Yaqi Zhang
CMHT 4750
Assignment #2
Assignment #2: Jane Elliot's "Eye of the Storm" Video
1. How did she divide her class for the project? Why?
She divided her class by eye colors which are blue eyes and brown eyes. She wanted these students to feel unfair treatment and learn about the prejudice/discrimination that could affect their life.
2. Please list at least 2 other ways she could have divided the class that would also have been effective for this project.
One way is to divide these students by gender. She could also divide these students by hair color. Foe example, dark hair color and light hair color.
3. Why did she decide to conduct the project?
According to the video, she thought that the children have to find out and be taught that prejudice and discrimination is wrong. Also, she wanted to let these children know that how it feels when discrimination and prejudice happened. She wanted her students to learn more outside from the textbook.
4.
…show more content…
What were four of the comments that the "superior" group made during the first day of the project? Be specific. What did you think about these comments?
One student from the blue eyes group said “I felt like a king, like I ruled the browns eyes, like I was better than them, and happy”.
“Blue eyes go first for lunch”
“Alert people with collars go back”
“I am on the top”
These comments show that the students who have blue eyes feel like they have higher social statues than those with brown eyes. Also, these comments are great reflection that shows how easy children’s mind could be affected just because they have different eye colors.
5. What were four of the comments that the "less-superior" group made during the first day of the project? Be specific. What did you think about these comments?
“When we were down in the bottom and everything bad was happening on us”
“You felt like you don't even want to try to do anything”
“It makes you feel like taking our best friends away from
The Perfect Storm is a novel written by Sebastian Junger, that retells the horrific story of fishermen and sailors who were caught in the eye of the worst storm in history. The book mainly focuses on the Andrea Gail, a swordfishing boat, with a crew of 6 men, who disappeared without a trace deep into the northern atlantic sea. In the year 2000, almost 10 years after the tragic event took place, a motion picture, perfectly titled, The Perfect Storm which was based on the novel was released. There were subtle to few changes in the plot line of the story, however there were many differences among the book and movie. The movie is very intact with the plot and is very based on the real story behind it. I believe the creator of the movie wanted, to whatever extent possible, recreate the events that happened in the storm as factual and according to the book itself. The movie, however, left out a tremendous amount of rich details that were a part of the book , such as varying kinds of information and direct quotes from people who were associated with the storm. The movie instead added more events to the story that weren`t in the book, to add more depth to the movie and to make it more enjoyable.
This made the author dislike and have hatred towards the parents of his fellow classmates for instilling the white supremacy attitude and mind-set that they had. It wasn’t possible they felt this way on their own because honestly growing up children don’t see color they just see other kids to play with. So this must have meant that the parents were teaching their children that they were better and above others because there skin was
My analysis is on the film The Goonies. While I view the movie and determine the various norms, behaviors, roles and interaction between group members, as well as individuals the examination within the realm of film can present many of the same components. Thus, our group selected this movie to analyze based on its formation of a cohesive problem-solving group full of unforgettable characters. The Goonies portray many different theories and aspects of small group communication.
She asked this of over 100 children from both segregated and integrated schools. The data she collected suggested that although the majority of black children identified the darker doll to look like them, they assigned the black doll with negative traits and wanted to play with the white doll instead. However, it was shown that the children from integrated schools were more aware of the injustice and had more equal opinions on which doll was better. This research and discovery gave new knowledge on the perception of self image, and more particularly race, in children. It demonstrates how we are shaped from an early age by our environment, conditioned to think what is ‘nice’ or ‘mean’, ‘pretty’ or ‘ugly’.
Students were grouped by IQ, those who had an above average or higher were helped to go to college and those who had a low IQ’s were not given the support or the push needed to get them into college. Educators allowed low education standards and refused to see students as equals. The advisors set students sights low for the future by encouraging how service jobs were a practical choice for us Mexicans. Cleaning houses were the normal thing to do for Mexican-American females. Students were tired of the inadequate staff and the staff's lack of concern for their students. The students sent out a survey among the other students to see if they were satisfied with what they were getting from their education. The result was that the schools and instructors were not meeting the needs of the students’ more so of the Chicano students.
Christina Judith Hein. (2004, July). Color-Blindness vs. Race Matters: Pre-School Education and the Need for a Communal Vision. Multicultural Education, 51-53.
