Internal stakeholders are individuals or entities within a business such as employees, managers, the board of directors, and investors. External stakeholders are individuals or entities not within a business itself but who care about or are affected by its performance such as consumers, regulators, investors, and suppliers. The internal stakeholders affected in this scandal were the university, Assistant Football Coach Mike McQueary, President Graham Spanier, Senior Vice President of Finance and Business Gary Schultz, Head Football Coach Joe Paterno, Athletic Director Timothy Curley, and the Board of Trustees. The external stakeholders affected by the scandal were the NCAA, students, vendors, retailers, and the community based businesses …show more content…
The university had to spend millions of dollars in combined legal, consultant, and public relation fees. They also had to pay fines imposed from the NCAA which they ended up paying to the prevention and recovery of child sex abuse. The university lost scholarships as imposed by the NCAA, and also lost funding from some of their private supporters as well as a decline in enrollment at the school. The employees involved in the scandal lost their prestige and their jobs even Mike McQueary, who reported witnessing Sandusky in the act of sexually abusing a young boy (CNN.com, 2017). The NCAA received negative publicity from their punishment imposed on the university. The vendors at the football stadium were affected by a loss of revenue due to the decline of attendance to football games as well as the retailers who sold Penn State merchandise. Community based businesses were also affected by the decline in enrollment at the university and the reduced attendance to sporting events. I believe the biggest stakeholders that were affected more than anyone involved were the victims. No one stood up for them, but instead, try to keep it quiet as if nothing ever happened (CNN.com, 2017). When a crisis of this magnitude occurs, it will affect more than the school, NCAA, staff, students, business, but others like the churches, stocks on wall street. I believe that it can touch almost every aspect of
The stakeholders are Raider Inc., PLB employees, Johnson printing owners and employees. Raider Inc. is a stakeholder because they must make a decision that impacts PLB. PLB employees are stakeholders because morale can be impacted by the
Stakeholder is anyone with an interest in a business; stakeholders are individual, groups or businesses. They are affected by the activity of the business. There are two types on stakeholders who are internal and external. Internal stakeholder involves employees, managers/directors and shareholders/owners. External stakeholder involves suppliers, customers, government, trade unions, pressure groups and local and national communities.
Internal Stakeholder are entities with a business which include general group such as manager and employees. For example, the procurement function may have to market itself to senior management or management teams, or may have to communicate changes in purchasing policy and procedures to all staff.
In 1986, it was hinted that people were giving money to Southern Methodist University to bolster the football program. After this was confirmed, the NCAA began taking action and started its own investigation into the program. Upon completing their investigation, they found that all prior allegations were true and began sanctioning the program. On February 25, 1987, the SMU football program, already the most penalized program in history, received the harshest sanctions ever hande...
The college football world has gone mad. Conferences are doing battle in courtrooms instead of on the football field. Teams are leaving their conferences and throwing tradition and loyalty out the window for a bigger paycheck. The Bowl Championship Series was supposed to end the confusion in the college football post season. It was supposed to crown a true champion. Instead, the B.C.S. has only brought more light to the fact that in college football it is all about money and TV contracts. Teams that have no right going to a major bowl game go because of who they are and, more importantly, who their fans are and how much money the fans are will to spend. Players are failing classes, stealing, doing drugs, breaking almost every law imaginable, and they are still suiting up to play on Saturday. In this new age of college football, there is a man who is as old school as having goal posts right on the goal line. He is short in stature, but he is larger than life. He has given millions of dollars back to his university, and he has put his heart and his soul into molding young me. Joe Paterno has become an icon of college football. In these modern times, however, his morals and his coaching style seem outdated. Now, in the twilight of his career, he has to battle a grueling Big Ten schedule, the media who made him a legend and who are now looking to make him into a fool, and even his once loyal fans who have turned their backs on him. Joe Paterno has his back against the wall; it seems everything is working against him. He could walk away now and forever be remembered as a great football coach, or he can keep running out of that tunnel and work on putting Penn State football back on the map. He can take back the title that is rightfully his, the greatest college football coach of all time. Joe Paterno should remain in charge of the Penn State football program. Along the way, he deserves every Penn State fans support, win or lose.
In an interview on the Mike Lupica’s radio show Kentucky’s head basketball coach John Calipari said, "All I can tell you is this: if it happens on your campus, and it happens with your assistants and those people, you probably have a pretty good idea of what's going on.” He also says, "If it happens back in their hometown, it happens back with their family or other ways, there's no way you can know. You just don't know. So all I would say is most coaches have an idea if it happened on their campus. You might not be the first to know about it, but you eventually hear about it.” This statement shows how much they really do know about athletes’ actions. If they don’t say anything about what’s going on but they know, that should cause some serious punishment for both school and
These players and their families have an obsession for football that is pretty obvious and damaging to the well-being of their future. Not only are the players affected but the school and other institutions as well. When football is at the forefront of everything you can miss key contributions to what would amount to having a successful life after football. The fans of the Permian Panthers love their football team and to them that is all that is important in the world.
