Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Patriarchy in frankenstein
Frankenstein : the relationship between the victor and the monster
The role of women within frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Patriarchy in frankenstein
Victor arrives aboard the ship in the fourth letter. Readers might notice that Walton does not sign this letter and none of the letters are ever signed again. This could initially lead readers to think that he is not as self-absorbed as he had been because his focus has turned to a friend; however it seems more like his obsession with himself and with self-gratification has not given way to empathy and emotions of a healthy caliber, but instead has become an obsession with Victor. In her essay “Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the Spectacle of Masculinity” by University of Rochester professor Bette London writes:
While the absence of signature leaves the reception of Walton’s “tale of horrors” uncertain, his testimonial seals Frankenstein’s narrative exchange. The bloodcurdling secret withheld from Elizabeth … finds its destination in Walton’s frame; the “tale of misery and terror” Frankenstein promises to confide to Elizabeth … passes instead to Walton’s pen in an act that stands as the thrilling consummation of confidential vows between men.” (263)
…show more content…
Because of Walton’s extreme tendencies, readers can hope that finding a friend would make him more normal.
Yet, the friend he meets is Victor Frankenstein. Shelley does leave some evidence that Victor might be a good match for Walton, such as the aforementioned example of the lack of signature in the remaining letters, but the evidence that points toward the idea that Walton has switched one unhealthy behavior for another is surmounting. These ideas are supported by London as well when she describes his lack of signature as the act of “relinquishing the reciprocity of letter writing for the journal’s narcissistic investments”
(263). At first Walton does become sympathetic of Victor, who is near death because of the abuse he suffered in the unyielding elements, whereas before meeting Victor, Walton only ever wanted someone to have sympathy for him. Nonetheless he quickly declines into a disturbing state. When he and the crew of the ship pull Victor aboard and revive him with a little brandy and a warm blanket, Walton decides that Victor should stay in his own room and he should attend on Victor himself as much as possible. He says that he had “great trouble to keep off the men, who wished to ask him a thousand questions.” He also tells Margaret that he had to “persuade” Victor to stay in his room because he was too weak to be out on the deck (15). Isolating Victor is not exactly a friendly gesture and this is only the beginning of the weird ways Walton interacts with Victor. It is clear that Walton doesn’t even know Victor’s name yet, but already loves him because “he must have been a noble creature in his better days, being even now in wreck so attractive and amiable” (15). The next letter is penned barely a week later, but Walton assures his sister that his affection grows daily (16) and what Walton considers affection is better called obsession. In the same letter he posits that “even broken in spirit as he is, no one can feel more deeply than he does the beauties of nature … he may suffer misery, … yet when he has retired into himself, he will be like a celestial spirit, that has a halo around him” (16). Victor is a “divine wanderer” (17) in Walton’s eyes and he even argues to Margaret that if she thinks his enthusiasm for Victor is laughable, then she must have lost all her innate charm. If readers find this behavior just plain laughable that would be an understatement. His words are more befitting of a lover who writes poetry that equates their partner to a deity of love than they are befitting of a man writing a letter to his sister about his captive acquaintance of only one week.
The start of Robert Walton and the monster’s final conversation, this paragraph near the end of Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein uncovers the untold perspective of Victor Frankenstein’s creation. Revealing to Robert that Frankenstein’s misery was not the only casualty of the novel, Shelly’s utilization of the monster’s pain illustrates mankind’s hatred and abandonment of the artificial being. Moreover, directing spiteful words towards Victor Frankenstein, Felix De Lacey, and even himself, the monster’s narration reflects the being’s unresolved emotions that have emerged because of society’s cruelty. Although science fiction, the narrative of Frankenstein’s monster exemplifies the literary reproduction of England’s monarchy deserting its own
The purpose of this suddenly close relationship is to bring credibility to the narrative of Frankenstein and ultimately bring credibility to the narrative of the monster. This is done be enveloping Walton’s letters around both these narratives. These layers sustain the relationship through the novel and allow the reader to be outside of the story, physically in another location as Walton’s sister is, but to be close and credible.
Victor Frankenstein may be the leading character in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, but a hero he is not. He is self-centered and loveless, and there is nothing heroic about him. There is a scene in Chapter twenty-four where Captain Walton is confronted by his crew to turn southwards and return home should the ice break apart and allow them the way. Frankenstein rouses himself and finds the strength to argue to the Captain that they should continue northwards, or suffer returning home "with the stigma of disgrace marked on your brows." He quite obviously has alterior motives and if he were not the eloquent, manipulative creature he so egotistically accuses his creature of being, he might not have moved the Captain and the men so much that they are blind to the true source of his passion. Unfortunately for Frankenstein, the crew, (however "moved") stand firm in their position. Yet the things he says in his motivational speech are prime examples of the extent to which Frankenstein is blind to his own faults and yet will jump at the chance to harangue others. He is so self-centered that his lack of interaction and love for others after his experiment has been completed, would barely qualify him as a person, if the difference between being human and being a person lies in the ability to have relationships with others.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein explores the downfall of certain human characteristics, set to the backdrop of creation, destruction, and preservation. The subtitle denoted by Shelly herself supports this idea, by relating the fact that the title can be viewed as either Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. One scholar, Marilyn Butler, also maintains this by noting, "It can be a late version of the Faust Myth"(302). Shelly uses the story of the main character, Victor Frankenstein, to produce the concept of a dooming human characteristic of which Frankenstein states, "I have . . . been blasted in these hopes"(Shelley, 152). The reader finds, as a result of his thirst for knowledge and infatuation with science, Victor creates a living being by whom he has "suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes"(Shelley, 17). Eventually, Victor realizes this self-destructive trait, but he is not able to save himself stating, "I have lost everything, and cannot begin life anew"(Shelley, 16). Although everything in his life that is dear has been lost, Victor is able to convince one in his same position--Robert Walton--to not "lead [his crew] unwillingly to danger"(Shelley, 151). While addressing the concept of characteristic and self-discovery, it is possible to realize that the monster also possesses the characteristics held by both Victor and Walton; except in his learning, the monster is driven to continue to cause destruction. Most important about the thirst for knowledge is that, as a form of human characteristic or downfall, it leads to large, critical pieces of self-discovery. In obtaining these critical pieces, Frankenstein finds satisfaction in j...
