Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma about animal rights
Why violence in media
Essay on the effect of tv violence on youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma about animal rights
First, it would make the claim difficult to prove for the use of vague definition. The
phrase “International law” is not very clear. What exactly is the “international law”? By “international” does it mean all the countries around the world? Is there only one specific law or many in the “international” section? Who exactly approves the “international law”, an “international” person? I for sure did not know that we even had an “international law”. As a matter of fact, I know that I am not the only one who does not know. Another is the lack of adequate support. The claim has no support, in other words, it does not go in deep why whale hunting should be banned. Should it be banned because it is animal cruelty? Or because there are fewer whales in the ocean? Lastly, conflict over beliefs. I believe that whale hunting should be banned, but not by the international law. There are other bigger problems that should become an “international law”. Underlying assumption assuming that everyone wants whale hunting to be banned. What if other people live from that like we live from cows, pigs, chickens. Also, there are another bigger situations that should become an “international law”.
f. Violence on television
…show more content…
produces violent behavior in children who watch more than four hours a day. This is a Claim of Value. The claim is difficult to resolve for the use of a vague definition of the word “Violence”. It is not being specific about what kind of violence.
It could be killing, raping, or hurting someone. The claim also uses underlying assumption. For the reason that is saying that children who watch more than four hours of violence produce violence. Is there a study that shows kids watching violence for four hours with the outcome of violent behavior? Also, the claim only states children, but couldn't it happen to any age? Also assuming that every child who watches television for four hours will be violent. What if it is fewer hours? What if it is not from watching violence on television. Conflict over beliefs, I do believe that children learn almost everything from television, but that does not mean that they are going to do some of the stuff that they
watch. j. Bilingual instruction should not be permitted in the public schools. This is a Claim of Policy The claim is difficult to prove for the use of vague definitions. “Instruction” does it mean by giving directions to a class, or teaching the class in bilingual? Another vague definition is “public schools” . Does it mean in general ALL public schools or can it be elementary, preschool, high school, middle school, or adult school? Another is the lack of adequate support why should it not be permitted? Are there studies that show that bilingually is a problem in public schools.
"Imagine if the world you lived in, the space you breathed in, and the freedom you played in were suddenly taken away from you." (Free Willy)
The quest to gain international agreement on ethical and legal norms for regulation of whaling has had a long and troubled history. The modern phase of global concern over whaling ethics and conservationist management originated in 1946, when the International Convention on Regulation of Whaling was signed. Thus the International Whaling Commission was created. The International Whaling Commission was designed to control and mandate the whaling industry. From it’s beginning as simply a whalers club with scientific guidance, to the current day conservationist body; the IWC has undergone many revisions and transformations since the start. In 1982 the IWC voted to implement a “pause” on commercial whaling (which is still in effect today). Which major whaling nations, Japan, Norway, Peru, and the Soviet Union (later replaced by Russia) lodged formal objections, due to the fact that the moratorium was not based on advice from the Scientific Committee. One major disappointment of this regulation was due the fact that the moratorium only applies to commercial whaling. Thus, whaling under scientific-research and aboriginal-subsistence is still allowed. Japan and other countries have continued their hunt in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary under the “scientific research” loophole. However, environmental activist groups openly dispute the claims and continue their rally to end the whaling industry for good.
I think that killer whale shows should be banned because killer whales can protect themselves in the wild,they can lose natural abilities to hunt and feed themselves, and that killer whale shows can ruin the population of killer whales. My first reason is that, that killer whales could protect themselves in the wild because from a website called “animals.mom.me,” it said that “Orcas in the wild have an average life expectancy of 30 to 50 years-their estimated maximum lifespan is 60 to 70 years for males and 80 to over 100 years for females. The average age of death for orcas that have lived in seaworld is 13 years old.” So this shows that if you do not capture orcas (killer whales), they will have a longer life span because they can protect themselves in the wild and can survive much longer than 13 years in an aquarium.
