In the passages Freddy in Peril part 1 and 2 by Dietlof Reiche, it was about a crazy doctor named professor Fleischkopf trying to get the hamster named Freddy. In the passage in paragh 3 Freddy told the readers of the passages that he was ¨IN mortal danger.¨ Then later in the passage you could tell that he was in mortal danger and that we knew that Freddy was a hamster you could tell that professor Fleischkopf was at the top of the stairs. Then not that far in the passage it say ¨Two things happened first, I heard someone insert something in the lock; and second, a smell hit me. In the second passage Freddy found Sir William the cat to help him but he was asleep so he bit him to wake him up and I wonder what that bit Freddy did
to Sir William got bit what would it feel like to get bitten by a hamster. By the almost the end of the story Sir William said ¨SSh!¨ Freddy listened ¨Footsteps… on the stairs...going down… He´s retreating! He's given up.¨ How would you feel if a professor was chasing you and his name in professor Fleischtopf. The passages Freddy in Peril part 1 and 2 is all about Freddys point of view of a hamster named Freddy.
If someone had previous knowledge of a crime, are they just as guilty for not reporting that a crime was going to happen as the person(s) that actually perpetrated the crime? This question was a major point of discussion and the major driver of the plot in the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers. In this book, 16 year old Steve Harmon is being tried for felony murder for participating in a robbery perpetrated by James King, Bobo Evans, and Osvaldo Cruz that ended in the death a Alguinaldo Nesbitt. Although the jury found Harmon innocent in the end, the readers still learn that Steve knew that a robbery was going to happen. Also, scattered throughout the book were bits of evidence that alluded to Steve’s involvement in the robbery. Therefore,
I see the author's use of imagery in this quote somewhat excessive, yet I get the point across effectively; Piggy's death was a gruesome one and a sight that would strike fear into most who view it. The way the author uses words such as "boiled" and "twitched" shows me that Ralph most likely viewed the aftermath of Piggy's fall and will, in turn, look back at the event as more personal than before viewing the dead
Curiosity always kills the cat, and these children’s curiosity wasn’t that extreme, but it definitely wasn’t helpful. In the book, the boys curiousness about hunting and finding the ‘beastie’ is what started the blood thirsty urge to kill (Holding 35). Once they had succeeded in hunting pigs and became rather good at it, they didn’t want to stop. In the poem, the kids curiosity about what the handicapped boy was ...
At Simon’s murder the boys, “Leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit and tore.”
In the short story, little things are mentioned that foreshadow what is about to happen. The screams are one of the main things. When George enters the nursery after Wendy and finds that it is now a forest full of color, there is an instant of doubt that maybe there never was any Africa or lions after all. George proves the suspicions wrong once he “picked up something that lay in the comer near where the lions had been” (Bradbury). Bradbury describes the wallet to have...
For even Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society. They, with all the other boys, surged after [Simon], poured down the rock, leapt on, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws.
After a journey into the dark history of Europe and Africa with Sven Lindqvist, I found myself shocked. It’s earth shattering. Ideas and historical events are presented through a journal/proposal of his unique view on racism. Lindqvist raises questions as to where racism was spurred and why what happened in late 1800’s and early 1900’s lead to the holocaust. Including religion, personal human values, advanced warfare and even societies’ impact as a whole. His travels through the Sahara and Africa in the early chapters show a more current day view of society over seas. The description of the desolate continent and harsh conditions paints a picture of what previous civilization lived through. He explains that part of the reason he has traveled to the desert is to feel the space all around him, a definite emptiness if you will. As his travels progress he introduces his own family life that pertains to the human emotion, which is also a big focus point in this book. Childhood beatings over taking the lord’s name in vain, dropped calls from his daughter that leave him torn and sad. He does an excellent job on taking the reader on a personal journey with him through his current day traveling and even his early life. Linking these personal experiences and tying in histories misconceptions of “right and wrong” is what makes this book so valuable. Lindqvist gives a relevant and educated answer to the question of how racism became such a terrible tribulation in all parts of the world.
