Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the book of Genesis
Analysis of Genesis 1-2
Compare Genesis 1 and 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the book of Genesis
While reading Genesis chapters one and two, I found several similarities, these similarities could easily complement each other. Dissecting the separate concepts of similarities proved to be a hard. Researching the bible, online resources, and bookstore materials of these differences have guided me to a better understanding of these similarities and compliments. The authors have offered opposition and agreement as to why this scripture is independent or complimentary accounts. Ultimately, this essay will dissect the similarities, compliments, and oppositions of this scripture. I will also explain why there are two accounts of the creation story, however, leaving a clear understanding will be based on the reader’s individual knowledge and comprehension …show more content…
Genesis chapter one is setting the stage for completion of God’s creation of earth, the scripture tells the creation story as a foundation and coming climax, giving each day of the creation a significant importance. While chapter one seems to tell a different creation story than chapter two, the choice of words used in each chapter give way to a meaning deeper than the reader is aware. Deciphering and studying these key words has afforded me a better understanding of the differences, similarities, and compliments in the scripture. The words “made” and “formed” are used throughout both chapters to show harmony not contradiction. Furthermore, in the online article “The Controversy between Genesis 1&2” writer Randy Lee and Richard Anthony express “The term “made” means “to prepare” and the word “formed” means to form, fashion, frame.” In other words, God “prepared” every living thing in Genesis 1, but did not actually bring it into physical form until Genesis 2” (1). Most people do not believe in this theory but chose to rationalize the scripture as a true contradiction, this is not surprising as the creation story has many opinions on
Genesis 1-11 sets the foundation for several concepts pertaining to the biblical worldview. These chapters illustrate the ideal relationship with God, creation, and others before the fall of man. It shows how sin affected human relationships and identities that still exist today. The chapters begin with a perfect creation and end with the division of men from God due to their wicked nature. “This section explains the terrible progress of sin and the reason God’s redemptive program was necessary. Thus, it is the foundation of the biblical worldview, and without this part the rest would be somewhat incomprehensible” (Hindson & Yates). Four concepts, found in Genesis 1-11, that set the foundation for the biblical worldview are the natural world,
“Genesis Chapter 2.” The Official King James Bible Online. n.p. n.d. Web. 11 Dec 2013. .
After viewing the “Bible Stories for Kids! Story of Creation” episode, there were several key differences to be found between this children’s show and the actual Genesis story from the Bible. Despite these differences, the episode did display a few similarities from the original Genesis story as well. Based off of the articles by Trible and Hassan, one may critique the characterization of this episode’s versions of Adam and Eve. Trible and Hassan most definitely have views of Adam and Even that differ from those portrayed in this show. While this may just be a representation of Genesis meant for children, it is still important to point out the differences it has from the original creation story.
Where Genesis I describes a more ordered creation - the manifestation of a more primitive cultural influence than was responsible for the multi-layered creation in Genesis II - the second creation story focuses less on an etiological justification for the physical world and examines the ramifications of humankind's existence and relationship with God. Instead of Genesis I's simple and repetitive refrains of "and God saw that it was good" (Gen 1:12, 18, 21, 25), Genesis II features a more stylistically advanced look at "the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens" (Gen 2:4). While both stories represent different versions of the same Biblical event, Genesis II is significantly more complex than its predecessor and serves both to quantify the relationship between God and his creations and lay the foundation for the evolving story of humankind as well.
The first creation myth I will begin with is Hebrew in origin and comes from the Old Testament book of Genesis, specifically chapters one through three. Chapters one and two focus on Jehovah’s (God) creation of the heavens, earth and all living things. After man (Adam) is created Jehovah, gives him a single command: “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of he tree of knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die (The Revival Study Bible, Genesis 2:16-17).” Jehovah then creates a mate for the man, woman (Eve). Throughout this creation story the reader is given the impression that the creation itself is perfect i.e.: following creation God declares everything good, man has a close friendship with his creator, man and woman were naked and experienced no shame. Unfortunately that perfection ends when Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. They then felt shame, cast blame to others rather than to themselves and hid from God. As a result of their disobedience God punished them according to his law. Both Adam and Eve and their offspring after them were sentenced to a life of pain, suffering and death.
