Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Successes and Failures of Educational Diversity
Diversity in schools research paper
The importance of managing diversity in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Successes and Failures of Educational Diversity
Freeman v Pitts (1992) Following the Brown cases, the Dekalb County School System in Georgia had yet to attempt to desegregate their schools. In 1966-1967 the Dekalb County school board adopted a “freedom of choice” transfer plan. This transfer plan gave black students the option to go to a formerly de jure all white school. But, this “freedom of choice” plan did not help desegregating schools that were all black. A year after Dekalb County School System adopted “freedom of choice”, the court struck it down in Green v. New Kent County School Board in the state of Virginia. The Court also ruled that lower courts should examine “every facet of school operations”. This meant that the schools would be looked at to see if they have desegregated …show more content…
their schools. Nearly two months had passed since Green when Willie Pitts filed a class action against the DCSS to make it abolish the freedom of choice plan.
A year later a federal court district court terminated the freedom of choice plan which put an end to de jure black schools. This allowed the federal court to supervise DCSS for what would be over 10 years. In 1986, Robert Freeman and the DCSS declared that they have achieved “unitary status” in the schools. The district court confirmed that they had achieved desegregation in student assignments, transportation, facilities and extracurricular activates. But the school had fail to achieve desegregation in teacher and principal assignments, resource allocations, and the quality of education in some schools in the county. So DCSS was ordered to continue to desegregate in those categories. Pitts appealed and said that there was still racial inequality in the school system. The court of appeals for the 11th circuit then reversed and then rejected the incremental approach that DCSS was taking. Freeman then appealed to the Supreme Court was the court ruled 8-0 in favor of …show more content…
Freeman. In Freeman v Pitts the two question of law were; Is the district court allowed to stop the supervision of DCSS for desegregation in the categories that the school does comply with desegregation if it still has some categories it is not completely desegregated in, and in the Freeman v Pitts was the courts appeal right when it reversed the District Courts ruling to withdraw supervision of DCSS incrementally? There were 3 important precedents in deciding the case of Freeman v Pitts. The first main precedent was Green v School Board of New Kent County (1968). This case was very familiar to Freeman v Pitts because this case also involved a “freedom of choice” plan in Virginia which was stuck down in court. This case also gave 6 categories in which a school should be desegregated in. Brown v Board of Education (1954) determined that separate educational facilities depending on race is unequal and unconstitutional. This case also ruled that racial discrimination is in violation of the 14th amendment equal protection laws. Right after this case was Brown II (1955) which demanded that schools should desegregate with “all deliberate speed”. The court’s opinion was unanimous and given by Justice Kennedy.
The Court held that a district court must only supervise a school system in the criteria where it has failed to follow the court’s desegregation plan. The Court said that the incremental plan provides district courts with a strategy to achieve the long term goal of a school system with no supervision. Federal courts possess the ability to put an end to supervision over school districts in incremental stages if the school has achieved the conditions that were set forth due to the Brown cases. The Court of Appeal's was wrong in rejecting incremental approach because racial balance is only to be used when the racial imbalance is due to the violation of the constitution. Once this problem is fixed, the school district should not have the duty to fix racial imbalances because of the demography and location of the school district. Just because the student attendance has more race than the other that does not mean that the school is not obeying the conditions of Brown cases. This re-segregation is the result of private choice, so there is nothing that violates the constitution, so it is not the Federal Courts responsibility to try to fix this issue of racial
imbalance. Justice Scalia said in the concurring opinion that while we should have zero tolerance for racial discrimination, we should consider laying aside the extraordinary presumptions of Green (1968) Justice Blackmun, Stevens, and O’Connor joined the concurring opinion and stated that the District Court must maintain supervision if it is necessary to achieve compliance or if the school district’s behavior is the reason of black majority schools. I agree with the Supreme Court’s decision for overturning the Court of Appeals. The incremental approach allows the school districts to still obey the conditions of Brown without any constitutional violations while improving on places where they still need to desegregate in the school system.
