Gentle And Soft: The State Of Satire

686 Words2 Pages

As a member of the parody genre, Documentary Now! and the episode “Gentle and Soft” in particular, inherently employs a more overt intertextuality than what is most commonly at play in televisual texts, because the foundation of this genre is in the humor created by references to other texts, genres, events, or people. This blatant intertextuality also exists in the integration of the program’s creators in the televisual landscape and in the program’s adjacent industries, primarily, the music industry. Thus, intertextuality is the basis of the text’s structural categorization as a parody and the cultural and intertextual knowledge that viewers have affect the ways that they consume the text and what meanings they receive from it. As such, …show more content…

Jones and Ethan Thompson, The State of Satire, the Satire of State, parody and satire inherently rely on intertextuality, because parody is the comical imitation of a cultural product and imitation requires a referent. According to Gray’s assertion that intertextuality prepares viewers for the text, becoming a site around which the production of meaning occurs, fully understanding the meaning of the text as a parody requires the intertextual knowledge of the referents of “Gentle and Soft”, primarily, The History of the Eagles and other music documentaries, as well as with the soft rock of the 1970s, the other televisual and parodic work of the creators, and even their musical backgrounds and skills. Thus, the way the viewers consume text intertextually, always bringing previous textual knowledge and experience to every text consumed and comparing it to those like it is particularly significant in the parody genre which in which all meaning established by the text is created in relation to the viewer’s previous media …show more content…

In his work, A Cultural Approach to Television Genre Theory, he suggests that genres are an industry and audience practice meant to organize fan practices, viewing practices, and everyday conversations and to sort television’s vast array of textual options. As such, genre is a culturally constructed textual category, not a textual component. Genres emerge from intertextual relations between multiple texts and through cultural practices. Thus, as a show defined and labeled as a member of the parody genre, Documentary Now! is culturally recognized and defined as an explicitly intertextual televisual text, which is particularly significant because each genre has its own common sense rules that viewers internalize to make sense of future texts, ultimately having a direct effect on how the texts are consumed and understood. However, Mittell’s insistence of genre as fluid and based on cultural context and intertextual knowledge, also allows other generic categories to define Documentary Now!. For example, if a viewer is unfamiliar with the intertextual referents of “Gentle and Soft” they may categorize the program as simply a documentary is they if they are unfamiliar with the actors or the program’s textual referents, which indicate that the program is not a genuine

Open Document