Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on Geoffrey Chaucer
Short note on Geoffrey Chaucer
Short note on Geoffrey Chaucer
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short note on Geoffrey Chaucer
As humans, it is a natural tendency to judge everything. We discriminate people, and judge them by who they are. Teenage girls judge other girls by what they wear, how they look, and how they present themselves socially. Do we do this on purpose? Of course not, but when we get bored with ourselves, we have to judge other people and compare. When we start this judgment process, we also form certain opinions towards that person or an organization. Geoffrey Chaucer is one of these people, but he actually did something about it. He had problems with some social aspects during the 1300s which included the church, gender differences, and hypocrisy. He wrote about these problems in a set of tales widely known as The Canterbury Tales. The first is The General Prologue which describes a pilgrimage to Canterbury that many people endure, but on this specific journey, twenty-nine different people travel together to Canterbury. He uses two types of satire to relinquish these opinions, juvenile and horacian. A general definition of satire is saying one thing, but meaning another. The author Cynthia justifies my definition by stating, “Chaucer reminds us that behind all the jokes are the serious truths that he and his pilgrims believed in.” (Werthamer, Cynthia C.).Juvenile satire can be very enraging to whomever it is targeting; on the other hand, horacain satire will make everyone laugh. By using both of these types of Satire, he expresses his concerns in The General Prologue, The Pardoner’s Tale/Prologue, and The Wife of Bath’s Prologue/Tale.
First of all, both types of satire are used in The General Prologue. His use of satire is primarily expressed through the characters. For example, the Knight is perceived as perfect, he follows the chiva...
... middle of paper ...
...the truth, which is what everyone should do. However, according to Toswell, “What they all share, however, is a sense of the impossibility of pinning Chaucer down to any one meaning, any one approach; he slides away, probably laughing.”(Toswell, J, M.).
Works Cited
Baragona, Alan. "Chaucer and War." Journal of Military History 1(2001):170. eLibrary. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
Bloom, Harold. "Road Trip." New York Times Book Review. 15 Nov. 2009: 13. eLibrary. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
Brewer, W, Gwen.. "What women want: The wife of bath and the modern woman." Human Quest. 01 Jul. 2001: 3. eLibrary. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
Toswell, J, M.. "Chaucer's pardoner, Chaucer's world, Chaucer's style: Three approaches to medieval literature." College Literature 3(2001):155. eLibrary. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
Werthamer, Cynthia C.. Canterbury Tales. Barron's, 2004. eLibrary. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
In the Horatian satire, The Wife of Bath, Chaucer is trying to teach the reader that if you respect others, you will get respect back. When the knight disrespected the maiden in the beginning, he was almost put to death. When he respected his wife as she was in the end, she respected him back. The reader also learns that “the most important thing is doing good deeds.” (Chaucer) Overall, the purpose of The Wife of Bath is to tell the reader how important it is to be a good
It is first important to understand the background of both The Wife of Bath and Margery Kempe’s stories. The Wife of Bath was a character created by Geoffrey Chaucer who is radically different from the nonfictional character of Margery Kempe. The Wife of Bat...
Eisner, Sigmund. A Tale of Wonder: a Source Study of the Wife of Bath’s Tale. New York: B. Franklin, 1969.
Shead, Jackie. "'The wife of bath's tale' as self-revelation: Jackie Shead discusses how far the Wife's Tale perpetuates the picture we have gained of her from her Prologue." The English Review Feb. 2010: 35+. General OneFile. Web. 24 Feb. 2011.
However, after hearing his tale it is quite shocking about his frankness about his own hypocrisy. We know that he bluntly accuses himself of fraud, avarice, and gluttony, all things that he preaches against throughout this tale. It is in lines, 432-433 that the Pardoner states, “But that is not my principal intent; I preach nothing but for convenience.” It is here that we truly begin to learn that The Pardoner’s Tale is merely an example of a story that is often used by preachers to emphasize a moral point to their audience. That is why, this tale in particular helps to comprehend Chaucer’s own opinions, and how he used satire to display them.
