Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender discrimination introduction
Society's views about women
Social stereotypes of women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender discrimination introduction
How does our history perceive women as of today? Why were women looked down to in the workplace? Our society as of today, has been struggling to handle with difficulties dealing with stereotyping and equal rights to women due to the men wanting controllability over the women.
The majority of impacts that concerns most women are job opportunities for women in the workplace and stereotypical surroundings that come with being a female in the labor force are still evident in the 21st century. Women, who our society perceives as the weaker sex, have been in a struggle to be recognized and accepted and to be given the same rights that have been given to men.
II. History
In History women were given domestic duties such as gathering, raising their children, and taking care of their families. Men were the patriarch of the home and their work is more valued in society. All though the women take on many roles such as the mother, care taker, and cook, the male takes the credit in supporting his family. This gap continued on to the work place and remained there for many decades (cite book). Throughout the 20th century, hiring, promotion, and salaries have been the three main factors that separate the men from the women in the work place . In hiring, the men are more guaranteed a
…show more content…
position then women are, but in the last 10 to 15 years, women have slowly changed to close the gaps. Currently, In the U.S., female workers are still paid only 77¢ for every dollar their male colleagues make . An ordinary 4.2 percent of leading executive officers at Fortune 500 companies are women. This number does not improve today. There are still fewer women in leadership positions although this number does increase a small percentage every year . Gender inequality in the workplace has effects women in many of different ways in history. Women receive lower pay for the same job with equivalent qualifications, are often passed up for promotion, and/or do not get hired for a position over men. Women are also more exposed to sexual harassment which may make them feel like they need to be tough to assert aptitude, especially in a male- dominated work places. All though instances are still evident in today’s work place, our government has made laws to close the gender gap. Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964 specifies that it is illegal for an employer to refuse to employ someone, or to terminate an employee, or to differentiate about wages, because of the individual’s gender . In 1963, the passing of Equal Pay Act essentially prohibits wage discrimination based on gender for employees in the same organization performing the same work under the same conditions. These are a few laws put into place to close the inequality gap . III. Gender inequality in the Household Gender roles are learned at a young age.
Girls and boys tend to find themselves fitting into where they should be in their family. In the past women were given domestic work that was done for the well-being in their household. This work was done without pay. Men did more physical work, additional leadership roles, and were paid for this physical labor and women didn’t not get the same benefits. This “status quo” defined women’s “place” for any years. Because women were seen beneath men in their homes, this mind set translated into the work place. Although the exact time and instance that cause gender inequality is uncertain, it is believed that this is where gender inequality truly began
. IV. Stereotypes Women are confronted with stereotypes on a daily basis. Working women are confronted with stereotypes on hourly basis, Such as name calling in a man’s work position. For example in reference to the Northern Country the women who worked in mining where called names, sexually harassed, mistreated. This is an example of inequality in the work place. Women have often been viewed as incapable of doing work that traditionally has been done by men, such as jobs involving physical labor and managerial skills. Research has shown that people tend to classify jobs as appropriate for either men or women. In one survey, participants were asked to identify the characteristics that identified women . Sixty percent of participants said “sex” and often it was the first thing mentioned. Because of the misconception that women can only do certain types of jobs, women are more likely to be put in jobs that have traditionally been done by women and these jobs tend to be lower paid. Research and experience have shown that women can be penalized in the workplace for appearing insufficiently “feminine” . For example, in one recent study participants rated women wearing makeup as more likeable, competent, and trustworthy than women without makeup . The stereotypes described hinder women’s advancement in the workplace. They have contributed to female being positioned in lower-paid and “traditionally female positions.” Between women and men this immobile salary gap has been a contributing factor. V. Conclusion Women are fighting and have become more defensive in gaining equality between genders but the role that is being played by genders are important. Life as we know it has changed drastically and keeps evolving no matter what gender we are. Females have just as many rights as men, but some men in our society don’t believe that females should have equal rights as them.
Women throughout history have been considered to have an active role in the family life as the caretakers, while the men are considered the “breadwinners” of the family. However, a few women still have had to provide for their families throughout the years and as a result have sought employment in industries that “were highly segregated by sex” (Goldin 87). Women employm...
