Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dystopian literature
How has digital technology impacted the film industry
Film analysis a league of their own
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dystopian literature
The movie The Island, directed by Michael Bay in 2005, is a SCI-FI genre film about clones. This movie features two main characters – Lincoln Six Echo (played by Ewan McGregor) and Jordan Two Delta (played by Scarlett Johansson) who escaped from a research institute after learning their true fate of being human clones. Lincoln Six Echo soon discovers the sinister purpose going on at that institute, rather than being kept safe from a contaminated world, and escapes with his friend Jordan Two Delta. The clone’s whole life revolved around winning the lottery, with the prize as moving to an uncontaminated paradisiacal island outside the institute that protect the dwellers against the contaminated environment, The movie created meaning by using the SCI-FI genre, full of futuristic technology and advancements of human life.
The SCI-FI genre occupies a vital role in the movie. It had created ideas, hopes and fears about the relationship the world has to technology, progress, and even to the human body. The movie allows us to think through these
…show more content…
issues in a unique way, because only SCI-FI is able to fully explore the space of opposites in a detailed and compelling way; for example: the clones are grown as source of genetically identical organs for transplantation and even babies are carried out by a surrogate clone mother who is a clone of the customer. The customers who are as shown are called “sponsors”. The sponsors are told that the clones live in a vegetative state without any consciousness and that they are not human at all. The clones, with full human development, are referred to as products, unequal to humans. Generally, SCI-FI is represented in an ambivalent way in movies, which almost always is in the form of technology. In The Island, the cloning technology enables the sponsors to prolong their lives and to get biological babies without carrying them out by themselves. In the movie, for example, there is a woman who has given birth, and soon after the nurses take the child away, give it to the sponsors, and then proceed to kill the surrogate clone. This has shown that it doesn’t matter how humans do whatever it takes to suit their needs, but to do it as soon as possible. Unfortunately, this also means that the hope for a life of “inhuman” length (living longer than we should) is only a matter of money. In this movie, the cloning of humans has been successful, moreover, it has become a commercial success. This results as the clones being nothing more than a product used for the purpose of prolonging somebody else’s life. For example, in the movie, Lincoln’s sponsor turns him in for his sake of living longer rather than Lincoln having a life. This cloning has created a significant amount of greed in the world of rich elites in The Island. These rich elites didn’t know that the clones were well alive and sentient but once they do, they’re unapologetic to their actions of wanting unnatural time. The unnatural creations from the SCI-FI based genre also has created a dark aura to the overly bright institute and the world above it. Something that isn’t a part of the ‘circle of life’ has now been introduced using advanced technology, when it shouldn’t be happening. The act of cloning in The Island is illegal (also in real life) but the creator still wants to make the large amount of cash he gets for creating the clones and so, for example, the institute is well hidden underground. Realistically, it isn’t a sanitary, sterile, carefully controlled institute, but rather a dark, dirty, and detrimental secret kept from the world. The way the SCI-FI genre is represented in this film points out the concerns about cloning, but shows us at the same time that this possible future is not too far away from today’s society.
Beginning as a dystopic science fiction movie about the cloning issue, this motion picture more and more turns into an action movie full of explosions during the course of action. This movie shows an ambivalent attitude towards new technologies using the SCI-FI genre. In everyday life, new technologies are used, but the high-end technology represented by cloning for spare parts is only affordable for the rich elite. The concept of cloning humans brings to light more than just a simple yes-we should, or no-we-should-not answer. To answer whether we should clone humans also brings to light science, technology, moral and ethical concerns, as well as religions notions. It is more of a question of: If we clone humans will we lose what makes us
human?
In 1992 A 24-year-old man named William Ford Jr. was murdered in cold blood by Mark Reilly with a .22 long rifle in the back of a body shop garage. Strong Island is a film documenting the life of William Ford and his family before and after Mr. Ford’s life was abruptly brought to an end. The film takes place in present time having the siblings, friends, and mother of Mr. Ford speak in depth about the events that occurred the night he was murdered and the impact the events after had on the family.
On the Waterfront directed by Elia Kazan about a man that once felt he owed something to the mob and now he wants to control his life. This film is a classic mobster movie that is well known for the filming techniques used whilst shooting. The method acting, the lighting, and the camera angles establish the plot.
Literature and film have always held a strange relationship with the idea of technological progress. On one hand, with the advent of the printing press and the refinements of motion picture technology that are continuing to this day, both literature and film owe a great deal of their success to the technological advancements that bring them to widespread audiences. Yet certain films and works of literature have also never shied away from portraying the dangers that a lust for such progress can bring with it. The modern output of science-fiction novels and films found its genesis in speculative ponderings on the effect such progress could hold for the every day population, and just as often as not those speculations were damning. Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein and Fritz Lang's silent film Metropolis are two such works that hold great importance in the overall canon of science-fiction in that they are both seen as the first of their kind. It is often said that Mary Shelley, with her authorship of Frankenstein, gave birth to the science-fiction novel, breathing it into life as Frankenstein does his monster, and Lang's Metropolis is certainly a candidate for the first genuine science-fiction film (though a case can be made for Georges Méliès' 1902 film Le Voyage Dans la Lune, his film was barely fifteen minutes long whereas Lang's film, with its near three-hour original length and its blending of both ideas and stunning visuals, is much closer to what we now consider a modern science-fiction film). Yet though both works are separated by the medium with which they're presented, not to mention a period of over two-hundred years between their respective releases, they present a shared warning about the dangers that man's need fo...
poster typically has the white cowboy large, presented front and center, with the antagonists and co-stars all behind him. An iconic western, The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly, has a poster picturing the white cowboy alone. Clint Eastwood stands there tall, stoic, and singular. Typical of most other westerns, the white cowboy is the center of attention. Here, however, there are two non-white figures presented: Bart, the Black cowboy, and a large Native American chief. This movie poster has the same style as other westerns with the color and layout, but is unique in the fact that a black man is presented where a white man would normally be dominating. Once again, this makes a statement about racial improvements. Previously having a black man at
In 2008 the worst financial crisis since the great depression hit and left many people wondering who should be responsible. Many Americans supported the prosecution of Wall Street. To this day there have still not been any arrests of any executive on Wall Street for the financial collapse. Many analysts point out that greed of executives was one of the many factors in the crisis. I will talk about subprime loans, ill-intent, punishments, and white collar crime.
