Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics in finance case study
Ethics in finance case study
Improve ethics in finance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One character in Flash Boys that is portrayed as moral is Brad Katsuyama. Brad started his career at the Royal Bank of Canada and did very well for himself. At RBC, Brad was able to establish himself as a good trader, but the bank itself attempted to do moral business. Early on, Brad comments that RBC had a “no-asshole rule” where the company turned down Wall Street guys that seemed to be typically obnoxious, thus giving RBC the nickname “RBC nice” (26). Later on, it became clear to Brad that most people working in this field had little “knowledge about high-frequency trading, he was not vain and did not focus too much on money. Even after the 2008 financial crisis when Brad thought about quitting Wall Street, he said that “his heart had been in his job, but mainly because he liked the people he worked for and the people who worked for him” (39). Still, he could not walk away because he saw that the markets were rigged and high-frequency traders were taking advantage of unsuspecting investors. He acted morally first at RBC by declining to open a dark pool which they could sell to high-frequency traders. From then on, he devoted his energy to …show more content…
finding out how people gained speed advantages to the exchanges thus being able to front-run orders. Instead of trying to profit off of this discovery, he went out to find out as much as he could to ultimate negate these arbitrage opportunities. Not only did Brad leave his high paying job at RBC, he embodied his mission to create a fair market by opening his own stock exchange IEX. Another character that was described as moral is Ronan Ryan. From his humble beginning as an Irish immigrant, Ronan showed his strong work ethic by going to work in the telecom industry. As he managed to be more knowledgeable about how information moved and the speed of signals as a function of distance, he eventually was offered a job on Wall Street by Brad. Once Ronan became the authority on the subject of “co- location” that enabled Wall Street proximity to the exchanges, he was the go-to man for “helping high-frequency traders to exploit the Americanization of foreign stock markets” (66). Yet, the reason why Ronan is still considered moral is that “a lot of what Ronan had seen and heard didn’t make sense to him: he didn’t know what he knew” (73). Even when Ronan knew things like Spread Network’s plan to sell line to high-frequency traders, he was under a non-disclosure agreement and could not talk about it until the NDA expired (83). Therefore, it reasonable to argue that once Ronan did understand what was going on (and could talk about it), he left his well-paying job to go with Brad to start the new exchange to combat market predators. In an industry where it is easy to be blinded by money, Ronan chose loyalty and clearly wanted to do the right thing for traders and investors. Another character deemed moral in Flash Boys is John Schwall.
Coming from Bank of America, Schwall saw first hand (especially after the 2008 crisis) how corrupt Wall Street was “with no corporate loyalty to employers” and “a lot of unspoken animosity” (92). Schwall shared Brad’s angry at the rigged markets as he said: “as soon as you realize that you are not able to execute your orders because someone else is able to identify what you are trying to do and race ahead of you, it’s over” (95). He continued by stating that “people set out this way to make money from everyone else’s retirement account” that in turn hurt honest people like his parents (95). Schwall’s dedication to “figuring out who was doing the screwing” of the market is why he is revered along with the other characters as a moral fighter against unfair
trading. Overall Brad seems to be the most moral character as his “unhappiness with Wall Street was starting to feel less like a business than a cause,” and he now found himself “educating the world’s biggest money managers about the inner workings of the stock market, which strongly suggested to him that no one else on Wall Street was willing to teach them how their investment dollars were being abused” (87-88).
This 1980s movie called "Wall Street" is about a young and impatient stockbroker who is willing to do anything to get to the top, including trading on illegal inside information taken through a ruthless and greedy corporate raider. A corporate raider is a person who buys up underperforming companies, breaks them up and sells their parts at a healthy profit. Gordon Gekko is a corporate raider and also the single largest shareholder in Teldar Paper made a speech about how the members of the management board steal money from the company during an annual stockholders meeting. Gekko gives a speech at a shareholders’ meeting of Teldar Paper, a company he is planning to take over. This is the famous “greed is good” speech as Gekko defends his planned takeover, pointing to the wasteful ways of post-War corporate America, using Teldar’s management as Exhibit A, and claiming himself the company’s saviour a “liberator” of value.
The novel Liars Poker by Michael Lewis is a very interesting firsthand account of an inside look into the investment banking world, in particular bond trading at the firm Solomon Brothers in the 1980s. Lewis took an interesting and roundabout way to end up on Wall Street, studying art history at Yale and bombing his interview with Lehman Brothers. But he eventually found himself at Solomon Brothers through a lucky encounter with two managing directors wives. Through his book, Michael Lewis conveys the inner workings of investment banks in the 1980s to the average person using his own experience at Solomon Brothers. The book goes into Lewis’s own rise in the firm, as well as the rise and fall of the entire Solomon Brothers Mortgage department.
