Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Origin Of Gender Inequality At Work
Origin Of Gender Inequality At Work
Origin Of Gender Inequality At Work
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Origin Of Gender Inequality At Work
Gender:
Gender segregation refers to the employment of men and women in different industries, occupations, firms, or jobs. A growing body of literature has documented the extensiveness of gender segregation and has attempted to explain its origins (see Reskin, 1993, for a review). Gender segregation is a major cause of the gender gap in wages, benefits, and retirement income (Perman & Stevens, 1989; Reskin & Hartmann, 1986; Treiman & Hartmann, 1981). Also, female-dominated jobs provide fewer opportunities for training and formal mobility than male-dominated jobs (Baron, Davis-Blake, & Bielby, 1986; Bielby & Baron, 1986; Halaby, 1979), and women's concentration in lower level positions may make them more vulnerable to repeated unemployment than
…show more content…
The contextual perspective focuses on factors that pre- dict variation in gender segregation across jobs, occupations, or firms (e.g., Bielby & Baron, 1986; Blau, 1977; Reskin & Roos, 1990). The cognitive perspective concentrates on how individual decision makers use gender when evaluating job applicants (e.g., Futoran & Wyer, 1986; Heilman, Martell, & Simon, 1988; Hitt & Barr, 1989). Although the cognitive perspec- tive does not directly examine gender segregation, it has clear implica- tions for segregation because the selection of men and women into dif- ferent jobs is a precondition for gender segregation. Specifically, we argue that decision makers' propensity to use gender as a basis for selection and promotion decisions varies across organizational contexts. A number of researchers have called for examinations of how organizational and individual fac- tors jointly affect individuals' workplace outcomes. For example, Cap- pelli and Sherer (1991: 90) argued that it is essential to link organizational context to individual outcomes by "finding mechanisms through which context can affect the …show more content…
Cappelli and Sherer (1991) argued that internal labor markets limit the influence of external labor markets on a variety of in- dividual outcomes, including skill acquisition and compensation. Simi- larly, Auster (1989) argued that task characteristics mediate the relation- ship between organizational context and individual compensation; Baron and Pfeffer (1993: 55) made a comparable argument about job titles and other "organizational categories." We follow in this general tradition; however, instead of emphasizing structural mediators between organizational context and individual outcomes, we focus on the mediating role of the cognitive processes of organizational decision makers. This focus is important because, as Reskin (1993: 250) has noted, although employers play a major role in creating and perpetuating gender segregation, "surprisingly little attention has been paid to the effect of employers' gender- role attitudes on their personnel decisions." Specifically, a scarcity of male applicants (or a large num- ber of female applicants) increases women's access to male-dominated jobs (see Reskin, 1993, for a review). Many firms create formal job ladders to govern the recruitment and mobility of employees (Doeringer &
Sex Segregation in the Work Place In the article “Sex Segregation at Work: Persistence and Change” by Anastasia Prokos explores ideas around the challenges and reasons of sex segregation in the work place. She argues that even though the United States has made several steps in the right direction throughout our history, there is still “… women and men in the contemporary United States continue to be concentrated in different occupations, jobs, and industries” (Prokos 564). She is presenting this as a social problem that leads to stereotypes, discrimination, and unequal pay.
Characters who violate social norms and expectations often create gender roles by illustrating how individuals should not act. In Euripides’ Medea and Disney’s “the Little Mermaid” the characters Medea and Ursula violate numerous social norms through their actions and, in Ursula' case her appearance. By doing this they create an image of what a woman should not be. The two are portrayed as lonely middle-aged women who have failed to nurture children, attempted to interfere with marriage, and ultimately act without male influence. In both works, Medea and Ursula’s actions are seen as wrong because of the reactions from the other characters, which is generally fear and discomfort. These reactions allow the audience to also see their actions as wrong and then create a definition of what is right. Although there are differences in the physical appearance of the two characters as well as their final outcome, the two women are portrayed, as everything a woman should not be e, i.e. jealous, childless, women who are independent and emotional.
When breaking down the labour market, it is possible to relate some patterns of gender segregation to the fact that young girls themselves tend to select or are influence into choosing gender stereotypical jobs, and this starts at very young age, when they join school.
