Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles through history
Women in society during the Elizabethan era
Gender roles in 17th century England
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles through history
Sahibdeep Singh
Mrs. Scruton
ENG-2DO
May 18, 2014
Gender Roles in Elizabethan Era
Gender role refers to set of possibilities controlled by society about the ways in which men and women are supposed to behave based on their gender. In Elizabethan era, gender roles played by men and women were critical in many ways: - The Elizabethan life for men was one of power, secondly, Elizabethan women were considered to be inferior to men.
Firstly, The Elizabethan life for men was one of power. Men were expected to have all the say and they were de facto the head of the family and expected to be obeyed as women were believed to be inferior to men. Next, as the head of the family, -men had to guide the female members of the family and in case of wealthier people, arranged fruitful marriages for their sons and daughters. In spite of their superior position, they were expected to be lovable to their wives. “In fact, they were encouraged by the bible to love their wives and treat them lovingly”. As a gender role, men in Elizabethan period acted as an authoritative person being the head of the family
Secondly, Elizabethan women were considered to be inferior to men. The life of Elizabethan women was certainly a tough - arranged marriages, subordination to men, short life expectancy, constant child bearing and no right to education, no voting, not political participation, etc. were crucial facts about Elizabethan women’s life. Elizabethan women were categorized class wise as: Upper Class, Royal Class, Lower Class Elizabethan women. Elizabethan women were considered subordinate to men and they were dependent on males. They were also used for alliance with powerful families through arranged marriages not only in the lower class, but also in the ...
... middle of paper ...
...n at home only by the tutors. In the light of all the above facts and information, it could be concluded that women had a submissive role to play in Elizabethan era.
In nutshell, women in Elizebathan era were expected to play second fiddle to men in their families irrespective of the strata of society they belonged to. In contrast, men enjoyed all the power & authority and had the final say in everything that mattered.
Works Cited
• Alchin, Linda. "Elizabethan Women." Elizabethan Women. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 May 2014. .
• "ELIZABETHAN WOMEN." Elizabethan Women. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 May 2014. .
• "Elizabethan Women." Elizabethan Women. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 May 2014. .
MLA formatting by BibMe.org.
Works Cited
The English attitudes towards gender are reflected in the literacy works of Margery Kempe and Elizabeth I’s letter to Sir Walter Raleigh. Within these two works, the women, especially, challenge the attitudes towards gender roles. First of all, women were expected to be domesticated, meaning all their duties lied within the home and the marriage. The women were responsible for taking care of the children/family and being obedient to their husband.
Throughout Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, there is an overlaying presence of the typical roles that men and women were supposed to play. During Elizabethan times there was a major difference between the way men and women were supposed to act. Men typically were supposed to be masculine and powerful, and defend the honor. Women, on the other hand, were supposed to be subservient to their men in their lives and do as ever they wished. In Romeo and Juliet the typical gender roles that men and women were supposed to play had an influence on the fate of their lives.
Centuries ago in Elizabethan England there were many traditions about marriage and the treatment of women. In Shakespeare's Othello these traditions can be used to examine the play in a historical context. One strong tradition of these times was the practice of marriage between races. Interracial marriages were considered extremely taboo. (High Beam). In this era marriages were arranged by the parents with strong help from the local church. The individuals had little choice as to who they would marry. (Elizabethan England Life). Yet another example of these traditions was the respectable treatment of women. While the husband was in charge of his wife, as was the father, the husband were expected to treat the women right (Elizbethi). In spurning these traditions, Shakespeare demonstrates there may be problems with how the traditions of marriage and the treatment of women in Elizabethan England.
Queen Elizabeth I, also known as the “Iron Queen”, was a remarkable woman of her time, she ruled with great power and longevity. She was one of the greatest feminist of time. Coming to the throne in 1558, she took the place of her father, Henry VIII. She was given one of the most difficult jobs fit for a man or King, ruling England. At the time women were second class citizens, they could not vote nor own properties and such. Surprising England with her intelligence and fierce rulings, she changed herself to make better decisions. She proved through her rulings, to everyone that females were strong and could rule just as well as a king. She refused to marry, giving a feeling of “I don’t need a man for anything.” The Queen was responsible for giving females a voice in literature and it is shown through Shakespeare’s writings.
They are told what role to play in a marriage and this role is about the only thing that defines women in this time period, even though marriage should not be the only basis women are judged on. At this point in time, women are mostly portrayed in a negative light. This might be said to be because they were not the ones who brought the income into the family and because they were not allowed to get involved in public affairs because they were not educated. Women were not allowed to get a higher education because they had to be married and had to take care of the men in the world who worked hard putting food on the table. It could also be said that because women were not allowed to get a higher education, they were not viewed as very intelligent because they got minimal schooling and did not need to be smart to be married as long as they could cook and clean without burning the house down. It may also be seen because of the influence that could be seen on the men in their lives and how there was very little influence because society did not believe that women were capable of everything men were capable of
Although Shakespeare’s female parts may have major roles in his plays, he manages a submissive way of treating his female parts throughout his play. He portrays his female roles as followers not leaders. His female characters are also delineated as property of the male characters. The female roles also are viewed as weak in comparison to males. Shakespeare creates his males dominant and his females submissive.
