Interpublic Group (IPG) is a multi-global company specializing in consumer advertising, digital marketing, communications planning and media buying, public relations and specialty marketing. As one of the leading marketing company, it is imperative that IPG successfully performs a financial management analysis to remain competitive and financially stable. An effective financial management analysis will incorporate financial ratios to determine the overall financial condition of IPG. According to Gitman and Zutter (2015), liquidity refers to the solvency of a company’s overall financial position. The liquidity of a company is measured by its ability to satisfy its short-term obligations as they come due (Gitman et al., 2015). Companies can Figure 3b shows that IPG’s debt to equity ratio moderately increased from 2013-2014 and significantly increased from 2014-2015. In addition, according to CSI Market, the marketing/advertising industry debt to equity ratio average for 2015 was 1.4 therefore; IPG’s debt to equity ratio is above industry average (“Financial Strength Information & Trends”, n.d.). In the future, IPG should be equipped to continue to effectively manage the money that it borrows. Measures of profitability enable a company to evaluate its profits with respect to a given level of sales, a certain level of assets, or the owners’ investment (Gitman et al., 2015). Essentially, a company can compare its expenses and other relevant costs incurred during a specific period of time. Companies use the net profit margin to measure the percentage of each sales dollar remaining after costs and expenses – the higher a company’s net profit margin, the better (Gitman et al., 2015). Figure 4a indicates that IPG’s net profit Furthermore, according to CSI Market, the marketing/advertising industry P/E ratio average for 2015 was 16.32 therefore; IPG’s P/E ratio is above industry average (“Valuation Information & Trends”, n.d.). Companies use the market/book (M/B) ratio to have an assessment of how investors view the company’s performance (Gitman et al., 2015). Figure 5b shows that IPG’s M/B ratio considerably increased substantially from 2013-2014 and increased considerably from 2014-2015. In the future, IPG should be able to increase its number of investors based on these
This requirement makes it important to look through a majority of the return ratios, which include return on sales, return on assets, and return on equity. Additionally, investors are also interested in the ratios related to the company’s earnings, such as earnings per share (EPS) and PE ratio. Looking at return on sales, we can see that Wendy’s has a 7.27% return on sales and Bob Evans has a 1.23%, which demonstrates Wendy’s has a higher profit margin. Moreover, Wendys’ return on assets is 2.85% and Bob Evans is 1.58%. Also, Wendy’s and Bob Evan 's have return on equity ratios of 6.66% and 4.30%, respectively. All of these return ratios show that Wendy’s has a better handle on turning working capital into revenue. On the other hand, although Wendy’s return ratios are higher than Bob Evans, Bob Evans has a better performance on earnings per share and PE ratio. This is due to Bob Evans having less common stock share outstanding, which makes their earnings per share and PE ratio higher than Wendy’s. Due to the EPS being higher for Bob Evans, we would recommend that investors look towards Bob
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
Ratio analysis are useful tools when judging the performance of a company by weighing and evaluating the operating performance (Block-Hirt). There are 13 significant ratios that can separate by four main categories, profitability, asset utilization, liquidity and debt utilization ratios. The ratio analysis covered here consists of eight various ratios with at least one from each of these main categories. These ratios were used to compare and contrast the performance of Verizon versus AT& T over the years 2005 and 2006.
The company’s revenue has nearly quadrupled in the past five years to $4.059 billion in 1991. As can be seen in Exhibit 1, Intel’s Gross Margin has continually increased over the past 4 years to 60.28%. The company’s ROE and ROA have also continued to increase, which suggests Intel is using its assets and funding from equity wisely. The company’s current ratio suggests it has more than enough money to pay off its liabilities over the next 12 months.... ...
A strong balance sheet gives an investor an idea of how financially stable the company really is. Many professionals consider the top line, or cash, the most important item on a company’s balance sheet. The big three categories on any balance sheet are “assets, liabilities, and shareholder equity.” Evaluating Barnes & Noble’s assets for the time 2014 at $3,537,449, 2013 at $3,732,536 and 2012 at $3,774,699, the company’s performance summarizes that it is remaining stable. These numbers reflect a steady rate over the three year period. Like assets, liabilities are current or noncurrent. Current liabilities are obligations due within a year. Key investors look for companies with fewer liabilities than assets. Analyzing this type of important information, informs a potential investor that if the company owes more money than they are bringing in that this company is in financial trouble. Assessing the liabilities of the balance sheet, for the same time period, it is also consistent with the assets. The cash flow demonstrates a stable performance in the company’s assets and would be determined that the liabilities of this company are also stable. Equity is equal to assets minus liabilities, and it represents how much the company’s shareholders actually have a claim to. Investors customarily observe closely
In 1993 the Debt to Equity Ratio was .45. In 1994 it was .68 and in 1995 it was .73. This is a trend that Clarkson will have to take into consideration as he refinances his company.
Debt-to-equity ratio: The debt-to-equity ratio for 2010 is $3,738,150/ $4,781,471=.782. For the year 2011, the debt-to-equity ratio is $2,722,811/ $5,672,551=.478. This number is calculated by Total Liabilities / Owners’ Equity
General Electric Company (GE) is a diversified technology, media and financial services company. With products and services ranging from aircrafts engines, power generation, water processing and security technology to medical imaging, business and consumer financing, media content and industrial products, it serves in more than 100 countries. This analysis will use financial ratios to see just how GE is performing as a Fortune 500 company.
Apple’s debt to equity ratio is not very high compared to the industry average of 2.23. The Debt to Equity Ratio of 2014 is 1.08, in which the normal ratio should be less than 1. This ratio of 1.08 shows that the company is financing more assets with debt than equity. In spite
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
The ratio of 1.7 for the last two years indicates consistency, although a lower number is preferred. As a company produces high value product, this could be a satisfactory ratio. By comparing it to 2011 when a ratio was 2.9, in the last two years a ratio improved
Firstly, based on the profitability, P&G has earned higher profit from each dollar of revenue which is 13.4% compared to C-P 12.9% for the recent year 2013. In addition, P&G also has higher EPS of US$4.04 compare to C-P US$2.41. In contrast, C-P register a Gross Profit of 58.7% and Return on Equity of 91.0% as opposed to P&G’s 49.6% and 17.0% respectively. C-P seems to rely heavily on debt and this has helped to improve the Return of Equity. P&G also has its downside in asset turnover ratio (0.62) and fixed turnover
In regards to the corporation’s balance sheet, it is necessary to place an importance on liquidity ratios to demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations such as accounts payable and notes that have a duration of less than one year. These commonly used liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. All three ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company or business. The current ratio is used to indicate a business’s ability to meet maturing obligations. The quick ratio is used to indicate the company’s ability to pay off debt. Finally the cash ratio is used to measure the amount of capital as well short term counterparts a business has over its current liabilities.
The horizontal analysis shows that IQ’s total current assets increased by 25% and its total current liabilities increased by 40% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in trade receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in trades payable, and the increase in term loans (notes 5, 6, 12, and 13 of the 2005 financial statement). The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 4.66 to 4.17 and from 4.02 to 3.5, respectively. However, IQ seems to remain highly liquid considering the values of the mentioned liquidity ratios.
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.