F. Scott Fitzgerald delineated the Roaring Twenties in The Great Gatsby as “the parties were bigger. The pace was faster, the shows were broader, the buildings were higher, the morals were looser, and the liquor was cheaper.” It was the era marked by social changes and splendous parties and self-made millionaires. However, unprecedented to Fitzgerald and many of his contemporaries was that said glamourous lifestyle was built on a precarious foundation. When the stock market crashed in 1929, it put a period to the beguiling era and opened Americans to a horrid epoch. Yet, in actuality, the Stock market crash is an inexorable consequence of a time so reckless such as the Roaring Twenties. Some identified causes of the eventual crash are margin buying, overproduction of goods, and banks investing in stocks with depositors’ funds.
As in any other discipline that entails interaction with individuals, the aspect of ethics must include a conscious principle. To define ethics in its simplest form, it is known as the ability to distinguish right from wrong. In the movie, the sudden pressure from management drives the company’s salesmen to increase sales with no regards to ethics in order to maintain job security. All of the main characters had made their fair share of unethical decisions, out of desperation, to increase their sales and ultimately to keep their jobs. The degree of each decision can be left for viewers to determine the level of appropriateness based on their own values. Personally, although all characters have made unethical decisions, the most ethical salesman was Ricky Roma. Ri...
The stock market is an enigma to the average individual, as they cannot fathom or predict what the stock market will do. Due to this lack of knowledge, investors typically rely on a knowledgeable individual who inspires the confidence that they can turn their investments into a profit. This trust allowed Jordan Belfort to convince individuals to buy inferior stocks with the belief that they were going to make a fortune, all while he became wealthy instead. Jordan Belfort, the self-titled “Wolf of Wall Street”, at the helm of Stratton Oakmont was investigated and subsequently indicted with twenty-two counts of securities fraud, stock manipulation, money laundering and obstruction of justice. He went to prison at the age of 36 for defrauding an estimated 100 million dollars from investors through his company (Belfort, 2009). Analyzing his history of offences, how individual and environmental factors influenced his decision-making, and why he desisted from crime following his prison sentence can be explained through rational choice theory.
Wilson, James C. “’Bartleby’: The Walls of Wall Street.” Arizona Quarterly 37.4 (Winter 1981): 335-346. Literature Resource Center. Web. 13 April 2015.
Jordan Belfort, better known as the man who served as the basis for The Wolf of Wall Street movie, concocted a scheme to bring in copious amounts of money to his investing firm Stratton Oakmont. Belfort’s company thrived on earning money from the commissions of investments the wealthiest 1% of America made. Stratton Oakmont became one of the most powerful investment firms in the United States. Hundreds of people were employed by the large investment firm. The firm earned a lot of money through the hard work of employees. The employees were average people with ambitions to make a lot of money. Jordan Belfort was at the helm of the investment giant. He single handedly created hundreds of very good paying jobs with an easy going work
The exchange being exorbitant compensation leads companies to near-overnight success, which more often than not results in bad business decisions and deceit, ensuing in shareholder loss. Buffett’s occupation as CEO has not been a series of home runs; however, he remains transparent by communicating in a plain language that in turn, protects the exploitation of Berkshires shareholders to investments outside of the company’s “circle of competence”. This is cleverly achieved through concise language explaining terminology coupled with usage the of metaphors in Buffett’s Chairman’s Letters to the shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway. For instance, Buffett states in his 2008, Letter to Shareholders on the economic collapse, “By year-end, investors of all stripes were bloodied and confused, much as if they were small birds that had strayed into a badminton game … In poker terms, the Treasury and the Fed have gone ‘all in.’ Economic medicine that was previously meted out by the cupful has recently been dispensed by the barrel.” Illustrating a candor that speaks louder than any shiny technical verbiage assuring his readers that investing with Berkshire is a relationship, and human
One of the most infamous characters that captured the public’s attention this past year is Jordan Belfort, a stockbroker better known as the “Wolf of Wall Street.” Jordan Belfort, played by Leonardo DiCaprio in the reenactment of Belfort’s first book titled, “The Wolf of Wall Street,” became a public spectacle when he aired his crime-ridden past and the momentous downfall of his life in his autobiographies turned blockbuster hit (McFarland et al., 2013). Belfort, who started his career by no unusual circumstances, became a multi-millionaire in the late 90’s selling a “pump and dump” scheme to unsuspecting investors (“Jordan Belfort Biography,” 2014). According to his autobiography, which admittedly could very well be an exaggeration of himself, claims that Belfort was a natural stockbroker, landing his first job because of an impressive sales pitch of a pen in his initial interview. Once he developed a reputation on Wall Street, Belfort opened his own firm called Stratton Oakland. He details the extraordinary company culture that he was part of and explains how it led to his eventual arrest for fraud and money laundering. His pompous personality is emphasized by his anecdotes of sex, drugs and money that were the three most important aspects in his life, whether it was at work, or in his personal life. It is clear that Belfort sported a type of superiority complex, as well as some kind of inherent drive for this type of lifestyle. Once he reached the top, no expense was too much, and he actively sought the attention from his peers for his style of living. Belfort’s personality was excessively grandiose and eccentric, revealing a sort of maladaptive manner in dealing ...
