Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Manipulating sound in films
Mr. Smith goes to Washington Main Actors: James Stewart, Jean Arthur, Claude Rains, Thomas Mitchell, and Harry Carey, Edward Arnold, Guy Kibbee The Director: Frank Capra There are many ways that this movie relates to the political process. At the very start of the movie a senator dies. We therefore learn the process in which it takes to replace a senator. The next form of political process that was taught in the movie was when the young boy while escorting Mr. Smith to his seat explained the process of his first meeting in the senate and when he was allowed to speak his mind or present a new bill. The movie also explains how a bill becomes a law and the use of a filibuster and why it may be used. The main Conflict in the movie is the corrupt …show more content…
government and the just Mr. Smith. The Corruption in the government is evident from the very start of the movie when Governor Hopper (Guy Kibbee) is talking to his wife about Jim Taylor’s unprecedented power and influence. Jim Taylor used this power to force other politicians to bend to his rules. The main character, Mr. Smith (James Stewart), naïve and innocent, is caught off guard by this corruption but is determined to stay true to himself and fight for what he knows is right. Political issues that were raised were the corruption of the government such as Jim Taylor who would black mail and use his power to benefit himself. Also it brought up the media and how it twists what one says into something completely different or even pits the country against the good guy, as James Stewart experienced during his first day at Washington and during his filibuster. Photograph: My Favorite shot of the film was when Mr. Smith is holding the telegrams of all the people writing about their disappointment and anger towards Mr. Smith and his filibuster. The photograph shows Mr. Smith with his shoulders slouched, hair disheveled, and his head down as if he’s carrying the world on his back and everyone in the senate watches him. However his stance is still steadfast and you can tell he will fight for what is right no matter the cost or whether anyone is with him or not. Mis-en-scene: The scene I think the director put most thought into was when Mr. Smith walks out of the airport and the first thing he sees is the capitol. It really exemplifies the importance of the capitol in the movie and portrays it as one of the most powerful buildings of Washington. I also thought that Mr. Smith looking at capitol in awe gave us the impression that Mr. Smith perhaps wasn’t ready for the senate. Movement: I thought that the Director used movement best during the scenes struggle when the boy rangers beneficial press for Mr.
Smith competed with the corrupt press benefiting Jim Taylor. The scenes showed the hustle and bustle of the boy rangers and just how hard they worked to keep up with the machines working for Jim Taylor. Editing: The best editing done in the movie in my opinion was the lighting that they put the capitol in when Mr. Smith first arrived at Washington. They made the capitol look very official and intimidating, which contrasted with Mr. Smith’s innocent nature therefore foreshadowing the conflict the two will have in the future Sound: I think that the times Sound most influenced the movie was when during the senate meetings when Mr. Smith was speaking and you either heard the inspiring shouts of guidance from Saunders, or the discouraging grumbles or outbursts from the other senate members who disagreed with Mr. Smith, or even the angry shouts from the boys in the senate meeting who were under the impression that Mr. Smith was steeling from them with his summer camp. These noises directly affect Mr. Smith and his self-esteem and confidence, and Mr. Smith is such a relatable character that you can’t help but feel remorse or hope depending on the sounds heard in the senate …show more content…
chamber. Acting: My favorite acting moment was Mr.