Women’s roles in the Elizabethan period were very specific. Women were seen as property to men. They had gender specific roles; such as non-participation in the army or navy, they were not allowed to act in the theaters with in turn explains how they were not equal to men because men were superior to women. As for marriage during the Elizabeth Era, women maintained all house work and were home schooled from the age of five. As for society during the Elizabethan period, women were very well known for their fashion. They wore beautiful big gowns with their hair pin up in curls. They also worn corsets that would often cause breakage of ribs because they wore them too tight. I also learned that women during this era learned many languages such
It was very prevalent back then that there was a social and sexual hierarchy and it clearly stated that each gender had its own roles. However, let it not be forgotten, the male was always higher up in the hierarchy. In such times, women were raised to accept that they were inferior to men and that their worth was based on their chastity. Many a times they did not have a say in who they married nor did their word mean more than that of a man. In such times, the works of Shakespeare worked to blur those lines of inequality by writing in heroines and round female characters like the opinionated and witty Beatrice.
Equality between men and women was not the norm at this time, and the Chain of Being was used to support the idea of men being the dominant gender. Among the physical world, men were viewed as the superior life form above women on the Great Chain (Roots). People interpreted this as men being more developed or advanced than women and this led to a great disparity between the roles of each gender. Men primarily worked either physical labor or those positions which required more knowledge such as sciences and mathematics, versus women who remained at home and cared for the male’s offspring (Elizabethan). Because of the Great Chain, the workforce for men revolved around positions of more prestige and education than what a women was able to pursue. Also, because of their perceived higher rank, men were closer on the chain to G...
Throughout the historical literary periods, many writers underrepresented and undervalued the role of women in society, even more, they did not choose to yield the benefits of the numerous uses of the female character concerning the roles which women could accomplish as plot devices and literary tools. William Shakespeare was one playwright who found several uses for female characters in his works. Despite the fact that in Shakespeare's history play, Richard II, he did not use women in order to implement the facts regarding the historical events. Instead, he focused the use of women roles by making it clear that female characters significantly enriched the literary and theatrical facets of his work. Furthermore in Shakespeare’s history play, King Richard II, many critics have debated the role that women play, especially the queen. One of the arguments is that Shakespeare uses the queen’s role as every women’s role to show domestic life and emotion. Jo McMurtry explains the role of all women in his book, Understanding Shakespeare’s England A Companion for the American Reader, he states, “Women were seen, legally and socially, as wives. Marriage was a permanent state” (5). McMurtry argues that every woman’s role in the Elizabethan society is understood to be a legal permanent state that is socially correct as wives and mothers. Other critics believe that the role of the queen was to soften King Richard II’s personality for the nobles and commoners opinion of him. Shakespeare gives the queen only a few speaking scenes with limited lines in Acts two, four, and five through-out the play. Also, she is mentioned only a few times by several other of the characters of the play and is in multiple scenes wit...
Gender Inequality may not be as apparent today in our more developed countries, but during the Elizabethan Era, gender inequality was standard and even encouraged. One of the many forms of women inequality during this era was forced marriage. Females involuntarily married men they did not accept and married at ages they did not agree with. The male population enforced these practices, making them traditional. So how did the balance between men and women become what it is today? One cause can be traced back to Shakespeare, a man who was and is widely revered as the greatest writer in the English language. With the comedy A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare supports women's growing independence by creating strong-willed female characters that defy male authority and gender
During the 17th century or better known as the Elizabethan era, honor was imperative in order to keep ones status in society powerful. Honor was what let them hold their titles to their names. However, gender differences also played a role when differentiating honor between men and women. It is illustrated throughout the play that, “Shakespeare portrays the difference as due to gender, not character” (Daalder 1). For men, going to war and fighting in battles was what held their nobility. As for women, it was their pureness, loyalty, and virginity that. “Unmarried women were supposed to be obedient to their masters and remain virginal until marriage” (Yerebakan 8), if their honor were put at risk in any way then their honor would be lost. In
During the past, education was not available for young women. Most monarchs were males, who received education ever since they were young. Women were seen as weak and powerless, as they were kept in a household without knowing politics. Elizabeth Tudor, however, proved men wrong, demonstrating that women had the ability to do things men could . As one of the significant leaders, Elizabeth I brought England through obstacles to success by making memorable history. Her life of determinations deserves attention and influenced many women.
William Shakespeare’s King Lear, however, takes a different approach. During Shakespeare’s lifetime, the Elizabethan Era, or more commonly known as the Renaissance, life for men and women differed greatly from what people are used to today. For example, during that era only young boys had the privilege of being educated in a school, women had arranged marriages, women were considered the property of the head of their household, whether that was their father or their husband. In addition, women were to believed to “perform their genders” (Silver), meaning that how behaved during that time period was not their true selves, but an act for approval from their husbands and fathers. Women were also greatly disregarded, not having much, if any, say in their own lives. While not all of these issues have been solved, even as of 2017, there has been an large amount of improvement. It is easy to see then, why Shakespeare wrote his female characters the way he did, particularly the ones in King Lear.
Women in the Elizabethan era were just mere properties for the entertainment and pleasure for men. Now, not all men- some would love to think- thought all women were to be their possession and to use in whatever way they choose, but majority of them did view women as less than them. Othello, a prime example of patriarchal man who disregards the existence of his wife unless it suites him. He dares get upset at the rumours of his wife’s adultery, (he has had his many fills of other women), because he is jealous, and his description of his jealousy is quite barbaric, “Thy bed, lust-stained,