Final Project

1434 Words3 Pages

Section 5: I-35W Bridge Collapse Case Study On August 1, 2007 at approximately 6:05 p.m. 1,064-foot section of the 1,907-foot long I-35W highway bridge collapsed into the Mississippi River. This catastrophic failure of the main bridge span resulted in the death of 13 people and injuring 145 others. In total, 111 documented vehicles were on the bridge at the time that it collapsed. Included in this total are 25 construction vehicles. On the day of the collapse, the bridge was undergoing a resurfacing project that closed 4 of the eight lanes. The closed lanes were used as a staging area for sand, gravel, construction materials, and other equipment necessary to complete the work. Following the collapse of the I-35 Bridge, other bridges in the country, with similar construction designs, were scrutinized. According to federal statistics, more than 70,000 of the 607,363 or roughly 12 percent of the bridges in the United States are classified as “structurally deficient.” Section 6: Determining the Cause of Collapse The I-35 Bridge collapse in 2007 was not the result of a single safety precaution being overlooked; it was primarily due to a miscalculation by the original design team, Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates. While the accountability can be placed on Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, the only way to learn from such disasters is to delve deeper into the root cause and determine why this minute, yet extremely important, detail was overlooked for over 40 years. Prior to making a final determination as to what ultimately caused the I-35 Bridge to fail, a number of alternatives were explored, including terrorist involvement. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) arrived at the site shortly after the bridge collapsed into ... ... middle of paper ... ...minating look at this essential part. • Add Specific Training on Gusset Plate Inspections The process of designing, building and inspecting the bridge had plenty of assumptions. Training on the strength of gusset plates would have mitigated those assumptions with expertise. Having explored this accident, as with many accidents, it too could have been avoided. Going through the checklist of potential solutions outlined above demonstrates how the disaster could have been averted. Unfortunately, this is the case with instances like the I-35 Bridge collapse. Ultimately, the takeaway from such events is how can it be avoided in the future. This oftentimes requires those involved to take precautionary steps prior to an event. Minneapolis addressed many of the necessary steps required following 9/11 and developed an extensive response plan for catastrophic events.

Open Document