Smith’s Filibuster. James Stewart portrayed the longing for justice and law within Mr. Smith without a flaw. You could see the longing in his eyes for someone to agree and stand along with him in his fight for justice. And his voice was calling desperately for anyone who would listen to his message and believe him. But best of all his defiance stance that told everyone that with him or not he was going to fight till his last breath for what he knew was right. It was truly inspiring I watched the filibuster again without sound and I found the acting to have been enhanced which I did not believe to be possible. I had more of an appreciation for Mr. Smiths body movements. They way he started out strong and tall but bearing the weight of everyone against him including the man he once looked up to, Senator Joseph Paine, all began to take its toll and he began to slouch more and more. By the end of the filibuster he was literally throwing himself onto other’s desks for support and would look the men in the eyes in hopes of someway getting the message through to them that he was
innocent. Again James Stewart was able to amaze me. His use of humor at the beginning portrayed Mr. Smiths Innocence and ability to see the best in every situation. As Mr. Smith begins to tire at the end of the filibuster his raspy voice is haunting and shows just how determined Mr. Smith is in his pursuit for justice. And his final please to the chamber of senates and to Joseph Paine are felt deep in your heart. Film Review If you are looking for a film that will make you think, laugh, and if you are the emotional type maybe even cry, Mr. Smith goes to Washington may be for you. The movie is a black and white film dealing with the corruption of the government that is taken on by none other than Mr. Smith himself. Mr. Smith, A naïve, Innocent, and justice-seeking individual finds himself being elected as a senate member due to the fact that he is inexperienced and was thought to keep quiet and not get in the way of previous plans. However Mr. Smith finds out about the corruption filled government and is anything but quiet about it. Mr. Smith is then framed and he is forced to stand up for himself and fight the corruption and seek for justice. This is a truly wonderful film. Mr. Smith beautifully played by James Stewart is very relatable and you soon learn to love the character and feel at a deeper level what he is feeling than most characters in movies. The director Frank Capra beautifully portrays the beauty of Washington D.C. with his masterful photography. And the political process of the senate is thoroughly explained throughout the movie.
The movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington did a great job demonstrating the power and influence media can have on American politics. In the movie Jim Taylor is an evil man who corrupts politicians. He uses his control of the media, particularly newspapers, to exert is power on politicians. Without his support politicians are viewed in a negative light by the media and are subsequently unelected (22). In the end of the movie Jefferson Smith who was appointed Senator from his state is falsely accused of trying to profit off of his bill. Senator Jefferson Smith goes to the senate floor to filibuster a motion to have him removed from the senate. The filibuster lasts nearly a full day as does the war of public opinion. Jim Taylor uses his pull with the local media to blacklist all information
The film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was made in 1939 but Franco’s portrayal of America has similarities to today’s society. Franco portrays different factors of America. One thing that he portrays a lot is the American Government. He shows that the political figures only care about themselves and based their decisions on what will benefit him. This is shown throughout the film specifically in the beginning of the film when Hopper the governor of an unknown state has to pick a new U.S Senator. Hopper flips a coin to choose between Jim Taylor and Henry Hill. Instead it landed on a newspaper with a story about Jefferson Smith. He then realized that Smith will be easier to influence and vote his way. This has not changed at all in America. In 2014 political figures still choose people that will support them and have the same beliefs. The only difference is now a day’s most Americans know more about politics and if they appoint someone that does not have the qualification the public voices their opinions. Another thing Franco depicts about America in 1939 is that anything can happen anyone can become successful. This is shown when Smith becomes the senator. He had all the odds against him but Smith believed he could be a good senator and succeeded. Throughout the movie other politicians try to take advantage of him but he stood strong and did what he t...
However, Senator Smith was determined to introduce his bill despite the grim prospects of its ratification, and refused to step back and take a passive role in the Senate. Historically, however, Senators in Smith’s time and position would not have taken on such an ambitious project as a new Senator.
This film influenced me greatly and how I might be able to go about in my speech making. James Farmer Jr. and his debate team delivered their speeches with a lot of emotion, drawing their audiences in on their side. James Farmer used his own experiences and struggles to drive his speech making, while trying to prove himself to everyone that he was not just a child. Although James Farmer and I are different, especially in the way we present our speeches, I admired the way he used his knowledge and emotions to help win the last debate
He took a stand to make a difference in something he was passionate about and he urged the American people to do the same. He made the audience realize that even if this law is passed there will always be times that We the American people will also have to take a stand to do what’s right. His speech is so well written it makes it seem like the only option is to vote for the law to be passed. In a way this speech inspired me to take a stand when something wrong is happening and make a difference. Living in a time period where this was a big issue would have been hard but, I think it needed to happen to show the world that just because your skin color or religion we are all American people and we all need to work together to make this place
There are many accurate depictions of the political process in this movie, but there are also some areas where this movie was just being a people pleaser. The American President accurately portrayed the rolls of the media, the effects of polling, the impact of primaries, and it showed the process of introducing a bill to congress. However, it also was being a typical Hollywood movie at times. This was mostly true in the cases where the President came off being naïve, when he through caution into the wind for a girlfriend, and at other times, like when he was to dignified to join into the smear campaign.
