Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book report on dostoevsky
Can You Find God in Sodom?
In one poignant scene of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, the character Dmitri asks, “Can there be beauty in Sodom?” (Dostoevsky 208). However, through the character of his father Fyodor, it is suggested that there is not just beauty in Sodom, but perhaps also an alternative image of God himself. Of course, Fyodor is no saint; he is a sensualist and shows complete unrestraint. Fyodor pales in comparison to the elder Father Zosima. However, perhaps Fyodor Pavlovich, with all his flaws and corrupt behavior, is just as godlike as Father Zosima, who is of course a good man and an uncorrupt follower of God. Alyosha, the youngest of Fyodor’s sons, is of course the Christ figure of the novel. When Ilyusha, a boy whose father had previously been wronged by Dmitri, strikes Alyosha with a stone, Alyosha shows active love by approaching the boy with words of love. However, the boy continues to throw stones at Alyosha, with the encounter culminating in him ferociously biting Alyosha’s finger. Although he is rather frustrated with the boy for this, Alyosha still accepts these violent actions. After all, he
…show more content…
Ivan rejects the Christian idea that there should be harmony in the future because he does not want people, especially children, to suffer in order to achieve that harmony. He even claims that “they have put too high a price on harmony; we can’t afford to pay so much for admission” (245). In the end, it is his compassion for others, combined with his lack of compassion for God, that spurs him to condemn God’s actions. He believes that the distant harmony that is promised with forgiveness is not worth the suffering in the
2. How do (a) the stories associated with the Baal Shem Tov and (b) the biblical tale of Elisha in Damascus illustrate the spiritual journey undertaken by Ivan Ilych?
As Rodya analyzes Luzhin’s character, he realizes that intellect unrestrained by moral purpose is dangerous due to the fact that many shrewd people can look right through that false façade. Luzhin’s false façade of intellect does not fool Rodya or Razumikhin, and although they try to convince Dunya into not marrying Luzhin, she does not listen. Rodya believes that Luzhin’s “moral purpose” is to “marry an honest girl…who has experienced hardship” (36). The only way he is able to get Dunya to agree to marry him, is by acting as if he is a very intellectual person, who is actually not as educated as he says he is. This illustrates the fact that Rodya knows that it is really dangerous because he knows that people can ruin their lives by acting to be someone they are not. Rodya also knows that people will isolate themselves from others just so that no one will find out their true personality. This is illustrated in through the fact that Luzhin tries to avoid Dunya and her mother as much as possible. The way he writes his letter, exemplifies his isolation, for Luzhin does not know how to interact with society. He has no idea how to write letters to his fiancée and his future mother in law. This reflects on Rodya’s second dream because he is unable to get Dunya married off to a nice person. He feels isolated from everyone else because his intellect caused him to sense that Luzhin is not telling the truth about his personality. However, it was due to his lack of moral purpose that Rodya berates his sister’s fiancé. He is unable to control himself, and due to his immoral act of getting drunk, Rodya loses all judgment and therefore goes and belittles Luzhin. Although Rodya’s intellectual mind had taken over and showed him that Luzhin wa...
when feeling holy passionlessness and that the best way to reach such a state was through the sexual exhaustion that came after prolonged debauchery” (Rasputin). After marrying Proskovia Fyodorovna and bearing four children, Rasputin left home and wandered through Greece and Jerusalem. (Rasputin). He was a strict father. His daughters weren’t allowed to go outside alone and Sundays were “devoted” to home worship (Fuhrmann 33).
Life is a wheel rolling inexorably forward through the temporal realm of existence. There are those that succumb to its motion and there are a certain few, like Christ and Napoleon, who temporarily grasp the wheel and shape all life around them. "Normal" people accept their positions in life and are bound by law and morality. Extraordinary people, on the other hand, supersede the law and forge the direction and progress of society. Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, is the story of a group of people caught beneath the wheel and their different reactions to their predicament. One individual, Raskolnikov, refuses to acknowledge the bare fact of his mediocrity. In order to prove that he is extraordinary, he kills two innocent people. This despicable action does not bring him glory or prove his superiority, but leads to both his physical, mental, and spiritual destruction. After much inner turmoil and suffering, he discovers that when a person transgresses the boundaries of morality and detaches himself from the rest of humanity, faith in God and faith in others is the only path to redemption.
The problem of reconciling an omnipotent, perfectly just, perfectly benevolent god with a world full of evil and suffering has plagued believers since the beginning of religious thought. Atheists often site this paradox in order to demonstrate that such a god cannot exist and, therefore, that theism is an invalid position. Theodicy is a branch of philosophy that seeks to defend religion by reconciling the supposed existence of an omnipotent, perfectly just God with the presence of evil and suffering in the world. In fact, the word “theodicy” consists of the Greek words “theos,” or God, and “dike,” or justice (Knox 1981, 1). Thus, theodicy seeks to find a sense of divine justice in a world filled with suffering.
