Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shakespeare's hamlet
Hamlet william shakespeare story
Discuss hamlet's character
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Talk and Action in Hamlet
The character of Hamlet is very prestigious, but he has many shortcomings. In many cases, he shows that he is all words and no action. He waits until the very last minute to take a course of action. Hamlet realizes this, and he wishes that he had the characteristics of Fortinbras, Laertes, and Horatio.
During the course of the play, Hamlet just talks and talks about what he plans on doing, but when an opportunity arrises to make good on his word, he backs down. for instance, when he finds Claudius praying, he could have easily killed him and been done with it. but instead, he makes up an excuse for himself, saying that it is dishonorable to kill someone in the church. Even Laertes agreed with Claudius when he said in Act IV, Scene 7 that "no place indeed should murder sanctuarize." The only times that Hamlet takes action is when he has no choice. He takes action when he is sent to England. He only does anything, because if he doesn't, he will be killed. The other time that he uses action instead of words is, of course, at the end. but by that time, it is already too late.
Laertes, on the other hand, was quite the opposite. He was all action and no talk. A very headstrong character, he was rash and let his emotions make his decisions for him. an example of this is when he finds out about his father's death, he immediately assumes it was Claudius and enters the castle by force, fully intending on killing him. This is what Hamlet needs to be like, but only in moderation. Sometimes, when the time calls for it, you must act on instinct, without having to think it through for a couple of days. Hamlet didn't want to be brash and end up getting killed like Laertes did, but then again, Laertes did avenge his father's death a lot faster than Hamlet did. And in spite of all the thinking and planning, Hamlet still ended up the same way that Laertes did.
Fortinbras was a mix of the previous two. He carefully planned out his strategy, and then acted on it when they were finished. He showed that he was not too reckless by sending his captain ahead of him to announce that he was coming, so that the king might have repay him instead of fighting him and losing men.
Linda Brent, Ms. Jacobs' pseudonym while writing "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl," became so entrenched in hatred of slaveholders and slavery that she lost sight of the possible good actions of slaveholders. When she "resolved never to be conquered" (p.17), she could no longer see any positive motivations or overtures made by slaveholders. Specifically, she could not see the good side of Mr. Flint, the father of her mistress. He showed his care for her in many ways, most notably in that he never allowed anyone to physically hurt her, he built a house for her, and he offered to take care of her and her bastard child even though it was not his.
Linda’s grandmother, Aunt Martha was arguably the most significant family member that aided in her liberation of a slave, but also played a role in the delay of Linda’s escape. Martha provided shelter and protection for Linda as Dr. Flint sought after her. As Dr. Flint assaults Linda at her grandmother’s home, Martha exclaims “Get out of my house… you will have enough to do, without watching my family.”(pg 70) As Dr. Flint exercised his tyranny onto Linda, Martha could not stand by and watch. Throughout Linda’s experience of a slave, her grandmother treated her as if she was her own daughter. This led to Linda
Jazz was a unique form of music, there had never been anything like it before. It was rebellious, rhythmic, and it broke the rules- musical and social. It started a musical revolution, “With its offbeat rhythms and strange melodies, jazz was blamed for everything from drunkenness and deafness to in increase in unwed mothers.” Jazz was seen as immoral and worried the older generation that their kids would lose interest in classical music. It was also seen as against society because it came about from the African- American culture, but despite all of that, jazz led to a new era of music that still prevails today.
