Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mill's definition of utilitarianism
Summary of aristotle virtue of ethics
Summary of aristotle virtue of ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mill's definition of utilitarianism
Imagine coming home one day after school and going to fix a glass of ice cold water. However, when you turn on the water faucet you first see brown water, and then you smell a disgusting aroma. In my paper I will incorporate Mill’s and Aristotle’s views on the Flint Water Crisis. I will use Mill’s view on utility judgement to refute Governor Snyder’s decision, and the use of his business methods. There will be a detailed timeline to illustrate the situations that led to the Flint Water Crisis. I am going to explain some reasons why Mill’s Utilitarianism is an efficient way for government to understand its ethics.
Is it possible for an action that makes you happy mean less compared to an action that will make the society happy? In this essay
…show more content…
I am going to focus on the Flint, Michigan Water Crisis. I am also going to focus on the importance of thinking of happiness as a community or aggregate, as opposed to an individual scale. I believe Mill’s theory would not have supported the Flint Water Crisis 1rst Flint Water Crisis Facts The Flint Water Crisis was bound to happen when Michigan took over Flint’s budget in 2011. In that year Governor Snyder appointed a new EFM to handle Flint’s budget. The EFM’s main purpose was to cut the budget for Flint. A way to cut the budget was to stop paying Detroit for Lake Huron water and start using Flint River Water. Flint water needed to go through an Anti-Corrosion Treatment. However, the water treatment would have costed the state about $100 a day. According to experts this treatment would have prevented 90% of Flint’s future water problems. This combatting problem with Flint’s water went on for about three years. In April 2014, Flint River officially becomes Flint’s new water source. This change of water supply was only supposed to be for the short-term. There was a “state-run” supply line to Lake Huron that was ready for connection in about two years. This span of two years was definitely not for the short-term. Also, the government officials knew that the Flint River was 19 times more corrosive than Lake Huron. Flint officials publicly drink Flint River water to supposedly show that they trusted the water. The officials drinking the water should be cancelled out because you don’t get sick from drinking the water one time. You get sick from drinking the water and showering with it daily. In May 2014, the water crisis had escalated for the civilians of Flint, Michigan. The problem was that the water was running brown, stinky, and tasted terrible. According to Thesaintaq.com, “From John Stuart Mill to Howard Zinn to Carole Pateman, one common theme continually appears in the philosophy we study: the people must always be questioning and challenging their government.” The civilians of Flint began to confront the government about their tainted water. “Of course, government officials are compelled to respond to public outcry, and despite the maxim that ethics cannot be legislated, it remains relatively expedient and politically attractive to respond to business scandal by increasing the sanctions for abusive or deceptive business conduct.” In Jan 2014, Detroit saw the Flint water problem and offered to help. The way they wanted to help was by reconnecting Flint to its water supply and waive the $4 million connection fee. Flint’s Emer. Manga. Jerry Ambrose declines Detroit’s offer. Although the $4 million is waived there will still be a $1 million a month fee to buy water from them. Jerry Ambrose did not think his decision through, because it costs the city more to fix the water issue on their own. In February 2016, the Environment Protection Agency and the Michigan Department of Environment Quality met to talk about the high levels of lead in Flint’ water. In July, there was an Environment Protection Agency internal memo leaked. This memo showed that there were high levels of lead found in a Flint woman’s home. The lead levels were definitely high enough that they would give her son lead poisoning. No parent should have to worry about the necessity of having clean running water in their home. Water is definitely the foundation for all human beings. The human body is made up of more than 70% of water. Your body needs water to function correctly, and flush out the bad toxins in your body. There is this unspoken rule that Mill believes people should abide by. This rule is “To do as one would be done by, and to love one’s neighbor as oneself constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality (pg. 296 Utilitarianism).” If Governor Snyder did not want to drink the water then why would he allow for it to be drank by the citizens? In September 2015, there was a pediatrician that ran tests on children and found lead in their blood. The pediatrician’s name was Dr. Mona Attisha. Her results showed that the percentage of lead found in Flint’s children had doubled in the recent times. “When (my research team and I) saw that it was getting into children and when we knew the consequences, that’s when I think we began not to sleep,” Hanna-Attisha said. The pipes had become damaged by the water and that went into the children’s system. Those children are going to suffer for something that they had no control over. The other sad part is that the community of Flint still had to pay their water bills. They were paying for water that they could not use. Info about Water Laws There are rules, regulations, and laws about the standards for water in communities. These laws are set for the government to abide by them to help their communities. “The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters.” The necessity of clean water is of high importance. I firmly believe that having access to clean water is needed. I drink a lot of water every day and I would be devastated if I was not able to have access to it. Counterargument 2-3 paragraphs Aristotle’s view Aristotle believes that politics should serve the needs of the community.