At times, he appears to be pandering to expectations of modesty, telling the readers at the outset that "my wit is short, ye may wel understonde." On multiple occasions, he breaks the fourth wall, jokingly criticizing his own rhyming abilities (through his own characters, of course) or having others lament that there is no story they can tell that Chaucer has not already told. Before the Miller 's tale, he apologizes for the crudity of the story (giving the excuse that it is the Miller spewing such ribaldry, not Chaucer himself), and asking his readers to "noght make ernest of game " (advice which perhaps his overly competitive pilgrims would do well to heed). Chaucer 's moments of uncertainty arise in his tales as well as his prologues, such as when he inserts himself into the Knight 's Tale after Arcite 's death, saying that he cannot possibly know where departed souls go when they leave the Earth. Chaucer 's proud quest to turn previously foreign classics into informative English poetry is in many ways a quest to prove the extent of his knowledge and abilities, which makes it most conspicuous that he inserts himself into a tale to tell the reader that there is a gap in his knowledge. Perhaps Chaucer 's ostentatious confusion when it comes to pagan theology is a subtle means by which he intends to distance himself from the non-Christian beliefs widespread in the setting of his opening
Use of Satire in Pride and Prejudice & nbsp; & nbsp; Satire is used in Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen to show the deficiencies in morals and ethics of the characters that Austen disapproves of. Satire is used to "attack" characters and to bring about change. The different character types she satirizes are "suck-ups," hierarchical, and/or ignorant. & nbsp; Austen disapproves of Mr. Collins and that is why she attacks and satirizes him. Mr. Collins is a "suck-up." His living with Lady Catherine has caused him to demoralize himself.
It is very rare that a book is written without the opinions of the author being clearly expressed somewhere within that book. Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales is one such book. In the General Prologue alone, by viewing Chaucer’s description of the Knight, the Prioress, and the Friar, the reader is able to pick up on Chaucer’s satirical humor toward the church of the 14th century.
In this example, Chaucer, by writing this parody, is trying to express the idea that a lot of the ideals of chivalry are a ...
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle. (1992). Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender. University of California Press, Ltd: England. (pgs 188-208).
The Prologue to The Canterbury Tales is a masterpiece of satire due to the frequent use of verbal irony and insults towards the characters and their roles in society. A major source of Irony is Chaucer’s representation of the Church. He uses the Prioress, the Monk and the Friar, who are all supposed to be holy virtuous people to represent the Church. In his writing he suggests that they are actually corrupt, break their vows and in no way model the “holiness” of Christianity.
One reason why he would add a talk show host, is because many times they make things up just to cause controversy. A lot of the hosts speak in a really fast manner, and try to be comical, even though they know they are hurting people’s feelings and leaving an impression stating that their views may not be verifiable. They continually want to get the people to commit their attention so that their viewers will increase. Chaucer would more than likely criticize them because they are dishonest about more topics than people will ever realize. Talk show hosts dress in a very formal way a majority of the time. They wear either business dresses, or a nice button up shirt. You could infer that they dress like they are very wealthy people. Chaucer would be very indignant at how they make people believe things that aren’t actually true. That hints to why he would probably write about them being
Chaucer, Geoffrey. "The Project Gutenberg EBook of Troilus and Criseyde." 12 July 2008. Project Gutenberg. Web. 27 November 2013.
Chaucer is not some unknown literary author who is known only by a dozen people in the English field. Besides Shakespeare, Chaucer is probably one of the most well-known contributors to English literature, if not the most well-known. His name is instantly recognizable, and many a high school student learned of him through the oftentimes-painful reading of his most famous work, The Canterbury Tales. Chaucer’s work is an extremely important text in terms of the evolution of the English language; The Canterbury Tales set itself apart from other literary works at the time by being one of the first pieces of literature to be written in English instead of French, and its extreme popularity spurred the creations of even more English literature, allowing the language to regain its prominence and evolve into the English we know today (“Chaucer”; Kemmer). Today, it’s the most prominent example of Middle English work, and is studied not just for its literary worth but as evidence of what the language was like at the time. The Canterbury Tales and Chaucer’s importance are extreme, and the author enjoyed his fame during his life as well as long after, largely due to his abilities to make sound decisions, take risks, learned to learn as a professional, and transfer knowledge, skills that people even today can utilize to be successful.
Chaucer's Irony - The Canterbury Tales Chaucer's Irony Irony is a vitally important part of The Canterbury Tales, and Chaucer's ingenious use of this literary device does a lot to provide this book with the classic status it enjoys even today. Chaucer has mastered the techniques required to skilfully put his points across and subtle irony and satire is particularly effective in making a point. The Canterbury Tales are well-known as an attack on the Church and its rôle in fourteenth century society. With the ambiguity introduced by the naïve and ignorant "Chaucer the pilgrim", the writer is able to make ironic attacks on characters and what they represent from a whole new angle. The differences in opinion of Chaucer the pilgrim and Chaucer the writer are much more than nuances - the two personas are very often diametrically opposed so as to cause effectual irony.