Free Cash Flow Case Study

INTRODUCTION

Organizations that have high free cash flow, creditors are willing to invest in these companies since these companies have powerful tools for debt repayment and they clearly have greater financial flexibility. On the other hand, cash enables managers to develop growth opportunities and development programs that will lead to an increase in company 's value. The free cash flow theory was first introduced by Jensen (1986), he stated that “Free cash flow as cash flow left after the firm has invested in all available positive NPV projects”.
Free cash flows are a criterion for measuring the performance of firm which shows the amount of cash possessed by the firm after spending the amount of costs which are required for keeping or expanding

Legitimate administration of working capital parts empowers the organizations to hold abundance free trade streams which can out turn be interest in productive speculations to create benefits for the firm. Cutting of expenses significantly affects the free income held by the firm; this allows the firm to have extra funds to exploit beneficial speculation extends that can yield higher returns. Free income does not just effect on incomes and gainfulness of the firm additionally the administration of the monetary record. In the event that the firm neglects to deal with its net working capital appropriately then free money streams may be lower than the net income of the firm. Late research by Hubbard (1998) demonstrates that there is a noteworthy positive relationship between free money streams and benefit, an expansion in the level of money stream of a firm prompts a comparing increment in benefits of the firm. This is accomplished through contributing. The firm ought to consider settling on key venture choices to make utilization of extra money streams. For instance firms that hold abundance trade may utilize it out purchasing overrated firms as opposed to paying out profits to the shareholders. This is conceivable notwithstanding when the organizations have a low budgetary limit in the wake of making acquisitions since they put resources into non productive speculation ventures (Carolyn, Carroll and Griffith, 2001). Firms can choose to hold free money streams for theoretical reason as they sit tight for a productive venture that can guarantee better returns in future. The firm can likewise choose to put resources into danger ventures that have higher returns; these speculations may later yield better returns which could be beneficial to the firm. Then again if6 inadequately contributed free