It is in the complex structure of the novel that Mary Shelley creates sympathy. We shift from Robert Walton to Victor Frankenstein to the monster and finally back to Walton. With each shift of perspective, the reader gains new information about both the facts of the story and the reliability of the narrator. Each perspective adds pieces of information that only they knows: Walton explains the circumstances of Victor’s last days, Victor explains his creation of the monster, the monster explains his turn to evil. This impact of the change of narration gives us a better understanding of each person, and we see that the monster is not such a monster at all.
Victor Frankenstein is a scientist whose ambition will be fatal. His story is central to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Nevertheless, Shelley gave a frame to Victor's tale as Frankenstein begins and ends with Captain Walton's letters. In this analysis, I will show that Shelley did not insert the letters by chance, but that they add a deeper dimension to the novel.
in Frankenstein: Contexts, nineteenth century responses, criticism. By Mary Shelley. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. Norton Critical Edition.
Baldick, Chris. In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Print.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W.
Works Cited for: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. ed. a. a. a. a. a J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.
...the downfall of Frankenstein and the monster. Frankenstein found the secret to life, though he applies his gained knowledge and ambition to his own selfish goals, which wind up destroying him and those closest to him. Walton has something in common with Frankenstein; his ambition to achieve something that no man has ever accomplished before. The difference between Victor and Walton is tat Walton decides to turn back. The monster on the other hand never wanted any fame or glory; his ambition was motivated by the thirst for revenge. Ultimately even Frankenstein, on his deathbed, realized the harsh consequences of his actions. Victor states, "Seek happiness in tranquility, and avoid ambition..." (Shelley 229).
The idea for the novel of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein came to her one night when she was staying in the company of what has been called ‘her male coterie’, including Lord Byron and her husband, Percy Shelley. Mary Shelley’s whole life seems to have been heavily influenced by men. She idolised her father, William Godwyn, and appears to have spent a good part of her life trying very hard to impress both him and her husband. There seems to have been a distinct lack of female influence, her mother, Mary Wollstonecraft, having died weeks after her birth, being replaced by a neglectful step-mother. These aspects of her life are perhaps evident in her novel. The characters and plot of Frankenstein were perhaps influenced by Shelley’s conflicting feelings about the predominately masculine circle which surrounded her, and perhaps the many masculine traits that we see in novel were based upon those of the male figures in Shelley’s own life. In this essay I will attempt to show some of these traits.
Mary Shelley’s use of a frame story in her novel “Frankenstein” generates the problem of reliable narration as many narrations do. However unlike most novels, this story is told through three different narrations allowing much room for bias and a slight change in the tale. The title character, Victor Frankenstein, is not trust worthy due to his deep personal loathing for his monster or another narrator. This narrator cannot be taken as an accurate depiction due to its lack of empathetic behavior and constant vying for pity but also acts in a manner that is gruesome. The last narrator proves to be most reliable because he has the least amount to do with the actual story other than to pass along Victor’s story and to carry on what happens when one is tainted by science and the pursuit of too much knowledge.
In the introduction of Frankenstein, the first four letters are documentations of Captain Robert Walton’s voyage to the North Pole written to his sister Margaret, where he comes across a frozen and weak Victor Frankenstein in search of his beast of a creation. After recovering from the harsh conditions, Victor “then told [Captain Robert] that he would commence his narrative the next day when [he] should be at leisure” (Shelley, 1818, p.18), telling his whole miserable life to Walton. Victor starts off by stating his jovial childhood growing up in Geneva, where his “mother’s caresses and [his] father’s smile of benevolent pleasure while regarding [him] are [his] first recollections” (Shelley, 1818, p.22). The turning point of Victor’s life is when he witnesses “a most violent and terrible thunderstorm” (Shelley, 1818, p.29) at the age of 15 that involved lightning striking and shattering an oak tree; he “never beheld anything so utterly destroyed” (Shelley, 1818, p.29). Before going off to the ...
Walter Scott’s critique in the 1818, Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein, is that Frankenstein is a novel of romantic fiction depicting a peculiar nature that narrates the real laws of nature and family values. This review explains that Mary Shelley manages the style of composition, and gives her characters an indirect importance to the reader as the laws of nature takes course in the novel. In addition, Walter Scott appreciates the numerous theme...