In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Brown vs. The Board of Education that schools needed to integrate and provide equal education for all people and it was unconstitutional for the state to deny certain citizens this opportunity. Although this decision was a landmark case and meant the schools could no longer deny admission to a child based solely on the color of their skin. By 1957, most schools had began to slowly integrate their students, but those in the deep south were still trying to fight the decision. One of the most widely known instances of this happening was at Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. It took the school district three years to work out an integration plan. The board members and faculty didn't like the fact that they were going to have to teach a group of students that were looked down upon and seen as "inferior" to white students. However, after much opposition, a plan was finally proposed. The plan called for the integration to happen in three phases. First, during the 1957-1958 school year, the senior high school would be integrated, then after completion at the senior high level, the junior high would be integrated, and the elementary levels would follow in due time. Seventeen students were chosen from hundreds of applicants to be the first black teenagers to begin the integration process. The town went into an uproar. Many acts of violence were committed toward the African-Americans in the city. Racism and segregation seemed to be on the rise. Most black students decid...
Board of Education was a United States Supreme Court case in 1954 that the court declared state laws to establish separate public schools for black segregated public schools to be unconstitutional. Brown v. Board of Education was filed against the Topeka, Kansas school board by plaintiff Oliver Brown, parent of one of the children that access was denied to Topeka’s none colored schools. Brown claimed that Topeka 's racial segregation violated the Constitution 's Equal Protection Clause because, the city 's black and white schools were not equal to each other. However, the court dismissed and claimed and clarified that segregated public schools were "substantially" equal enough to be constitutional under the Plessy doctrine. After hearing what the court had said to Brown he decided to appeal the Supreme Court. When Chief Justice Earl Warren stepped in the court spoke in an unanimous decision written by Warren himself stating that, racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that "no state shall make or enforce any law which shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Also congress noticed that the Amendment did not prohibit integration and that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal education to both black and white students. Since the supreme court noticed this issue they had to focus on racial equality and galvanized and developed civil
The famous Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka can be used to illustrate when judicial review should be implemented to aid one or a faction in actions that are unconstitutional. In the town of Topeka, Kansas a black third-grader was forced to walk one mile through a switchyard in order to get to her black elementary school, although a white elementary school was only a few blocks away. Her parents attempted to enroll her into the white school but were repeatedly denied. The Brown v. Board of Education case was tried on behalf of the black minority that was the target of racial segregation in public schools.
It is important, of course, to note that the Supreme Court was not able to immediately create and implement desegregation policy, because the Court does face constraints in the area of local implementation. However, the Brown decision was crucial for the success of the desegregation movement, because it supported the Civil Rights Act and provided a precedent for later decisions like Green that would help to implement the ruling at the district level. The courts were thus able to make decisions in this policy area that profoundly shaped the way that civil rights policy developed in the United States, as the courts were enabled to create successful policy in the area of school desegregation because of the combined influence of federal court
Milton Galamison, a local black leader, was an educated reverend that believed integration was the key to equality. He successfully convinced the Board of Education to institute the “Open Enrollment” plan in 1960. Under this policy, black students in over crowded institutions would have an opportunity to attend under utilized white schools. Three years later, because of the plans ineffectiveness, the “Free Choice Transfer” plan was initiated, allowing for an increased amount of school choices and the remapping of districts. Again, these attempts were futile, causing the black community to explore alternate options. The white groups’ resistance to integration was the reason for subsequent political action to ensure its demise. All across the country, the words of Martin Luther King and the successful integrations of southern colleges were the examples that guided the actions of local civil rights movements. During King’s “I have a dream” speech, he said, “the Negro dream is rooted in the American dream.
Before the decision of Brown v. Board of Education, many people accepted school segregation and, in most of the southern states, required segregation. Schools during this time were supposed to uphold the “separate but equal” standard set during the 1896 case of Plessy v. Ferguson; however, most, if not all, of the “black” schools were not comparable to the “white” schools. The resources the “white” schools had available definitely exceed the resources given to “black” schools not only in quantity, but also in quality. Brown v. Board of Education was not the first case that assaulted the public school segregation in the south. The title of the case was shortened from Oliver Brown ET. Al. v. the Board of Education of Topeka Kansas. The official titled included reference to the other twelve cases that were started in the early 1950’s that came from South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware and the District of Columbia. The case carried Oliver Brown’s name because he was the only male parent fighting for integration. The case of Brown v. Board o...
Their story started in 1954 when Brown v Board of Education ruled that segregation in schools was unconstitutional. It was the first legal decision that opposed the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine that had become standard since the Plessy v Ferguson case in 1896 which propagated segregation: “'separate' facilities provided for blacks and whites were legally acceptable provided that they were of an 'equal' standard” (Kirk, “Crisis at Central High”). Little Rock, Arkansas, was on...
