Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Genetic counselling essay
Essay on the need for genetic counselling
Genetic counselling essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Genetic counselling essay
Genetic Counseling If I was a genetic counselor working with a couple who just had a child with Tay-Sachs disease, I would first explain that it is an inherited genetic disease. It would be important to explain the lineage of the disease and how if they were to trace their ancestry, it would most like trace back to European Jews. People of this decent have a 1 in 27 chance of being a carrier. Testing of the parents to see if they are carriers would not be necessary. I would explain that they are definitely both carriers because the only way to have a child with Tay-Sachs is to receive the defective gene from both parents and the two defective genes are now affecting each cell inside of their baby. Furthermore, I would discuss the Tay-Sachs disease itself. I would explain to the couple that the disease is caused by a mutation of the hexosaminidase A (HEXA) enzyme that has been altered. Because the parents would not understand this – I would explain the function of the HEXA gene and how it is responsible for the breakdown of fatty substances in the brain. Explanation would also include …show more content…
what happens when this gene is absent and how toxic levels of fatty substances building up in the brain will affects the nerve cells. When they HEXA enzyme is absent, toxic levels of the fatty substance are reached in the brain and the child will start displaying symptoms of the disease. It is not impossible to have no family history of Tay-Sachs in a couple that are carriers of the disease. Many people can be carriers but it takes two carriers to both pass the gene to the fetus before the infant will get it. Even though both parents are carriers – only one can pass the gene on to the fetus. I would gently try to explain to the couple that since they both passed the defective gene to their infant, their baby would not survive to pass the disease on to future generations. The outcome for their child is inevitable and most die before the age of four. It would be hard to explain to the couple that for the next few months, even up to six months or more, the child will appear healthy and normal. Symptoms of mental and physical deterioration will appear after that time. The child may become, unable to swallow and will need a feeding tube, may lose their hearing, eye sight, lose muscle mass and strength, and likely become paralyzed. Death is certain because as of now, there is no treatment or cure for the disease. Supportive treatments is the only care to ease the symptoms of Tay-Sachs and to extend life. Knowing that their child will certainly die, they may try to have another child in the future.
As a counselor, it would be very important for me to explain the chances of their future children having the disease. Since both parents are known carriers now, there is a 1 in 4 chance of their children having Tay-Sachs disease. There is a 2 in 4 chance their child will be only a carrier. If the couple were to divorce and marry someone that has had genetic testing and is not a carrier, there would be no chance of having a child with the disease, but would still have a 2 in 4 chance of having a child that is also a carrier of the disease. Genetic and prenatal testing would help plan future pregnancies. Another option for the parent would be to implantation. The embryos tested and then when a healthy embryo is found not to have the disorder, it would be implanted for a hopefully healthy
baby.
Tay-Sachs disease is a rare hereditary disease found mainly in infants but is also found in juveniles and adults. It is caused by the abnormal metabolism of fats and is characterized by mental deterioration, blindness, and paralysis. There is no available treatment for this disease.
Although Tay-Sachs is an extremely rare disease it is most evident in people with Ashkenazi Jewish origin from eastern Europe and those with a Cajun heritage have a higher rate of being a carrier than any other group. Ashkenazi Jews and people of Cajun heritage have a carrier rate for Tay-Sachs disease of 1 in 17 people. However, 1 in every 25 people of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage have Tay-Sachs disease, including carriers of the disease. Another sad and interesting fact about Tay-Sachs disease is that children lose their ability to smile. While Tay-Sachs is a terrible and sad disease with barely no miracles, one miracle stands out and that is the oldest living child to ever live with Infantile Tay-Sachs. Seth England, 9 years old, is the oldest living child to have Infantile Tay-Sachs disease. Seth’s disease was discovered by his eye doctor and was later confirmed by the Mayo Clinic of Rochester, Minnesota. Despite the miracle of having lived so long with Tay-Sachs disease, Seth is only 70 lbs, can not talk or move and needs round the clock care his
Tay-Sachs disease is a rear inherited disorder that affects the nerve cells (neurons) in the brain as well as the spinal cord. This disease is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder rather than a sex-linked disorder like some think. In order to inherit Tay-Sachs disease, the gene must be inherited by both parents (Gravel, 2003). If the gene is inherited only by one parent, then the individuals will only be a carrier and has the potential of passing on this disease to their children. The odds of inheriting Tay-Sachs disease if both parents are carriers are 1-4 (25%). The chromosome responsible for the abnormality or mutation that causes Tay-Sachs disease is chromosome 15. Chromosome 15 is the one that codes for production of the enzyme hexosaminidase A (Hex-A) (Gravel, 2003).
In the book it says "They can spend a whole lifetime worrying whether they 're carriers, and then we come along and offer them a test. Recessives and X-linked. Look what they 're doing with fragile-X nowadays. And cystic fibrosis. Just imagine the commercial possibilities if you can design and patent a probe for something like Gaucher 's disease...(69)" Recessive traits is the phenotype is seen only a homozygous recessive genotype for the traits of the interest is present. The booked talked about two of three diseases that are most common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The first one is Cystic fibrosis which is an inherited life-threatening disorder that effects the lungs and the digestive system. The other one mention in the book that wasn’t mention in class was Gaucher 's disease. Gaucher 's disease is a build up of fatty substances in your organs, usually in you spleen and liver. Which causes them to become bigger affecting their function. The last one that we learned in class was Tay-Sachs disease, which is a rare inherited disorder that destroys nerve cells in the brain and spinal
Human Genetic Screening and Discrimination in Gattaca. Works Cited Missing A few months ago I watched a movie called Gattaca, which dealt with the issue of genetic discrimination in the near future. In the movie, people were separated into two classes, those that were genetically screened and positively altered before birth and the class that was unaltered. The separate classes had stark divisions, from what jobs that you were able to apply for to where you could eat. Security was aimed at keeping unaltered people away from the enhanced people.
