Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The future of policing
Body worn cameras on officers essay
Past present and future of law enforcement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The future of policing
With the continued rise in media presence and malicious acts by police officers, I will show what I think the future of law enforcement looks like in our country. I will talk about the things that I think law enforcement is going to be required to do in the future. I also want to talk about the vision I see law enforcement going in the future. I think we are at a crossroads in our profession and it will be a turning point for all to come. As we have all seen in the news we have had several incidents that I think will be known for as incidents that will shape the future of law enforcement. These are incidents like Ferguson, Travon Martin and the Charlottesville incident. These incidents did not just happen overnight. The public is demanding that they be treated fairly and also have video to prove every incident. The media is not helping the perception of law enforcement at all in this journey. I think the way we quickly resolve the issue is to release video of an incident as soon as possible after the incident and before a false narrative can be created.
Agencies that are not already wearing body cameras or using in car cameras are going to be far behind other law enforcement in the near future. For agencies that do not have a body worn camera program or in car camera program it is
…show more content…
The public is allowed to watch television and create a false narrative about what happened to them and get away with it. Not only are officers going to have to wear cameras but the police departments are going to have to start prosecuting the people making false statements. This will make the public be held just as accountable as the officer on the street. People are going to have to realize that officers have a job that is a noble profession but we are not babysitters nor are we referees. The more we allow the public to act the way we do the longer it is going to take to get respect
"Cop-cams strike a blow for truth, but they strike a blow against relationships. Society will be more open and transparent, but less humane and trusting." This is absolutely true. One of his concerns is that society will be less humane due to the transparent of reality with cops’ cams. However, would you rather have that and know that you are safe or cops violated his authority to mistreat a citizen or worst, commit a crime themselves? So as the ground-level policies of cameras are being implement, state and federal legislation should be enacted in tandem as a result, for the very reasons Brooks offers in this column. Law makers must be urged to pass use and leak laws, making it a felony to publicly leak and post "cop cam" footage that has been obtained by law enforcement during the regular course of active duty. This should be a punishable offense, the consequences should be time spent in jail. In a day and age where we click away our privacy in the most nonchalant manner and justice rarely meted out when it's violated in the most obscene way, it is a moral imperative that we take legislative measures to enforce and protect what privacy we have
Police Body Cameras Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians, law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be fitted with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around. I feel body cameras will bring more awareness to police departments when it comes to the honesty in their staff’s actions when they are unsupervised. They can be used as hard evidence in courtrooms, to help make the correct judgment on the situation in question.
Bob Johnson's Toughbook Stuff. (n.d.). : How Police Technology Has Changed.... Retrieved , from http://www.panasoniclaptops.com/2012/01/how-police-technology-has-changed.html
Clearly state whether or not you think that in this era of policing we are heading in the right direction and explain the reasoning for your judgment. What about the present era will work or not work comparatively
Police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will build a trust between law enforcement and the community, it will decrease the amount of complaints against police officers, and lastly it will decrease the amount of police abuse of authority. In addition, an officer is also more likely to behave in a more appropriate manner that follows standard operating procedures when encountering a civilian. “A 2013 report by the Department of Justice found that officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present” (Griggs, Brandon). Critics claim that the use of body cameras is invasive of the officers and civilians privacy.
Some of these individuals think everything will remain the same while others feel there are too many drawbacks associated with them. In “Body Cameras Will Not Stop Police Brutality”, Shahid buttar states that, “Police can do anything-even murder someone in broad daylight on videotape… and get away with it.” This statement is in acknowledgment of the Eric Garner case in which an African- American male get murdered in NYC using an illegal maneuver and the officers involved were not held accountable. Although this may be true as far as the legal aspect due to them having a video recording it brought the issue of police brutality to a national and even international spotlight. So yes the officer wasn’t convicted but this being caught on camera was beneficial in sparking the #blacklivesmatter movement which is seeking to prevent future incidents. Another claim that the opposition makes about why law enforcement shouldn’t wear body cameras is due to privacy concerns. Buttar declares, “…police body cameras also pose a massive risk to privacy and support mass incarceration.” This statements stems from the fact that the body cameras are on the public and not the officers. Most people don’t care about a so -called lack of privacy if it’s for their safety so that claim is not credible. Also, the body cameras should only be used for
Law enforcement officers make an oath to serve and protect, and they are expected to uphold this oath to the best of their ability, but recently there has been an increase in the number of civilian deaths at the hands of law enforcement. Since the rise in this alarming trend, public distrust of law enforcement officials is at an all-time high. This has caused the public to demand the use of body worn cameras be made mandatory. Some people argue that imposing this new technology can cause unintended problems such as, violating privacy laws or interfering with how police interact with the public. However, these concerns can be easily solved once more policies are created to guideline usage. High profile
Many numerous police officers have been given body cameras over the last few months. Due to this, there have been videos that were made public which caused an outcry throughout the country. With the increase in body cameras over the country, there has been many setbacks and potential benefits that
The New York Police Department has a mission to "preserve peace, reduce fear, maintain order," and protect its civilians in their communities (NYPD, 2016). On the contrary, civilians do not see the police officers as individuals who are there to protect them because they do not trust the police officers or the justice system. In the past few decades, police officers have not been held accountable for their actions in a few incidents where a few unarmed young black males were killed by the police. Communities responded to this issue with the Black Lives Matter movement with protests nationwide to show support for the unarmed young black men who were killed by police. In response to the aggressive policing, methods of using body cameras and detailed incident reporting ...
