Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corruption in the us government
Corruption in the us government
Corruption in the us government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corruption in the us government
Freddie Mac is a financial services company. Congress chartered the company in 1970 with the statutory mission of providing liquidity, stability and affordability to the U.S. housing market. According to the company’s website, Freddie Mac’s main line of business is buying mortgage loans and mortgage related securities in the secondary market. Since they operate in the secondary market, Freddie Mac does not issue mortgages themselves but they buy mortgages, as whole loans, and mortgage backed securities for investment. The company also issues guaranteed mortgage-related securities that sell in the secondary market. In the beginning of the 21st century, Freddie Mac found itself in the center of an accounting scandal. According to an SEC disclosure …show more content…
According to the Baker Botts investigation, the company started maneuvering its gains and losses in early 2001 with the concurrence of its auditor Arthur Andersen — Baker Botts was the law firm that the board hired to investigate the accounting fraud (Barta, McKinnon and Zuckerman). By the fall of 2001, Freddie Mac started using other accounting tools to smooth out future earnings and an Arthur Andersen partner objected but gave an unqualified opinion on their financial statements (2002 Annual Report). The next year the company fired Arthur Andersen and brought in PricewaterhouseCoopers as the auditor. PricewaterhouseCoopers refused to certify the company’s book, prompting the board to contract Baker Botts to investigate the company’s books in January …show more content…
Later in the year, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) issued a report detailing the occurrence and the board negligence in accepting the changes in accounting in order to fix their earnings (Barta and McKinnon). OFHEO is the federal regulator in charge of overseeing the government-sponsored companies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. OFHEO also punished Freddie Mac with a $125 million settlement and a series of additional penalties such as separating the functions of CEO and chairman, as well requiring Freddie Mac to hold more capital and limiting their growth temporarily. As far as management is concerned, the former COO, CFO and two vice presidents had to pay civil penalties and disgorgement charges to the federal
Take into consideration the auditors from Arthur Andersen. They did not take into consideration the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The auditors from Arthur Andersen took into consideration the consequences only for their own firm and their own well-being. Vinson & Elkins lawyers should not have destroyed evidence in order to protect their client Enron. Lawyers do take an oath to help protect and defend their client but they are not to help find ways for their client to violate the
In March 2001, FORTUNE pointed out that Enron's financial statements were nearly impenetrable. That time, all people began to talking and speculation truth of Enron financial statement. Securities and Exchange Commission also starts to investigation of Enron. At the same time, Andersen destroys Enron audit evidence, eventually also destroy their credibility. They stop to destroy after received the letter of Securities and Exchange
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
The years 2008 shined a light on a group of people who were considered high society. When the stock market crashed in September 2008, the world shines a spotlight on the financial corporation. Words such as hedge fund manager and financial instrument such as credit default swaps are not words not known to everyday citizens. The economic downturn forced society to ask question not normally asked.
The company has to buy mortgages with a loan to value ratio of 80 percent unless the mortgage carries mortgage insurance or other credit support. 3 FNMA was allowed to borrow money at cheaper rates than their private counterparts to help create the secondary market, which consisted of only FNMA until the creation of The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) in 1970.2 In the early 2000s, FNMA gave mortgage loans to people who could not pay them back and as a result the homeowners defaulted on their mortgage loan. These unstable loans helped to bring around the financial crisis of the early 2000s. On September 6, 2008 FNMA was put into a conservatorship with the United States Government.4 The US Department of Treasury is providing financial services to FNMA so that the company can remain stable. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is now the authority of the board of management of FNMA, which gives FHFA the power to make decisions for FNMA. The FHFA created a platform that would maintain FNMA’s current business but it would upgrade their infrastructures, which would save taxpayers money.
The Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), and most commonly known as, Fannie Mae, was established in 1938 and plays an important role in the nation’s housing system. The company’s main responsibility is to serve the people who live in America, which involves purchasing loans and giving the mortgage lender cash in return (www.knowledge.wharton). Their mission statement says, “Fannie Mae serves the people who house America. We are a leading source of financing for mortgage lenders, providing access to affordable mortgage financing in all markets at all times. Our Financing makes sustainable homeownership and workforce rental housing a reality for millions of Americans” (fanniemae.com).
