Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare the movie Animal Farm to the novel
Compare the movie Animal Farm to the novel
Comparing animal farms to the modern world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare the movie Animal Farm to the novel
Countless people pursue perfection as their ultimate goal, thereforeso it makes sense that attempting to create a perfect society has been a common goal for centuries. Unfortunately, everyone’s view of perfection is different, making this ultimate goal not only unobtainable but also problematic. At first glance, the novels Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and Animal Farm by George Orwell seems simply to be about yet another noble pursuit of perfection, but underneath the surface, both novels demonstrate the perils of striving towards the perfect society at the cost of individual liberty.
In order to overshadow any possible criticisms to their particular view of perfection, characters in both novels continuously trash and condemn any previous societies and practices. In Animal Farm, whenever any characters question
…show more content…
new methods they are met with the response, “Surely, comrades, you don’t want Jones back?” (Orwell 21) The connotation of this response is that the old society was much worse and that if they weren’t agreeable they may have to revert to the old society. The pigs, who emerge as the leaders of the revolution, also convince the other animals that man is the source of all their problems and that any society without man is a better society. The sheep’s constant bleating of “two legs good, four legs bad” (19) serves as a reminder of this concept. In Brave New World, the characters view the past practice of having mothers and fathers as horrifying and disgusting “The world was full of fathers—was therefore full of misery; full of mothers—therefore of every kind of perversion from sadism to chastity; full of brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts—full of madness and suicide.” (Huxley 39) Similarly, the previous natural practice of giving birth and raising children is discarded “For in nature it takes thirty years for two-hundred eggs to reach maturity... But our business is to stabilize the population at the moment, here and now. Dribbling out twins over a quarter of a century—what would be the use of that?” (8) In both cases, the characters are encouraged by the authorities to despise the past and embrace a technologically enhanced future in order to justify polygamy and new ways of creating babies in test tubes. Throughout both novels, characters point out the often false superiority of their new society in order to convince themselves and those around them that their actions have been justified. In Animal Farm, Squealer presents supposed facts and reports that show how much more successful their new society is, “Reading out in a shrill, rapid voice, he proved to them in detail that they had more oats, more hay, more turnips than they had in Jones’s day, that they worked shorter hours, that their drinking water was of better quality, that they lived longer, that a larger proportion of their young ones survived infancy, and that they had more straw in their stalls and suffered less from fleas.” (Orwell 36). When the animals felt that they were working just as hard as they had in the previous society, there were more facts and propaganda to dissuade such thoughts such as “On Sunday Mornings, Squealer, holding down a long strip of paper with his trotter, would read out to them lists of figures proving that the production of every class of foodstuff had increased by two hundred percent, three hundred percent, or five hundred percent, as the case may be.” (31) In Brave New World, the characters, particularly the authorities, explain most citizens’ lack of knowledge and intellectual freedom with the view that too much knowledge leads to unhappiness “For of course some general idea they must have, if they were to do their work intelligently—though as little of one, if they were to be good and happy members of society, as possible.” (Huxley 4) According to the authorities in Brave New World, individual identity leads to instability and chaos, and thus their mass produced society is better “‘You really know where you are. For the first time in history.’ He quoted the planetary motto. ‘Community, Identity, Stability.’ Grand words. ‘If we could bokanovskify indefinitely the whole problem would be solved.’” (7) Unfortunately, in both books, despite all the attempts at perfection, there are still major downfalls in the new society.
In Animal Farm, the ultimate goal of what they called animalism was originally equality, yet eventually a hierarchy appears and eventually is justified “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” (Orwell 43) The hierarchy becomes so extreme that the pigs who have emerged as the top of the new social class of supposed equality are indistinguishable from the previous society’s rulers, the humans whom they had overthrown “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.” (45) One of the major downfalls in Brave New World is how completely determined each person’s life is by technology. For instance, a person’s life can be easily altered or ended because of a mistake made while they were developing in a test tube “Twenty-two years, eight months, four days from that moment, a promising young Alpha-Minus administrator at Mwanza-Mwanza was to die of trypanosomiasis—the first case in over half a century.” (Huxley
187) Almost everyone strives for some form of perfection. The pursuit of perfection isn’t the problem. As Animal Farm and Brave New World demonstrate, the problem is when people attempt to force their individual views of perfection on the rest of society and resort to taking away rights, lying, and promoting false propaganda and violence in order to achieve this supposed perfection.
In all aspects a utopian society is a society that is place to achieve perfection, and that is the society that both the “Uglies”, by Scott Westfield and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, was striving for. In both of these stories, the government had control over the people’s choices, freedoms, and their natural abilities. Yet both government strive for a perfect society, the methods they use to achieve this goal were different from each other.
Over the centuries, mankind has tantalised itself with the prospect of a perfect world. These
In the beginning of the text, “all animals are equal” (Orwell 6) and are united under the common goal of freeing themselves from “the tyranny of human beings” (5). However, life on the farm progresses in a manner contradictory to this initial belief, and ultimately does not benefit the masses. Rather, it is driven exclusively by and for the privileged elite, “the cleverest of animals” (9): the pigs. Napoleon and his supporters are able to impose their authority upon the “lower animals” (92) by using language to create “the seven commandments” (15), and consequently re-creating them when they see fit. For example, it was declared in the Commandments that “no animal shall kill any other animal” (61). Yet, when the very pigs that created the law break it, it is re-written such that “no animal shall kill any other animal without cause” (61). These subtle manipulations take place consistently throughout the story, until all previous laws are eradicated and replaced with one overarching commandment: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” (90). Here Orwell highlights the fact that by re-writing the past, those in power are able to directly control the future. By monopolizing language, they monopolize progress. Without “the words to express” (59) their opposition, the animals lack agency and are effectively silenced, forced to accept what is written “on the
He states that the possibility of a utopia is enough by itself in order to strive for a perfect society and a perfect world. Huxley shows that with the right amount of control and power in the government’s hands, a society that has reached complete perfection is possible and could actually occur. Aldous Huxley analyzes the amount of freedom a society should have in relation to the power given to its government and the limitations that arise due to this ratio by creating and then elaborating on a fictional society controlled by ten
When George Orwell’s epic novel 1984 was published in 1949 it opened the public’s imagination to a future world where privacy and freedom had no meaning. The year 1984 has come and gone and we generally believe ourselves to still live in “The Land of the Free;” however, as we now move into the 21st Century changes brought about by recent advances in technology have changed the way we live forever. Although these new developments have seamed to make everyday life more enjoyable, we must be cautious of the dangers that lie behind them for it is very possible that we are in fact living in a world more similar to that of 1984 than we would like to imagine.
