Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American agriculture 1860-1900
American agriculture 1860-1900
How has farming changed in america since 1900
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hannah Tate
Dennis
ENG 112. 4401
01 March 2016
Film Analysis
Food, Inc is a documentary directed by Robert Kenner and co-produced by Eric Schlosser that was released in 2009. The purpose of this film is to inform how the food industry has changed from farmers making products to companies controlling them on how to mass produce. This new way of farming that is unhealthy to Americans and it is also harmful for the animals that have to live in unsanitary conditions. Food, Inc is an effective film because it shows how the companies have taken over the control of farmers in the food industry by mass producing foods and how these foods could have negative effects on humans and animals. Food, Inc is an effective film because it encourages Americans
…show more content…
to be more conscious about what they eat and by eating locally made food. The director, Robert Kenner was inspired to produce Food, Inc after reading Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser. This film aims towards Americans that are not informed about what goes into their food and those that are interested in learning about how their food is made. Eric Schlosser states that, “the industry doesn’t want you to know what you are eating because if you did, you may not want to eat it” (Food, Inc). This is just one of the flaws in the food industry that Robert Kenner explains during the movie. In this film, Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation, explains that even though a “typical supermarket has 47,000 products, only 4-5 companies make these products” (Food, Inc).
This represents how much the food industry has changed over the years. The film shows two statistics that in “1970, companies controlled 25% of the market”, but “now they own 80% of the market” (Food, Inc). This goes on to show just how much companies are more involved in production of products than ever before. This movie points out to fast food chains have influenced how our food is produced. Robert Kenner believes that the industrial food industry began when McDonalds started cutting down their menu and began using assembly lines and low pay for their workers. After McDonalds became a success, it shaped how our food is being made by big …show more content…
companies. In Food Inc, Robert Kenner, explores the argument of the food industry through interviewing farmers, advocates, and employees of companies on their opinion on the food industry.
This documentary uses pathos to show animal cruelty in the food industry, such as cutting off beaks off chickens and beating cows. This movie presents the flaws in the food industry of not responding to cases of E. Coli and Salmonella outbreaks. In the ending scene, it presents information to viewers to make a change about how they eat. For example, eating organic foods, going to farmer’s markets, and providing ideas for food safety measures for farmers, employees, and for animals that are being mistreated in the food industry. Throughout the movie, Robert Kenner showed footages of animals being abused.
About 50 years ago, chicken would be in houses for 3 months, but now they are only there for about 47 days before they are slaughtered. In the “Unhealthy Meat Market”, Nicholas Kristof states that “chicken are bred to grow huge breasts so that as adults they topple forward and can barely breathe or stand” (2). This is true in the film because there it shows footages of chickens that are so big that they plop on the ground and die because they can not handle their weight. This article compares to the movie because it explains that these animals are given antibiotics and hormone so they can grow
faster. As I was watching Food, Inc, I was shocked by what the animals have to live in and how they are slaughtered. I was shocked by how employees and farmers by these companies were throwing chickens into a transport truck. I was surprised by the conditions that these animals live in. For example, they do not see sunlight, they are cramped together and are being forced to eat and get so big that they can not move. Before watching this movie, I knew that these animals were cramped together into houses and slaughtered as they get to a certain weight. However, I did not know about farmers are being hired by these companies to produce their food and do not receive a lot of money for investing in these houses for animals. I was also surprised by how many cases of E. Coli and Salmonella are and how a company took two weeks to recall a product. After watching this film, I will be more consciously aware of what I eat by looking at labels and buying more locally made foods. Today in the food industry, farmers are being taken advantage of because they are hired by companies and are being controlled by how they raise their food. About 50 years ago, food used to be made by farmers. Now it has shifted to companies making the food by mass producing, such as assembly lines, and are taking the ability for farmers to take profit for making their food. At the end of this film, they provided ways on how people can be more conscious of what they are eating. Food, Inc is an effective film because it demonstrates how the companies that are mass producing are affecting the lives of consumers
Food Inc. addresses many political issues during the film to draw in the audience. Issues such as: the environment, education, workers’ rights, health care, climate change, energy control, to name a few. Director Robert Kenner exposes secrets about the foods society eats, where the food has come from and the processes the food went through. It is these issues that are used as politics of affect in both an extreme visual representation and a strong audio representation that has the biggest impact on the audience and their connection to what they are being told. This paper aims to discuss the film Food Inc. and the propaganda message for positive change, as well as, the differences between seeing food and deciding...
is a great documentary that uses pathos, ethos, and logos, it is very easy while watching this film to agree with the all of the points made and opinions formed. However, this is a very biased documentary that does not necessarily tell the entire story behind these company’s business plans or ideas. Major companies such as Tyson, Perdue, and McDonalds all declined to interview for this film. By doing this, the viewer automatically forms a negative opinion and assumes that Food Inc. is correct in its claims. Also, this film uses an overwhelming use of pathos. As stated previously, the death of Barbara Kowalcyk’s son Kevin was life changing and tragic. However, the film abused the element of pathos by showing the home video of Kevin happily playing with family and some of his last moments before his death. This is a very one-sided documentary that does a great job of persuading the viewer to change or strengthen its opinion on the food
In the documentary, Food Inc., we get an inside look at the secrets and horrors of the food industry. The director, Robert Kenner, argues that most Americans have no idea where their food comes from or what happens to it before they put it in their bodies. To him, this is a major issue and a great danger to society as a whole. One of the conclusions of this documentary is that we should not blindly trust the food companies, and we should ultimately be more concerned with what we are eating and feeding to our children. Through his investigations, he hopes to lift the veil from the hidden world of food.
