From Front Porch To Back Seat Analysis

1675 Words4 Pages

In her book, From Front Porch to Back Seat, Beth L. Bailey makes it evident that courtship is primarily decided and formed from the youth. It was the youth of the early twentieth century that took courtship from calling on a girl in her parents home, to take a girl out on a date during the 1920’s. Since then the term “dating” has evolved a number of times, it has stayed the test of time as there was no return of the classical “calling on a girl”, and the social impacts, for both men and women, are still felt to this day. Before dating, it was customary for a boy to ask a girl if he could “call” on her, and the social implications of this were akin to marriage. In this convention of courtship, the woman had the upper hand as the men would call on a girl in her parents home. Courtship was done in privacy as an unmarried woman meeting outside of her home with an unmarried man was considered a threat to her reputation. Men and women believed that courtship was meant solely for the purpose of finding a desirable person to marry. Calling on a woman meant her parents could chaperon the encounter, ensuring their daughter's reputation would be kept intact. Calling on a woman gave …show more content…

Reputations it seems were worth risking. Women gave up their control over courtship for another freedom, they could be taken out without the watchful eye of their parents. The change between calling on a girl at home and dating in public meant the expectation of the woman was to be entertained. It gave men more power over courtship as the women were dependent on the men paying for her time. Even though the man was obliged to spend money on her, she had no obligations to return any favors to him. The men then had a certain amount of power over the date, but it was still up to a woman how physical the couple would

More about From Front Porch To Back Seat Analysis

Open Document