He declares that the “ancestors, the Christians, worshipped entropy as they worshipped God” (159). The ancestors, the savages, worshipped the tendency towards a chaotic world. They were drawn to the gradual decline into disorder and the fact everything will eventually fall apart, which would ultimately bring their world’s demise. What does this then say about the God the Christians followed with such fervor? Zamyatin attempts to persuade the readers that a God worthy of such followers is not interested in a thriving society, but rather only in His own amusement at the cost of humanity. Yet, “this is still the God who has been worshipped for centuries as the God of love” (206). In a climatic conversation with the protagonist, the Benefactor justifies the cruelties of OneState by comparing Himself to the Christian God. The Benefactor argues that His unexplainable actions are for the good of mankind, just as the ancestors would argue that “God works in mysterious ways,” even when those actions are not immediately beneficial towards its citizens. The “Christian, all merciful God—the one who slowly roasts in the fires of Hell all those who rebel against him—is he not called the executioner” (206)? The Benefactor compares Himself to the old God, claiming that He too uses his power to punish all those who sin against OneState. The text reveals that He is proud to be the supreme leader of OneState, and to be the execution of the state. Zamyatin uses direct metaphors to show that just as OneState follows a totalitarian regime controlled by a power mad ruler, Christianity has also deteriorated into a totalitarian
The story of In "The Death of Ivan Ilych", was written by Leo Tolstoy around who examines the life of a man, Ivan Ilyich, who would seem to have lived an exemplary life with moderate wealth, high station, and family. By story's end, however, Ivan's life will be shown to be devoid of passion -- a life of duties, responsibilities, respect, work, and cold objectivity to everything and everyone around Ivan. It is not until Ivan is on his death bed in his final moments that he realizes that materialism had brought to his life only envy, possessiveness, and non-generosity and that the personal relationships we forge are more important than who we are or what we own.
identical. Both characters were in isolation prior to the initial plot of the books, but for
Dismayed by his poor fortune, Boethius’s question regarding how a just God could allow evil into His world generates the idea of a simultaneous yet omnipresent God. Boethius relates his experience with injustice with the actions of God saying, “It is nothing short of monstrous that god should look on while every criminal is allowed to achieve his purpose against the innocent. If this is so, it was hardly without reason that one of your household asked where evil comes from if there is a god, and where good comes from if there isn’t.”(Book 1, Prose 4)
Sontag introduces her essay to the audience by establishing a focal point around the fact that women viewed today are derivative from the religious perspective of how women were viewed in history. During the ancient times, Greeks and Christians practiced their own methods of analyzing and critiquing women and their beauty. The Greeks believed that the lack of ‘inner” beauty could be compensated with “outer” beauty. They distinguished the two beauties in a way that suggested that both were interconnected to one another within an individual. The preference and priority was given to the ‘outer’ beauty, while the ‘inner’ beauty would be kept at bay. Christianity, on the other hand, gave moral significance to beauty; in defining beauty, or words of physical character to be associated with woman and feminine. Gradually, Sontag introduces the distinguishable beauty between men and women. She does this by recapitulating how in a Christian religion, a woman’s body was parted into many sections to be judged and scrutinized, while men are visua...
Within the tortured mind of a young Russian university student, an epic battle rages between two opposite ideologies - the conservative Christianity characteristic of the time, and a new modernist humanism gaining prevalence in academia. Fyodor Dostoevsky in the novel Crime and Punishment uses this conflict to illustrate why the coldly rational thought that is the ideal of humanism represses our essential emotions and robs us of all that is human. He uses the changes in Raskolnikov's mental state to provide a human example of modernism's effect on man, placing emphasis upon the student's quest for forgiveness and the effect of repressed emotion.
Arthur Ashe once said, “From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however makes a life.” Such is the case in Nikolai Gogol’s short story The Overcoat. Gogol takes a man without a friend in the world and gives him a new overcoat. The new overcoat represents a new life and a new identity for the man and instantaneously he is much happier. The man, Akaky Akakievich, basis his “new life” upon the love that he gives to his overcoat, and what he feels it gives him in return. Before long, Akaky begins to care more about his beautiful coat and less about the people around him. Thus is the theme of the story. Often material things are more important in our lives than people, resulting in the emptiness of one’s heart and soul. One cannot be truly happy with his possessions alone. He needs more than that. He needs people his life, whom he can call friends.
Then novel War and Peace was written by a famous Russian author Leo Tolstoy in 1865. The novel describes the war with Napoleon in which many countries were involved such as Russia, Austrian, Prussia, Spain, Sweden, and Britain. The novel mainly focuses on Russia. It reflects the different views and participation in the war of Russian aristocracy and peasants and also shows Tolstoy’s negative viewpoint on the war.
...lost and is a mythical heaven. This woman is described as Abyssinian. Abyssinian literally refers to the inhabitants of a place in Northern Africa, but use of word “Abyssinian” also implies the word “abyss”. The speaker must revive the heavenly song, sung by the maid, inside himself to “build that dome in the air.” Just as the sacred river from the abyss makes possible of the creation of Kubla, the heavenly song of the Abyssinian makes possible the creation of the speaker’s “pleasure dome”. The speaker then speculates on reaction of people over his creation. He states that “all should cry, Beware, Beware!/ His flashing eyes his floating hair/Weave a Circle round him thrice/ And close your eyes with holy dread,”. The reaction of awe and terror that people have to the speaker’s heavenly vision demonstrates the power that the speaker feels is contained in that vision.
The Russian short story, God Sees the Truth, But Waits, is a very effective tale. It has all of the elements that make a short story effective. It has developed settings, and it has developed characters. It has an interesting plot, and has as a part of that a set of fascinating conflicts. Its point of view is consistent, and it has a theme, although that theme is not necessarily easy to recognize. These elements of the story shall now be demonstrated.