Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of henri fayol's principles of management
Henri Fayol theory of classical management
Essay on merits and demerits of Henri Fayol principles of management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relevance of henri fayol's principles of management
Dated back in 1984, Henri Fayol a French mining engineer developed and proposed fourteen principles for management and at the same time come up with five main elements of management. Planning, organizing, coordinating, commanding and controlling were Fayol’s version. As time goes by and generation changes, these five elements of management had been modified and reduced to four, which is plan, lead, organized and control. Fells (2000) claim that Fayol’s theory of management is appropriate and relevant for management nowadays. However, there are still other individual disagree with his theory and thought it is no longer relevant to the society nowadays. However, Foyal’s process of management idea had been the main basic structure of management, which creates clear and relevant set of guidelines that managers will be managing an organization by using the organization resources efficiently and effectively (Dianne 2008). Fayol’s five principles of management are still relevant for managers in this new century as it is the basic of management. The ideas could be modified enable it to suit the new generation or society but it should not be scrap off from management as it had been the guideline for managers and proven its effectiveness in assisting managers to developed perfect managing skills for many years. In this essay I will try to prove Fayol’s five elements of management is still relevant for managers in this new era because it had been a guideline, although been modified enable to suit the new society but it still relevant as it is the basic of management.
By comparison, Fayol’s five element of management was very similar to the modified version. There were three elements still remain in the new version of management, plannin...
... middle of paper ...
..., ‘Fayol Stands the Test of Time’, Journal of Management History, Vol. 6, 8, pp. 345‐360.
Gittell, J.H. 2002, ‘Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects’, Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 11, pp. 1408-1426.
Lewin, A.Y, & Minton, J.W . 1986 ’ Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research’, Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 514-538.
Marrewijk, M.V, & Timmers, J. 2003 ‘Corporate Sustainability Conference 2002: The Impact of CSR on Management Disciplines’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 2/3, pp. 171-184.
Moratis, L, Jeroen, H, & Bert, R. 2006 ‘A dual challenge facing management education: Simulation-based learning and learning about CSR’, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 25 Iss: 3, pp.213 – 231.
In my understanding, management has had only to do with preserving the current status of thing so that today’s methods of production are upheld even tomorrow. The process of managing things. However, as Deming and Lee point out, management and leadership must be innovative enough to look into the future and examine if today’s methods will be relevant tomorrow to yield even more results. Effective management and leadership calls for flexibility to ensure that changes are welcomed and any adjustments deemed necessary are taken into consideration so as not to miss out on any opportunity
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
pp. 146-170. Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A., (2004). Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Over 50 years ago, English-speaking managers were directly introduced to Henry Fayol’s theory in management. His treatise, General and Industrial Management (1949), has had a great effect on managers and the practice of management around the world. However, 24 years after the English translation of Fayol, Henri Mintzberg in the Nature of Managerial Work (1973) developed another theory and stated that Fayol’s work was just “folklores”.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Through the interview, it is proven that Fayol’s four functions; Mintzberg’s managerial roles and Katz’s idea of management skills are essential to be part of the manager consideration when making a decision because these theories are able to assist in organisation’s progress. Tracy (2014), suggested “The true measure of the value of any business leader and manager is performance” and this could be reflected in Manager X as he has proven that organisation performance is top priority for him. To make a conclusion on this topic of discussion, a manager duty is to function as a leader of an organisation, a negotiator with the clients, a motivator to the team and the coordinator of the whole organisation’s progress.
Rodrigues, C. (2001), “Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organisations effectively”, Monclair State University, New Jersey.
...n Africa. As mentioned in the main body of the essay, the Indian oil company seem to be the leading the way as they look to be resolving all these issues by dedicating some of their time to solving serious issues of the world. Moving on, the advantages seem to outweigh the disadvantages because some companies who are using the CSR approach to show themselves in a positive light in the eyes of the public are, on one hand helping the problems in the world and at the same time, gaining good publicity. It is also worth mentioning that companies who are looking of finding new ways of motivating their staff then from the survey by Net Impact will be a real wind in their sails because by using CSR it will not only motivate the employees but also allow them to make a little pay cut. Surely, if these are the advantages of taking CSR then it will certainly be worth it.
In today’s competitive business environment, effective management plays a crucial role. The article Five Minds of a Manager by Jonathan Gosling and Henry Mintzberg, identify some important aspects of effective managers. According to the author, “The world of the manager is complicated and confusing.” Consequently, mangers need to think above ordinary employees. In particular, managers should, think global and act local, collaborate through competitions, be agents of change and maintain order. This paper provides a reflective review of the article Five Minds of a Manager by Jonathan Gosling and Henry Mintzberg.
Although it maximized efficiency and productivity but its main limitation was ignoring human aspects of employment. This is manifested in the following:
4. Kinicki, Angelo, Williams, Brian Management, a practical introduction, Second Edition. New York, New York, McGraw-Hill 2006/2003
Management plays a significant role in how business operates. The diversity of approaches to the theoretical and practical background of management has come up with several versions of what is meant by such key words as management and organization. The academia views expressed in relation to management theories take a different role than that prescribed to managers. There has not been any concrete definition of management even though the classic definition of Henri fayol still remains in contention to be the preferred choice after eighty years. In the context of what is required I would like to elaborate on the following journals.
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
Nowadays, management has become an important part of the society. The role of management is to assist the organisation to make the best use of its resource to achieve its goal. Base on the aim of management, one of the theorists Henri Fayol proposed the four necessary management functions: planning, organisation, leading, controlling are the tools managers use to achieve these goals. (Jones 2006) This essay is going to describe and discuss these functions.