But sex-segregation does not really explain the overall gender wage gap. Women’s average educational attainment now exceeds that of men’s and as a result, women have been entering previously considered to be “masculine” occupational fields at growing rates. Even in the STEM fields, women are no longer underrepresented except for in computer sciences and engineering. However, gender wage gap is present at every level of the career ladder in every field. How and why does this
Also, the majority of women have been able to secure employment from traditionally female occupations such as teaching compared to male-dominated careers like engineering. Moreover, democratic country like the United States of America has recognized gender inequality as a fundamental issue and espouse equal right between men and women in contributing to social, economic and cultural life. Despite this improvement, gender inequality persists as women are not represented and treated equally in the workplace (Michialidis, Morphitou, & Theophylatou, 2012). The increasing number of women in the workplace has not provided equal opportunity for career advancement for females due to the way women are treated in an organization and the society. Also, attaining an executive position seem impossible for women due to the glass ceiling effects which defines the invisible and artificial barrier created by attitudinal and organizational prejudices, which inhibit women from attaining top executive positions (Wirth
Parcheta, N., Kaifi, B., & Khanfar, N. (2013). Gender Inequality in the Workforce: A Human Resource Management Quandary. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 240-248.
Yet, gender inequality occurs in most organizational processes including compensation, recruitment, promotions, performance appraisals, training, job assignment, and career development. Study after study has affirmed that people associate women and men with different traits and link men with more of the traits that connote leadership (Maithian, 2012). To this end, evidence shows that men are hired, paid higher wages for comparable work, and promoted more frequently than women (Harvey & Allard, 2009). Research by experts provided evidence that gender inequality can be found in numerous lawsuits alluding to gender discrimination. The following cases and lawsuits prove how gender can influence hiring, pay, and
A gender role in the time when British literature was being written was very important to the women history. Women were subservient to men in most of the British literature. Some literature women had a little more power than in others. When women were asked to do something by a man there was no way they could say no. the way women were treated then is the equivalent to a housewife now in the Twenty-First century. When a man told them to do something they had to do it. Throughout the literature women started desiring more respect and power. A very good example of a woman that overcame gender roles is Susan B. Anthony. She was born on February 15, in 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts. Susan B. Anthony taught for fifteen years then she decided to be in the women’s rights movement. After that’s she was committed and devoted to be to omen suffrage. Susan B Anthony remained very active with anything that had anything to do with women until her death on March 13, 1906. Another example is Elizabeth Cady Stanton she was born on November 12, 1815 in Johnstown, New York. Throughout her life she stood behind women’s right with the Women’s rights movement as well as Susan B Anthony. She was the president of the National Women’s Suffrage Association (NWSA) for 20 years. She died a very respected and honorable woman on October 26, 1902. These women really changed the game for women back in the day. These women were very important representatives in the Women’s Rights Movement. They helped out a lot and put a lot of time throughout their life to make sure women got to where we are today. They were huge role models for women today. Although women had to fight for us to get rights, British literature consisted of women being subservient to men. I am go...
For many decades, women have faced inequalities in the workforce. At one point, they were not allowed to work at all. Although women's rights have improved and are now able to work alongside men, they are still treated unfairly. According to the 2012 U.S. Census, women’s earnings were “76.5 percent of men’s” (1). In 2012, men, on average, earned $47,398 and women earned only $35,791. This is when comparing employees where both gender spend the same amount of time working. Not only do women encounter unfairness in work pay, they also face a “glass ceiling” on a promotional basis. This glass ceiling is a “promotion barrier that prevents woman’s upward ability” (2). For example, if a woman is able to enter a job traditionally for men, she will still not receive the same pay or experience the same increase in occupational ability. Gender typing plays a huge role in the workplace. It is the idea that women tend to hold jobs that are low paid with low status. Women are not highly considered in leadership positions because of social construction of gender. Society has given women the role of “caretakers” and sensitive individuals. Therefore, women are not depicted as authoritative figures, which is apparent with the absence of women in leadership roles in companies. Furthermore, sex segregation leads to occupations with either the emphasis of women in a certain job or men in a certain job. In 2009, occupations with the highest proportion of women included “secretary, child care worker, hair dresser, cashier, bookkeeper, etc.” (3). Male workers typically held job positions as construction workers, truck drivers, taxi drivers, etc. (3). Sex segregation represents inequality because the gender composition for these jobs depends on what ...
Many people think that boys in our culture today are brought up to define their identities through heroic individualism and competition, particularly through separation from home, friends, and family in an outdoors world of work and doing. Girls, on the other hand, are brought up to define their identities through connection, cooperation, self-sacrifice, domesticity, and community in an indoor world of love and caring. This view of different male and female roles can be seen throughout children’s literature. Treasure Island and The Secret Garden are two novels that are an excellent portrayal of the narrative pattern of “boy and girl” books.
