Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Story of an Hour Analysis
Analyse the story of an hour
The Story of an Hour Analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Since the beginning of civilisation, discoveries have encompassed an enticing notion of uncovering something for the first time, however contemporary perceptions of discovery appreciate the transformative nature of newfound realisations whether they arise from a process of deliberate planning or are evoked unexpectedly. Simon Nasht’s 2004 TV movie documentary Frank Hurley: The Man Who Made History explores the lifetime of the celebrated photojournalist and grand illusionist, Frank Hurley, who pioneered the art of photography and documentary filmmaking and transformed various principles, cultures and civilisations along the way. Correspondingly, Kate Chopin’s contextually divisive and avant-garde short story The Story of an Hour recounts the …show more content…
emotional whirlwind experienced by the protagonist, personifying the concepts of feminism, emancipation and liberty. Both texts demonstrate the ramifications of particular discoveries for the individual and broader society. While, personal discoveries have the ability to revolutionise literary and artistic forms, as well as grant the pioneering personality fame, wealth and distinction, they too damagingly influence ones connections and relationships with other individuals.
Through Nasht’s informative documentary, the ramifications of individual discoveries have been disclosed in Hurley’s works and accomplishments. Hurley’s realisation of the power images possesses to portray “a whole range of human experience that no one had ever seen before” demonstrates his newfound belief in the need of photographs to tell the entire story. This belief inspired Hurley to resort to different measures and innovations, such as manipulating and creating composite images as well as experimenting with colour for the first time, in order to attain the perfect shot as “it was impossible to secure the full effects of war without composite pictures”. Thus, not only transforming the art of photography with his ground-breaking techniques but also cementing Hurley’s position in history as one of Australia’s most influential war time photographers. One the other hand, extracts of the interview with Hurley’s twin daughters, Toni and Adele, illustrate the impression of a father who was always absent, “a fascinating stranger” outlining the datum that Hurley was never able to truly explore his relationship with his own progenies, due to the fact it was always sacrificed in order for him to embark on another historical …show more content…
adventure, solidifying the idea that although discoveries have the aptitude to change one’s life, they all come at a cost. Correspondingly, one’s own inner discoveries often spark a new perception of life, becoming the facilitator in the transformation of one’s ethics, morals and principles.
Mrs Mallard, much like Frank Hurley, became aware of the endless possibilities her life could offer following her sudden and eye opening discovery. The realisation of her husbands supposed death inspires the repetition “Free, free, free!” outlining the embracing of her new found freedom as a means of breaking the shackles of her old married life, and plunging into her new life free of the “blind persistence”. Furthermore, the imagery of the open window, “she could see in the open square…all aquiver with new spring life” also symbolises her newfound individuality but more so emphasises the reclamation of her individuality and a new life that solely belongs to her, which stood as a revolutionary concept related to the context of the story as the ninetieth century was an era that limited the progress of women. This imagery also acts as a means of the protagonist escaping the one dimensional “square” of her marriage and truly experiencing all life has to offer for the first time, consequently demonstrating the ways in which discoveries transform and encourage individuals to acquire a new outlook on
life. Though personal discoveries have the ability to advance an individual professionally and personally, they also acquire the capability to preserve lost societies and rejuvenate aging demographics. Through Simon Nasht’s annexation of the segment titled Papua, the revolutionising nature of the discoveries are addressed in a communal sense. Despite Hurley’s expedition to Papua New Guinea being plagued with various controversies, “he unintentionally left them with something of immense value. A record of their lost culture”, this narration combined with the archival footage of Hurley’s work in Papua demonstrate the enduring quality of his photography which in turn provides future generations of the New Guinean society with a record of lost customs, practices and traditions allowing the culture to be continually passed down and prosper, rather than vanishing completely. Moreover, Hurley’s realisation that through camerawork he had the opportunity to “photograph the nation [Australia] as he wished it to be” forever transformed the demographic of Australian society. Acting as a catalyst changing it from the once exclusively British society and ultimately painting Australia as a utopian society with “no poor, no indigenous Australians, no struggling farmers” inspired over six million migrants to journey to the land of supposed boundless opportunity depicted in Hurley’s photographs. Thus, expressing the societal impacts of the ramifications of individual and communal discoveries.
The impact of discovering something for the first time can often broaden our understanding and lead to new innovations. In Simon Nasht’s documentary; Frank Hurley: The Man Who Made History, Hurley spent most of his life trying to capture the beauty of nature as well as capture photos of war to create emotion and illustrate the hardships that was experienced in WWI and WWII. Representations of discovery can vary one’s understanding of the physical aspects encountered in the process of discovering and this has been portrayed through the montage in the early scenes of the documentary. The combination of archival footage with non-diegetic
Discoveries can be unexpected and sudden or they can transform from a process of careful and calculated planning evoked by curiosity, and wonder. These discoveries can lead individuals to search for meaning through a series of experiences. Simon Nasht’s documentary Frank Hurley - The Man Who Made History (2004) captures the experiences of adventurer, Frank Hurley as he explores the importance of discovery through the challenges that evoke individuals to transform through a process of journeys of discovery and exploration. John Keats’ poem ‘On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer’ (1816) portrays the persona discovering Chapman’s translation of Homer’s epic poems evoking a transformative process from a passive reader of literature to be stimulated
In this paper I used outside sources such as Hurley’s book, Gawthrop’s, Jacobson and Moakley articles to clarify and develop deeper thinking about Coles’ ideas in “The Tradition: Fact and Fiction,” with focal points being: human actuality, the interiority of a photograph, and the emotional impact of cropping. Throughout Coles’ essay he portrays a documentarian as one who creates their work to meet their own standards based on personal opinion, values, interest and their audience. He also shows, in correlation to the title, that there is no line between fact or fiction in documentary work; they are loosely mingled, overlapping and only seen separately from a biased standpoint.