The need in this instance was healthy water. “For though this good is the same for the individual and the state, yet the good of the state seems a grander and more perfect thing both to attain and to secure; and glad as one would be to do this service for a single individual. To do it for a people and for a number of states is nobler and more divine (The Nicomachean Ethics pg. 64).” Aristotle wants us all to aim for happiness, but there are exceptions to his
Governor Snyder was not focused on wealth in terms of money. “For it (wealth) is merely useful as a means to something else (The Nicomachean Ethics pg. 67).” He was focused on wealth in terms of prestige, honor, and political superiority. There has to be rules for government officials that prohibits them from hurting the people they work for. Aristotle would say that Governor Snyder was putting the wealth as the end and not happiness. “Happiness seems more than anything else to answer to the description for we always choose it for itself, and never for the sake of something else; while honor and pleasure… we choose for the sake of happiness (The Nicomachean Ethics pg.
67).” Mill View: Governor Snyder’s occupation is to govern the city of Flint, Michigan. This entails him to provide a safe environment for the people of Flint, Michigan. Governors are supposed serve the citizens that are in the state they work for. To serve is to ensure the well-being of the citizens, and this includes making sacrifices for the citizens. According to Mill, “The utilitarian morality does recognize in human beings the power of sacrificing their own greatest good for the good of others. It only refuses to admit that the sacrifice is itself a good (pg. 296 Utilitarianism).” Governor Snyder would have increased the sum of total happiness for Flint if he would have made the sacrifice to “go over” the budget. His plan to cut the budget ended up backfiring because now the city is not only spending more money on the water, but the citizens are really sick. When you make decisions in life it is best to take into account what the end result of your actions will be. Every action in this world has a reaction to it. For example, an action may be you throwing a piece of plastic into the ocean. The reaction will be that eventually that plastic will end up around a turtle’s neck. This will cause the turtle to have lacerations to its neck. In the Flint case the action was avoiding the apparent signs that the Flint River water was not suitable for anyone to ingest. The reaction was highly corrosive water that was definitely not transparent. Water should definitely be transparent and not have a brownish color. The world is an open system and we are all little factors of this system. When we as individuals do not cooperate together then issues arise like the Flint Water Crisis. “Should so use that power as to establish in the mind of every individual an indissoluble association between his own happiness and the good of the whole; especially between his own happiness and the practice of such modes of conduct, negative and positive, as regard for the universal happiness prescribes (pg. 297 Utilitarianism).” We cannot focus on ourselves only because we all have a part in this movie called “The World”. I believe Mill thinks that governors are supposed
William James once said that “Action may not bring happiness but there is no happiness without action." Everyone living in a society we live in today are putting in efforts to obtain happiness. Many individuals will pursue that happiness while others will compromise it. To achieve happiness, everyone has their own methods, but sometimes it will not work, when you realize you can’t always have what you want. In the text To Kill A Mockingbird and the Shakespearean play Romeo and Juliet, Harper Lee and Shakespeare developed the idea that every individual pursue or compromise happiness differently because we have different beliefs and values that shapes our identities. Compromise can seem like a negative thing, but in some situations it is crucial to happiness. It is not possible to always everything you want in life but the desire of pursuing happiness provide individuals with more satisfaction than compromising happiness.
