Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality in ancient times
Gender inequality in ancient times
Gender inequality in ancient times
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender inequality in ancient times
A Woman’s Worth
When one speaks of women’s issues, the general reaction is that of frustration. It seems that the 21st century general society is already tired of hearing about the issues that women face even when approximately half the world’s population is female (UNPD, 2002). In Indu Sundaresan’s The Twentieth Wife, the topic pervasive of gender inequality is explored through Mehrunnisa’s life experiences. Mehrunnisa’s story gives insight into the situation and social status of women in 16th century India. Female children are trained to be good housewives from a young age. Women in general are restricted in their educational freedoms to reduce the validity of their opinions. A woman can only achieve the freedom to make her own decisions
When faced with the opportunity for her children to learn from a Hindu priest, Asmat, Mehrunnisa’s mother, began to worry that “[teaching] the girls too much [will cause them to] want of the outside world” (48). Although Asmat has good intentions, her wish to reduce Mehrunnisa and her sisters’ knowledge in order to reduce their desire ultimately results in the opposite as it causes Mehrunnisa to crave authority over others and additional knowledge. Mehrunnisa knows firsthand that her marriage dictates her power and luxuries for the rest of her life. “She was…married to a common soldier” which means she does not have the freedoms associated with being in the royal Zenana or marrying the Emperor as she wishes (79). Calling her future husband “common” also furthers the negative connotation she already associates with him as he would not be able to provide her with the power she yearns for. Even after becoming part of the Zenana, Mehrunnisa “realized that just being [there] was not enough” (324). The women in the Zenana had more power than those of working class husbands but within the palace walls, only those with direct relations with the emperor had ultimate control. Mehrunnisa grows up with the notion that a man is her only pathway to receive the influence that she desires as that is the information she is fed her entire
This is proved by the fact that Mehrunnisa’s parents worry that their daughters “will [never] find husbands if they are too [educated]” (48). During this time in Mughal ruled India, an educated woman is a symbol of arrogance and dominance which is undesirable as these women begin forming their own opinions instead of agreeing with their husbands. This society would rather her live in ignorance and complacency. Mehrunnisa’s mother continues to enforce her daughters’ training for married life by teaching them the skills needed to manage a household and be good wives such as “[learning] to paint, sew, embroider, and oversee the servants” (49). These are seen as essential for a woman to know as they will remain at home but men do not require this knowledge as they will other, typically regarded as more important, responsibilities. Men and women are given expectations to which they are expected to conform to before they are even old enough to make a choice about their future. Once women grow up and begin to have opinions, they are reprimanded by their husbands. Mehrunnisa’s first husband, Ali Quli, told her to “confine [her] interests to the house and the children [she] is supposed to have” simply because she gave him advice about politics (179). Mehrunnisa’s father is a respected man in the royal court and she spent a lot of time learning
Women were auctioned off as “merchandise” to the best suitor they could get in town. Beauty, though important, was not as important as the dowry the woman possessed, because it was the dowry the family provided that could exalt a man’s societal status to all new heights. Once married, women were expected to have son’s for their husbands in order to take over the family business. A barren woman was not an option and could have easily been rushed to the nearest convent to take her vows of a nun, for no honor could be brought otherwise. No woman could run from the societal and legal pressures placed upon them. Rather than run, some chose to accept their place, but, like Lusanna, some chose to fight the status quo for rights they believed they
The book became a great source of information for me, which explained the difficulties faced by women of the mentioned period. The author succeeded to convince me that today it is important to remember the ones who managed to change the course of history. Contemporary women should be thankful to the processes, which took place starting from the nineteenth century. Personally, I am the one believing that society should live in terms of equality. It is not fair and inhuman to create barriers to any of the social members.
...c. 4). This is an example of one of the seven unequal relationships in Confucianism. Much of the social structure of classical China was based on Confucian ideals (Doc. 3). In Greece the relationship between a husband and wife also very unequal due to her young age and lack of education. Alone a woman had no political rights and limited legal powers therefore is was necessary for a husband to provide for his wife much like a father would (Doc. 6) A woman would learn house hold management and eventually produce heirs. These two similar systems of social roles was not a benevolent system. It did not take into account the welfare of individuals, particularly woman who had little power to leave in a bad marital situation. However by insuring that people know their place, which kept them in line, classical societies were more prosperous and able to run more smoothly.
A woman’s role in the early twentieth century still revolved around serving the male members of one’s family. Klara was tied to the traditional role of a female. She would have chores as well as having to make supper for her father, grand father and sometimes Eamon. Klara was more independence than the average woman because she was taught two arts by two masters. She could tailor suits, and carve wood. She had two skills that were named to be man’s skills. Her knowledge gave her the power to control what happened in her life. Klara was respected in her town for her skills because they usually came to her to make suits. Eamon acknowledged her skill and asked her to make a red suit. Her knowledge of these skills gave her more independence, freedom and power. She was one of the few female members in her community who had their own income. She had freedom to do what she wanted with her life but she was still restricted by her society because she was still a woman.