Time and language are both basic constructs for society. Individuals depend on the existence of time to organize their lives and language to have the ability to communicate with those around them. Though the technicalities of time and language have changed over the years, they have, for the most part, remained the same conceptually. However, The Arrival, a science fiction movie released in 2016, took the philosophy behind time and language and altered it completely. The Arrival tells the story of Dr. Louise Banks, a professor of language, as she attempts to decipher the language of the aliens. In doing so, her perceptions of time are completely changed, an experience which causes emotional
Children grow up watching movies such as Star Wars as well as Gattaca that contain the idea of cloning which usually depicts that society is on the brink of war or something awful is in the midsts but, with todays technology the sci-fi nature of cloning is actually possible. The science of cloning obligates the scientific community to boil the subject down into the basic category of morality pertaining towards cloning both humans as well as animals. While therapeutic cloning does have its moral disagreements towards the use of using the stem cells of humans to medically benefit those with “incomplete” sets of DNA, the benefits of therapeutic cloning outweigh the disagreements indubitably due to the fact that it extends the quality of life for humans.
In the documentary “Fed Up,” sugar is responsible for Americas rising obesity rate, which is happening even with the great stress that is set on exercise and portion control for those who are overweight. Fed Up is a film directed by Stephanie Soechtig, with Executive Producers Katie Couric and Laurie David. The filmmaker’s intent is mainly to inform people of the dangers of too much sugar, but it also talks about the fat’s in our diets and the food corporation shadiness. The filmmaker wants to educate the country on the effects of a poor diet and to open eyes to the obesity catastrophe in the United States. The main debate used is that sugar is the direct matter of obesity. Overall, I don’t believe the filmmaker’s debate was successful.
Cloning is an exciting and ongoing field of study with many great possibilities, and negative drawbacks; this leaves many Christians wrestling with the idea of cloning, trying to decide where to stand on, for or against it. To follow, in the paper is an explanation of what cloning is and the uses of cloning at the present and projected in the future. After that the focus will be on the problems with cloning from a non-ethical stance. Finally the issue of cloning and Christian’s views on it will be addressed.
Science fiction writing began in the early 1800’s as a reaction to the growth of science and technology. The genre is characterized by its intellectual excitement, high adventure, and its making of the fantastic possible. Due to the nature of science fiction, film has become an essential part of its popularity. Science fiction films have been popular since the earliest silent clips because of the outlandish visuals and creative fictional story lines that capture an audience’s attention. Under the guise of this popular platform, writers relay political, social and philosophical messages to their audience.
In conclusion, it is clear to see that cloning is not the taboo it has been made out to be. It is a new boundary that humanity has never encountered before and so it is understandable that people have qualms about ‘playing God’ by shaping a life. Although some might argue that it is immoral to clone human beings, the truth is that it is unethical not to. Given that such technology has the potential to save millions upon millions of lives, not tapping into that industry would have dire consequences on the future. In this case, the ends more certainly justify the means.
Imagine a world where everyone looked like you and was related to you as a sibling, cousin, or any form of relation, wouldn’t that be freaky? Although cloning is not an important issue presently, it could potentially replace sexual reproduction as our method of producing children. Cloning is a dangerous possibility because it could lead to an over-emphasis on the importance of the genotype, no guaranteed live births, and present risks to both the cloned child and surrogate mother. It also violates the biological parent-child relationship and can cause the destruction of the normal structure of a family. The cloning of the deceased is another problem with cloning because it displays the inability of the parents to accept the child’s death and does not ensure a successful procedure. Along with the risks, there are benefits to Human Reproductive Cloning. It allows couples who cannot have a baby otherwise to enjoy parenthood and have a child who is directly related to them. It also limits the risk of transmitting genetic diseases to the cloned child and the risk of genetic defects in the cloned child. Although the government has banned Human Reproductive Cloning, the issue will eventually come to the surface and force us to consider the 1st commandment of God, all men are equal in the eyes of god, but does this also include clones? That is the question that we must answer in the near future in order to resolve a controversy that has plagued us for many years.
In the essay, Cloning Reality: Brave New World by Wesley J. Smith, a skewed view of the effects of cloning is presented. Wesley feels that cloning will end the perception of human life as sacred and ruin the great diversity that exists today. He feels that cloning may in fact, end human society as we know it, and create a horrible place where humans are simply a resource. I disagree with Wesley because I think that the positive effects of controlled human cloning can greatly improve the quality of life for humans today, and that these benefits far outweigh the potential drawbacks that could occur if cloning was misused.
“Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” (Kass) The concept of cloning continues to evoke debate, raising extensive ethical and moral controversy. As humans delve into the fields of science and technology, cloning, although once considered infeasible, could now become a reality. Although many see this advancement as the perfect solution to our modern dilemmas, from offering a potential cure for cancer, AIDS, and other irremediable diseases, its effects are easily forgotten. Cloning, especially when concerning humans, is not the direction we must pursue in enhancing our lives. It is impossible for us to predict its effects, it exhausts monetary funds, and it harshly abases humanity.
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of “Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?” John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.