The ignorance presented within media affects people of color negatively as well. The Clark Doll Test presented this in the 1950s. Their tests show that black children felt inferior to white children. In 2010, CNN conducted a study amongst New York and Georgian children similar to the Doll Test used in the case Brown vs Board of Education led by Professor Margaret Spenser. White children had “white bias”. According to the study, this meant that they identified “the color of their own skin with positive attributes and darker skin with negative attributes”. Black children had bias towards white people as well. Despite the infamous Clark Doll Test being over half a century old, it shows that the ideals have not changed. It led her to conclude that even in 2010, “We are still living in a society where dark things are devalued and white things are valued.”
She goes on to tell readers of a child's perception of race with other life examples that she learned from her own students. She states that children learn prejudices and stereotypes early on in life from cartoons, story books and their own parents. They are easily susceptible these things even if th...
There are many social identities to take into consideration. It is not just race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, language and social class. There are also categories such as health, education level, and body type. With a surplus of social factors, it is easy to have a hidden prejudice toward certain social identities. It is critical to first acknowledge how institutional forms of prejudice will covertly affect a child’s educational experience. As you can imagine, overt prejudice, a term used to describe the explicit discrimination you see, is easier to spot and therefore avoid. But the covert/indirect prejudices are much easier to slip through the cracks of lessons and classroom materials. For example, having a selection of children’s books that showcase only white, slim, heterosexual family structure is an illustration of a way ...
This experiment was originally tested by Muzafer Sherif is a famous social psychologist who worked on understanding groups and their members. This experiment is to test his Realistic Conflict Theory. The Realistic Conflict Theory studies, “group conflict, negative prejudices, and stereotypes as being the result of competition between groups for desired resources” (McLeod). This study of group conflict and cooperation shows how groups favor their own members, and how in group conflict can be resolved by groups working together on a common task that neither group can complete without the help of the other group. This is proven in this experiment when two groups have to work together to solve a given problem.
This grows them not only in their physical development but also in their emotional and social. As mentioned previously, they start to form impressions and ideas around the ages of two and four. So, this is the foundation of how their interpretation is formed at a very early age. Diversity is important to apply here but also touchy as it needs to be handled carefully. Teaching diversity at this point in their lives is critical when children are young. From this study, it was found that children from as early as six months of age can distinguish the varied of skin colors and facial features. In early childhood settings, name-calling is often toward their discriminatory behavior and prejudicial thinking. If they are not told to stop and use the situation as a teaching moment, it will have the potential to escalate into violent acts of hate as children grow older. It is important as to how caregivers and teachers respond to children. They can help the children’s questions and misperceptions about skin color, ethnic differences, and other forms of differences in
“A Sound of Thunder” is a short story written by Ray Bradbury that includes a man named Eckels who enters Time Safari, Inc., to time travel. Time Safari, Inc. is a company that offers safaris to those who want to go hunting back in time. When Eckels offers his $10,000 check to go on a safari, he asks if the company guarantees that hunters will come back alive from the past. However, the company does not guarantee anything except encountering dinosaurs. Hunters are supposed to obey their guides and only shoot what they are told to shoot. Before they leave, Eckels reviews that everyone is happy that President Keith was elected and how bad it would have been if the other candidate, Deutscher, won the election.
Another moment that surprised me was during the adult version of the experiment when a woman provided an example of how brown-eyed people were superior by using her two nephews. The women tried to verify Jane Elliot’s claims by describing her blue-eyed nephew as being lazy and the brown-eyed one as outgoing, she also hoped that her own children would be brown-eyed so they would have the more favourable characteristics. This surprised me because she took what Jane Elliot said and blamed her nephew actions on their eye colours even though they were family. One of the parts I found important in the video was during the adult version of the experiment when a blue-eyed woman was attacked and ridiculed for voicing her opinion. That part of the video was important to me because it showed us viewers that when there is a prejudice against a person for a certain trait, no matter what they say or do they are viewed wrong.
Students of different race and ethnicity always stayed together – Hispanics were in one corner, the African American stayed in another corner, and so on. Administration staff did not have any sympathy or cared for the students. Administration staff always saw the students as delinquents and a waste of time to teacher. Another issue was the drawing that a student drew of an African American student. When the students returned from summer Mr. Gelford, the honors teacher, called out on Victoria to give the black perspective of The Color Purple, which was uncalled for.
Demonstrates Fairness: I had many teachers throughout elementary and high school who demonstrated fairness in the classroom. At the time, I did not understand that fair doesn’t always mean equal. I would wonder why teachers spent more time with certain students, but now I understand that the teachers were assuring that all students were given what they needed to succeed.