The Help for Fahrenheit 451
The book I chose for this assignment was The Help by Kathryn Stockett. I chose this book because I believe that it has content that is important to society and should continue to influence the mind of others. The Help should be preserved because it has a theme of fighting for what you want in life, it has life lessons about staying true to your own values and not letting anyone derail that, and it shows the important historical perspectives of women, both white and african american, during the time period the book was set in.
One of the main reasons this book should be preserved is because it has an important theme of fighting for what you want in life. In this book, Eugenia (Skeeter) Phelan, one of the main
…show more content…
Likewise, in Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, the main character Guy Montag, continues throughout most of the story to fight society and the laws that come within it. In the story, Montag wants to learn …show more content…
In The Help, Skeeter is apart of a group of friends who are all married and have children, excluding her. She has no partner or a child. Her mother is one of many who nag at her for her difference, yet she is unconcerned with the fact that she doesn't have a partner. In one statement Skeeter declares she’s much more interested in her writing career than finding a man. Although later in the story she does find a man, she still continues to stay true to her values and expectations. This is important because it shows that she does not care what other women are doing, she is only concerned with herself and her goals. This contributes to the importance of the story because when readers read this book and process all of these lessons they will hopefully want the same attributes, creating a more independent society. Similarly, in Fahrenheit 451, Montag chooses not associate himself with the constant technology that seems to consume most of the other characters in the book, such as his wife, Millie. Most of the characters seem to be more interested in what’s in technology more so than what’s going on around them. For example, when confiding to Faber about his situation, Montag says, “Nobody listens anymore. I can't talk to the walls because they're yelling at me. I can't talk to my wife; she listens to the walls.” (Bradbury 82) This statement
Guy Montag in Fahrenheit 451 written by Ray Bradbury, not only shows personal responsibility but moral character and inner strength. He shows these particular traits when he stands up for what he believes in and goes against the majority.
Even though one may not realize it, all books have life lessons intertwined into the plot. Whether the lesson is simple or extraordinarily complex, there is always something one can get out of a book and can apply to their lives. Through Montag’s struggles, the readers learn the value of family, the irony of judging a book by its cover, and self-created thoughts and ideas. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury includes many life lessons through the characters thoughts and decisions, which allow readers to understand the plot in a more detailed matter.
"Burn em' to ashes, then burn the ashes",imagine a fireman saying these words, fireman that burn things to ashes instead of putting the ashes out; that use flame throwers instead of water hoses. In the futuristic distopian society created by Ray Bradbury in the book Fahrenheit 451 is the harsh reality that main character Montag must go through with his drug addicted wife, a retired English Professor named Faber, and a very intelligent fire captain named cap. Beatty, as well as a teenage girl named Clarise that is the symbol of purity. .
Change is inevitable and can sometimes lead to success. In literature, many authors have the characters in their books change because it helps their stories progress from the beginning to the end. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury he has the main character Montag change throughout the novel to show the readers that Montag has learned from his surroundings and his mentor, Faber. Overall, we realize that even though Montag started out as one of the uneducated firefighters burning books, he fought his ignorance and realized that books are really something everyone needs to expand their knowledge and lead a successful career.
The lost of connections with people, and when people don’t think for themselves can lead to a corrupt and violent society. Thats why in the novel Fahrenheit 451, Montag learns that when thinking for your own self you can achieve your goals. Having connections with other people like Clarisse and Montag is a good thing and not bad. They both learn that thinking different and have a real connection with other people can help society and not turn it into a corrupt and violent society.
Fahrenheit 451 centers upon protagonist Guy Montag, who is employed as a fireman: someone who, in this society, no longer puts out fires, but rather, starts them to burn the houses of those who possess books. In the beginning, Montag finds much enjoyment in and is extremely faithful to his occupation and is the ultimate conformist of his society—he is like the millions upon millions of other people in his society who are completely brainwashed by the government, oblivious to the autonomous democratic societies in which their ancestors lived. However, Montag’s character abruptly changes upon his acquaintance with Clarisse McClellan, a seventeen-year-old girl who knew of a past so shockingly different, causing Montag to truly question the current society and his own happiness. His dissatisfaction is instigated through a series of distressing events which follow his initial encounter with Clarisse, including witnessing his wife, Mildred Montag, attempt suicide, receiving news that Clarisse had died in a car accident and the impending war. He ultimately turns to seek relief
“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.” ― Albert Einstein In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Guy Montag meets a girl who is different from the others in the city. The city is full of people who watch television almost all of the time rather than doing something with their life.While he doesn’t think very much, she thinks and observes often. Over the next few weeks of seeing her daily, his way of thinking completely changes. Being a fireman, the change in the way he thinks is so difficult to fathom so that he steals a book from one of the houses the firemen had to burn. Montag is figured out by his boss and has to burn down his own house. Soon afterwards, Montag must go on the run to avoid being arrested. The government is on guard trying to find him to show people what'd happen if they were to break laws. Getting help from an older man who had learned to handle the knowledge while Montag could not, Montag is able to make it out of the city quickly with little damage done to himself. Ray Bradbury is warning readers of the horrible impacts caused by laziness and how the government can take advantage of weak minded people.
