Fahrenheit 451: Poem Analysis

Fahrenheit 451 is a standout book by Ray Bradbury that covers every corner of the complicated topic called censorship. It even addresses issues of limits on personal freedoms. This book is basically about a futuristic world where the job of a fireman is to set fire to books, not prevent fires. A fireman named Guy Montag then starts to question his task at hand: burning books. Just like Bradbury, many authors have written texts based on their opinions about censorship. Along with Fahrenheit 451, poems, newspaper articles, magazine articles and even the Constitution have touched base on censorship. One poem that discusses this problem is “Rain” by Billy Collins. This poem explains censorship in a domino effect. The author shows how banning books

US linked to new wave of censorship, surveillance on web”. The article states the benefits of censorship in a free society, although there are both benefits and dangers of censorship in a free society. Fahrenheit 451 responds to censorship in every detailed page of the book. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury has created a life where censorship is in the center of all of its problems. The book addresses censorship with a pretty unique story. In this future society they burn all books for many different reasons. To start, it addresses censorship by saying that it is needed. They say censorship is essential because it makes people happier. In a deep conversation between Guy Montag and the head of his fire department (Captain Beatty), Beatty tells him, “Colored people don’t like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people

It seems to me that the government of the society in the novel gives the people a decent number of freedoms, except when it comes to literature. For example, the people in the text are allowed to drive as rapid as 130 miles per hour, but anyone caught with a single book is arrested. Then, in Fahrenheit 451 the people have to fight for their personal freedoms. One of the characters, named Faber, is against the book burning and he wished he battled against it. He explains this by saying, “I’m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the “guilty”, but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself”. This quotation confirms one of the ways that the book acknowledges limits on personal freedoms. Amendment one gives you an abundance of personal freedoms, including freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Fahrenheit 451 shows what life would be like if we did not have those two freedoms. Some of the characters in the book are forced to keep their memorization of writings inside of their head. They do not have the personal freedom of being able to share their admiration of books. They say, “We’ll pass the books on to our children, by word of mouth, and let our children wait, in turn, on to the other people”. The novel Fahrenheit 451 sends hard-hitting notes of what life would be like