The Enuma Elish mirrors the subordinate disordered lives of the Babylonians that created it. Genesis mirrors the newfound freedom and idealism of the Jewish people who created it after years of oppression. These two writings contrast the differences between the ancient Babylonians and the ancient Hebrews. Creation stories give great insight into the lives of the people who created them.
In this paper I will discuss three similarities and four differences between Enuma Elish-The Epic of Creation (King,1902) and Genesis 1:1-3:24 as described by Michael Fishbane (Fishbane, 1979). These writings are selected to describe the story of creation of the earth and the inhabitants of the earth. However, each author has a very different view and way of explaining what they have interpreted the sacred texts to mean.
First, let us analyze the particulars of the Christian Genesis story as to begin formulating the basis of comparison and contrast. We shall look at the two parts of Genesis, the first discussing the formulation of earth and its inner particulars, in concert with the first few verses associated with the second part of Genesis, which touches on the creation of the first man and woman:
Throughout history many civilizations and cultures have had their own ways of explaining the world and its creation. Each of these civilizations has created unique descriptions and accounts of such events. However, when comparing them to each other, are they really different? Look at the ancient Greco - Roman creation myths as told by Hesiod in his Theogony and Works and Days and Ovid’s Metamorphoses, when compared to the creation myths as seen in the Old Testament’s book of Genesis they may not be as different as one would think. Taking a more in-depth look at both Genesis and Hesiod’s and Ovid’s work more closely, the reader can see that on multiple occasions the myths have almost identical similarities which reflect their views in society. The similarities in particular are the myths of the creation of man, women with their subsequent role of evil in ancient times, and the great floods. These similarities prove that even though these two scriptures were centuries apart, the concepts presented in each myth were almost identical to one another.
Genesis is the first book of the Pentateuch, the first section of the Jewish and the Christian Scriptures. The seven-day creation story is in Genesis 1:1-2:4 and it tells of a God whose mere word produces a beautiful universe in which human beings are an essential and important part. While Genesis 2:4b-3:24 can be seen as the second creation story with the creation of Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden. Both creation, Genesis 1:1-2:4 and Genesis 2:4b-3:24, stories have a lot in common yet they also have a lot of differences.
As previously written, God creates Adam and Eve and puts them into a Garden of Eden to live for eternity as immortals as long as the obey God. Adam and Eve eat the fruit from the forbidden tree and as a consequence God expels them from the Garden of Eden. Their disobedience to God becomes known as "The Fall of Man, Failure of Man or the Original Sin." After their expulsion from the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve begin a family together eventually having three sons named Cain, Abel and Seth followed by two daughters and two more sons who are not named in the bible. Adam lives to be 930 years of age, but there is no biblical reference as to Eve's age when she dies.
One of the fundamental questions that religions seek to answer is that of origin. How was man put on earth? Why and from what was he created? Who created him? What does his creation imply about the status of human beings? Some or all of these questions are answered by a religion’s creation stories. Every religion’s creation myths attempt to give solutions to problems present to that religious society. Because of this, each religion may have one or more creation stories, each of those different from one another in the questions they ask and the answers they give.
Genesis 2 talks more instruction to man rather than him creating man. They are both included since they are different in the reason that man is instructed rather than created.
Theopedia, an Encyclopedia of Biblical Christianity." Theopedia, an Encyclopedia of Biblical Christianity. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Apr. 2014. (Theopedia) (Theopedia)
Over the past month and a half, many articles and people battled my close-minded view. I expected Amy Levine’s Agree to Disagree presentation to illustrate differences in Jews’ and Christians’ interpretations with specific Old Testament verses, but she validated both religions’ interpretations because, “they are following their own set