Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the French Revolution in Europe
Nationalism an effect on french revolution
The negative and positive impact of the French revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the French Revolution in Europe
The French Revolution is the Most Influential
On a July morning 228 years ago, at around 1:30 pm, a group of “unimportant” people stormed the Bastille; this would become symbolic of the revolution and the concept of citizenship. For purposes of this essay, let the french revolution be defined as an attack against the monarch and the societal and political upheaval across France teeming from 1789 to 1799. Even today we live in socially explosive times not unlike that of 1789 France, with a small portion of the wealthy holding a large majority of government offices. The storming of the Bastille was a turning point, not only for France, but for humanity. It sparked the movement that the majority could rise against an unjust government. It is
…show more content…
A citizen prior to the revolution was nothing more than a slave to the monarch, expected to starve in order for their king to feast. French citizens prominently held the idea that citizens had duties to their country and their fellow citizens, rather than to their monarch. “...perhaps the strongest notion that emerged from the Revolution was the concept of being a citizen.” In this they accept the reality that until they were treated as such, they were nothing more than pawns. This was not tolerated well in the progress booming 1790’s of France. The people of France wanted equal rights for all citizens, including women and people of color. With newfound citizenship, came patriotism for their country. “The Revolution is also credited with introducing the notion of nationalism into political discourse – the idea that the nation belongs to its people.” Realizing the potential for French greatness allowed them to have greater care for the legacy of their country, rather than their monarch. They also realize that citizenship can not coincide with monarchy, leading to the revolt against wealthy government. Citizenship and patriotism influenced europe's people, and allowed for a movement of change and …show more content…
The involvement of King Louis XVI in the American Revolution led to bankruptcy through France, causing unrest among the 3rd estate. “Many expressed their desperation and resentment toward a regime that imposed heavy taxes yet failed to provide relief by rioting, looting and striking.” This behaviour showed a glimpse of the fact that monarchs were losing control over their people. These acts provided the notion that monarchs were easily outpowered by their own people. Not only that, but it also showed the weakness of a monarchy. “Once the King gave in to revolutionary demands after 14 July, the National Assembly began drafting a constitution...” The lower class was able to cause so much havoc on the monarch, that it agreed to their demands. This proved that the monarch was easily manipulated by a majority. Eager to settle the mayhem and revolts the king gave in to their bidding. With monarchy’s power deteriorating the lower class was able to freely express the class struggle through
This oppression of the Third Estate along with the financial problems that fell on the common people would lead to the French Revolution. Overall, the people of France revolted against the monarchy because of the unsuccessful estate system and the inequality it led to, because of the new enlightenment ideas that inspired them, and because of the failures of the monarchy.
When the King of England began to infringe on the colonists’ liberties, leaders inspired by the enlightenment grouped together to defend the rights of the American colonies. As Thomas Jefferson writes in the Declaration of Independence, “History of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States” (Jefferson 778). The citizens of France, inspired by the enlightenment, desired a government run by the people. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness” (de Lafayette 783).
The French Revolution was a tumultuous period, with France exhibiting a more fractured social structure than the United States. In response, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen proposed that “ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities, and of the corruption of governments” (National Assembly). This language indicates that the document, like its counterpart in the United States, sought to state the rights of men explicitly, so no doubt existed as to the nature of these rights. As France was the center of the Enlightenment, so the Enlightenment ideals of individuality and deism are clearly expressed in the language of the document. The National Assembly stated its case “in
One more long-lasting effect from the French Revolution is nationalism. They called fraternity at the time, but both words share the same meaning. The French people fighting for their right to survive and later to protect their borders from foreign powers seeking to restore tyrannical order, produced a sense of pride and brotherhood. No longer being forced to front lines by an unseen monarch hundreds of miles away, the French people started to find, close to heart and empowering reasons, to defend their
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country.
This proved to the working class something needed to be done about the government or there would be constant revolts.
The essential cause of the French revolution was the collision between a powerful, rising bourgeoisie and an entrenched aristocracy defending its privileges”. This statement is very accurate, to some extent. Although the collision between the two groups was probably the main cause of the revolution, there were two other things that also contributed to the insanity during the French revolution – the debt that France was in as well as the famine. Therefore, it was the juxtaposing of the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy as well as the debt and famine France was in that influenced the French Revolution.
One cause of both Revolutions was that people from all social classes were discontented. Each social class in France had its own reasons for wanting a change in government. The aristocracy was upset by the king’s power while the Bourgeoisie was upset by the privileges of the aristocracy. The peasants and urban workers were upset by their burdensome existence. The rigid, unjust social structure meant that citizens were looking for change because “all social classes…had become uncomfortable and unhappy with the status quo.” (Nardo, 13) Many believed that a more just system was long overdue in France.
During the eighteenth century, France was one of the most richest and prosperous countries in Europe, but many of the peasants were not happy with the way France was being ruled. On July 14, 1789, peasants and soldiers stormed the Bastille and initiated the French Revolution. This essay will analyze the main causes of the French Revolution, specifically, the ineffectiveness of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the dissatisfaction of the Third Estate, and the Enlightenment. It will also be argued that the most significant factor that caused the French Revolution is the ineffective leadership of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.
The American Revolution was so much more than just a war, or a time in history. It was a time where America grew, and as the name suggests, revolutionized their way of thinking and governing. It was a time for some great thinkers to get their ideas out there, and these ideas helped shape America into what it is today. These revolutionary thinkers shared their ideas publicly, and that gave the people ways to revolutionize their thoughts as well. They flipped what they knew about government upside down.
The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most other countries as well. On the other hand, Schama viewed the French Revolution as unproductive and excessively violent.
The French Revolution brought about philosophical and political changes that promoted the growth of a new society.
In 1789, thousands of starving peasants abandoned the lands of their ancestors as the price of bread rose to eighty percent of the average peasant’s income (Kreis). Blazing buildings marked the path they took to the source of their woes in Paris. They attacked any food cart they passed. The outline of their skeleton could be seen from under their filthy, thread-bare clothing. Their impoverished condition had reached its climax. Their desperation led them to action. They over took the largest fortress in France, the Bastille, in search of weapons. Members of the Bourgeoisie had formed the National Assembly three weeks prior to the storming of the Bastille to begin to address the grievances of the peasants (Dabney). On August 4, the National Assembly met in Paris, and, with one enthusiastic fell swoop, they agreed to abolish the feudal system forever, thus gaining the support of the mob. “The Decree of the National Assembly Abolishing the Feudal System” created equality between the nobility and citizens, ended the Church’s authority over the state, and pledged to work with King Louis XVI to rectify the injustices of the people.
On July 14, 1789, several starving working people of Paris and sixty soldiers seized control of the Bastille, forever changing the course of French history. The seizing of the Bastille wasn’t caused by one event, but several underlying causes such as the Old
“As soon as any man says of the affairs of the State “What does it matter to me?” the State may be given up for lost,” written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in The Social Contract reveals the important responsibility a citizen plays in their government (Good Reads 7). History shows the world was once divided into empires where subjects made up the majority of society and over time subjects demanded equality among royalty so the shift towards citizenship occurred. A major step towards citizenship for the subjects was through the feudal system and the traditions of fealty and homage (McKay el al. 393). Then many subjects were led to pursuing a revolution so the people could acquire specific rights they had demanded for decades. When placing citizenship beside the idea of being a subject the contrast reveals that a citizen has