I do not feel that a ban on whaling constitutes a violation of the sovereignty of nations that have a history of whaling. As sovereign nations, they have the choice to follow the recommendations set forth by non-government organizations such as the International Whaling Commission. Problems can arise when other members of the commission then press for sanctions against the nation choosing not to follow the mandates from the commission. These problems need to be addressed in a way that not only honors the cultural heritage of the nations that are not following the recommendation of the commission, but prevents every nation from claiming a cultural exemption in order to skirt the
Captivity is the state or period of being imprisoned, confined, or enslaved, according to Wiktionary. Every year, marine parks and aquariums, like SeaWorld, make billions of dollars through ticket sales. SeaWorld estimates about 70% of their total revenue is due to their performing killer whales (Jeffs). People visit from all over the world to encounter killer whales up close. “Their beauty and power, combined with willingness to work with humans, have made them legendary performers” (Gorman). In recent years, humans have gained the ability to tame and train these creatures. Killer whales should not be kept in captivity simply because it is cruel, unnatural, and dangerous.
Everybody has one thing in the world that they feel strongly about. Weather if it is a stuffed animal, person, or a job. We all praise something. I believe that we need to stop whaling. Every day whale after whale die. Why? Just because people want their meat and to make oil and some money. We need to find a way to stop these terrible Pandemic. There has to be another way to make money and oil than killing this marvelous animal. If this was happening to you what would you want to do to stop this?
Before a person reaches the age of 18 they will have witnessed over 40,000 murders, and over 400,000 other acts of violence. One research study concluded that just one hour of television everyday will increase the chances of a person committing an act of violence by four times. Violence depicted in movies will leave an impression on the viewer and the feelings they had about violence will slowly and subtly begin to change as the person becomes desensitized to violence. Witnessing repeated acts of violence raises a person’s level of hostility and lowers empathy. The violence that is portrayed in movies and television has long been known to influence crime and violent behavior in our society.
The current ban on fox hunting has been very controversial, and there have been many arguments, both for and against hunting. Fox hunting is typically viewed as a traditional British activity, but actual fox hunting that uses hounds takes place all over the world. Historically wherever the British have gone building their empires, they have taken the sport of fox hunting43 with them. In addition, plenty of other countries have their own fox hunting traditions. In France, Italy and Ireland they are thriving fox hunts.
In a research analysis of Media and Violence, studies show that “Although the typical effect size for exposure to violent media is relatively small ... this ‘small effect’ translates into significant consequences for society as a whole” (“Media and Violence: An Analysis of Current Research”, 2015). This states violent behaviors can come from the smallest variables, or clips from videos, which is why it is important for parents to control what their kids see, read, and watch, and limit the amount of violence exposure.
For almost 400 years, whales have been chased to near extinction. Vessels have travelled the globe to find and extract precious oil and gather whale meat to eat. This has resulted in over 10,000 whales being executed since the moratorium in 1986. A moratorium is a delay or suspension of an activity or a law and in this case a suspension of whaling. Also a ...
In an article written by Kevin D. Browne and Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis out of Lancet, dated 2/19/2005, Volume 365 in issue 9460, on page 702 a collection of research shows short-term effects increasing the likelihood of aggressive or fearful behavior in younger children, especially in boys. It also shows research stating that there is a very weak correlation directly between media violence and acted out aggression. This article basically states that violent media being watched by children does impression and arouse some, but does not associate strongly with violent acts. This would help explain the fact that millions of kids watch violent television shows and remain nonviolent.
On average and American child will watch 32 acts of violence per hour on TV. This number has skyrocketed from 20 years ago when it was just 12 acts per hour (Krieg). This being said a child will have watched anywhere from 8,000 to 100,000 acts of violence before they even finish elementary school (Weiss). While adults can watch violence on TV and understand that it is not real, children on the other hand have difficulty differentiating the between what is real and what is make believe.
Television violence causes destructive behavior in children, however; television can be a powerful influence to young viewers in our society. Unfortunately, much of today's television programming are very violent. Many researchers like scientists, pediatricians, and child researchers in many countries have studied to find out what it is about television violence that makes it such a big affect on the way kids act and behave. Sometimes, children think that is a normal thing in our real life, by watching only a single violent program, which can increase aggressiveness on children and become violent, aggressive, and vicious.
Freedman, Jonathan. "Television Violence Does Not Contribute to Aggressive Behavior in Young People." April 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. .
Furthermore, television violence causes aggressive behavior in children. Many people believe that children who watch violent television programs exhibit more aggressive behavior than that exhibited by children who do not (Kinnear 23). According to the results of many studies and reports, violence on television can lead to aggressive behavior in children (Langone 50). Also, when television was introduced into a community of children for the first time, researchers observed a rise in the level of physical and verbal aggression among these children (Langone 51). The more television violence viewed by a child, the more aggressive the child is (“Children” 1).