Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Motown legend Diana Ross
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Motown legend Diana Ross
Gail Davis was a former executive assistant to the Motown legend, Diana Ross. Davis presided in that position until she voluntarily resigned. About a year later, a letter was written and distributed by Diana Ross, which claimed Gail Davis, along with several other former employees, was no longer employed by her. She further states that the employee's’ work or personal habits may have been unacceptable to her and if used as a reference, she requested to be contacted (Walsh, 2013, p. 164). Also, she states in her letter that she “she do not recommend theses people” (FindLaw, n.d., para. 4) This whole case is revolved around a letter and its interpretation. For Davis, the letter sound as “though she had failed at the job and been dismissed"; Davis maintains that she was a good assistant who quit voluntarily (Lewin, 1987, para. 10). Ross, on the other hand, felt that the letter she distributed to the record companies were just her opinions and was not meant to be defamatory or libelous. This case was taken to court, to federal court, where it was dismissed. However, Davis was not happy and pursued the Court of Appeals. During the trial, the court had to view the letter as a whole and not just as individual statements she claimed that the letter stated her opinions only. However, if it is …show more content…
Davis stated she did not request a recommendation or reference from Ross, neither has any potential employers asked for information about Davis to Ross (Walsh, 2013, p. 164). The letter also appeared to have negative connotations, although Ross may disagree. Potential employers could have interpreted the letter as negative. Davis felt the letter made her seem to look as if she was terminated and was too incompetent to be an executive assistant. The letter did not differentiate, or could express, that Davis was not terminated, but instead, she volunteered to
Doris Reed bought a house for $76,000.00 from Robert King. Mr. King and his real estate agent failed to disclose to Mrs. Reed that a murder had taken place in the home ten years ago. Neighbors told Mrs. Reed about the murders and the stigma associated with the house after she moved in. The property appraised in the amount of $65,000.00 with reference to the history of the house. Reed sued King on allegations of misrepresentation for the purchase of the home seeking rescission and damages to terminate the contact.
Matthew G. Cowman, Separation of judicial power: Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Deakin Law Review 119
letter; the court refused, by a vote of 92 to 17, and was dismissed. The
The second August 25 letter amounted to an unlawful amendment. The City relied on section 16b(b) of article 1269m, which provided that "[i]n a civil service hearing conducted under this subsection, the department head is restricted to his original written statement and charges which may not be amended." However, section 16c(a) included in pertinent part the following language, "in addition to other notice requirements prescribed by this Act. The language in this section not only points out that the Legislature intentionally imposed the notice requirements contained in section 16c on the City, but all of the notice requirements contained within the
It is argued that the evidence, if admissible, was not sufficient to prove that the defendant Schenck was concerned in sending the documents. According to the testimony Schenck said he was general secretary of the Socialist party and had charge of the Socialist headquarters from which the documents were sent. He identified a book found there as the minutes of the Executive Committee of the party The book showed a resolution of August 13, 1917, that 15,000 leaflets should be printed on the other side of one of them in use, to be mailed to men who had passed exemption boards, and for distribution. Schenck personally attended to the printing. On August 20 the general secretary's report said, "Obtained new leaflets from printer and started work addressing envelopes" &c.; and there was a resolve that Comrade Schenck be allowed $125 for sending leaflets through the mail. He said that he had about fifteen or sixteen thousand printed. There were files of the circular in question in the inner office which he said were printed on the other side of the one sided circular and were there for distribu|tion. Other copies were proved to have been sent through the mails to drafted men. With; out going into confirmatory details that were l proved, no reasonable man could doubt that the defendant Schenck was largely instrumental in sending the circulars about.
a passage from the letter she is writing to add a personal feel to the
To my understanding the letter that Martin Luther King Jr. composed while confined in the Birmingham Jail, is as one with the appeal that was given by David Walker.
... Baca wrote a letter sent to the board stating “acknowledged that the hiring standards were violated”. I delegated the authority for making the hiring decisions to his undersheriff at the time, Larry Waldie. My direction was unequivocal that we were to only hire qualified candidates, “according to the LA Times. The department is still assessing the hiring of deputies and is already developing new reforms.
Judge Learned Hand was a judge at the US District Court level who decided on the two court cases Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten and Nearing v. United States, both involving the Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1918. The Espionage and Sedition Acts limited what papers and people could say, especially during war times. In these two cases, seemingly antiwar sentiments were allowed by Hand based on his own test for the act. While Judge Holmes was more focused on the effects of the words, Hand was more focused on the words, specifically the literal meaning. Hand’s literal meaning test used in the Masses case was revised in his next court case Nearing v. United States due to shortcomings in his first test.
On her evaluation, she described working there as “a kick in the teeth”, and never got offered a full time
The Department of Labor believed that Eileen Foster a whistleblower at Countrywide Financial was improperly terminated by Bank of America Corp. Foster was a vice president in charge of investigating fraud at Countrywide Financial who took her job seriously. A Countrywide employee in Boston contacted Eileen Foster with evidence of widespread loan fraud, foster investigated and confirmed the employee’s report and eventually shut down six Countrywide offices in Massachusetts. As a government investigator for this case, I feel that the employee did the right thing by contacting Foster (Fraedrich, Ferrell, & Jackson, 2011).
Beverly Glen filed a subsequent law suit against Warner Inc., this time seeking an injunction against the hiring of Ms. Baker and the use of her vocal talent for
Kim Davis, a county clerk in Kentucky, has been in the news quite often this past month. Her claim to notoriety was her refusal to issue marriage license to gay couples in the state, despite the Supreme Court ruling gay marriage constitutional. Davis’s refusal, due to her religious beliefs, landed her five days in prison. She was released by federal district judge David Bunning, under conditions she would not interfere in any way with the efforts of her deputy clerks issuing marriage licenses.
against hiring him. The seventh reciever of a letter gives him a job in a
She has a clear understanding of the information that needs to be dispersed to the trainees. She knows the facts and has done research on the skills that she is teaching. At the same time, she has displayed an inability to implement some of the very skills that she is teaching such as good communication and networking, which would indicate a lack of procedural knowledge. Heather’s inability to answer questions and be a resource to her class would also support this deficiency.