In terms of language use, one of the approaches that Blair uses to construct the identity as a ‘normal person’ is presenting himself in a folksy and relaxed style. The term ‘style’, in the area of critical discourse analysis, as Fairclough (2003:25) defines, is the way of enacting particular political identity by using discourses. According to Fairclough (1995:164), there are ‘discourses of ordinary life and ordinary experience’, which are opposed to ‘official’ discourses. What Blair uses to build his political identity is a ‘lifeworld’ discourse (Pearce 2001:211). In the following sections, Blair’s strategic use of a conversational style in public election broadcast will be examined. The informality is one of the distinctive features of Blair’s language style in PEB. It is widely noted that in contemporary public communication, there is an increasing informality in politicians’ PEBs (Fairclough 1996:7; Pearce 2005:65-66), especially in Blair’s political broadcasts. In a broad sense, the ‘formality’ refers to the language style ‘associated with everyday life’ (Fairclough 2000b:1-2; Pearce 2005:65). Fairclough claims that the informality is made up by two strands: the conversationalization and the personalization …show more content…
The use of ‘I’ brings the individual life into the political discourse and makes it more conversational and personal. Communicating with audience in his personal identity helps Blair to build an intimacy with audience, which can ‘work well in the format of the PPB’ (Pearce 2005:81). In cases mentioned above, it is possible to replace ‘I’ for ‘we’, which presents the stance of the Labour party clearly and unambiguously. Thus, if Blair substitutes ‘we’ for ‘I’ in his text, as what most leaders in political history did, the language style is significantly more formal while the intimacy with audience is
Wilson, T. W. (n.d.). "This is War" American Rhetoric: The Power of Oratory in the United States. Retrieved April 14, 2011, from http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/wilsonwarmessage.htm
Former Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher, in her 2004 eulogy for Ronald Reagan, exemplifies both his impact and legacy on the world. Throughout her speech, Thatcher memorializes Reagan’s performance in office as well as the decisions he made as a person by illustrating their time together to the reader. By utilizing these examples, the reader can then understand Thatcher’s overall claim that Reagan was one of the most profound leaders in history; however, the impact of Thatcher’s use of diction and sentence arrangement both provoke thought in the reader and allows him or her to comprehend her message on a more sophisticated level.
John Marsh, Ph.D., shares his epiphany, that his sharing the popular belief that higher education was the answer to bringing about economic equality and curing poverty, was in fact wrong; in this short selection, “Why Education Is Not an Economic Panacea”, taken from his book, “Class Dismissed: Why We Cannot Teach or Learn Our Way Out of Inequality”. Marsh had felt that gaining a higher education himself worked to bring him to a level of economic equality, so, it should work the same way for everyone else. His change of heart comes after perhaps stepping down from the pedestal that many, with lots of letters after their name, sit on, or are put upon by others, and witnessing first-hand the dismal rates of graduation of students in the single course he teaches for The Odyssey Program. Serving as good Public Relations for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the program’s purpose was two-fold; it was to provide, at no cost, college level course(s) for low-income adults and look good for the University. In this excerpt, Marsh’s narrow vision seems to have opened up somewhat, however, it does not demonstrate that his visual field widened enough to see that there is much, much more than simply economics or education that is at play in determining where people end up in the spectrum of being considered successful in the United States. (Marsh 914)
Tom Robinson, a black man in To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the main characters in
These devices can be applied more effectively by verbal communication. Firstly, face-to-face communication allows speaker to show his persistence, determination, establishing trust and constitute a strong emotional bond on audiences. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is an accurate masterpiece of rhetorical devices. In his speech, he quotes from the Constitution of the United States and builds up his own credibility, refers to the religious and patriotic documents by drawing attention on emotional values of many people. Additionally, he makes some rhythmic repetitions, which enriches the power of his words such as “Let freedom ring from”, “One hundred years later” and “Now is the time”. These strong traditions of verbal communication support political leaders in public speaking.“Anyone who has heard the speeches of Martin Luther King, such as are still available in recorded form will recognize the rhetorical features that lay behind such powerful words.” (Furniss, 2004, P. 88) Speakers who use paralinguistic features and rhetorical devices appropriately can give the message without isolating at the time of oral argument, while understanding the reactions of audiences and leading the
On July 27, 2004, Barack Obama made arguably his most important speech, “The Audacity of Hope”, at the Democratic National Convention Keynote Address. These conventions are for political parties to announce a winner for nomination. All the way through his piece, Obama focuses on connecting Americans and himself to the audience. In fact, at the time, Barack Obama was a US Senate candidate for the United States president, and in making this speech, was offered a window for raising his popularity. Throughout “The Audacity of Hope” speech, Barack Obama implements three main devices to raise his political popularity: repetition, abstract language, and structure.
