Death penalty should be allowed
A man, Frederick Anthony, is a murder victim’s family, and his sister was killed in 1987 when he was seventeen years old. He became a supporter of death penalty because of this. He seeks the justice for his sister’s death. The death penalty is justice for victims like him. This is from emotional reason to support the death penalty, but we cannot just ignore these reasons because it’s not appropriate for human being. And the board reported that about 1200 convicted murderers who released from 1985 to 2003 in New York state returned to prison for a new felony conviction within three years. Although this percentage of second offence which is felony are low, this shows only one state of fifty and it’s fact that
…show more content…
When someone commit felony by very harmful way to society and people, we society need to show the result of it. But, there are many reasons to disagree with the death penalty, and most of them says it is immoral in principle, unfair, and discriminatory in practice. It is barbaric way in our currently society. However, these opinions are not necessarily true. Bruce Fein, JD, General Counsel for the Center for Law and Accountability says “The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a free moral actor able to control his own destiny for good or for ill; it does not treat him as an animal with no moral sense, and thus subject even to butchery to satiate human gluttony.” Like in case of Frederick Anthony, a man who was killed his sister, victim’s family or people who was really close to them seeks punishment that they can be convinced theirself. And this punishment can be justified only if we make full use of all available tools to aid in the determination of guilt or innocence. That’s why we can say the death penalty is justice for our society. Furthermore, there should be ultimate punishment like the death penalty to prevent people from committing felony in our …show more content…
In fact, all of punishment like death penalty also have aspect to prevent people from crimes. The death penalty was the best one to show the most serious penalty to people if they try to commit crimes. Is there any other punishments which can be convinced any other people including victim’s family? Speak to now, the answer is no. Of course, all penalty has problem because there’s always some reasons against their punishment. But also, they have strong reasons why they are adopted. Richard A. Devine, JD, State's Attorney in Illinois thinks the law of death penalty is appropriate for the worst crimes. And if we change the law to abolish the death penalty, the legislature must reach a decision to give us all a clear understanding of how the worst crimes will be punished, and it must convince all people. Now, the death penalty is the strongest one which the many numbers of people are convinced because there are a lot of factors to support the death
The death penalty has always been a subject of controversy. Some say that it is a barbaric practice that should be done away with while others claim it to be necessary to ensure the safety of modern society. Either way, capital punishment has always remained a grey area in the
In the article “The Penalty of Death”, written by H. L. Mencken, utilitarian principles are used to cover up for a system that wants results. All of the reasons that Mencken gives as justifications do not give concrete evidence of why the death penalty should continue as a means of punishment. The article states, “Any lesser penalty leaves them feeling that the criminal has got the better of society...” This statement alone demonstrates how he believes the death penalty brings justice and satisfaction to the people. Mencken creates the points he makes in his article in order to give society a way to make the death penalty seem less intrusive on moral principles and more of a necessary act.
The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian). The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning. Crimes in colonial times, such as murder and theft of livestock were dealt with swiftly and decisively ("The Death Penalty..."). Criminals were hanged shortly after their trial, in public executions. This practice was then considered just punishment for those crimes. Recently though, the focus of the death penalty debate has been on moral and legal issues. The murderers of today's society can be assured of a much longer life even after conviction, with the constraints of the appeals process slowing the implementation of their death sentence. In most cases, the appeal process lasts several years, during which time criminals enjoy comfortable lives. They have television, gym facilities, and the leisure time to attend free college-level classes that most American citizens must struggle to afford. Foremost, these murderers have the luxury of time, something their victims ran out of the moment their paths crossed. It is time this country realized the only true justice for these criminals is in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes.
Elaboration- information about the issue: This process was been practiced as a sentence to the criminals, back in the years. However, now in the day government still use it as a punishment to some delinquents. People are wondering if US should allow the Death Penalty.