Fahrenheit 451’s Relevance to Today Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence of the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today, which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books. Patai explains that Bradbury saw that people would soon be controlled by the television and saw it as the creators chance to “replace lived experience” (Patai 2).
Ky Vo College writing Mrs. Bergaus May 16, 2016. What Awaits Us in The Future. What is the meaning of happiness? In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, happiness is a virtual family, watching endless amounts of TV on a huge plasma display and working out. Ray Bradbury depicts a dystopian future America, where the government is corrupt, socializing is strange and reading books is against the law.
From our readings so far, one can see the strenuous decisions that have to be made when choosing to conform or to rebel against societies expectations. There can be both positives and negatives to conforming or rebelling. One isn’t right or wrong over the other, it’s based off of the particular individual. “The Hero’s Journey” is the perfect template for most works of literature. It conveys the steps necessary individuals must take to find themselves and to overall grow as a person. “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. are perfect examples of characters going through the cycles of the “Hero’s Journey,” while trying to determine exactly where they belong in society. Not only characters in a story,
Although he does not rebel directly against Big Brother as one would imagine, he does rebel against its ideas. This occurs when he discovers that the girl that he initially thought was stalking him tells him that she loves him. After only being able to talk to her in a business-like manner in crowded areas to avoid detection, they meet out in the woods one day where they are free from The Party 's censorship and have sex. Since the government tells everybody that the act of sexual intercourse should strictly happen for reproduction and not enjoyment, he sees this as an act of rebellion. However, towards the end of the novel he becomes captured and tortured to the point where he truly believes that he loves Big Brother, and fails at changing anything. Going back to Fahrenheit 451, a similar rebellion occurs. Guy Montag (the main character) works as a firefighter who has one job: burn down anyone 's house that has possession of a book. As he 's going through his daily routine though, he begins to wonder what books contain that make them so evil. Out of curiosity, he steals a book from one of the houses they had to burn down, and brings it home. Reading the book makes him much more curious – an extremely dangerous trait to a utopia. Later in the novel though, his house becomes the next target, and gets burnt down. He flees the house, and eventually escapes the manhunt for him by floating down a river, until he meets some other rebels living out in the woods. Throughout both of these novels, rebellion appears a lot, but each book has different outcomes from
The book I read was Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. In this book, A firefighter named Guy Montag was living a very happy life burning people’s book and the houses they were hidden in. That is until he met a seventeen year old girl named Clarisse McClellan who opened Montag’s eyes to show him a world he wanted to be in. After Montag and his firemen co- workers went to another house that contained hidden books, he met an elderly lady that was not afraid of their presence. The lady was tortured by the firemen but said these words “Play the man, master Ridley; we shall this day light such a candle by God’s grace in England, as I trust shall never be put out.” The lady refused to leave and was then burnt along with her books. A short while after the incident Montag asked Captain Beatty about the quote the lady said and Captain Beatty said she got the quote from a man named Nicholas Ridley who said this as he was burnt alive at Oxford, for heresy, on October 16,
Guy Montag, the protagonist in the novel Fahrenheit 451, was stuck in a time when society was set to one standard. Montag had been living by his society’s “rules” which ultimately required everyone had to live and act the same. Any variance from the “rules” or standards would be considered abnormal and wrong. Montag’s journey on the path of redemption began the day that he met a seventeen year old girl named Clarisse McClellan. With the help of Clarisse, Montag transforms himself from a thoughtless machine into a free spirited intellectual. When the old lady burns herself up with the books is when Montag realizes that burning books is completely wrong and that his society is messed up. The old lady said before she burned was “Play the man, Master Ridley; we shall this day light such a candle, by God’s grace, in Englan...
In Fahrenheit 451, the main character Montag a noble men following rules and the law. As the noble keeps going the character starts to question what is his purpose. We read how he is in a dark smoky place where he is burning books when he should be putting out fire but he is starting them. Knowledge is band everyone should be the same know one should be smarter every one should be equal if you break the law you pay with your life and property because books are bad that harm the people and confuses and makes you feel things.
Fahrenheit 451, written in 1953, still advocates for a traditional monogamous relationship for the protagonist. Much unlike The Handmaid’s Tale, which was written in 1985 – a time in which the feminist movement was at large – and wanted a chance to break away from traditional relationships. Initially, Montag is happily under the impression that his relationship with Mildred is acceptable; however this is called into question after her suicide attempt. Montag slowly breaks away from conformity as he realises that their relationship is hardly one at all, that they are unable to connect with each other. Even when he tries to bond with her, asking her about how they met, her Mildred’s response is impersonal and unsympathetic. This is reinforced when she informs him of the death of his friend, Clarisse telling him “she’s gone for good. I think she’s dead” in a nonchalant manner, disregarding her husband’s feelings. His relationship with Clarisse, however, defies what is expected. Upon their first meeting, Montag asks her “But what do you talk about?” showing his shock at the thought of a relationship like that. The society in which they live supports the idea of a lack of communication, as it is easier to conform if the populace cannot connect with one another, thus isolating them; in concordance Aleš Kozel notes that “The emptiness of their bond can be supported