Freddie Mac is in the home mortgage business. It is their jobs to help low income families find affordable housing. Freddie Mac has been in business since 1970. They were created in order to get more American families in to their own homes. Their mission statement says, “Our statutory mission is to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the U.S. housing market” (FreddieMac.com, 2014). Despite this honorable mission statement, Freddie Mac was involved in a case of accounting fraud that went on from 1998 to 2002. The lack of ethics at this company started with top brass setting the tone, and the rest of the company following suit.
"This is why the market keeps going down every day - investors don't know who to trust," said Brett Trueman, an accounting professor from the University of California-Berkeley's Haas School of Business. As these things come out, it just continues to build up"(CBS MarketWatch, Hancock). The memories of the Frauds at Enron and WorldCom still haunt many investors. There have been many accounting scandals in the United States history. The Enron and the WorldCom accounting fraud affected thousands of people and it caused many changes in the rules and regulation of the corporate world. There are many similarities and differences between the two scandals and many rules and regulations have been created in order to prevent frauds like these. Enron Scandal occurred before WorldCom and despite the devastating affect of the Enron Scandal, new rules and regulations were not created in time to prevent the WorldCom Scandal. Accounting scandals like these has changed the corporate world in many ways and people are more cautious about investing because their faith had been shaken by the devastating effects of these scandals. People lost everything they had and all their life-savings. When looking at the accounting scandals in depth, it is unbelievable how much to the extent the accounting standards were broken.
In 2002, WorldCom’s bankruptcy was the largest in US history; WorldCom admitted that it had falsely booked $3.85 billion in expenses to make the company appear more profitable. Ebber who was CEO of WorldCom created fictitious some more than questionable accounting practices. Thus began the practice of taking an operating expense and reclassifyin...
The company concealed huge debts off its balance sheet, which resulted in overstating earnings. Due to an understatement of debts, the company was considered bankrupt in 2001. Shareholders lost $74 billion and a lot of jobs were lost because of the bankruptcy. The share prices of Enron started falling in 2000 and in 2001 the company revealed a huge loss. Even after all this, the company’s executives told the investors that the stock was just undervalued and they wanted their investors to keep on investing. The investors lost trust in the company as stock prices decreased, which led the company to file bankruptcy in December 2001. This shows how a lack of transparency in reporting of financial statements leads to the destruction of a company. This all happened under the watchful eye of an auditor, Arthur Andersen. After this scandal, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was changed to keep into account the role of the auditors and how they can help in preventing such
Enron and Arthur Anderson were both giants in their own industry. Enron, a Texas based company in the energy trading business, was expanding rapidly in both domestic and global markets. Arthur Anderson, LLC. (Anderson), based out of Chicago, was well established as one of the big five accounting firms. But the means by which they achieved this status became questionable and eventually contributed to their demise. Enron used what if often referred to as “creative” accounting methods, this resulted in them posting record breaking earnings. Anderson, who earned substantial audit and consultation fees from Enron, failed to comply with the auditing standards required in their line of work. Investigations and reports have resulted in finger pointing and placing blame, but both companies contributed to one of the most notorious accounting scandals in history. There remains much speculation as to what steps could and should have been taken to protect innocent victims and numerous investors from experiencing the enormous loses that resulted from this scandal.
However, in December 2001 Enron became global interest as the debts of the firm unfolded which led to the largest bankruptcy in US history at that time yet sharehol...
Enron was on the of the most successful and innovative companies throughout the 1990s. In October of 2001, Enron admitted that its income had been vastly overstated; and its equity value was actually a couple of billion dollars less than was stated on its income statement (The Fall of Enron, 2016). Enron was forced to declare bankruptcy on December 2, 2001. The primary reasons behind the scandal at Enron was the negligence of Enron’s auditing group Arthur Andersen who helped the company to continually perpetrate the fraud (The Fall of Enron, 2016). The Enron collapse had a huge effect on present accounting regulations and rules.
Prior to 2000, Enron was an American energy, commodities and service international company. Enron claimed that revenue is more than 102 millions (Healy & Palepu 2003, p.6). Fortune named Enron “American most innovative company” for six consecutive years (Ehrenberg 2011, paragraph 3). That is the reason why Enron became an admired company before 2000. Unfortunately, most of the net income for the years 1997-2000 is overstated because of unethical accounting errors (Benston & Hartgraves 2002, p. 105). In the next paragraph, three main accounting issues will identify for what led to the fall of Enron.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.