Fighting Bodies Fighting Words Analysis

582 Words2 Pages

In Sharon Marcus’ essay, “Fighting Bodies, Fighting Words: A Theory and Practice of Rape Prevention”, she breaks down the process of rape in order to fully understand the act and discusses the ways that women could prevent it. Marcus starts by arguing that
Marcus argues that many current theories of rape present it as inevitable and a part of life. The physical ability of a rapist to overcome his target is the foundation of rape. Feminist anti-rape literature in the US focuses on police procedues and legal definitions, encouraging the idea that rape is inevitable, and only the post rape procedures need intervention. Marcus focus’s on rape prevention. Legal deterrence persuades men not to rape, rather than enabling women to sabotage men’s ability to rape - causing …show more content…

“A rape act thus imposes as well as presupposes misogynist inequalities; rape is not only scripted-it also scripts” (p391) “The rapist does not simply have the power to rape; the social script and the extent to which that script succeeds in soliciting its target’s participation help to create the rapist’s power (pg 391) Gendered grammar of violence sets the rules and structure that assign people to positions in a script Grammar of violence assigned to women: empathy “prods some women to identify with rapists rather than to defend themselves from rapists’ desire to destroy their target” (pg393), responsiveness “Encourages women not to take the offensive in a dialogue with a would-be rapist but to stay within the limits he sets – she can consent or not consent, acquiesce to his demands or dissuade him from them, but she does not actively interrupt him to shift the terms of discussion” (pg

More about Fighting Bodies Fighting Words Analysis

Open Document