The decision to integrate Boston schools in the 1970’s created negative race relations and later fueled a political debate that would change schools across the country. Most desegregation efforts in the United States began with the case of Oliver Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954. The case ruled that segregation on the basis of race was prohibited because it violated citizen’s rights under the Constitution. On June 21, 1974 in the case of Morgan vs. Hennigan, Judge Garret made a ruling that accused the Boston School Committee of engaging in racial segregation. “This ruling later would serve to fuel one of the prominent controversies embedded in our nation’s ongoing struggle for racial desegregation.” The busing policy created extreme acts of violence, invaded personal freedoms, hindered students’ education and
The case started with a third-grader named Linda Brown. She was a black girl who lived just seen blocks away from an elementary school for white children. Despite living so close to that particular school, Linda had to walk more than a mile, and through a dangerous railroad switchyard, to get to the black elementary school in which she was enrolled. Oliver Brown, Linda's father tried to get Linda switched to the white school, but the principal of that school refuse to enroll her. After being told that his daughter could not attend the school that was closer to their home and that would be safer for Linda to get to and from, Mr. Brown went to the NAACP for help, and as it turned out, the NAACP had been looking for a case with strong enough merits that it could challenge the issue of segregation in pubic schools. The NAACP found other parents to join the suit and it then filed an injunction seeking to end segregation in the public schools in Kansas (Knappman, 1994, pg 466).
The Supreme Court is perhaps most well known for the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954. By declaring that segregation in schools was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a ‘direct reversal of the Plessy … ruling’1 58 years earlier was affected. It was Plessy which gave southern states the authority to continue persecuting African-Americans for the next sixty years. The first positive aspect of Brown was was the actual integration of white and black students in schools. Unfortunately, this was not carried out to a suitable degree, with many local authorities feeling no obligation to change the status quo. The Supreme Court did issue a second ruling, the so called Brown 2, in 1955. This forwarded the idea that integration should proceed 'with all deliberate speed', but James T. Patterson tells us even by 1964 ‘only an estimated 1.2% of black children ... attended public schools with white children’2. This demonstrates that, although the Supreme Court was working for Civil Rights, it was still unable to force change. Rathbone agrees, saying the Supreme Court ‘did not do enough to ensure compliance’3. However, Patterson goes on to say that ‘the case did have some impact’4. He explains how the ruling, although often ignored, acted ‘relatively quickly in most of the boarder s...
African Americans are still facing segregation today that was thought to have ended many years ago. Brown v. Board of Education declared the decision of having separate schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. As Brown v. Board of Education launches its case, we see how it sets the infrastructure to end racial segregation in all public spaces. Today, Brown v. Board of Education has made changes to our educational system and democracy, but hasn’t succeeded to end racial segregation due to the cases still being seen today. Brown v. Board of Education to this day remains one of the most important cases that African Americans have brought to the surface for the good of the United States. Brown v. Board of Education didn’t just focus on children and education, it also focused on how important equality is even when society claimed that African Americans were treated equal, when they weren’t. This was the case that opened the eyes of many American’s to notice that the separate but equal strategy was in fact unlawful.
The request for an injunction pushed the court to make a difficult decision. On one hand, the judges agreed with the Browns; saying that: “Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children...A sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn” (The National Center For Public Research). On the other hand, the precedent of Plessy v. Ferguson allowed separate but equal school systems for blacks and whites, and no Supreme Court ruling had overturned Plessy yet. Be...
Brown v. Board of the Education in 1954 was a landmark decision in the education arena. The decision maintained that schools that separated students by the color of their skin could no longer be maintained. The court saw this as necessary, since in their mind schools for black students would always be inferior. This inferiority would not be caused by lack of resources, although that usually was a contributing factor to the poor quality of the school, physically and performance-wise. As the Supreme Court saw it, s...
Despite the ruling of the Supreme court for the states to desegregate their schools, there was some resistance to the ruling. This prompted the Supreme court to make another ruling in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (2) (n.d.). The ruling, in this case, ordered states to immediately comply with the ruling in Brown I.
.... The burden rests upon the defendants to establish that such time is necessary in the public interest and is consistent with good faith compliance at the earliest practicable date. To that end, the courts may consider problems related to administration, arising from the physical condition of the school plant, the school transportation system, personnel, revision of school districts and attendance areas into compact units to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis, and revision of local laws and regulations which may be necessary in solving the foregoing problems. They will also consider the adequacy of any plans the defendants may propose to meet these problems and to effectuate a transition to a racially nondiscriminatory school system. During this period of transition, the courts will retain jurisdiction of these cases