The characters in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World represent certain political and social ideas. Huxley used what he saw in the world in which he lived to form his book. From what he saw, he imagined that life was heading in a direction of a utopian government control. Huxley did not imagine this as a good thing. He uses the characters of Brave New World to express his view of utopia being impossible and detrimental. One such character he uses to represent the idealogy behind this is Bernard Marx.
I strongly agree with Fromm’s viewpoints and interpretations of Orwell’s 1984 text. He warns that the future federal powers will dehumanize society and leave everyone alienated. Thus, I agree with Fromm to the extent that he acknowledges the fact that humanity can indeed cease to exist as a result of our own self-destruction as well as the effect of our actions. Many of his opinions and warnings expressed by Orwell to an extent appear in contemporary society.
War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength. The party slogan of Ingsoc illustrates the sense of contradiction which characterizes the novel 1984. That the book was taken by many as a condemnation of socialism would have troubled Orwell greatly, had he lived to see the aftermath of his work. 1984 was a warning against totalitarianism and state sponsored brutality driven by excess technology. Socialist idealism in 1984 had turned to a total loss of individual freedom in exchange for false security and obedience to a totalitarian government, a dysutopia. 1984 was more than a simple warning to the socialists of Orwell's time. There are many complex philosophical issues buried deep within Orwell's satire and fiction. It was an essay on personal freedom, identity, language and thought, technology, religion, and the social class system. 1984 is more than a work of fiction. It is a prediction and a warning, clothed in the guise of science fiction, not so much about what could happen as it is about the implications of what has already happened. Rather than simply discoursing his views on the social and political issues of his day, Orwell chose to narrate them into a work of fiction which is timeless in interpretation. This is the reason that 1984 remains a relevant work of social and philosophical commentary more than fifty years after its completion.
Imagine a life where everyone living in a society is happy and prosperous, without a worry in life of something called pain. A society where people could live caring for each other, live on the same level, and enjoy what they already have. A place where people would work together and try to soar to higher peaks and achieve the impossible out of their free will. Unfortunately, there will never be a society similar over even close to similar to the society that seems so full of satisfaction and dreams since man exists. Man exists only to indulge and act for his self benefit and ambitions. In George Orwell’s Animal Farm, Old Major tries to pass on this utopian ideal to his fellow comrades
Dystopian novels are written to reflect the fears a population has about its government and they are successful because they capture that fright and display what can happen if it is ignored. George Orwell wrote 1984 with this fear of government in mind and used it to portray his opinion of the current government discretely. Along with fear, dystopian novels have many other elements that make them characteristic of their genre. The dystopian society in Orwell’s novel became an achievement because he utilized a large devastated city, a shattered family system, life in fear, a theme of oppression, and a lone hero.
Orwell's book, "Animal Farm", is full of satire. This satire is Orwell's way of communicating problems and resolutions. The main message in Animal Farm is that power cannot be divided equally. There will never be equality for all. Once power is obtained it is always abused, and power causes all to think as the leader does. Equality does not exist, for it is impossible for everyone to be equal.
In essence, it is all about perception. When a society like those found in 1984 or “Number 12 Looks Just Like You” aim for perfection, there are two broad paths that they can follow in an effort to achieve their goals. Most obviously, the creation of perfection could be accomplished through the task of simply attempting to meet every individual standard that exists across the society. However, this is often an impossible task in practice considering the contrasting and often outright antithetical perceptions of perfection. Instead, dystopian works often depict societies that approach the path to perfection through the slightly more realistic task of creating perfection through the goal of eliminating or reducing the sheer variety of standards by which its citizens can judge their treatment and their happiness.
The best feeling in the world is love and happiness. In today’s society, we are very fortunate to experience love, happiness, and liberty. After reading the works of Aldous Huxely and George Orwell, it made me realise how different my society is compared to the depiction of the future by Huxely and Orwell. Orwell described the future as if we live under a dictator, and Huxely described it as “everyone can have their needs, as long as you let me be in complete power”. In today’s society, we have the freedom to speak out against unfair policies set by the government.
In Animal Farm by George Orwell, one of the key themes that is shown is the idea that with power comes corruption even if it may be in a different form. This is shown as that while the revolution is successful, the end goal of true equality is not accomplished by the animals. Because of this they find out that there are great similarities between the old "corrupt" rule under the farmer and the new rule under the animals.This comes to show them that animals are like men because when they receive power, they are bound to become corrupt.
George Orwell's, Animal Farm, depicts how power can corrupt society. If one person receives too much power, one will most likely lead up to dictatorship. To exemplify this idea, Orwell uses a farm to represent a society and the animals inside to portray the people. Orwell's use of the pigs and animals are also an analogy that people sometimes act as 'mindless pigs';. Orwell makes the reader realize just how bad a society of dictatorship can really be.