In this paper, I will argue that genetic therapies should be allowed for diseases and disabilities that cause individuals pain, shorter life spans, and noticeable disadvantages in life. I believe this because everyone deserves to have the most even starting place in life as possible. That is no being should be limited in their life due to diseases and disabilities that can be cured with genetic therapies. I will be basing my argument off the article by “Gene Therapies and the Pursuit of a Better Human” by Sara Goering. One objection to genetic therapies is that removing disabilities and diseases might cause humans to lose sympathy towards others and their fragility (332). However, I do not believe this because there are many other events and conditions in society that spark human compassion and sympathy towards others.
The key thing that I learned from this story was that every pregnant women being given standard prenatal screening should be educated on certain genetic disease that she may have an increased risk of giving to her children. Each women should be told what each genetic test is, what they test for, and what they don't test for. It should not be assumed that they have any information on a genetic disorder unless it was stated otherwise prior to the screening. I learned that education is important because Emily thought that the chance of her child having Tay-Sachs was "infinitesimal" because she was not educated about how genetic diseases are inherited. Even though through this education the disease could not have been prevented it could have better
A genetic family history assessment contains information about family structure and relationships. A typical nurse will use a three-generation family pedigree to gather the information. By doing so, nurses can be aware of which family members are at risk for disorders from a genetic component. Therefore, they can be provided with lifestyle advice, recommendations, and referrals to appropriate specialists (Kaakinen, Coehlo, Steele, Tabacco & Hanson, 2015). A genetic family history assessment will be provided about my family.
Due to this disease the body is slowly broken down by affecting the central nervous system of a person’s body. The children depicted in the essay are probably an example how fellow human beings should be around a disabled person. They just view the disabled person as another human being and respect them the same way. The children are proud to associate themselves with Mairs and do not shy away from introducing her to the general public. This is what a disabled person requires: that all those around him or her should respect them for what they are and give them unconditional regard
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
I believe Deb should get genetic testing done for a few reasons. First of all the test would allow Deb to prepare and start to limit a potential disease. In the story it states that "at some point Deb would like to know her Cancer risk." That statement leads me to believe she would like the test conducted at some point as that's one of the few ways she can find out her risk. I feel the bioethical principal that represents this situation is the respect for patients principle. It is entirely up to Deb if she wants to have the test completed and no one should try to influence her decision. I also like to think if a cancer gene is found in Deb she will start preparing be starting a possible treatment plan and also start financial planning for the disease as she will have to pay some money to have the
In recent years, genetic testing has become a popular topic in the media. Usually involving cheek swabs, blood samples, or amniotic fluid samples, the procedure is relatively simple and can help diagnose genetic disorders, determine ideal medication types, or simply determine the patient’s heritage. It has saved many lives from cancer and other afflictions, but to say that genetic testing is always the correct choice is false. There are many issues with the tests, considering that they are new to the medical world. Genetic testing is mostly harmful because of privacy concerns, how underdeveloped it is, and the risk of it pushing a mother to abort her child.
The desire to have a "normal" child is held by every parent and only now are we beginning to have the ability to select for that child. In preparation to receiving genetic testing, the parents are required to meet with a genetic counselor. A detailed description of the testing methods are reviewed with the couple as well as the risks which are involved with each. Upon an understanding of the procedures, the counselor discusses the many possible outcomes which could be the result of the diagnosis. Finally, before any tests are performed, anxieties from either of the parents are addressed as well as the psychological well-being of the parents.
First of all, I want to start by saying that I 'm not discriminating the disabled community, but this is a very large number that could possibly be diminished with the help of genetic testing. (1) I believe that there is nothing wrong with testing the genes of an unborn child to possibly determine if it could develop a genetic disorder in the future. One of the advantages that genetic testing provides is that the parents could now be informed of the situation, and keep track of their unborn child 's health. I 'm sure those parents are pleased with this technology, and the chances to be able to keep track of their baby. This a baby, and is something very precious, and valuable, and I believe that parents want to keep track of anything that may happen with the unborn child. I 'm sure that a large amount of people would agree would agree that they don 't want to suddenly take the hard hit. When the news is presented in the delivery room. This serves more as an advantage than a disadvantage, due to the fact parents. Pull be more prepared, or possibly have the option to abort it. This is a right that the parents should have regardless of the opposing side arguments towards it. Im a hundred percent sure that the opposing side has very strong arguments towards genetics testing, and one of the main ones is "playing God." The opposing side believed that some things in
Using gene editing for gene therapy to help people with genetic diseases, such as Tay Sachs or cystic fibrosis, is a benefit that may be worth the slight risks that come with gene editing. When it comes to rare situations in which both parents suffer from the same recessive genetic disorder, germline editing may be the only way to guarantee that their child doesn’t end up with that genetic disorder. These diseases can be treated with somatic cell therapy but with germline cell therapy, children wouldn’t develop these diseases in the first place. In this case, the normative ethical theory of consequentialism, and more specifically, utilitarianism would apply because using gene editing for the benefit of curing people of genetic diseases outweighs the possible risks that may come with it. This pertains to the utilitarian principle that one must do whatever produces the greatest net happiness, therefore the greatest net happiness would be a healthy person free of any genetic disorder. According to Kantian’s formula of universal law, if someone has a genetic disorder then they can use CRISPR to remove the gene causing it. I believe this maxim may apply to everyone in this particular situation. Having an opportunity to treat cancer, save children from genetic diseases, and understand diabetes offers justification to push forward on the idea of CRISPR. However, it