Enforcing death penalty in itself deters people from getting suitable opportunity to ensure that rehabilitation is enhanced. It is necessary to note that many individuals who have been charged with capital punishment have been emotionally and psychologically unstable. Enforcing the death penalty therefore denies them room for rehabilitation. There is a need to advance towards rehabilitation as opposed to advocating for execution. If individuals know that upon committing a capital offence they will be sentenced to death, they will hardly consider reform programs. It is also crucial to note that there is no concrete evidence on advantages derived from the death penalty. The truth is that it only aids in perpetuating death and chains of violence. Prisons should serve as centers to rehabilitate violent fellows, and then return them to the community as fully reformed and responsible individuals. It is therefore not justifiable that a death penalty should be enforced to them at all
The death penalty is something that many people do not have a clear decision on. Many people support the death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished, and there are some that support the death penalty, but only in certain cases. My personal opinion on the death penalty is it should be administered only in cases of particularly
The United States has a long history with the death penalty. The “first recorded execution was in Jamestown in 1608” (“Death Penalty in America” 259). Since then, thirty five states have continued to use the death penalty. Now it can be considered a normal punishment and many people feel strongly about it, but maybe we should forget what we have done in the past and take a second look. The death penalty should not be used in the United States because it is too expensive, affects the poor and minorities more than others, and (even though many people think it is true) the death penalty does not deter crime.
The death penalty, ever since it was established, has created a huge controversy all throughout the world. Ever since the death penalty was created, there have been people who supported the death penalty and those who wanted to destroy it. When the death penalty was first created the methods that were used were gruesome and painful, it goes against the Eighth Amendment that was put in place many years later. The methods they used were focused on torturing the people and putting them through as much pain as possible. In today’s society the death penalty is quick and painless, it follows the Eighth Amendment. Still there are many people who are against capital punishment. The line of whether to kill a man or women for murder or to let him or her spend the rest one’s life in prison forever will never be drawn in a staight.
Offenders given mandatory life in prison on charges of murder, on average only serve 16 years before being released back into society. One in three of these killers carries out a second murder even under the supervision of the probation officer.1 If we allow murderers to spend life in prison we run the chance of them getting out and killing again. Capital punishment can also deter future perpetrators from committing such a heinous crime, and it will end the prisoner’s suffering by giving them a humane death and give closure to the victim’s family. Without a concrete meaning of “life in prison” we need the death penalty to put an end to the most evil of people.
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear a lot of people say “an eye for an eye.” Most people feel strongly that if a criminal took the life of another, their’s should be taken away as well, and I don’t see how the death penalty could deter anyone from committing crimes if your going to do the crime then at that moment your not thinking about being on death role. I don’t think they should be put to death they should just sit in a cell for the rest of their life and think about how they destroy other families. A change in views and attitudes about the death penalty are likely attributed to results from social science research. The changes suggest a gradual movement toward the eventual abolition of capital punishment in America (Radelet and Borg, 2000).
1. monsters and marvels in the essay dr.daedalus by the author laura slater the plastic surgeon joe rosan defines what marvel and monster are. according to rosan he says a monster is someone who is born with abnormal deformities whereas marvel is someone who has an animal part such as wings or tails slater 58 individuals are afraid of monsters than marvel because of how they look. i think marvel and monsters are similar to each other even though they have different meanings. again monsters are born with abnormal deformities however when you are born with those deformities the deformities may look like some kind of animal parts. in other words a doctor would know what deformities a child might have before they are born by looking into the sonogram
Jacoby believes the death penalty protects society by threatening future murders with fear. Gaes believes the death penalty is necessary because the overpopulation in prisons causes emotional and physical distress. The stronger side of the debate seems to be that the death penalty does not discourage crime at all nor does it help the victim’s family heal. It would be useful to know whether or not death-penalty states as a whole have lower rates of crime than non-death penalty states when arguing for the death penalty.
Death penalty supporters believe that capital punishment is the only sure way to deter murderers from committing murders again. “The argument that murderers are the least likely of all criminals to repeat their crimes is not only irrelevant, but also increasingly false. Six percent of young adults paroled in 1978 after having been convicted of murder were arrested for murder again with six years of release” (Death Penalty Paper).
The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a moral able to control his/her own destiny for good or bad behavior. I believe it is an asset to society. The death penalty should not be abolished because it will reduce crime rate, it will save us and the government money, and It helps our society.
The death penalty ultimately is taking an individual’s life as a justification for that person committing a heinous crime. As a society, it is noted that anything that is dignified is worthy of respect or considered honorable. If one is to take a look at one of the most honorable and respected documents in the United States, The Declaration of Independence; it is evident that dignity and the death penalty are incoherent with one another. The Declaration of Independence states, that every citizen of the U.S. has the rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (National Archives) If the United States promises the individual the right to life and this right is considered “inalienable”, the death penalty simply can not be dignified.