In addition, Jack treated Piggy with extreme cruelty. Jack's brutal behavior toward Piggy exposed his evil side. This could be why he wanted to kill him, as they began arguing since they had first met. Jack also felt a desire for power; Piggy would never grant him this supremacy, which led to violence either physically or verbally. After Jack let the fire go out, Piggy reprimanded him leading to frustration in Jack; “This from Piggy, and the wails of agreement from some of the hunters, drove Jack to violence. The bolting look came into his blue eyes. He took a step, and able at last to hit someone, stuck his fist into Piggy’s stomach ” Jack could have hit anyone else but struck Piggy, showing his deep hatred for him. All Jack needed was the opportunity to kill Piggy, and he would have taken it just like when he punched him in the stomach.
Mary Wroth alludes to mythology in her sonnet “In This Strange Labyrinth” to describe a woman’s confused struggle with love. The speaker of the poem is a woman stuck in a labyrinth, alluding to the original myth of Theseus and the Minotaur. The suggestion that love is not perfect and in fact painful was a revolutionary thing for a woman to write about in the Renaissance. Wroth uses the poem’s title and its relation to the myth, symbolism and poem structure to communicate her message about the tortures of love.
It is ironic how the most optimistic situations turn out terribly, in an almost mocking way. Piggy is doomed from the start, they savagely hunt and kill pigs, torturing them and enjoying it. It is the beast within each boy that kills Piggy, as it is the beast within that eats away at any civilized instincts. Ralph wishes, ‘If only they could send a message to us. If only they could send us something grown-up … a sign or something’(p:117).
...at the hands of his master. The mutilation of its eye, hanging it to death from a tree and killing his wife, which had shown the cat love. There are two interpretations you can take away from this story, the logic of guilt or supernatural fantasy. Which conclusion will you take?
One of her entries plainly states that her brother’s “conduct to Heathcliff [was] atrocious” (20). Curiously enough, Catherine is not present for later atrocities narrated by Nelly Dean, but her hypothetical narration would provide a much more sympathetic perspective towards Heathcliff and the possible effects of the abuse he experiences, something which Nelly’s accounts sorely lack (20). Nevertheless, Hindley’s atrocious behavior is expanded on in the original text as Nelly Dean recounts instances of abuse between him and Heathcliff, telling Lockwood of an occurrence when the boys’ quarreled over a colt. Hindley resists Heathcliff’s demands that he gives him his horse, his denial soon met with Heathcliff’s threat to show Mr. Earnshaw “[his] arm, which [was] black to the shoulder,” assumedly from one of Hindley’s beatings, as well as a later threat to “tell how [Hindley] boasted that [he] would turn [him] out of doors as soon as [Mr. Earnshaw] died” (39). While this circumstance certainly illustrates Heathcliff’s capacity for manipulative behavior, it also provides insight on the verbal and physical abuse which Heathcliff frequently experiences in his day-to-day life. Moreover, Nelly Dean later notes Heathcliff’s ability to “stand Hindley’s blows without winking or shedding a tear,” further reinforcing the consistency with which Heathcliff endured abuse
Arthur Ashe once said, “From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however makes a life.” Such is the case in Nikolai Gogol’s short story The Overcoat. Gogol takes a man without a friend in the world and gives him a new overcoat. The new overcoat represents a new life and a new identity for the man and instantaneously he is much happier. The man, Akaky Akakievich, basis his “new life” upon the love that he gives to his overcoat, and what he feels it gives him in return. Before long, Akaky begins to care more about his beautiful coat and less about the people around him. Thus is the theme of the story. Often material things are more important in our lives than people, resulting in the emptiness of one’s heart and soul. One cannot be truly happy with his possessions alone. He needs more than that. He needs people his life, whom he can call friends.
P. 98 “Even the sounds of nightmare from the other shelters no longer reached him, for he was back to where came from, feeding the ponies with sugar over the garden wall.”
Dr. Thomas Stockmann: Hero or Enemy ? Dr. Thomas Stockmann is the Medical Officer of the Baths in the play ''enemy of the people'' by Henrik Iben; and the brother of the Burgomaster (mayor) of the town. Jovial by nature, the doctor enjoys the company of "bright, cheerful, freedom loving young fellows" who share his idealism and ability to think freely. Throughout the play, Stockman shows himself to be a conscientious person and a caring father.