“Boys will be boys, and girls will be girls”: few of our cultural mythologies seem as natural as this one. But in this exploration of the gender signals that traditionally tell what a “boy” or “girl” is supposed to look and act like, Aaron Devor shows how these signals are not “natural” at all but instead are cultural constructs. While the classic cues of masculinity—aggressive posture, self-confidence, a tough appearance—and the traditional signs of femininity—gentleness, passivity, strong nurturing instincts—are often considered “normal,” Devor explains that they are by no means biological or psychological necessities. Indeed, he suggests, they can be richly mixed and varied, or to paraphrase the old Kinks song “Lola,” “Boys can be girls and girls can be boys.” Devor is dean of social sciences at the University of Victoria and author of Gender Blending: Confronting the Limits of Duality (1989), from which this selection is excerpted, and FTM: Female-to-Male Transsexuals in Society (1997).
Suggested roles of all types set the stage for how human beings perceive their life should be. Gender roles are one of the most dangerous roles that society faces today. With all of the controversy applied to male vs. female dominance in households, and in the workplace, there seems to be an argument either way. In the essay, “Men as Success Objects”, the author Warren Farrell explains this threat of society as a whole. Farrell explains the difference of men and women growing up and how they believe their role in society to be. He justifies that it doesn’t just appear in marriage, but in the earliest stages of life. Similarly, in the essay “Roles of Sexes”, real life applications are explored in two different novels. The synthesis between these two essays proves how prevalent roles are in even the smallest part of a concept and how it is relatively an inevitable subject.
Traditional gender roles in the United States and other societies have always been dictated as where the man goes and works for a salary as women stay at home to take of house related work. However, many changes in the traditional family has made gender roles go through significant changes. Many women have gone through college and have obtained college education degrees, which has allowed women to advance their careers. The break down of rigid gender roles and the increase in participation of women in the workplace have granted women more choices in life. The choices many women now have in there career fields has made some controversial views on the intelligence of women achieving the status of their male counterparts The first view obtained in the workplace is the ability to make a even paying field for both men and women. Many constituents have pledge to achieve equality for women through laws forbidding the use of any sexist policies that may constitute discrimination against sex. The second is weather working women have been allowed to working women have the same opportunities rewarded to them as men do. Many political action committees have help perpetuate feminist movements which intended to build equal opportunity workplaces for both men and women however, many questionable issues still arise at weather working conditions have become better for women.
One important question that needs to be asked is, “what is equal?” Equality between sexes and race has been stressed and made law in the late nineteenth century, but even though laws have been made to protect woman from this discrimination, it still occurs frequently. Equal is being treated the same way and having the same opportunities no matter who one is. Big business has not given women the chance to be equal with men. One does not normally see a woman as the owner, or even the manager of a major corporation, these jobs consistently go to men. Traditi...
Since the beginning of time men have played the dominant role in nearly every culture around the world. If the men were not dominant, then the women and men in the culture were equal. Never has a culture been found where women have dominated. In “Society and Sex Roles” by Ernestine Friedl, Friedl supports the previous statement and suggests that “although the degree of masculine authority may vary from one group to the next, males always have more power” (261). Friedl discusses a variety of diverse conditions that determine different degrees of male dominance focusing mainly on the distribution of resources. In The Forest People by Colin Turnbull, Turnbull describes the culture of the BaMbuti while incorporating the evident sex roles among these “people of the forest”. I believe that the sex roles of the BaMbuti depicted by Turnbull definitely follow the pattern that is the basis of Freidl’s arguments about the conditions that determine variations of male dominance. Through examples of different accounts of sex roles of the BaMbuti and by direct quotations made by Turnbull as well as members of the BaMbuti tribe, I intend on describing exactly how the sex roles of the BaMbuti follow the patterns discussed by Freidl. I also aim to depict how although women are a vital part of the BaMbuti culture and attain equality in many areas of the culture, men still obtain a certain degree of dominance.
Even with the great strides being made toward gender equality, women have a long way to go before true equality is reached. Stereotypes and misconceptions regarding the abilities and roles of women must continue to positively evolve for our society to improve both in the workforce and at home.
