Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frankenstein critical analysis
Gothic literature stephen king
Frankenstein monster analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Frankenstein critical analysis
The classic gothic novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley details the relationship between two significant figures, Victor Frankenstein, and his unnamed monster. The critical relationship between such characters causes many literary critics to compose the idea that they are bound by nature – inadvertently becoming a single central figure (Spark). The notion that the monster is an alter ego to Victor is an ideal suggestion, as their roles in the story consistently change; from predator to prey, depression to anger, pity to cruelty, these are all characteristics shared between both characters at different times of the novel. Numerous themes show these characters as both complementary and contrasted beings (Spark). Muriel Spark proclaims one of the most prominent pieces of evidence to show the relationship between Victor and the monster includes the alternate title of the novel, The Modern Prometheus. In the initial chapters, Victor was himself the protagonist, Prometheus, the beloved contributor of fire. Nevertheless, as the monster was created, he had assumed the role of Prometheus. The godforsaken monster recites, “But am I not alone, miserably alone?” (Shelley). The revolt of the monster against his creator is another feature to depict the similarity between the monster and Prometheus; a Titan, who sought revenge against the Gods. The title may imply that the monster is an alternative Frankenstein. Critics have often provided specific examples from the text to support their claims of the relation between Victor and the monster. Primary characteristics shared amongst both figures can include a strong lust for knowledge, arrogance, and ignorance to those around them, an inner darkness that dictates their principles, and a conscience... ... middle of paper ... ...is actions, especially those that will cause the death of creator. After continuous threatening, and taunting of his creator to satisfy his desire for revenge the monster achieves his goal by murdering Elizabeth. These actions result in the chase between both characters, resulting in the death of Victor, the only person the monster has had a true relation to. Possessed by unyielding guilt from his morality, the monster flees into the Arctic; aware of his wrongdoing in murder, the monster plans his self-destruction. Victor and the monster are very different characters, yet they share many similar characteristics – perhaps this was the intention of Mary Shelly, to provoke one to think of the notion that the monster is a reflection of Victor Frankenstein. This can potentially be reason why the popular misconception in media is that the monster is named Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein explores the downfall of certain human characteristics, set to the backdrop of creation, destruction, and preservation. The subtitle denoted by Shelly herself supports this idea, by relating the fact that the title can be viewed as either Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. One scholar, Marilyn Butler, also maintains this by noting, "It can be a late version of the Faust Myth"(302). Shelly uses the story of the main character, Victor Frankenstein, to produce the concept of a dooming human characteristic of which Frankenstein states, "I have . . . been blasted in these hopes"(Shelley, 152). The reader finds, as a result of his thirst for knowledge and infatuation with science, Victor creates a living being by whom he has "suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes"(Shelley, 17). Eventually, Victor realizes this self-destructive trait, but he is not able to save himself stating, "I have lost everything, and cannot begin life anew"(Shelley, 16). Although everything in his life that is dear has been lost, Victor is able to convince one in his same position--Robert Walton--to not "lead [his crew] unwillingly to danger"(Shelley, 151). While addressing the concept of characteristic and self-discovery, it is possible to realize that the monster also possesses the characteristics held by both Victor and Walton; except in his learning, the monster is driven to continue to cause destruction. Most important about the thirst for knowledge is that, as a form of human characteristic or downfall, it leads to large, critical pieces of self-discovery. In obtaining these critical pieces, Frankenstein finds satisfaction in j...
Critic Northrop Frye says, “Tragic heroes tower as the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, the great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divine lightning”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein greatly exhibits the theme of the consequence of knowledge and irresponsibility among others through its tragic hero, Victor Frankenstein. Northrop Frye’s quote is certainly true when looking at Frankenstein’s situation. Victor is a victim of his divine lightning, and ultimately causes much trouble for himself; however, Victor also serves as the tragic hero in the lives of the monster, his family, and his friends.
...e seeking help and strength to take care of problems in their lives. Victor Frankenstein is a man with a loving and caring family. Family and friends are an important part of his life. He has his whole life in front of him, when creates his monster. He creates the monster in the likeness of man with same need of love and affection as man. Although, this is his creation, he lets the monster down and does not care for him. The monster begins to feel neglected and lonely and wants desperately to have a human relationship. The monster turns angry and revengeful because he is so sad and abandoned. He wants Victor to feel the way that he does, all alone. The monster succeeds and Victor ends up losing all the important in his life and his own life. In the end, the monster dies and the need for human relationship becomes the destruction for both the monster and Victor.
Isolation is one of the major motifs that resonates throughout Frankenstein. Tying into the romantic style of the novel, Shelley uses this element all the way through the work to show a repetition of isolation, an aspect that is present in almost every character in the novel and expressed primarily in Victor and the monster. But even some other minor characters such as Justine, Caroline, and Walton deal with isolation in one way or another.