To be named one of the top photographers of the 20th Century is a substantial credit on its own, but to do so with no formal training or background in the art is remarkable, yet accomplished by Philippe Halsman. It all started at the young age of fifteen, when Philippe would photograph friends and family with his father’s 9x12-cm view camera, developing the glass plate “miracles” in the family’s bathroom sink. Even in these early years, using rudimentary equipment, it was evident Halsman had a gift and would leave a definitive mark on the photographic industry. With his ability to capture the true spirit of the subject and his advanced technical abilities, his career was destined to be nothing short of successful (B. Johnson 180).
It is rather ironic that she writes that her husband's death in Mrs. Mallard's case gives a sense of new found freedom and that the path that led to a `freedom for Kate' led Kate to write about a certain type of freedom for Mrs. Mallard. In a sense this seems a genesis of what is the path of a woman pursuing feminism without knowing what it is. We can see this when Mrs. Mallard is alone and looking out the window in her room and the text speaks to us.
Mrs. Mallard?s freedom did not last but a few moments. Her reaction to the news of the death of her husband was not the way most people would have reacted. We do not know much about Mr. And Mrs. Mallards relationship. We gather from the text that her freedom must have been limited in some way for her to be feeling this way. Years ago women were expected to act a certain way and not to deviate from that. Mrs. Mallard could have been very young when she and Brently were married. She may not have had the opportunity to see the world through a liberated woman?s eyes and she thought now was her chance.
Mrs. Mallard’s repressed married life is a secret that she keeps to herself. She is not open and honest with her sister Josephine who has shown nothing but concern. This is clearly evident in the great care that her sister and husband’s friend Richard show to break the news of her husband’s tragic death as gently as they can. They think that she is so much in love with him that hearing the news of his death would aggravate her poor heart condition and lead to death. Little do they know that she did not love him dearly at all and in fact took the news in a very positive way, opening her arms to welcome a new life without her husband. This can be seen in the fact that when she storms into her room and her focus shifts drastically from that of her husband’s death to nature that is symbolic of new life and possibilities awaiting her. Her senses came to life; they come alive to the beauty in the nature. Her eyes could reach the vastness of the sky; she could smell the delicious breath of rain in the air; and ears became attentive to a song f...
Mallard realizes that her husband has died, she realizes that she is free, something which was unusual for women in the mid 1800’s. She said it over and over under her breath: “`free, free, free! `” (151). Her husband’s death represents a new life for Mrs. Mallard. Mark, Cunningham notes, “Mary E. Papke has noted that the reader learns Louise’s first name only after Louise accepts her `new consciousness` of freedom; before that Louise is Mrs. Mallard” (1).
Mrs. Mallard is an ill woman who is “afflicted with heart trouble” and had to be told very carefully by her sister and husband’s friend that her husband had died (1609). Her illness can be concluded to have been brought upon her by her marriage. She was under a great amount of stress from her unwillingness to be a part of the relationship. Before her marriage, she had a youthful glow, but now “there was a dull stare in her eyes” (1610). Being married to Mr. Mallard stifled the joy of life that she once had. When she realizes the implications of her husband’s death, she exclaims “Free! Body and soul free!” (1610). She feels as though a weight has been lifted off her shoulders and instead of grieving for him, she rejoices for herself. His death is seen as the beginn...
Another example of how Mrs. Mallard was more uplifted than brought down by the news of her husband?s death is the description of the window. As Mrs. Mallard looks out Chopin explains ?she could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all a quiver with new life?. This is telling the reader about the new life that Mrs. Mallard can see in the distance that symbolizes the new life she saw that lay ahead of her now that she was free of her husband. This thought being supported by Hicks in saying "The revalation of freedom occurs in the bedroom"
Her sister, Josephine, broke the news to her “in broken sentences, veiled hints that revealed in half concealing”. After hearing of her husband’s death, Mrs. Mallard locks herself in her room to mourn. She sits in a chair facing an open window and begins to sob. As she sat gazing at an open patch of blue sky, a thought started to come to her. “Free, free, free!” escapes her lips.
Mallard’s emotions over the presumed death of her husband. The author used both dramatic and situational irony to mislead the reader and surprise them with a plot twist ending. By utilizing both external and internal conflict the author expresses the internal debate of Mrs. Mallard’s true feelings and those of the people around her. The author used symbolism to display Mrs. Mallard’s desire for freedom from her marriage. In the end it was not joy that killed Mrs. Mallard but the realization that she lost her
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...
As seen in paintings of battle scenes and portraits of wealthy Renaissance aristocracy, people have always strived to preserve and document their existence. The creation of photography was merely the logical continuum of human nature’s innate desire to preserve the past, as well as a necessary reaction to a world in a stage of dramatic and irreversible change. It is not a coincidence that photography arose in major industrial cities towards the end of the nineteenth century.
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.