In contrast to Aristotle, Roko Belic’s documentary “Happy” provides a fresh perspective that takes place far more recently. The film sets out to similar goals of Aristotle in defining the nature of happiness and exploring what makes different people happy in general. Unlike Aristotle, however, the film’s main argument refers to makes people happier. In this case, the film argues that merely “doing what you love” is what leads to happiness (Belic). The argument itself appears oddly self-serving, considering that message is what underlines the foundation of happiness, yet there is a subliminal message that a simpler lifestyle is what leads to what the film is trying to convince you of. The message itself is obviously addressed to Americans, considering
Ending homelessness will be a huge challenge for Flint/Genesee County just like it will be for the rest of the U.S (Walker S & Hutchison, n.d). This is because of the economic conditions that continue to decline while communities struggle with increased unemployment, dilapidated housing and shortage of affordable housing. Flint/Genesee County faces a crisis because of the declining job markets as a result of jobs that are either closing or relocating, which include Delphi or General Motors plants, which are located in the county. Unemployment remains one of the main causes of homelessness. Other causes include lack of harmonization in the discharge policy between the county and the state, insufficient affordable and safe housing, cuts in funding, local government’s lack of commitment and decline in available private resources have also contributed greatly. 30% of all the housing stock in the City of Flint is in rundown condition.
In conclusion, i don’t think that we are happy. I think that most people just say they are happy but are actually discontent. The people I talked about in this essay show that today in our world we are not very happy. It is kind of scary to find out that you have to question if you are really happy. So ask yourself right now if you think you are happy, or are you actually sad inside.
Society pressure themselves to be happy; they often ask questions like, “does that make you happy?” What they fail to understand is that sometimes doing the right thing, for the moment, might not seem to bring happiness in one’s life, but after trekking the ups and downs of life, happiness might be waiting on the other side. From time to time people also judge good and bad through happiness. “If something is good, we feel good. If something is
The Flint water crisis would be one of the most critical things today in michigan. It’s critical for young children not to get lead exposure they should be screened from the lead and lead levels in children's bodies as well. (National Center for Healthy Housing) The water needs to be treated with which it will increase the corrosiveness and potentially further erode any lead piping. (Duke) The People in Flint are a facing with not be able to drink water, and shower. All of these things that happened are critical factors of what is happening in the Flint water crisis today. (Reveal)
The struggle between happiness and society shows a society where true happiness has been forfeited to form a perfect order.
The water crisis in Flint Michigan began as early as was as April of 2014. The crisis is concerning a small town called Flint, located at the bottom right of michigan were the majority of the population is African American. The issue began when the town 's water supply witch in past use to come from the detroit river water supply was switched over to the Flint river water supply. People soon began to complain about the taste, smell, and color of the tap water, and of symptoms such as hair loss and rashes from bathing in the water. Even though there were many signs that the water was indeed contaminated, such as when a General Motors plant in Flint stopped using municipal water in October of 2014, claiming that it corroded car parts, the government officials stated that the water was not a threat to the public 's health and safety. However it was later revealed that the water was in fact unhealthy, and contained too much lead. The issue was brought to the eyes of the public when Lee Anne Walters, a Flint resident. This mother of four had seen her family suffer from various alarming symptoms, including abdominal pains, hair loss, and rashes; she also has a son who showed signs of developmental problems. She decided to switch her family to bottled water, and the symptoms abated. Finally, in February of 2015, she demanded that the city test the tap water. A federal investigation was launched and the results came back shocking. The water was extremely toxic containing 400 parts per billion of lead. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), there is no safe level of lead in drinking water, but the maximum allowed by law is 15 parts per billion. Virginia Tech professor and engineer Marc Edwards, an expert on municipal w...
In conclusion, Aristotle’s elucidation of happiness is based on a ground of ethics because happiness to him is coveted for happiness alone. The life of fame and fortune is not the life for Aristotle. Happiness is synonymous for living well. To live well is to live with virtue. Virtue presents humans with identification for morals, and for Aristotle, we choose to have “right” morals. Aristotle defines humans by nature to be dishonored when making a wrong decision. Thus, if one choses to act upon pleasure, like John Stuart Mill states, for happiness, one may choose the wrong means of doing so. Happiness is a choice made rationally among many pickings to reach this state of mind. Happiness should not be a way to “win” in the end but a way to develop a well-behaved, principled reputation.
