Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Naval rivalry in ww1
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Naval rivalry in ww1
The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the extent to which the Allied success in overcoming German submarine warfare and land invasions in the first world war can be attributed to Britain’s military tactics and resources. The method in this investigation is to first explain what Britain had that could have led it to contribute to Allied success. This includes an evaluation of different British tactical procedures such as ship camouflage, cartography and early naval operations in particular events from the war. Then, Britain’s contribution will be compared against an economic and military viewpoint of the success of the Allies in World War One. This investigation will not discuss all of Germany’s land invasions during the war nor will it discuss the situation of all of Britain’s allies. Instead, Britain’s contribution to the war will be compared with that of the United States.
The two sources that will be evaluated for their origins, purposes, limitations and values are Jon Tetsuro Sumida British Naval Operational Logistics, 1914-1918 and Mark Harrison’s Why The Rich Won: Economic Mobilization and Economic Development in Two World Wars.
Summary of Evidence
Following the declaration of war, Britain took measures with its navy and Royal Geographical Society (RGS) in an attempt to gain a military advantage against future attacks. The RGS began to work on two projects. One project was to create an index of strategic locations on the large scale maps of Belgium and France which were already at hand and issued to officers in the British forces (Heffernan 508) and the second project was to produce a new skeletal wall map of Britain showing its “railways, principal towns, rivers and county boundaries” (Heffernan 508). After b...
... middle of paper ...
...rsity of Warwick working paper, 2005. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/ fac/soc/economics/staff/academic/harrison/public/whytherichwon.pdf
Heffernan, Michael. “Geography, Cartography and Military Intelligence: The Royal
Geographical Society and the First World War.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 21, No. 3 (1996), pp. 504-533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/622594
Keylor, William. “World War 1.” Encarta. 2001. http://www.is.wayne.edu/mnissani/WWI/ encarta.htm
Shimshoni, Jonathan. "Technology, Military Advantage, and World War I: A Case for Military
Entrepreneurship." International Security. Vol. 15, No. 3 (1990) pages 187-215. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2538911 Sumida, Jon Tetsuro. “British Naval Operational Logistics, 1914 -1918.” The Journal of Military
History. Vol. 57, No. 3 (Jul., 1993), pp. 447-480. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2943988
Herman, Arthur. Freedom's Forge: How American Business Produced Victory in World War II. New York: Random House, 2012. Print
"Queen's University Archives - World War I." Queen's University Archives - Home. Web. 23 July 2010.
Whiteside, Noel and James Gillespie. "Deconstructing Unemployment: Developments in Britain in the Interwar Years," The Economic History Review, Vol. 44, No. 4. (Nov., 1991), pp. 665-682.
At the beginning of the war, the preconceptions of each side show exactly why Britain was destined for failure. On the American team,
Sister Claire Evelyn Trestrail was the eldest of five being born on the 10th of December, 1877 in Clare, South Australia. Trestrail served in the First World War as a nurse following in her mother’s footsteps who was a trained nurse, Acting Matron of King Edward Hospital in Perth and also had involvement within the Red Cross and the Saint John’s Ambulance Services. Trestrail’s younger siblings also had involvement within the First World War with her two younger brothers; John Henry and Amarald Glen, serving in the royal Flying Corps and respectively, 1 Machine Battalion. Amarald was also presented with a Military Medal for Gallantry at Villaret. Sister Ella also served as a nurse, got married, but tragically returned as an amputee. It was only her youngest sister Amy who did not serve during the war.
By December 1914 the First World War had reached a dilemma on the western front that neither the triple entente nor the triple alliance had expected. The war had reached a stalemate, a state where both sides are so evenly balanced that neither can breakthrough against the enemy. The advances in Technology played a big role in creating the stalemate through strong defensive weaponry such as Machine Guns and Artillery, this caused ‘trench warfare’ (BOOK 48). Trench war is when troops from both sides are protected from the enemy’s firepower through trenches. Many advances in technology also attempted to break the stalemate throughout the war with tanks, gas and aircraft, these however failed. Eventually the stalemate was broken through a combination of improved technology, new strategies and the blockading of the German ports.
The United States and World War II. New York: Harper & Row, 1964. Print. The. Feis, Herbert.
This statement begins to expose the fear felt by Britain of the imposing German fleet. Due to the militaristic views of Europe, many countries desired to have more power and control, by any means possible. This hunger initiated the Naval Arms Race, in which nations believed as one country increased its naval powers, they too were obliged to increase their armed forces, to maintain a balance of power. The British had dominated the seas and many far off colonies because of their naval fleet, granting them immense power. As the Germans began to propose a new and vast naval fleet, and France and Russia formed a new alliance sparking suspicion in Britain, Germany quickly became a threat to British supremacy. This created a chain reaction of stressed importance upon naval arme...
“The effect of World War II” 1950s vol. 4. Danbury: Grolier, Scholastic Library Publishing, 2005.
"Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. Ed. Michael Duffy. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.
Field, Frank. British and French Operations of the First World War. Cambridge (England); New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
The Origins of the Second World War, by A.J.P. Taylor, proposes and investigates unconventional and widely unaccepted theories as to the underlying causes of World War Two. Taylor is British historian who specialized in 20th century diplomacy, and in his book claims that as a historian his job is to “state the truth” (pg. xi) as he sees it, even if it means disagreeing with existing prejudices. The book was published in 1961, a relatively short time after the war, and as a result of his extreme unbias the work became subject to controversy for many years.
Warfare was in a state of transition. Older commanders and generals in the French and British militaries were very cavalry and infantry focused. These commanders believed that cavalry, infantry, and artillery would assure victory in any circumstance, against any foe. They clung to the static tactics of the bygone World War I era. World War I had been fought primarily on French soil, and the military as well as the government never wanted that to happen again, therefore they wanted to reinforce their main border against any future German. Little did they know that only twenty two years later they would be bested by German forces in a way that would shock the world. This research will be analyzing many important assumptions, oversights,...
Macksey, Kenneth. Military Errors of World War Two. Great Britain: Arms and Armour Press, 1987.
O’Neill, William L. World War II A Student Companion. 1 ed. William H. Chafe. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.