Friedman And Neuman View Of Social Work

699 Words2 Pages

Savaya, Gardner and Stange discussed in their paper of stressful encounters with social work clients and provided insights and suggestions as to how social work students can resolve these conflicts. For social workers to successful cope under stressful environments, they must feel a sense of competence and mastery of various set skills (Savaya, Gardener & Stange, 2011). They further expand on the need to train and help social workers to anticipate and identify aversive behaviours to handling situations (Savaya, Gardener & Stange, 2011). This view of social work situates them at a professionalized setting where they are to be experts in handling all scenarios (Savaya, Gardener & Stange, 2011). Contrary to this approach, Palumbo’s participants …show more content…

They elaborate that the development of a learning plan invests students in the learning processes when engaging with clients (Friedman & Neuman, 2001). To map out the learning experiences helps focus the students and supervisors to a common language in identifying the needs, capabilities and interests (Friedman & Neuman, 2001). In a sense, Friedman and Neuman views highly of social work’s facilitation of students learning processes within the educational system and expected them to perform them having fully mastered the concepts taught in class. Palumbo’s participants were split in their views of education practices. Some participants expressed that social work education gave them language for deep questioning; whereas other participants believed that the educational environment does not elicit deep questioning practices since they are operating under the neoliberal system (Palumbo, 2014). However, all participants came to a consensus that social work education must rest alongside other sites of informal education and seek alternatives. When comparing both papers, the binary of having to prove yourself as professionally competent and ensuring practitioners are competent to reduce oppression creates an opposition to the approach in the educational system (Palumbo, …show more content…

She opposes the single narrative that can only exists and celebrates the diversity in perspective and experiences. In the same sense, doing several comparative analysis has help me understand the dangers of believing in only one narrative. I am reminded that each individual has come from a different background, experiences, oppression that has all cultivated their understanding of reality. It is not only inevitable to have different perspectives but it is also necessary. The allowance of different perspectives helps challenge and encourage deep questioning in whether we might be unknowingly marginalizing others.
As well, to believe that there is only one ‘right way’ results to dangers in privileging my own experiences over others and implementing my own assumptions upon others. As Palumbo sought for diverse perspectives to enrich knowledge for both social workers and activists, it was an experience for me to interpret my own assumptions and to not implicate my own thoughts that interrupts or alter others

More about Friedman And Neuman View Of Social Work

Open Document