Ihara Saikaku’s Life of a Sensuous Woman written in the 17th century and Mary Woolstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman written in the 18th century are powerful literary works that advocated feminism during the time when women were oppressed members of our societies. These two works have a century old age difference and the authors of both works have made a distinctive attempt to shed a light towards the issues that nobody considered significant during that time. Despite these differences between the two texts, they both skillfully manage to present revolutionary ways women can liberate themselves from oppression laden upon them by the society since the beginning of humanity.
Throughout most of recorded history, women generally have endured significantly fewer career opportunities and choices, and even less legal rights, than that of men. The “weaker sex,” women were long considered naturally, both physically and mentally, inferior to men. Delicate and feeble minded, women were unable to perform any task that required muscular or intellectual development. This idea of women being inherently weaker, coupled with their natural biological role of the child bearer, resulted in the stereotype that “a woman’s place is in the home.” Therefore, wife and mother were the major social roles and significant professions assigned to women, and were the ways in which women identified and expressed themselves. However, women’s history has also seen many instances in which these ideas were challenged-where women (and some men) fought for, and to a large degree accomplished, a re-evaluation of traditional views of their role in society.
Initially, Zenzele brings up the concept to voice her disapproval of the idea. Much of her concern comes out of a modern and Western view of such practices. Zenzele sees it as a man buying his wife as if she were property. Amai Zenzele, on the other hand, though she can understand her daughter’s concerns, can still see it in the customary way it was meant. Through this she is even able to get her daughter to relent with Zenzele saying, “I find it encouraging that our culture actually places great value on an educated, smart woman who has a career” and further, “I guess if submission was the goal, then they would certainly go for the rural, illiterate girls” (Maraire 33). Zenzele may debate in a heated manner, especially with her father, and touch upon subjects beyond Amai Zenzele’s reach, but she can still always be influenced and persuaded gently by her mother’s experience. Both are influential just with different
Their limitations amongst society can also be noticed by the amount of education that they are entitled to. Plato’s Republic mentions how the role of women is determined by the status of their spouse. For instance, if a woman were to be the wife of a guard, then she would be expected to live at the level of that status, too. She is expected to be able to contribute to society a great deal more rather than stay at home and take care of her children and household.
Women had no choice but to follow whatever society told them to because there was no other option for them. Change was very hard for these women due to unexpected demands required from them. They held back every time change came their way, they had to put up with their oppressors because they didn’t have a mind of their own. Both authors described how their society affected them during this historical period.
The narrow view of the world that we often experience prevents us from even engaging for or against ideals that we would take on, given the chance. We often become deaf to opportunity, however. While it may seem we are complicit in many of the injustices that our society perpetuates, often times we are not even aware of the issue. An uninformed decision will be as bad as no decision. Many problems exude from the state of our social values. The role that women play in society is slowly changing from that of a ‘nurturer’ to any role a woman strives for. Progress has come through much pain and the hope is one day there will be real equality in the results of our societies spoken and unspoken laws.
Since the beginning of time, women have strived to achieve an equal status in society. The vast majority of women have rebelled against the norm for equal status. As if washing the dirt off one’s hands, women are forgotten for all of their achievements. The identity of women in the Western world has evolved from domesticity and servility, and moved toward their valuation as individuals of intellect, talent, and independence. The culture about women’s empowerment has been reflected in literature and history throughout many ages.
There are a great number of issues in our society, dated back even further than 1800’s to present day. The struggles of today’s women are presented in Tennyson’s “The Lady of Shalott.” A vast majority of women are held back by society’s judgmental thought. Not just in third world countries like, Pakistan, India or Afghanistan, but also in first world countries, like America. Society should stop oppressing women by how they should dress, their freedom, and their love affairs in these countries and all over the world.
With the change of the society from the primitive period to technological globalized world, people tend to believe that men and women have the equal rights in workplace or domestic life. But it does not happen so. Women have always been the second class to the man because of the inequality in wages, workplace and domestic life. Women movement started after the late 19th century and early 20th century but the involvement of women in the political events in the past goes far beyond the history. Most of the chronological event of the history is written in the male’s perspective. That’s why feminist historians tend to focus only women in women’s history.
Many women in modern society make life altering decisions on a daily basis. Women today have prestigious and powerful careers unlike in earlier eras. It is more common for women to be full time employees than homemakers. In 1879, when Henrik Ibsen wrote A Doll's House, there was great controversy over the out come of the play. Nora’s walking out on her husband and children was appalling to many audiences centuries ago. Divorce was unspoken, and a very uncommon occurrence. As years go by, society’s opinions on family situations change. No longer do women have a “housewife” reputation to live by and there are all types of family situations. After many years of emotional neglect, and overwhelming control, Nora finds herself leaving her family. Today, it could be said that Nora’s decision is very rational and well overdue.
In the past, many people believed that women’s exclusive responsibilities were to serve their husband, to be great mothers and to be the perfect wives. Those people considered women to be more appropriate for homemaking rather than to be involved in business or politics. This meant that women were not allowed to have a job, to own property or to enjoy the same major rights as men. The world is changing and so is the role of women in society. In today’s society, women have rights that they never had before and higher opportunities to succeed.