Cahn, Steven M., and Peter J. Markie. "John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism; Chapter 2: What Utilitarianism Is." 2009. Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. 4th ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2009. 330-41. Print.
Imagine a child living in a hot, government owned apartment in Chicago. He has no father. With his single, jobless mother he struggles to the words of the founding fathers: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable Rights; that among these, are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness...” (The Declaration of Independence). This is one of the most famous phrases in the US Declaration of Independence and has become the underpinning of the dreams of millions of people around the world. Although the words are different, these sentiments are reflected in the political and economical policies of many democracies. While the notion of ‘happiness for all’ seems like the obvious solution to many of our persistent problems, we inevitably encounter conflicts between our actions and our morals. “The state is based on……the contradiction between public and private life, between universal and particular interests. For this reason, the state must confine itself to formal, negative activities.”(Marx, 1992). This essay focuses on the issues of a prominent theory, Utilitarianism as it blends and encompasses both areas of Economics and Ethics which have become the basis of our governmental bodies.
In its political philosophy utilitarianism provides an alternative to theories of natural law and the social contract by basing the authority of government and the sanctity of individual rights upon their utility, or measure of happiness gained. As an egalitarian doctrine, where everyone’s happiness counts equally, the rational, relatively straightforward nature of utilitarianism offers an attractive model for democratic government. It offers practical methods for deciding the morally right course of action - “...an action is right as it tends to promote happiness, wrong as it tends to diminish it, for the party whose interests are in question” (Bentham, 1780). To discover what we should do in a given situation, we identify the various courses of action that we could take, then determine any foreseeable benefits and harms to all affected by the ramifications of our decision. In fact, some of the early pioneers of utilitarianism, such as Bentham and Mill, campaigned for equality in terms of women's suffrage, decriminalization of homosexuality, and abolition of slavery (Boralevi, 1984). Utilitarianism seems to support democracy as one could interpret governments working to promote the public interest and welfare of citizens as striving for liberty for the greatest amount of people. While utilitarianism at its heart is a theory that calls for progressive social change through peaceful political processes, there are some difficulties in relying on it as the sole method for moral decision-making. In this essay I will assess the effectiveness of utilitarianism as a philosophy of government by examining the arguments against it.
Happiness is not easy to define. A good life has one characteristic – happiness. Happiness can be defined as pleasure, joy, contentment and satisfaction. Understandings of how to be happy were changing throughout the history. Aristotle who lived in 4th century BC in Athens and Schopenhauer who is19th century philosopher from Germany have contrasting understanding of happiness. In this essay I will argue that Aristotle and Schopenhauer provide accounts of happiness that are useful to contemporary society. The reason for this is that happiness is universal and people’s ways to achieve it did not changed tremendously over times.
As of this year, nearly 1.1 billion people live without clean drinking water and 2.6 billion live without adequate water sanitation. The McDonald's down the street, however, will sell you a 1/3 pounder burger for only 150 gallons. Changes in lifestyle can easily reduce this number and help not only save water, but money as well. Currently, with our diminishing water supply, one of the main goals of humanitarian organizations is ensuring that everyone has the right and equality to water. With global access to water, it reduces the responsibility for political tension between countries fighting to literally stay alive.
Aristotle argues that being happy is also being good. Once you have achieved happiness that is the end, and because it is something final it should be where all actions aim. Aristotle says that this is a truism, meaning that of course we should always aim to be happy because it is supreme good. The idea behind this links back to virtue and why being virtuous leads to happiness. Each individual has different abilities and skills which will lead to their own specific type of happiness. Happiness does not come in the same form for everybody, but ultimately when one is excellent at what they do, they will achieve happiness. In this paper, I will explain why the virtuous life is the equivalent of the happy life.