Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The main theme of the truth about stories
The truth about stories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The main theme of the truth about stories
"Story-truth is sometimes truer than happening-truth." (171) When most people read this quote in Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, they think story truth is emotional truth while happening truth refers to the facts and reality. But beneath the surface we see that the truth is never actually told. No matter how you tell a story the actual truth will never be revealed. The actual truth is for our own sense of self.
Throughout the story “The Lives of the Dead”, O’Brien recalls his history with Linda, his first love. “[Linda] wore a new red cap…very unusual.” (217) O’Brien has no idea what is going on with Linda at this point in time, but the cap is clearly hiding the truth. It is not until later, when Nick Veenhof sneakily lifted off the cap that Linda’s head is revealed with “[a] smooth, pale, translucent white.” (222) The whiteness of Linda’s head seems to be in reference to a blank slate; the purity of Linda, but more so the truth. If O’Brien wrote that her head was tan or didn’t even refer to the nature of the color of her head, then we wouldn’t have read closely into this passage.
But if you continue reading, we come across this: “[t]here was a large Band-Aid at the back of her head” (222) which can be interpreted as covering up the remaining truth. From this moment on, we can assume that Linda has some sort of fatal disease and it is confirmed later in the chapter. But what we don’t know is how she got it, when she got it, why she got it (genetic or just random), or more importantly, what she is thinking throughout this process. This Band-Aid covers up the remaining answers we have from this point on about Linda. And since she does not speak because Timmy and Linda have a “pure knowing” (218) of each other, ...
... middle of paper ...
...rite about Linda to rid his memory of the horridness that she went through the day her cap was removed and the visual truth came out.
The truth is glorified and considered moral, but if we know that someone will not understand the truth (which happens in most cases), then we tend to bend it. But how flexible is the truth? The expression of stretching the truth is very relevant in Tim O’Brien’s case. In The Things They Carried, he knows the truth about his characters and his stories, but he stretches the truth continuously throughout his novel and especially with Linda in his dreams. He is not trying to deceive us. He is actually trying to do the opposite and try to get us to understand the truth, not so much know the truth. Understanding the truth is not overrated, it is just not fit for words or even expressions. The truth is not for anyone, but yourself.
Tim O’Brien’s ultimate purpose is to detract the fine line between fiction and reality. In order to fully grasp what a true war story consists of, the definition of true must be deciphered. O’Brien seems to believe that it does not need to be pure facts. Instead, it is mostly found in the imagination of the individual. Readers need to receive a story based on the truth in its overall purpose and meaning. It just needs to feel true. The author implies that it is not important whether the event actually occurred or not, because if the reader wants to believe it that badly, the feeling of truth will always be present.
In the ted Talk video, Elizabeth Loftus tells her viewers an interesting fact, not all memory is true. It is a proven fact that the brain sometimes has blanks while recalling a memory. The brain subconsciously makes up a false memory to go in this lost memories place. In the novel The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, O’Brien tells what the reader thinks are true war stories. While reading the book, the reader soon finds out that this novel is full of false memories. Not only does Tim O’Brien use false memories, but he uses other ways to present the story as well. Tim O’Brien uses the way he portrays his story to explain what he went through and to tell this traumatic story through the story truth and the happening truth.
One of the later entries in the book called “Good form”, helps alleviate the suspicion of dishonesty in the stories by bluntly telling the reader that all the other entries are a mix of both fact and fiction. O’Brien feels the need to make up parts of his stories due to the fact that he wants the reader to experience emotions as opposed to mental visuals. He describes these emotion-laden scenes as “story-truth” due to the fact that they are part story and part truth. The parts that are only for emotio...
The truth is subjective and how we see the truth impacts the way we understand meaning. Each individual’s memory is a result of what they deem to be true. Sarah Polley questions this concept through her film ‘Stories We Tell’ and brings to light the topic of reliability and subjectivity in terms of memory and the truth.
Storytelling is a way of expressing one’s imagination through fanciful adventures and serve a variety of purposes. One important reason is to capture a special moment and endure it but mostly because it unites us and of course entertains us. In Yann Martel’s Life of Pi, and Tim Burton’s The Big Fish, storytelling is seen as more important than the truth. Throughout the novel Life of Pi, and the film The Big Fish, it can be argued that the truth is intertwined with the lies in each story to form a new kind of truth. An example of this would be when Pi retells his story to the two Japanese men in a way in which he makes the animals human and introduces a different version of the truth. Both the film and movie also share a unique way of story telling because what they both share is a common moral “quest” which involves the main character, who is usually the hero, must overcome challenges in order to achieve a goal or reward at the end.