...es of cattle, which resulted in the increase of suicidal reports. Slaughterhouses and meatpacking companies have amplified the amount of cattle slaughtered each hour to fulfill the amount of meat consumed in the United States due to the cause of fast food. The damage that fast food had placed on illegal immigrant workers and sanitary workers that are employed in slaughterhouses are as much as murdering the men and women, minute by minute. The growth of fast food is too fast for our voices to be heard and fast food had implemented too much innovation in agriculture today for us to fix. We can still change the society that we live in today, as long as we withdraw our arrogant and selfish thoughts on fast food and think of ways to improve and recover what the fast food industry had done.
Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,
The article highlights and includes the documentary Food, Inc. which exposes the inability of the profit system to provide safe and healthy food for the vast majority of the population. Eric Schlosser investigating journalist quotes, “The way we eat has changed more in the last 50 years than in the previous 10,000…now our food is coming from enormous assembly lines where animals and the workers are being abused, and the food has become much more dangerous in ways that are deliberately hidden from us”. Schlosser also quotes, “Birds are now raised and slaughtered in half the time they were 50 years ago, but now they’re twice as big”. He believes they not only changed the chicken, but they changed the farmer implying that capitalism has taken the place for the need of small scale farming. In addition, Michael Pollan also a journalist believes that the vast array of choices which appears in everyday supermarkets is nothing but an “illusion of diversity”. The advancement of technology and how consumers react to products has been further developed and continues to be in this generation. Food scientists are now genetically modifying and engineering products to satisfy and manipulate consumers to desire more of these unhealthy product choices. The biggest advance in recent years has
Nutritionism and Today’s Diet Nutritionism is the ideology that the nutritional value of a food is the sum of all its individual nutrients, vitamins, and other components. In the book, “In Defense of Food” by Michael Pollan, he critiques scientists and government recommendations about their nutritional advice. Pollan presents a strong case pointing out the many flaws and problems that have risen over the years of following scientific studies and government related warnings on the proper amount of nutrients needed for a healthy diet. Pollan’s main point is introducing science into our food system has had more of a negative impact than a positive one, we should go back to eating more of a traditional diet. I believe food science has given us
Michael Pollan makes arguments concerning the eating habits of the average American. Pollan suggests, in spite of our cultural norms, we should simply “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly Plants.”
“If you live in a free market and a free society, shouldn’t you have the right to know what you’re buying? It’s shocking that we don’t and it’s shocking how much is kept from us” (Kenner). For years, the American public has been in the dark about the conditions under which the meat on their plate was produced. The movie, Food Inc. uncovers the harsh truths about the food industry. This shows that muckraking is still an effective means of creating change as shown by Robert Kenner’s movie, Food Inc. and the reforms to the food industry that followed its release.
Food Inc. is a great documentary film. It describes the grave health risk of the top food industries and plants. These food industries also practices animal cruelty. Different disease breakouts has occurred since the engineering of food production began. Many have died because of the greed of the new age food production.
There are many debates around the world about the topic of animal abuse. Animal abuse in the food industry has become a major problem due to the cruel treatment of animals. Most of the world's population might think that animal cruelty is only found in homes and on the street, but they forget about the other forms of animal abuse that affect the food industry. Large contributors to animal abuse are due to fishing methods, animal testing, and slaughterhouses. "Animals have always been a major part of our society in history and they have played huge roles in agriculture" (ASPCA). Factory farming is a system of confining chickens, pigs, and cattle under strictly controlled conditions. Slaughterhouses are places where animals are killed
One example of how the food industry is ruthless is when one of the CEOs of a fast-food chain states they are part of the problem is hired immediately. Though I don’t not find this wrong because if I was a stock-holder with my life savings invested within his company I would without a doubt have him fired for placing my money at risk. That is the harsh reality of economics, you cannot place you company in shock by either a damaging statement or bad executive move. I found most disturbing about the movie was how a case was being made against McDonalds that two obese teens did not know fast-food was unhealthy (Spurlock). Regardless of how they lived word of mouth had to have taught them fast food is not healthy, and if that didn’t health education has been in place for years now teaching us
This book is a life changing book. It was inspirational, informative and gave you insight about the things we do not know about the food we eat. The documentary was graphic and detailed, informing you of the process from the farm or the fields, to the manufactures, to the labeling and packaging companies. It informed me, about the school lunches, how some of the meals at school are made, to the politics behind it. This book is also a collectible.
Factory farms have portrayed cruelty to animals in a way that is horrific; unfortunately the public often does not see what really goes on inside these “farms.” In order to understand the conditions present in these factory farms, it must first be examined what the animals in these factory farms are eating. Some of the ingredients commonly used in feeding the animals inside factory farms include the following: animal byproducts, plastic, drugs and chemicals, excessive grains, and meat from members of the same species. (Adams, 2007) These animals are tortured and used for purely slaughter in order to be fed on. Typically large numbers of animals are kept in closed and tight confinements, having only little room to move around, if even that. These confinements can lead to suffocation and death and is not rare. Evidence fr...
... and nutritious experience by giving people actual experience to see, feel and taste what is nutrition about (Hegler, 2010).