I agree with Emerson's statement because if you already master something that your good at and don't try new things then you can never learn. For example if I'm really good at football and I want to play basketball I can't just start on a team with knowing any of the rule. Another example would be applying for a job or trying to ride a motorcycle. Lets say I wanted to ride a motorcycle but I only knew how to drive a car. I can't just hop on a motorcycle and be able to ride it I have to learn how to ride one. I also have to take a test showing I know how to ride a motorcycle. If I only know how to drive a car and I don't want to learn how to ride a motorcycle but I want ride one I can't because I have no experience riding one.
You have to learn something new things if you want to try new things. Another example would be me trying a new sport. I I'm really good at football but I wanted to play basketball I can't. First I would have to learn all the rules to the sport so I can know what I can and cannot do. Second I would have to learn the basics, like how to dribble the ball and shot it. Finally I would have to know how to play with other people because basketball is a team sport and it is nothing like football. My finale example would be applying for a job. Let say I work at a fast food place and all I do all day is take orders and I apply for a different job. I wouldn't get the job because if they don't sell food I cant do anything. If I were to work at a hotel I wouldn't be good at it because in the past all I did all day was take orders for people. Someone on the job would have to teach me on what I should do because I have no experience on how to do my job. If I am not able to finish the task given to me at my job I would be fired from my job. This proves that you must learn new things to grow because not everything is the same as the things you have mastered. You must learn new things to become a better person and have better experience at what you do. trying new things will make you grow. I agree with Emerson's statement because you can't grow if you don't do things beyond what you have already mastered.
1.I would describe Faber as a “ a loner but he is also a mischievous person ” . he is similar to montag by living and listening to the rules. They are different because Faber is always at home, he doesn’t go anywhere but montag does go outside. Faber’s purpose is to help montag understand book’s. “ that’s the good part of dying when you’ve nothing to lose , you run any risk you want”. Which is saying that because they loners they don’t have no one to answer , but Faber is a loner that wants n trouble “not if you start talking the sort of talk that might get me burnt for my trouble. “ plant the books, turn an alarm and see the firemen’s houses burn, is that what you mean” Faber wants to be tricky and plant books to frame firemen. “ I’ve a list of firemen’s residence everywhere”. “ you and I who else will set the fires”. Montag wants to go along with the deceit but he doesn’t want to set the fires .
Clarisse is a very smart and thoughtful character. She isn't stuck on materialistic things like other people in their society; she enjoys nature. Some personality traits would be confrontative/extroverted, knowledge-seeking, scatterbrained, curious, and knowledgeable. Because of these things, she is considered crazy and is an outcast: "I'm seventeen and I'm crazy. My uncle says the two always go together. When people ask your age, he said, always say seventeen and insane. Isn't this a nice time of night to walk?" (Bradbury 5).
Are you really happy? Or are you sad about something? Sad about life or money, or your job? Any of these things you can be sad of. Most likely you feel discontentment a few times a day and you still call yourself happy. These are the questions that Guy Montag asks himself in the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. In this book people are thinking they are happy with their lives. This is only because life is going so fast that they think they are but really there is things to be sad about. Montag has finally met Clarisse, the one person in his society that stops to smell the roses still. She is the one that gets him thinking about how his life really is sad and he was just moving too fast to see it. He realizes that he is sad about pretty much everything in his life and that the government tries to trick the people by listening to the parlor and the seashells. This is just to distract people from actual emotions. People are always in a hurry. They have 200 foot billboards for people driving because they are driving so fast that they need more time to see the advertisement. Now I am going to show you who are happy and not happy in the book and how our society today is also unhappy.
“Remember when we had to actually do things back in 2015, when people barely had technology and everyday life was so difficult and different? When people read and thought and had passions, dreams, loves, and happiness?” This is what the people of the book Fahrenheit 451 were thinking, well that is if they thought at all or even remembered what life used to be like before society was changed.
You take advantage of your life every day. Have you ever wondered why? You never really think about how much independence you have and how some of us treat books like they’re useless. What you don’t realize is that both of those things are the reason that we live in such a free society. If we didn’t have books and independence, we would treat death and many other important things as if it were no big deal. That is the whole point of Ray Bradbury writing this book.
Few people in the world choose to stand out instead of trying to be like everyone else. In Fahrenheit 451, most people are the same because no one ever thinks about anything and their world moves so fast. In Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, the author uses characterization to show the individuality and sameness of the characters.
