Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of racism
Justice for Sparkle helps to create an impressionable mark on the persisting prejudice that the United States still faces today. It illuminates the long lasting history of racism that has been integrated into society, especially within the United States. This documentary goes beyond the confinement of the broad spectrum of racism by looking closely at a specific case, in which race can ultimately lead to death. When the documentary was finished, I was fascinated by the motive and thought that was put into this plan in order for it to be executed properly as well as how this topic remains relevant in my own household, considering my mother is the only one in her family to married outside of her race, causing my relatives to not be supportive …show more content…
As shown through the interactionist perspective, her interactions with her immediate family, her husband, Ricky Rai, and her daughter, Analla, has proven to be a strong relationship as a whole even when some questioned the decisions she made within her life. However, it should be noted that the interaction between Sparkle and her in-laws were less than friendly to the point where Ricky’s family blamed Sparkle for being the reason for Ricky to drop out of college. Though this is a wild accusation to make, what frustrated me the most was how both Ricky’s parents faked their own death to not have anymore more interactions with Sparkle and have Ricky lie and act sad and depressed to enhance their story. In comparison, however, when Sparkle was found dead in her apartment complex and Ricky remained completely calm when detective Lee Brown asked him questions, the interactionist perspective would help show that this sort of behavior is unusual in a situation like the one presented before him. It makes me questions whether or not Ricky was apart of this master plan to terminate Sparkle as well as become more aware of any observations that may be seen as …show more content…
One idea that has been theorized was that Ricky’s parents, especially his father, Chiman Rai, were against their marriage due to the fact that Sparkle was black. This plays along with how racism is still thriving in the United States today, and many people are getting away with thinking and using bigotry languages towards other races. Looking through this documentary, I could see some subtle connections of how this relates in my own immediate family. My mother married my stepfather, who is white, and is the only one on her side to marry outside of her race. It was a long road ahead for my family to be accepted by my relatives on my mother's side, but after a few years, they were fine with it. Getting back to the documentary, it shows that conflict continued to partake in a crucial role in Sparkle’s story, considering Willy Fred Evans and Herbert Green, Chiman’s accomplices in the murder, turned against him and worked with investigators by wearing body cameras to finally unfold the truth of how Chiman asked Evans, Green, and Cleveland Clark to commit the murder of Sparkle Rai. I was thoroughly pleased to hear that Chiman was prosecuted on September 2006 for his racially-charged motive to murder his daughter-in-law Sparkle and was given a life sentence without parole for his actions. These sorts of actions
Bridge to Freedom provides the historical documentary behind the events that served as the narrative for Selma. Instead of a drama, the viewers receive an actual documentary that shows the confrontations between the marchers and the government. Like Selma, it highlights the violence, the deaths, and the beatings, but also goes further back in time to show society’s treatment of African Americans.
“The New Jim Crow” is an article by Michelle Alexander, published by the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. Michelle is a professor at the Ohio State Moritz college of criminal law as well as a civil rights advocate. Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law is part of the world’s top education system, is accredited by the American Bar Association, and is a long-time member of the American Law association. The goal of “The New Jim Crow” is to inform the public about the issues of race in our country, especially our legal system. The article is written in plain English, so the common person can fully understand it, but it also remains very professional. Throughout the article, Alexander provides factual information about racial issues in our country. She relates them back to the Jim Crow era and explains how the large social problem affects individual lives of people of color all over the country. By doing this, Alexander appeals to the reader’s ethos, logos, and pathos, forming a persuasive essay that shifts the understanding and opinions of all readers.
This movie was very sad but depicted the many social problems of struggling black communities in the early 1990’s. We learned in Adler, Mueller, & Laufer how criminal behavior as a result of frustrations suffered by lower-class individuals deprived of legitimate means to reach their goals are
In her book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, Michelle Alexander states that we still use our criminal justice system to “label people of color ‘criminals’ and then engage i...
Stop Australia its time to act on this ice epidemic that is overtaking are country! This is something you all may have herd in the new or in the paper. This is how the media portrays dugs, but is this really happing or is the media over extracting to make it seem worse then it really is. This is where the media is bombarded us with titles like “Inside Australia’s drug epidemic: how ice is tearing our country apart” that is to make us believe things that are over the top and exaggerating on a small statistics to get a good story. There are only 7.0% of Australians aged 14 years and over have used meth/amphetamines such as ice one or more times in their life. Where cannabis has 34.8% of Australians aged 14 years
Touching upon one specific case of this growing problem, she incorporates “Michael Brown,” who was an “18-year old unarmed black man shot down by a white police officer.” As heartbreaking as it sounds, it has happened on several occasions to men similar to “Michael Brown.” Accordingly, Myers formulates that it “is the same story. It is just different names.” Myers logically lists the other names of several black men who unfortunately fell victim to hate crimes, (Amadou Diallo, Sean Bell, Oscar Grant, Trayvon Martin), as well as flashing their images on the screen. Not only does Verna Myers use imagery in order to show that there is an evident issue with brutality and racism, but she knows it will tug on her viewers heartstrings. Likewise, this makes her audience become wary and sympathetic towards the situation at
What has changed since the collapse of Jim Crow has less to do with the basic structure of our society than with the language we use to justify it. In the era of colorblindness, it is no longer socially permissible to use race, explicitly, as a justification for discrimination, exclusion, and social contempt. So we don’t. Rather than directly rely on race, we use the criminal justi...
Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New, 2012. Print.
...nly seen in everyday television. Common beliefs of black families being more aggressive, having lesser moral values, and living less socially acceptable and lawful lives can be clearly seen through the actions of the white characters, and the thoughts that Chris expresses throughout the episode. The show uses satire to exaggerate black stereotypes to the point where it means the opposite of the comedic nature of which it was presented. The treatment and visualization of the lives of the black characters in the episode, through comedy and exaggeration, clearly shows the real-life problem of black stereotyping that is still all too present in American life. Chris’ everyday life as a black student in a white school and struggle to “fit in” is a struggle that non-white students have faced and are still facing today.
Humanity instructs us that we must behave with tolerance and respect towards all. Just Mercy exemplifies how that is not the case for many Americans. Critical Race Theory is a theory which focuses on the experiences of people who are minorities. It argues that people who are minorities in the United States are oppressed and, because of the state of being oppressed, creates fundamental disadvantages (Lecture 4.7). A study conducted for the case McCleskey v. Kemp revealed that when a black defendant killed a white victim, it increased the likelihood the black defendant would receive the death penalty (Stevenson, 2014). Looking at this fact through the lens of a critical race theorist, it illustrates how unconscious racism is ignored by our legal system. The actuality that, statistically, people of color have a higher chance of getting sentenced to death than white people is a blatant example of inequality. In Chapter 8, Stevenson discusses the case of multiple juveniles who were incarcerated and sentenced to death in prison. These juveniles who were sent to adult prisons, where juveniles are five times more likely to be the victims of sexual assault, show an innate inequality towards minors (Stevenson, 2014). Ian Manuel, George Stinney, and Antonio Nunez were all only fourteen-years-old when they were condemned to die in prison. Although they did commit crimes, the purpose of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate young offenders. Trying juveniles in adult court represents a prejudice against age, which Stevenson sought to fight by working on appeals for Manuel and Nunez (Stevenson, 2014). His humanity shines through once again, as he combats the justice system to give the adolescents another chance at life, rather than having them die in prison. The way prisoners with mental and/or physical disabilities are treated while incarcerated is also extremely
This presentation related closely to political and economic justice; however, this documentary is certainly related to social justice too. It was evident that this documentary was educating us about the policies and laws in America that have oppressed people who are non-white. It was disheartening to learn that America has a history of making laws that segregate non-whites in our society. I was well aware that African Americans have been oppressed by the policies that were put in place; however, I was shocked to learn that other non-white people too were oppressed by these policies. The documentary talks about what it means to be white by law; I was shocked to learn that our government never
The two families were just some of those that really cared although all had different stand points and views they stuck to their beliefs and ended with more love for each other in the end than they ever started with. In the white family there was the conservative ex-marine father who loved his children dearly but wanted them to be well behaved and often was hard on them. The mother was more liberal housewife who stood up for her and her children’s opinions to her husband. The oldest son Brian was a football star in high school and later goes on to join the marines and fight in Vietnam. The middle child Michael was very liberal active anti war student who marched with the blacks in the Birmingham. The youngest Katie was a young 16 year old who loved to party and have a good time. The black family was a family of good hearts and lots of hope.
Racism Review: Scholarship and activism toward racial justice. (2010). Race and the Death Penatly 2: Black defendants, White Victims . Retrieved from Racism Review: Scholarship and activism toward racial justice : http://www.racismreview.com/blog/2010/04/17/race-and-the-death-penalty-ii-black-defendants-white-victims/
Walker, Samuel, Cassia Spohn, and Miriam DeLone. The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning, 2007. Print.
One it depicts the problems that African American male defendants have in getting a fair trial. Given the negative police actions, it is reasonable for many African Americans to accept that police racism exists, and that this racism would lead into false biases of framing African Americans defendants in a court setting. It also shows the difference in treatment of whites who are the exploiters, consistently showing up as the “good guys”. Their superiority is taken as justified while non -whites are the “bad guys”. In Kopplemans, Understanding Human Differences section one he describes how the majority group creates names and labels for the minority groups. When a dominant group has the power to label the subordinate group labels are used to define and control the subordinate group. The media portrays these groups in negative ways (Koppleman, 2005). In “A Time to Kill”, African Americans are labeled as enemies of the community, the story is predicated on the fact that society is so racist that this father has to avenge his daughter himself. If the little girl had been white, there would have been prosecution to the fullest extent of law; however since the girl was black, he couldn’t depend on our system justice to prevail in a positive outcome. Unfortunately, this stereotype is deeply ingrained in our popular culture and