This statement raises an interesting view on how women have been socially constructed with regard to their place in the work force. Does this also mean that men have been constructed toward a different position in the workplace? Although women have progressed, as far as occupational status is concerned, patriarchy still persists in our modern society. The subject area that will be focussed upon in this paper is the social construction of gender. The purpose of my paper is to explore how the social construction of gender has produced inequalities among men and women at work. The direction this paper will take is to discuss the differences of status, wealth and power between men and women in the work place. The sociological theory that I will apply is gender as a sociological construction. The key element of this theory is sex dimorphism where traits are conceptualized as typically male and typically female normative patterns and these as cultural norms (Hale, 1995).
Society places ideas concerning proper behaviors regarding gender roles. Over the years, I noticed that society's rules and expectations for men and women are very different. Men have standards and specific career goals that we must live up to according to how others judge.
The concept of gender in relation to the division of labor in the workplace, and in relation to issues of power and control is an unfortunate, groundless stereotype. Suzanne Tallichet notes that the gendered division of workplace labor is rooted in flawed ideology of innate sex differences in traits and abilities, and operates through various control mechanisms. (Tallichet 1995: 698) These control mechanisms are primarily exercised by men over women and serve to exaggerate differences between the sexes, especially surrounding women’s presumed incapability for doing male identified work.
Men are traditionally seen as being in the "supervisor" position in the home. They are the heads of the household, the breadwinners, and the women are behind the scenes, like the threads that hold everything together. The same can be said about the workplace. Men tend to hold administrative positions, while women usually have the positions that support the administrator. They are the secretaries and assistants that do the work for their male bosses and prepare things for them that later on only the administrator may receive credit for. " ‘Where,' asks the Englishman who is prominent in social welfare, 'are you're men? We see their names on the letter-heads of organizations, but when we go to international conferences, we meet almost entirely women.' 'Our men-oh, they are the chairmen of boards, they determine the financial policy of our agencies, but they leave the practice to women. They are too busy to go to conferences.'" (Mead 304).
Indisputably, roles and characteristics of opposite genders have been ubiquitous, since historical evidence proves so – dating back to when the practice of oral tradition was favored over written language. This historical evidence is especially apparent in literature from previous time periods. In these works of literature, men and women often have very different social and economic positions within society. Particular duties, or tasks, are practiced depending on the gender of these individuals. However, in the advancing world we are currently living in, these duties are beginning to intertwine in an effort to allow equal rights amongst opposite genders. This effort to break the sexist barrier, which encompasses our world, has already begun rattling the chains of politicians and the like. However, with the progressions made thus far in retaliation to sexism and unequal gender privileges, the United States of America is heading in a positive direction towards gender equality. Nonetheless, the female gender is perceived as a lesser entity in society while the male gender is dominant and controlling. The masculine individuals in literary works usually govern, or direct the feminine individuals. These characteristics are often evident in various literary works – including “Hills Like White Elephants,” and “A&P” written by Ernest Hemingway and John Updike, respectively. The slow and steady transformation from a sexist society to one that allows inferior genders to perform similar tasks, if not the same as their superior counterparts, may disturb the ideological mindset of figures with authority; however, it provides inferior genders with the opportunity to branch out socially, economically, and politically.
It is, therefore, natural for most companies to think that women cannot be as capable as men in terms of assuming strenuous or challenging positions because women, by default, become less participatory and more vulnerable when they start to have family and children. Apparently, this situation has led to various gender discriminations in the labor market. In conclusion, although the roles of men and women have radically changed over the turn of the century, it is still inevitable to have various gender-related occupational differences because the social and biological roles of women and men do not really change. Society still perceives women as the home makers and men as the earners, and this perception alone defines the differing roles of men and women in the labor market.
The roles women typically play in the family may not always be consistent with success in the occupational arena. Staying home to care for a sick child may conflict with an important meeting (Broman 1991:511). Sometimes there has to be a change of plans when it comes to the family. Most people believe that family comes first no matter what. Men 's engagement in paid work fulfills prescriptions of hegemonic masculinity by facilitating their ability to gain status in the public sphere. A man can judge his worth by the size of a paycheck (Thebaud 2010:335). Most research shows that women are more likely to be effected by the household and men are more likely to be effected by their job. Some people feel that the goal is to reach higher on the occupational
have been seen as the lesser sex. Women today face discrimination in fields such as the media,