To start, the novel Fahrenheit 451 describes the fictional futuristic world in which our main protagonist Guy Montag resides. Montag is a fireman, but not your typical fireman. In fact, firemen we see in our society are the ones, who risk their lives trying to extinguish fires; however, in the novel firemen are not such individuals, what our society think of firemen is unheard of by the citizens of this futuristic American country. Instead firemen burn books. They erase knowledge. They obliterate the books of thinkers, dreamers, and storytellers. They destroy books that often describe the deepest thoughts, ideas, and feelings. Great works such as Shakespeare and Plato, for example, are illegal and firemen work to eradicate them. In the society where Guy Montag lives, knowledge is erased and replaced with ignorance. This society also resembles our world, a world where ignorance is promoted, and should not be replacing knowledge. This novel was written by Ray Bradbury, He wrote other novels such as the Martian chronicles, the illustrated man, Dandelion wine, and something wicked this way comes, as well as hundreds of short stories, he also wrote for the theater, cinema, and TV. In this essay three arguments will be made to prove this point. First the government use firemen to get rid of books because they are afraid people will rebel, they use preventative measures like censorship to hide from the public the truth, the government promotes ignorance to make it easier for them to control their citizens. Because the government makes books illegal, they make people suppress feelings and also makes them miserable without them knowing.
It's been five days since my family's death, I am still grieving over them but I don't let that affect my work. I've been working a lot harder so I don't let them down, I'm getting good praise from my lord at the moment, it's very refreshing. I earned a hand me down tunic for my hard work and I love it! I've never been Given anything as needed or special as this. Today's duties for me include: going to the markets and getting some food and water for the lord and the animals, planting some new seeds, and washing the lords’ horses. It's a pretty easy day for me, but tomorrow it'll be back to hard work. It's my birthday tomorrow, not that anyone knows that, but I turn 18, sometimes I wished that once I turned this age I would be allowed to leave
Everyone has the ability to look at where the world is today and picture what the future might hold. That’s exactly what Huxley, Orwell and Bradbury did in their futuristic novels, though exaggerating quite a bit. In Huxley’s novel Brave New World, he depicts a society where people are decanted from bottles instead of being born from mothers. George Orwell gives us a glimpse at a world where everything is regulated, even sex, in his novel 1984. Bradbury foresaw the future in the most accurate way in his novel Fahrenheit 451; writing about a future without literature to guard the people from negative feelings, just as our college campuses in America are doing by adding trigger warnings to books with possible offensive content.
The North Korean government is known as authoritarian socialist; one-man dictatorship. North Korea could be considered a start of a dystopia. Dystopia is a community or society where people are unhappy and usually not treated fairly. This relates how Ray Bradbury's 1953 novel Fahrenheit 451 shows the readers how a lost of connections with people and think for themselves can lead to a corrupt and violent society known as a dystopia.
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is a novel based on a dystopian society. The way society copes with the government is through conformity. Conformity is an act of matching attitudes and beliefs. Many of the characters like Mildred, Beatty, and the rest conform to the government because it is the way this culture lives. Individuality is not accepted in this society because it causes conflicts with one another. The government demolishes any kind of individuality one has, and does not tolerate with any kind of knowledge because they will find a way to punish an individual. Individuality expresses the differences of a person, it create a unique personality of one self like Clarisse McClellan showed Montag in the beginning of the story. Clarisse
Fahrenheit 451’s Relevance to Today Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence of the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today, which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books. Patai explains that Bradbury saw that people would soon be controlled by the television and saw it as the creators chance to “replace lived experience” (Patai 2).
Narrator 1- It is currently 1775 in the month of April and Elisha Connors and her husband, minuteman Archibald Connors, were sleeping soundly in their home in the town of Lexington.
When Skyler demands to know what Walt has been hiding, he admits that he has been cooking meth. Horrified, Skyler asks for a divorce in return for her silence, and demands that Walt move out. She ultimately comes to uneasily accept the situation and helps Walt launder his drug money, but refuses to have anything to do with him outside of business. The rift in their marriage worsens when Skyler sleeps with her boss, Ted Beneke (Christopher Cousins). Walt tries to get back at her by making a pass at the school superintendent, who puts him on indefinite suspension.
Everything worth knowing can be taught by going out into the world and meeting new people and doing things that a person has not experienced for themselves. Oscar Wilde is right in certain circumstances, but he is also wrong. While valuable knowledge is not gotten from a textbook we have to get it somehow. Nobody is born knowing everything they do when they are at the end of their life, so if nothing worth knowing can be taught, how would anybody