Only recently has there been an increased amount of police involvement with citizens all over the media because of the past years fatal police encounters with unarmed black men in New York City, Ferguson, Mo., Baltimore and other parts of the U.S. Most of it has been either feeding the war on cops theory or shedding light to the real injustices dealt by police officers. The reality of the issue is that there 's too many opinions and not enough facts to back up either notion of whether the body cameras work or not due to the fact of how recent the issue is. Time is a large factor in any study dealing with long term effects for what is being researched. There has only been a handful of studies made to combat the real issues present in our society today, but there is not enough time to provide the people today the long term effects of police worn body cameras.(7 Findings from First-ever Study on Body
All police officers should be required to wear a body camera and a microphone that should be turned on at all times. These body cameras and microphones would eliminate lies told by police officers, and would create a true picture of the crimes. Court systems should not just provide any public defender to those who cannot afford a lawyer. Social status should not interrupt the due process of law. Public defenders should be trained to be adequate lawyers and provide adequate service to their clients. As Muhiyidin D 'Baha stated, we need a citizens’ review board that has subpoena power, so as a community we can monitor officers and review their actions to prevent events such as the death of Walter Scott from happening. The biggest thing that should occur is trust should be restored with our community and officer. Somehow we have to make sure that officers respect our communities and our people, and in return we must trust them to protect. We have to erase the idea of officers fearing black men because of the color of their skin, and we have to not fear officers due to other officer killings. There has to be some balance and understanding between officers and communities, where they trust us and in return, we trust them. Finally, we should honor and protect the fourteenth amendment, which states equal protection. Obviously, we do not have
Law enforcement is a career that is both violent and rewarding in many capacities. Justice needs to be served in law enforcement and they have a responsibility to uphold the law and serve the people in the community. Law enforcement is crucial in the world today as a global realm as life continues to be more complex and law enforcement struggles to combat many aspects of crime. In order to combat these problems and have a positive future in the criminal justice system, everyone must work together on a bigger scale.
Young people and the police have, for many years, experienced a tense and confrontational relationship (Borgquist & Johnson et al., 1995). This has led to a great wealth of literature based upon the notion of police-youth interaction. Much of this literature has tended to focus upon juvenile criminality and the reasons why young people commit such seemingly high levels of crime. Whilst the relationship between young people and the police force has been widely theorised and explained, there is very little literature on juvenile attiudes towards the police. Research that concerns societies attitudes towards the police force tends to focus upon the views and opinions of adults (Hurst and Frank, 2000). In this first section of my literature review I am going to focus upon work that allows us to gain a deeper understanding of why young people are so important when looking at crime. This section will allow us to comprehend the ways in which, literature suggests, young people view the police. This knowledge will provide a basis for my research in which I look more specifically at youth attitudes towards PCSO’s.
The challenge for law enforcement and cultural awareness, is more unique than in any other profession because of the power held by police. This creates a special need for understanding a multicultural world. The success of the many sides of community policing is dependent on this awareness. In previous courses that I have taken, the instructors taught that times were changing and had been changing due to the influx of immigrants living in America, and that police agencies have to be able to understand what is acceptable in their cultures when they are interacting with them. Understanding the importance of culture and the role that police play is not new to police agencies. Law enforcement throughout the world are becoming more concerned of
Advances in law enforcement technology are often divided into hard technology and soft technology. We often see hard technology placed to stop crime like the ever present security cameras, baggage screening, bullet proof windows, metal detectors, and security systems at businesses and homes. Additionally the utilization of private protection devices like mace, tasers, lifeline emergency devices, and ignition interlock systems with alcohol sensors to stop someone from starting a vehicle while intoxicated are seen. Technology advances being employed by law enforcement officers include new weapons, use of force instruments, enhanced patrol cars, and new police protecting gear. Soft technologies involve the strategic use of data to stop crime and to boost the performance of the police. Soft technology advances embody new classification systems, computer code programs, crime analysis techniques, and information sharing techniques. Though this listing of recent hard and soft technologies is not meant to be complete, we have a tendency to suspect...