In conclusion the novel Frankenstein shows similarities in both Victor and the monster. Even though Victor created the monster using different body part he ended up acting a lot like Victor even for different reasons. The monster may have looked a lot different from Victor but that doesn’t mean he has to shun him away. You shouldn’t judge a book by its cover.
In the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the main theme revolves around the internal and external consequences of being isolated from others. Being isolated from the world could result in a character losing his/her mental state and eventually causing harm to themselves or others. Because both Victor Frankenstein and the creature are isolated from family and society, they experienced depression, prejudice, and revenge.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. For example, Victor creates the monster to be like himself. Another similarity is that the anger of both Victor and the monster is brought about by society. One more parallel between Victor and the monster is that they both became recluses. These traits that Victor and the monster possess show that they are very similar.
In Marry Shelly’s book Frankenstein, she tells the story of a man named Victor Frankenstein. The character of Frankenstein contains traits that parallel Prometheus from Greek mythology. Through his actions and emotions Victor Frankenstein becomes the modern Prometheus by producing ill-fated actions that carry tragic consequences just as Prometheus’ did.
When you hear the word “Frankenstein”, the first thing that comes to mind is a creepy, zombie-like monster; but this is not exactly what the story is all about. The monster is not actually named Frankenstein; it’s the creator of the monster whose name is Victor Frankenstein. Because of Victor’s interest in natural science and creation of life, he decided to study relentlessly and create his own human out of something inanimate. Once brought to life though, the creature ends up being more of a curse than an amazing invention. Victor then spends the rest of his life in fear and grief to try and put an end to the monster he created. The novel Frankenstein shows remarkable and deliberate connection with the myth of Prometheus from the cover page to the creation scene and is tied in through the rest of the book. (Whisenant)Victor Frankenstein can be called a modern-day Prometheus because of his creation of a being, their love for human kind, and their fate at the end.
...three different symbolic levels, as a Romantic novel, Archetype novel, or a Gothic novel. On the romantic level, Victor is the villain because he abandons the creature and leaves it to fend for itself. The creature is miserable and just wants a friend, but was abandoned by Victor making it almost impossible. On the Archetype level, Victor is the villain because he tries to play god. He wants to be worshipped like a god, by creating his own species, and creating life from plain matter. But in doing so, Victor disturbed the natural order of things. Finally, Victor is the villain on the Gothic level. There he is the villain, because he and the creature are part of a greater being, and Victor's subconscious wants William and Elizabeth dead, which is why the monster kills them. Despite the fact that Victor didn't physically murder anyone, he was the villain of the novel.
When growing up, life begins to change and obstacles appear from left to right. A part of growing up is to face responsibilities that challenge you day to day. In order to own up to one’s responsibilities, they must mature with age. For one to be truly mature, they have to accept their responsibilities before they can be fully mature. A lot of people in our world and in the book Frankenstein, are too immature to accept their responsibilities. Whether that responsibility has to do with work, school, or family, it takes time to become someone who owns up to what they have done. I believe that if you are mature enough, you should be able to accept what you have done and why you have done it. A lot of people that are immature, just ignore what
More than just a spooky story, Shelley’s novel is rife with allusion, both literary (the Creature’s relationship with its creator closely resembles Satan relationship to God in Milton’s Paradise Lost), and mythological (the book’s subtitle, The Modern Prometheus, likens Dr. Victor Frankenstein to the mythic bringer of fire to mankind). Of course, nothing could have been expected of Mary Shelley, the daughter of a prominent philosopher and a feminist, raised to be an intelligent and educated woman. Despite a lack of critical support for her novel, Frankenstein found a home with everyday readers who appreciated its macabre atmosphere and the plight of the strangely sympathetic
Mary Shelley in her book Frankenstein addresses numerous themes relevant to the current trends in society during that period. However, the novel has received criticism from numerous authors. This paper discusses Walter Scott’s critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in his Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein (1818).
Mary Shelly does a very good job making us believe that both Victor Frankenstein and the monster are real. Victor Frankenstein is the creator of the monster and he spends most of the novel trying to defeat him. Fra...
Having watched the movie Frankenstein was an experience that truly stirred up emotions in me that I thought was only normal for everyone who knew Frankenstein and be melodramatic for a day, but the chance to really understand the emotions I have felt back as I watched the movie was reading Frankenstein’s book story. Reading Frankenstein in depth made my understanding of its contents more comprehensive and led me to identify the many social issues within. Frankenstein was a tough read for me, but going on through it gets better and more exciting as I got used to the style and the language used therein. Can science have the ultimate power to push the human potential of manipulating life itself as something that man can create and give? The act of playing God usually comes with transgressions done in the field of science including choosing who must and who must not be given life which ultimately results in serious negative moral consequences.