Sex, love, depression, guilt, trust, all are topics presented in this remarkably well written and performed drama. The Flick, a 2014 Pulitzer Prize winning drama by Annie Baker, serves to provide a social commentary which will leave the audience deep in thought well after the curtain closes. Emporia State Universities Production of this masterpiece was a masterpiece in itself, from the stunningly genuine portrayal of the characters of Avery and Rose, to the realism found within the set, every aspect of the production was superb.
What parts of the film were surprising or made you sit back and say, “Hmmm, I need to think more about that? Or, “Wow, I never thought about that.” The part would be when he was talking about “shared equality” up until the 1970’s was a normal thing and how everybody’s income doubled in size as well.
"Mrs. Robinson, you are trying to seduce me," says Benjamin Braddock (Dustin Hoffman). The Graduate, directed by Mike Nichols in 1967 is an influential satire/comedy film about a recent East Coast college graduated who finds himself alienated and aimless in the changing, social and sexual general public of the 1960s, and questioning the values of society. The theme of the film is of an innocent and confused youth who is exploited, mis-directed, seduced (literally and figuratively) and betrayed by a corrupt, self-indulgent, and discredited older generation (that finds stability in “plastics”) that I found to be quite clear and understanding, while also capturing the real spirit of the times and allows America's youth to perceive onscreen an image of themselves which they can both identify with and emulate. The Graduate is a significant film even today due to its use of abstract camera angles, telephoto lenses, excellent cinematography, and great acting. Few visual effects were used, however, matting and numerous point of view shots were used. These characteristics and the fabulous use of mis-en-scene, great writing and the era of the film all made The Graduate what it is today, magnificent.
The film "Garden State" is an eccentric drama; in addition, a romance comedy, with a slew of complex, innate cast of characters, each deeply entrenched in profound emotional and psychological scars, ascending from the regrets of their past. The film is a reflection, on rediscovering yourself after years of goalless ambiguity. Writer/Director Zach Braff, stars as the films’ chief character, Andrew Largeman. In James Berardinelli’s movie review, he said: “Garden State is one of those movies that fails to stay with the viewer for an extended period of time. It 's a forgettable film featuring a throw-away story with unmemorable characters and unremarkable performances.” I must disagree; although "Garden State" can be a tad somber, moody and too subtle for many viewers. Yet, the film is fantastically intriguing, by arousing viewers thoughts, and stimulating ones emotions, and that 's exactly what draws viewers in. Since the storyline requires viewers to dig deeper into the subtle undertones and symbolisms
The film begins with a narration that took place approximately ten days before the 1992 presidential election, Andrew Cooper, a reporter from New Zealand, is approached by a man named Everett Hamm. According to Cooper, who explains his story to the camera, Hamm explained that he was a part of a group called the Alliance for the Rebirth for an Independent America (ARIA). The right-wing, well-funded organization, Cooper claimed, was dedicated to discrediting the Clinton family by any means possible. The filmmakers show a tall, bald-headed, burly man with a lot of shadow over his face to portray Hamm has a monstrous individual. Hamm and his well-known co-partner, lawyer Cliff Jackson, planned to do everything they could to hurt Clinton’s reputation.
Dir. Stanley Kubrick. Prod. Stanley Kubrick, Victor Lyndon, and Ken Adam. By Stanley Kubrick, Terry Southern, Peter George, Gilbert Taylor, Anthony Harvey, and Laurie Johnson. Perf. Peter Sellers, George C. Scott, Sterling Hayden, Keenan Wynn, Slim Pickens, and James Earl Jones. BLC, 1963. DVD.
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.
Barsam, Richard. Looking at Movies An Introduction to Film, Second Edition (Set with DVD). New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. Print.
For this assignment, I decided to do my film review on To Kill a Mockingbird (Mulligan, R., & Pakula, A. Director of the Department of Health and Human Services. d. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. To Kill a Mockingbird [Motion picture on VHS]. United States of America. I have a personal connection to this film because it is one of my most beloved novels by Harper Lee. I have never watched the film so it was a nice experience to see the characters I have loved for years come to life just before my eyes.