The Southern Methodist University football scandal, also known as Ponygate, was one of the most severe consequences that the NCAA has ever given out to a college or university. In this instance, the Southern Methodist University football program was found to be illegally paying their players after already being in trouble with the NCAA several times. The first time this football program had been caught by the NCAA for not following its rules was in 1985. This was when an incident regarding offensive lineman Sean Stopperich came up. Prior to transferring schools after going through an injury which made him unable to play, he was paid $5,000 by one of the Southern Methodist Universities booster programs to attend the school and play football there. This caused “the NCAA to place SMU on three years of probation in 1985, limit its postseason appearances, ban the boosters involved and strip the football program of 45 scholarships.” This did not show the program or the school a lesson though. Again in 1986 the Southern Methodist University football program was found breaking NCAA rules. This was their seventh time they had broken and been caught breaking NCAA rules. This time it was found that, “an unnamed booster had been found to have paid 13 Mustang players $61,000 from a slush fund with the approval of key members of the SMU athletic staff.” The result of this complication with NCAA rules is what became known as the, “death penalty”. This death penalty declared that there were to be, “no football in '87. only seven games in '88. no television or bowl appearances until 1989 and restrictions on off-campus recruiting and the number of assistant coaches until 1989 SMU which signed no high school players to letters of intent this winter...
It is amazing how an isolated incident, such as the one at Colorado, can incite such a large frenzy and call for change. The scandal started with a former recruit telling his experiences during his college visit in Boulder at the University of Colorado. His stories included wild parties with unlimited amounts of alcohol and the open availability to sex with the women of his choosing. The term used for these parties was "sex parties" and recruits were told that the women would perform any sexual act he desired. After the recruit made his experiences public, other stories began to surface from other recruits who had similar experiences at Colorado and other schools. The situation came to a boil when a former female player accused some of her team mates of sexual assault at one of these parties. Other students came forward with similar allegations of football players forcing sex from females at their parties. What started as small story ballooned into a very situation and it became very obvious that the recruiting game was out of control and in need of major change. After the stories surfaced out of Boulder, Colorado more stories began to surface around the country and even Brigham Young University kicked off four players for sexual misconduct.
The behaviors of the athletic management staff can affect the team performance and temperance. This has been evident in the case scandal of the Baylor university basketball team. However, there is a great need for those in leadership of the universities to evaluate constantly the behaviors of the staff concerned with various games in the school. This will make such cases to be evaded and when problems occur, they can be timely handled.
College athletes are manipulated every day. Student athletes are working day in and day out to meet academic standards and to keep their level of play competitive. These athletes need to be rewarded and credited for their achievements. Not only are these athletes not being rewarded but they are also living with no money. Because the athletes are living off of no money they are very vulnerable to taking money from boosters and others that are willing to help them out. The problem with this is that the athletes are not only getting themselves in trouble but their athletic departments as well.
Key stakeholders of British Airways include customers, employees, those who have invested in BA by buying shares of the business as well as corporate organizations. To analyze the stake holders in BA the power/interest matrix (Gardner et al, 1986) can be applied in terms of its power and matrix. Brand reputation, economy of scale and cost control are some the key success factors of BA. In addition to Boston Matrix can position BA’s business in terms of short haul (cash cow business) and long haul (star business).
Collegiate athletics in the United States, in particular N.C.A.A. (National Collegiate Athletic Association) Division I basketball and football, have become one of the most prominent forms of sports entertainment today. Like their professional counterparts, the economic stability of many university and college sports programs relies on the success of its teams. As a result, coaches and team officials have been subject to a great deal of criticism, as many have been using improper methods to recruit athletes for their teams. In the past half century, the NCAA, an amateur organization, has been no stranger to its share of corruption and scandal. The NCAA’s constitution states that “An amateur sportsman is one who engages in sports for the physical, mental or social benefits he derives therefrom, and to whom the sport is an avocation. Any college athlete who takes pay for participation in athletics does not meet this definition of amateurism.” (from In Praise of ‘Student-Athletes’: the NCAA is Haunted by its past, in The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 8 1999) In addition to athletic scholarships, statistics have shown that nearly 50% of college athletes have themselves - or know of - athletes who have received under-the-table-payments for their services. (from Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Exploiting College Athletes, page 63)
Many times white collar criminals play a prominent role in society, especially in smaller communities, such as the college town of Penn State. Because this educational institution is so beloved by those who go there and the local community, many people cannot even see that an actual crime was committed and that not just Sandusky is guilty. This case is a white collar crime due to the fact that it was at an institutional level. While he may have committed the actual act, several people at different levels were notified, and the act covered up. This is not only a failure at this educational institution, it is a crime. Sandusky was in a position of power where he had gained the trust of his coworkers and the people around him. Therefore, he took advantage of this gained trust to commit unspeakable crimes upon those children around him. Penn State is a trusted institution; well know university that many people love and support. Jeff Anderson said, “Well, in our practice across the count...
The NCAA has specific rules in regard’s to it's Division I and II schools can offer scholarships to athletes for playing a sport. On the other had Division III schools can not offer any athletic scholarships. So we ask ourselves , how has the NCAA affected high profile colleges and universities ? During today’s research we will examine how , what the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent the scandals at schools like that of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Detail how the principals in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. While examining two actions that the NCAA leadership could take in order to regain the trust and confidence of students and stakeholders. And lastly be able to recommend two measures that the HR departments of colleges and universities should take to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the