During their time of slavery under Dr. Flint, William provided care towards Jacobs and cared for her children while they were imprisoned after her escape from the plantation. Shortly after her escape, Jacobs took refuge in the home of a kind slaveholder, who was acquainted with Aunt Martha and offered to conceal her. The kind mistress sent her cook, Betty, to care for and feed Jacobs during her stay. After some time, Jacobs relocated her hiding spot to her grandmother’s crawlspace and after seven years, Uncle William, along with his friend, Peter, executed a plan for her to escape the South. Once she arrived in the Free States, she became employed to an English woman named Mrs. Bruce, as a nurse to her baby. While employed to her, Jacobs observes that the English had “less prejudice against color than Americans entertained” (Jacobs 138). Jacobs revealed that she entered their family with “distrustful feelings I had brought with me out of slavery” (Jacobs 139), however, due to the kindness of Mrs. Bruce and the smile of her baby, she found that they “were thawing my chilled heart” (Jacobs 139). After sometime, she finally confides in Mrs. Bruce that she is a fugitive slave and finds Mrs. Bruce to be very sympathetic and helpful. After Mrs. Bruce’s death, Linda continues her association with the Bruce family and eventually becomes close with the second Mrs. Bruce after Mr. Bruce remarried. Once Jacobs learned that her mistress, Emily Dodge, daughter of Dr. Flint, and her husband are in New York, she confided in Mrs. Bruce and fled the city. Without Jacobs’ knowledge, Mrs. Bruce employs a man from New York to “enter into negotiations with Mr. Dodge” (Jacobs 163). The gentleman pays Mr. Dodge for her freedom, and thus finally gives Jacobs her freedom. Regarding the second Mrs. Bruce, she writes, “Friend! It is a common word,
The life of a slave was tedious and full of pain, many of them hoped for death to come and take them away. They were constantly being whipped, locked up in jail, starved; and unfortunately the young beautiful girls, abused by their masters. When Linda and Benjamin (her brother) were taken to their new owner’s home, Benjamin said that they “[were] dogs [there]; foot balls, cattle, everything that is mean.” Their old mistress would take such good care of them, that when they stepped into the Flints home, they immediately felt how cold this family was towards their slaves. Harriet states that “No pen can give an adequate description...
Despite Flint’s overtures, Linda is able to avoid being by the grace of her own intellect. Although her actions may seem illicit and ill-advised, like her love affair with Mr. Sands to fend off Dr. Flint, so are the repercussions if she cooperates and does nothing. Jacobs predicates that slaves suffer from the influence of the slave system on their moral development. In the text, it is evident that Linda does not condemn slaves for illegal or immoral acts such as theft or adultery, but rather saying that they usually have no other option but to behave this way. However, she also points out that slaves have no reason to develop a strong ethical sense, as they are given no ownership of themselves or final control over their actions. This is not their fault, but the fault of the slavery system that dehumanizes them. “Pity me, and pardon me, O virtuous reader! You never knew what it is to be a slave; to be entirely unprotected by law or custom; to have the laws reduce you to the condition of a chattel, entirely subject to the will of another” (Jacobs 49). Slaves are not evil like their masters, but important parts of their personalities are left undeveloped. She argues that a powerless slave girl cannot be held to the same standards of morality as a free
Jazz is referred as “America’s classical music,” and is one of North America’s and most celebrated genres. The history of Jazz can be traced back to the early era of the 20th century of the U.S. “A History of Jazz” presents From Ragtime and Blues to Big Band and Bebop, jazz has been a part of a proud African American tradition for over 100 years. A strong rhythmic under-structure, blue notes, solos, “call-and response” patterns, and
Jazz comprises of a wide range of music from the ragtime to the present music listened to by many people. The music evolution has taken roughly 100 years and jazz has been put in this particular evolution as one of the music styles today. In the definition of jazz, there is no actual definition of jazz because it a composition of very many music styles hence making it hard to get the required definition that would describe it fully. Attempts being made to define jazz have a basis of traditional music that have similar characteristics as jazz but not real jazz. Using the American or African music examples, the researchers argue that the definition is very broad and wide. Ernest Berendt one of the researchers says that jazz originated from America in the process of confronting Negros with Europeans in terms of music. This can then be termed as a tool of identity between the two groups of people due to the racist and discrimination aspects that faced America. This was now a tool that could identify the two groups to bring about national integration and understanding among the members of America. In America jazz has incorporated time as a special factor and is now referred to as swing. Swing means spontaneity and vitality of the production of music which has an improvisation role to play to the listeners. This particular jazz music contains a particular manner of phrasing which acts as a mirror to an individual and the personality of the musician performing that particular jazz music on stage. The early jazz musicians include Double Bassist Reggie Workman, saxophone player Pharaoh Sanders, and drummer Idris Muhammad who were performing in 1978 hence dating back to early jazz performance and presentation.