1. What is the difference between Introduction Legislative issues are a battle for force to put certain political, financial and social thoughts into practice. In this procedure, language assumes an urgent part, for each political activity is readied, went hand in hand with, affected and played by dialect. This paper examines discourse on political talking, specifically the inaugural address of President Barack Obama.
Butler describes modern notions of identity as ?being made up of regulatory ideals?9, these regulatory ideals provide ?idealised and reified norms which people are expected to live up to.?10 These types of regulatory ideals are sustained or undermined through performance. Performativity is not a singular act, ?it is always the reiteration of a norm or a set of norms, and to the extent that it acquires an act like status in the present, it conceals or dissimulates the conventions of which it is a repitition.?11It is through this repeated action that that these norms are created and lived up to. This idea can also be related to discourse; Butler argues that performative acts are statements that also produce that which they say. Discourse promotes specific kinds of power relations, in other words to know is to participate in complicated webs of power. Thus perfomative acts are a domain in which discourse acts as power.
CDA looks to disclose the ways discourses are produced and distributed (Halliday, 1985), as well as how they work symbolically to disguise power (Thompson, 1990) and control others
In Harper Lee’s novel To Kill A Mockingbird, a black man is wrongfully convicted due to racism. In Macomb which is a small town in southern Alabama Scout and Jem Finch spend their days trying to find out who the mysterious Boo Radley is. When their dad Atticus which is a lawyer gets assigned Tom Robinsons case. Who is a black man accused of beating and raping Mayela Ewell. Throughout the story Jem and scout learn you shouldn’t judge someone until you walk around in their skin.
Furthermore, this goes to show that popular culture and political communication, far from being distinct realms of study, are ‘closely – even inseparably – entwined. Political communication is a form of popular culture, and popular culture communicates political ideas and values.’ (Street 2012: 81). We may further argue that popular culture may potentially provide ‘an alternative to established forms of political communication’ (Street, Inthorn and Scott 2011: 352) by providing an ‘alternative sense of community’ (Hermes 2005: 11).
A political science major is the main discourse community I am apart of. It is a community that consists of students studying political science through a four-year bachelor’s program at the University of New Mexico. Almost anyone interested in being a part of this community is capable of joining. This guide goes in depth about what this discourse community is about. Making it easy for anyone that would like to be apart of the community, allowing outsiders to see if it is truly for them. This guide will touch on the origin, goals, values, and the exploration of language usage in the discourse community of political science majors.
The aim of this paper is to achieve better understanding of political communication by critically reviewing Jesper Stromback’s four-dimension concept of mediatisation of politics. The essay is divided into three parts as follows. The first part presents the concepts of mediation and mediatisation, which contribute to the basis of Stromback’s theories. In the second part, the concept of mediatisation of politics by Stromback is deconstructed. With the help of such a concept, political communication can be perceived as a process in which adaptations between politics and media as well as competitions between media logic and political logic are involved in. The final section of the paper points out the limits of Stromback’s concept and further illustrates the extent to which political communication can be better understood. Political communication, in this context, should be conceived of as a process conducted under the functions of different variations beyond the spheres of media and politics.
People often times single me out for being a christian. They just love asking me about touchy subjects to see my response. And this is because, unfortunately, there are so many christians who have this idea that the whole world needs to see things the same way they do. You see so much hate coming out of a religion that claims to preach peace and love. Christians see it as protecting the bible but it just comes across as ignorant. I am not saying I don’t share in the opinions of many christians, but more than anything I am saying that christians need to learn that not everyone in the world is going to see it the same way they will. When it comes to sin, same sex marriage, and living a holy life there are more than one opinion on what is right. So, you can’t justify all of the hate-acts in the name of your religion. Instead use all that energy you waste on hate to love and help those around you, despite whether you think they are “right or wrong”. I believe that that’s what God is more concerned about.
Goodwin, B. (2007) Using political ideas. 5th edition. Chichester, England: Wiley. Heywood, A. (2012) Political Ideologies: An Introduction.