At the end of the book Lennie killed curlys wife and George killed him but did he have a valid reason to kill him. George killed Lennie out of friendship if George hadn’t killed him then the others especially curly would have tortured him or killed him much slowly and painfully. George did a mercy killing by shooting Lennie in the head so that his death was quick, sudden and painless a much better death than torture.
How can one tell if something is true or not? How can one tell if what you hear or read is pure fiction or reality? These are questions I often asked myself when I read “The Things they Carried” by Tim O’Brien. You begin to ask these questions throughout the book, but begin to realize that these types of questions don't matter. What matters is the deeper meaning that the author is trying to convey. O’Brien often describes this as “accurate representation,” he does this throughout his book within his portrayals of each individual story or character. What I mean by this is that the author gives a truthful story of what happened, he may add a few extra details, but at the end it is the truth in the way he perceives it and the way he wants his
1. Growing up we all heard stories. Different types of stories, some so realistic, we cling onto them farther into our lives. Stories let us see and even feel the world in different prespectives, and this is becuase of the writter or story teller. We learn, survive and entertain our selves using past experiences, which are in present shared as stories. This is why Roger Rosenblatt said, "We are a narrative species."
...story telling of the reality they see every day. Nonetheless, many of these narratives of their own life are either completely false or highly exaggerated.
1. When O'Brien writes that "story-truth is truer sometimes than happening truth," he is claiming that the nature of truth is subjective. This applies to war stories, which he claims that if they have a moral, it is untrue. O'Brien states "It's a question of credibility. Often the crazy stuff is true and the normal stuff isn't, because the normal stuff is necessary to make you believe the truly incredible craziness" (O'Brien 68), meaning even true stories will throw in lies to make it more believable. O'Brien encourages skepticism of war stories, saying at the end it comes down to gut instinct on whether believing a story is true or not. War stories with morals are the most likely to be untrue, because war is hell and should not encourage virtue or models of human behavior. O'Brien tells an example
Lennie was saved from a situation he wouldn’t want to be in, a situation even George could not help him. After he accidentally killed Curly’s wife, Lennie knew he was in trouble. Lennie remembered what he was supposed to do when he got in trouble go to the brush by the river bank. When Curly found out Lennie killed his wife he used this chance to kill Lennie
...erstanding this “truth” is to not just simply look for one given truth but analyze the whole story and see it from many different perspectives. There is no one absolute truth. I have watched this movie three times and I still haven’t able to figure out if he is Sammy or if it was his wife who was diabetic or the fact that is teddy really John G.? There is so much that one could predict and interpret and I think that’s exactly what Christopher Nolan aimed for.
O’Brien subjectifies truth by obscuring both fact and fiction within his storytelling. In each story he tells there is some fuzziness in what actually happened. There are two types of truths in this novel, “story-truth” and “happening-truth” (173). “Happening-truth” is what happened in the moment and “story-truth” is the way the storyteller reflects and interprets a situation. O’Brien uses these two types of truths to blur out the difference between fact and fiction. For example, when Rat Kiley tells a story he always overexaggerates. He does this because “he wanted to heat up the truth, to make it burn so hot that you would feel exactly what he felt,” (85). This is the same for most storytellers, even O’Brien. When he tells the story of Norman Bowker he makes his own truth stating, “He did not freeze up or lose the Silver Star for valor. That part of the story is my own” (154). Not everything that O’Brien said was fact, however, it made the the meaning of the story effective and significant. O’Brien reveals that he never killed a man after devoting a whole short story to “The Man I Killed.” When his daughter asks “Daddy, tell the truth, did you ever kill anybody?” he can honestly say “Of course not,” or “Yes,” (172). This illustrates the subjectivity of truth, how both truths can in fact be true. This goes for all the stories told in this novel, the truth is held in the storyteller 's
The topic of truth in itself is a paradox; if telling someone the truth will hurt him, then is it worth lying to him, creating a false reality to be comforted by? In the short story “Like the Sun” by R.K. Narayan, the theme is that similar to the sun, truth cannot be directly seen without being hurt.
"It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit."-Noel Coward. The truth can be disguised and deceit can take its place which leads to misinterpretations and misconceptions. In Shakespeare's comedy known as Twelfth Night, the idea of deceit and misconceptions is all throughout the play. In one way or another, the truth is disguised. Shakespeare shows that misconception and misinterpretation don't always end in a good way, but sometimes have happy endings.