The Wolf of Wall Street produced and directed by Martin Scorsese tells a story of Jordan Belfort, a stockbroker living a luxurious life on Wall Street. Due to greed and corruption, Jordan falls into a life of crime and abusive activities. Belfort made millions of dollars by selling customers “penny stocks” and manipulating the market through his company, Stratton Oakmont, before being convicted of any criminal activity (Solomon, 2013). Jordan reveals behaviours and impulses all humans have, however, on an extreme level. This movie illustrates “why ethics is another tool whose importance cannot be overstated” (Delaney, 2014). Without ethics and morality, individuals can never truly live an honest and happy life.
Wall Street is a movie that exposes corruption and disguises all values, beliefs, and other ethical philosophy. Throughout the movie, Wall Street shows how ethics adapts to a person’s personality by power and wealth alongside honesty and truth. Bud Fox, a young stockbroker is looking for a way to make a name for himself. He is determined to get as many clients as he can to become successful. He later meets a ruthless man named Mr. Gekko where learns how to reach to the top by illegal actions such as insider trading. Bud Fox was an honest living man who had good ethics but was later showed what true power is became money hungry. The power of greed is fascinating the code that everyone lives by is inevitable once money comes into play. There are five types of interpersonal power; reward power, coercive power, legitimate power, referent power, and expert power. These types of power will be used to correspond relationships throughout the movie. In Wall Street we realize how Gordon Gekko uses Bud Fox for his benefit. In this paper I will show the types of powers that are used by Gordon Gekko and how they are used. One clear type of power that Gordon Gekko uses in his relationship with Bud Fox is the Referent power base. This power stands out because it is clear that Bud wants to become a top notch in the industry. Bud is striving to be successful when he exposes what he’s able to do at the meeting with Gordon Gekko he instantly become closer to his goals. There were scenes where Gordon had legitimate power. His knowledge and information was what made him rich. Bud Fox had to listen to what Gordon was telling him in order to become successful. This was an example of Gekko having legitimate power over Bud Fox. Expert power which is an ...
Wall street has run the american society for a long time and has corrupt congress system legal ( Harvey). It also caused many Americans to go through the greatest economic depression since the Great Depression. Many individuals before this went along with this neoliberal agenda because it has become an accepted common sense. Wall street was a dominate power and has one universal code there shall be no serious challenge to the absolute power of money to rule absolutely ( Harvey 403). These principles have been carved into the body politics of our world through the collective will of capitalist class animated by the coercive law of competition ( Harvey 403 year). However, it was not just the neoliberal economic that played a huge role, but also the neoliberal political policy. “Neo liberal political police aimed to break down social solidarity and have similarly paved the for broad based democratic uprising” Brown 409)..When individuals becomes newly unemployed and long term poor become desperate, these facts lead to disorderly and disruptive protest against institutions such as banks and other corporations that have grown richer and the gap has increasingly grown. Butler
Damian Chunilal, former presient of Merrill Lynch Pacific Rim, argues that the universal banking model setup for economies of scale and synergies, is breaking down. He says the return on equity and valuations have fallen for almost all universal banks. Recently Wells Fargo has been charged of opening over 2 million fake accounts and has been fined for $185 million. This will lead to unrest within its own customers and is a shame for big universal banks. Arthur writes that Citigroup’s history indicates that the universal banking model is full of flaws; conflict of interest, culture clashes and complexity of management. Sandy Weill called for the universal banks to be broken up so that the taxpayer’s and depositors won’t be at risk. Let’s hope for a more stable banking system where big banks cannot exploit investors and taxpayers with the ring-fencing which is going to hit the UK Banks soon.
The film Inside Job directed by Charles Ferguson, grandstands the bare essential of how Wall Street cheated the American white-collar class and working poor out of billions of dollars before making an already difficult situation even worse and utilizing citizen dollars to safeguard themselves out. Inside Job includes hard-hitting interviews with a portion of the nation's most persuasive monetary figures and lawmakers to get to the base of the covetousness. Rather than truly explaining definitions or tossing in VIP cameos to guarantee you're focusing like The Big Short does, Inside Job treats you like the grown-up you are and educates you regarding what went ahead in secret on Wall Street before Ben Bernanke, and the Federal Reserve acted the
During this crisis, millions of people lost their savings, job, and homes due to 2008 financial meltdown. The film exposes the root causes of the financial meltdown. It explores the players and mechanisms in the financial system such as: politicians, bankers, deregulation, academics, accounting firms, and credit rating agencies. Inside Job divides the story of the financial crisis in into five parts. This reaction paper will state a synopsis of each section and my reaction.