The jazz we know of today wasn't recognized as its own genre until the 20th century. Before, jazz was considered to be music for black people and it was rarely appreciated for the ordinary white man. During the 18th century when African slaves were shipped to America where the music was later on influenced by the western European music. The rhythm inherited from Africa and a lot of the melody came from western European music such as folk songs and church hymns. So the jazz genre is inherited from the folk music from Europe and also some African music. At the time only the “Negroes” were listening to their music and the white man let the “Negroes” play the black music to calm down the slaves.
Each man deals with grief in extremely distinct manners, when looking at Laertes in comparison to Hamlet you can swiftly see their great contrast to one another. Hamlet would rather create reason before madness; he is the type to use his brain before his fist. Whereas Laertes is always caught up in his anger that he sees no means to absolve the actions of others.
As the play’s tragic hero, Hamlet exhibits a combination of good and bad traits. A complex character, he displays a variety of characteristics throughout the play’s development. When he is first introduced in Act I- Scene 2, one sees Hamlet as a sensitive young prince who is mourning the death of his father, the King. In addition, his mother’s immediate marriage to his uncle has left him in even greater despair. Mixed in with this immense sense of grief, are obvious feelings of anger and frustration. The combination of these emotions leaves one feeling sympathetic to Hamlet; he becomes a very “human” character. One sees from the very beginning that he is a very complex and conflicted man, and that his tragedy has already begun.
Hamlet is a scholar, speaker, actor, and prince. For some reason, Hamlet is not able to avenge his father's death without considerable delay. There is one major flaw in Hamlet's character which causes him to postpone the murder of Claudius. I believe that this flaw is Hamlet's idealism. While his idealism is a good trait, in this case, Hamlet's environment and his...
He has the ability to perform tasks that may be unpleasant or dangerous. Laertes does not simply try to kill someone by thinking cautiously the whole time, but by directly confronting them and facing them head-on. When Laertes returns home to Denmark he even confronts Claudius about the death of his father. Swearing Laertes says “I dare damnation. To this point I stand,/That both the worlds I give to negligence,/Let come what comes, only I’ll be reveng’d/Most throughly for my father.” (IV. v. 133-136). With this declaration Laertes plots with Claudius to kill Hamlet and they construct a plan to have Laertes fence with Hamlet and for him to kill him. They instrument a plot of revenge for the death of Polonius, quickly coming up with three ways to kill Hamlet: stabbing him with an unblunted sword, placing poison on the sword, and poisoning Hamlet’s drink (IV. vii.). After they construct this plan they swiftly utilize the plan. Laertes did not wait for the perfect moment, at the perfect time, and at the perfect place. He created the place, time, and moment to carry out the dangerous task. Hamlet, however, waited and waited for what he thought one day would be the perfect moment in which he could kill his uncle. Even when Hamlet had an opportunity to kill Claudius, he talked himself out of it. When compared to Laertes, Hamlet is a coward because of his inability to
this leads me to my next question: how does one know if the words mean
As described earlier, Hamlet is slow to act. Laertes, on the other hand, acts quickly and with precision, wasting no time in acquiring his target and formulating a plan. Robert Palfrey Utter, Jr., puts it best, Hamlet and Laertes both come to the same conclusion that murder must be carried out, but Hamlet reaches that conclusion only “after he has had a few minutes to think it over.” (140) Once Laertes finds out that the man who killed his father was Hamlet, he is ready to charge in and kill him as soon as possible. He is only stopped by Claudius, who advises him on a more subtle approach.