Freedom In Toni Morrison's Song Of Solomon

971 Words2 Pages

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, freedom is defined as the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants. While having the power to act independently seems easy to obtain at first, in reality the state of freedom is an untenable goal for many. In the novel Song of Solomon, the author, Toni Morrison, describes the journey of a young man finding his freedom. For most of Milkman’s early years he struggles to find meaning in life and become independent. His father, Macon, states that “money is the only real freedom there is” and urges his son to follow his footsteps to accumulate more wealth. Though Macon may feel more secure being financially stable, money is not freedom. Having money may help one become free, but money itself …show more content…

Since it is a resource and not a state of being, possessing money is not nearly as important as using it. Spending money ineffectively does not help one achieve freedom. People can have large sums of money but using them for the wrong purposes does not help become free. For example, Milkman feels trapped during his time on Not Doctor Street because he spends money on alcohol and other whimsical activities rather than pursuing freedom. Milkman complains that “if he had to spend the rest of his life thinking about real estate and property, he’d lose his mind” (257) since he has no interest in becoming a landlord. Milkman acknowledges that money is not the culprit because “no one had ever denied him any” (107). Though working for Macon brings Milkman tremendous wealth, Milkman still cannot live his own life. Freedom is not about having money but rather the ability to decide for oneself. Therefore, freedom does not always come with money. Unless money is used to further one’s ability to choose for oneself, it does not make an individual more …show more content…

It is not a means to all ends. In certain situations money is irrelevant to one’s pursuit of freedom. For example, when Milkman is denied entrance to the bar, no amount of money would change that outcome. Money would not give Milkman the freedom to enter the bar. It is simply not the right resource to deploy. Feather associates Milkman with his father and dissipates the unwelcomed guests: “‘He’s Macon Dead’s boy, ain’t he?’ ‘So what?’, ‘So get him outta here’” (57). Since Macon is an imperious landlord, everybody resents him as well as Milkman. Individuals must decide wisely if money is the appropriate resource to deploy. For Milkman only an improved family reputation would earn him the right to the bar. Similarly, in Corinthian’s strife to escape Macon’s control and live her own life, money plays an equally insignificant role. She struggles to find independence in Macon’s household so she wants to find a husband to restart her life. However, none of the suitable men are interested in Corinthians. She lacks the drive to “like the climbing, the acquiring, and the work to maintain status once it was achieved” (188). While she is financially comparable or superior to those young men, her complacency discourages the men from proposing marriage and freeing her from Not Doctor Street. She needs to invest in herself more to have the productive attitude that her bachelor men are looking for. In both of these cases money is not the means to

Open Document