elephant represents imperialism; therefore, the slow destruction of the elephant must represent the slow demise of British Imperialism.
The rhetorical aim of expression appears when Orwell starts by stating that he is in Moulmein, in Lower Burma as a “sub-divisional police officer of the town” (243). Throughout the essay, he continues offering personal experience when he is searching for the elephant. He writes, “I had merely sent for the rifle to defend myself if necessary” (246). Orwell knew his intention is never to shoot an elephant. Orwell concludes his essay with the realization that he “should have to shoot the elephant after all” (247), and executes the shooting of the elephant. Orwell remains expressive and narrative throughout the essay by only expressing his own experience upon this
I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool." So ends George Orwell's poignant reminiscence of an incident representing the imperialist British in Burma. Unlike Soyinka, who wrote about colonialism from the African's point of view, Orwell, like Joseph Conrad in Heart of Darkness, presents the moral dilemmas of the imperialist. Orwell served with the Imperialist Police in Burma while it was still part of the British Commonwealth and Empire. His service from 1922 to 1927 burdened himwith a sense of guilt about British colonialism as well a need to make some personal expiation for it (Norton 2259). "Shooting an Elephant" chronicles an incident in which Orwell confronts a moral dilemma and abandons his morals to escape the mockery of the native Burmans. He repeatedly shoots and kills an elephant which had ravaged a bazaar and scared many Burmans even though "As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him" (6).
The character, himself, is part of the British rule and is supposed to have all of the power. The Burmese, though, dangle the power in front of him. He is weak and unsure of himself, stating that he “wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it” (60). The character is not able to stand up for what he believes in -- that is, not shooting the elephant. There is a back and forth struggle in his mind about whether or not the elephant needs to be killed. Orwell’s character is fully aware that it is wrong and immoral to shoot an innocent creature, but eventually secedes to the demands of the Burmese, attempting to prove his cooperation and loyalty to those watching. In a way, the Burmese represent the pressures of society. Because of this, the audience can sympathize with the main character. There are always times when we, the readers, are unsure of ourselves, but we eventually make a decision. Whether we make the decision for ourselves or are assisted by others, in the end, we must take responsibility for our own actions. In a broader sense, Orwell’s character represents the internal conflict that everyone faces: should we conform to society or should we be our own
The quest for power is one which has been etched into the minds of men throughout history. However, it can be said that true power is not a result of one’s actions but comes from the following one’s own beliefs without being influenced by others. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The protagonist, Orwell himself, is a sub divisional police officer in Burma, a British colony. Orwell must try to find and use his inner power when he is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill an elephant which has ravaged the Burman’s homes. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell, as a colonist, should be in control. As well, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessen the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols shown are representations of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power comes from following the dictates of one’s conscience.
Orwell’s differing techniques in one work illuminates what he is talking about in the other. The political purpose that is explained in Why I Write reveals aspects of Shooting an Elephant that were previously overlooked. Quite explicitly, the speaker in Shooting an Elephant vocalizes the dissent he feels for the British empire. The political purpose in this work may have been to voice the opinion that no people should be subject to oppression. Even though the Burmese people jeered at the speaker for his European heritage, the speaker still saw beyond the prejudice to consider the underlying reason behind this foul treatment; he even went to the extent to agree with them and join in on the fight against the empire. This level of maturity that Orwell instills in his main character voices his opinion for freedom even louder than a character or storyline that outright fought against the literal British empire, or any other oppressive regime. By incorporating this political purpose so deeply within his story, Orwell preserves a writer’s integrity of creating meaningful work that voices an opinion but is still tactfully crafted. In Why I Write, George Orwell touches on these different types of writing, writing that is crafted and writing that is produced. “You’ve turned what might have been a good book into
Orwell’s use of symbolism is perhaps his greatest stylistic technique, as it weaves together the theme of Imperialism. The elephant represents British Imperialism, which Orwell must kill. Meanwhile, the cheering of the natives signifies his conscience throughout the novel. Before shooting the elephant, Orwell describes the crowd using a metaphor, a stylistic element by narrating, “And suddenly I realized I would have to shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly” (299). Orwell uses a metaphor to describe the natives as a physical force, implying his want to earn the respect of the Burmese and go against his duties as an Imperial police officer. Orwell’s need to please the Burmese is seen when he shoots the elephant, freeing himself from representing British Rule. By using the natives as a form of conscience, the narrator is able to come to terms with his inner conflict and earn the respect of the
Like the elephant, the empire is dominant. The elephant, an enormous being in the animal kingdom, represents the British Empire in its magnitude. The size represents power as it is assumed that the two are insuppressible. Also, the elephant and the British empire, both share hideousness in the effect it causes in Burma. To create a comparison between the elephant and the empire, the author describes the elephant as wild and terrorizing when the “elephant was ravaging the bazaar” (324); thus, it symbolizes the British Empire is restraining the economy of the Burmese. When the elephant kills the Indian laborer, it represents the British oppressing the Burmese. On the other hand, the elephant is a symbol of colonialism. Like the natives of Burma who have been colonized and who abuse Orwell, the elephant has a destructive behavior by being provoked and oppressed “it had been chained up” (324). Despite the fact of its aggressive behavior and the Burmese’ more astute rebelliousness could be undeniably good things, they are doing their best given the oppressive conditions, both the Burmese and the elephant have to endure. Also, the elephant symbolizes the economy of the oppressor, as well as the oppressed. This animal is a “working elephant” (326) in Burma, and for the colonial power. The Burmese are also working animals because they are hard workers and involuntarily are following the rules of the British empire.
"Shooting an Elephant" is perhaps one of the most anthologized essays in the English language. It is a splendid essay and a terrific model for a theme of narration. The point of the story happens very much in our normal life, in fact everyday. People do crazy and sometimes illegal moves to get a certain group or person to finally give them respect. George Orwell describes an internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country to the white man's reputation. The author's purpose is to explain the audience (who is both English and Burmese) about the kind of life he is living in Burma, about the conditions, circumstances he is facing and to tell the British Empire what he think about their imperialism and his growing displeasure for the imperial domination of British Empire.