Gender stratification limits women’s achievement in their lives. In term of jobs, women continue to enter a narrow passage of occupations range. Compared to men, women often face greater handicap in seeking job because the higher income and prestigious jobs are more likely held by men. In the workplace institution, men are also prior to a faster promotion. There is a case where women were allowed to get promoted to a more advance posi...
The opportunities available to women in the market are not as diverse as those presented to men. Still, the construct of gender ideology influences how employers undertake economic decisions, and that is why companies still have jobs labelled as “men’s work” and occupations categorized as “women’s work.” Indeed, the pervasiveness of gender differences in labor markets is undeniably true, specifically with respect to salary gap between men and women, occupational gender segregation of men and women, and the challenge that women face in terms of juggling their time and attention between their career and family life. There is no denying that the salary of men is far more than that of women’s. In the Great Britain (and other parts of the globe), there are pieces of evidence which suggest that gendered practices of participation in the labor force still have significant impact on the economic security level that men and women develop over the course of their lives (Warren 606).
As we all know, gender inequality is a social issue that has been addressed over the years and has however, given rise to other issues such as misogyny, feminism, male sovereignty, female oppression and criticism, and the list goes on. Most times, especially during the Elizabethan era, before feminists began to fight for their rights as women, women were viewed as substandard when compared to men and they were classified more as possessions rather than as people. These gender biased opinions were developed under the reign of Queen Elizabeth and Shakespeare’s explicit exhibition of this fact in his plays can be traced to the circumstances at which the society was at that time. Shakespeare shared this opinion and had few female characters in his works and even when he did have them, he portrays them as either “deceivers”, for example Cleopatra in “Anthony and Cleopatra” and Cressida in “Troilus and Cressida” or better still, he just cuts off the female role in the plays. Even if it appears as though Shakespeare exhibited a form of short shrift towards women in his works, we are however in no position to judge his beliefs concerning whether or not he had a hatred for women because it might just appear so because of the occurrences in the time at which he made his works, a time where the unsympathetic treatment of women was just a customary trend. We are however, uncertain as to whether Shakespeare’s display of sexism in The Tempest is intentional or not. However, I personally think most times it is unintentional, because sometimes he presents his female characters very outstanding roles, just like Miranda.
“Statistical research by Catalyst demonstrate that women account for 46.7 percent of the U.S. labor force” (Evans, 2011, p.62), but gender bias continues to distort employers hiring decisions intensifying the challenges women endure in the workforce. Controlling bias has been a goal of American society resulting in federal, state, and local laws preventing hiring discrimination in the workplace. There is a natural tendency for superiors to prefer to work together with members of the same sex or hire applicants close to their age. Male leaders are likely to hold stereotypes about women that influence employment decisions not based on an applicant’s ability, but rather categorization. Management often perceives male applicants as the only candidate or the best fit for the job, even though the position does not require masculine characteristics. Koch et al. (2015) highlighted that highly qualified women are seen “just as competent as men” however; these women are still unlikely to be hired over their less qualified male counterparts. Laws prohibit prospective employers from asking women about family responsibilities outright, nevertheless this subject often surfaces during the interview process. As a result, hiring personnel pass over experienced female candidates when they suspect women struggle between the conflicting demands of family and career responsibilities. Men have quite different roles and responsibilities regarding family giving the...
In the earlier years of literature and life women's roles within society were at a minimum and woman were shunned upon by men. They are also suppressed, unequal, and seen as the minority in the population. Within these three poems; "Goblin Market", "MacBeth", and "Sir Gawain and The Green Knight" the position of women and lack of power is displayed in broad context and is projected out to the audience, they also show the way woman are used for one’s self pleasures. Gender behavior is remarkably swayed by social factors than by natural differences, like how humans naturally are supposed or how they want to respond to certain thing. Gender roles of men and woman heavily depend on culture, race, location, religion, location, a stance on politics and so many more circumstances. The way society is determined is by your outside forces, the trend. It is basically what everyone expects you to do, to be, to look like, to marry and so forth. Believe it or not, when you learn to read, you are also learning your culture. As a child the first few books you read are set up to give you a vision of the ideal boy and the ideal girl and what to expect from them. This doing can shape the way you look at life as a child and you will grow off of that very platform and extend the branches. What is old English literature book without a woman either being stupid, sexual or trying to mock a masculine quality figure of a hero? Exploring these three works of literature, you can also gain a sense of where you came from and how you think subconsciously. Most people don’t realize that who they are today, and how they think today is based upon their past. Men and women both play important roles no matter what they “rank” in society in English Literature. To c...