Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should juveniles be treated or tried as adults
Should juveniles be treated or tried as adults
Effects of youth crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should juveniles be treated or tried as adults
Crime has risen and fallen over many years; not only have adult crimes become more common but so have juvenile crimes. Because of this many judges have to put some sort of sentence down, like being tried as an adult. If a juvenile is accused of a violent crime they should be tried as adults because if they do a crime once they may try to do it again, if they do a crime they may want to escalate and do a more severe crime or they may do a crime that could hurt more than one person. If this were to happen a severe punishment should be given to the assailant.
When a juvenile or someone under the age of eighteen commits a crime, sometimes they think it is fun because they got away with it. If and when they do get caught, they should be convicted as adults especially if they are caught committing: murder, rape, or are in possession of a controlled substance or drug. Some people say, “Prison changes a man”; if a juvenile goes to prison they will learn not to hurt people and become a possible asset to society while they are in prison. Even if a juvenile were not to be sentenced as an adult they should at least have to go through some kind of adult prison sentence even if they were to have parole.
Juveniles have been committing crimes for a long time and more teens are becoming
…show more content…
accustomed to thinking it is okay but it is not. If courts and police do not start cracking down on kids who think it would be appropriate to hurt someone or commit a serious crime then our country will become extremely dangerous. Not only will teens want to commit a crime but they may try to convince others, not necessarily a friend, to join them, which in turn hurts their “friend” and their family. If a person is caught trying to convince a friend to commit a crime with them, their sentence should be doubled for the induction of a second party. To some people crimes can be fun and sometimes a juvenile might escalate. If a person were to kill an animal and think it was fun they would eventually want to try to kill bigger animals and thus leading them to a human target. It would be extremely dangerous for the court to let a juvenile go spend their years in a juvenile penitentiary because they would not know how losing everything in their lives would be. When they are tried as adults they would feel the full punishment of the law for murder. Life in prison for such a crime should be mandatory because even though they may be nice in prison does not mean they will be in the real world. Everyday someone is murdered and juveniles are becoming frequently more known to do it.
Juveniles should be tried as adults because if they were taught correctly they would not go do something such as killing and even if they were brought up correctly, going to prison will make them learn really quick not to play around with something so serious. As teens are being sentenced as adults, another will murder someone they do not like, a member of their family or, even a friend. Even while that is happening, a kid has killed an animal and feeling the joy of his or her kill and is escalating. Teens should be tried as adults because it is the right thing to do, whether their family wants it or
not.
The central idea of this article is to show the two sides of the prompt ¨should Juveniles be tried as adults?¨ This article uses a lot of stories to help back herself up in her answer. The authority with the author/creator is trustworthy because, Jessica Reaves works for a trustworthy place ¨Time¨ The difficult part of trusting the accuracy of the article is, it was published in 2001 which could have a lot of changes in roughly 15 or 16 years. The article uses examples of juvenile violence to prove the point that kids are treated differently from adults. Readers can use this article to prove that kids are incapable of understanding the consequences of their action.
Being charged with adult sentences is a very harsh punishment considering their age. Andrew Medina was fifteen when he got sentenced to life without parole because of a murder that he possibly did not commit. Officers also alleged that he was part of a gang and sent him to spend the rest of his life in a very strict prison. Trevor Jones also got sentenced to life without parole at the age of seventeen because of reckless manslaughter. Even though it was an accident, the victim’s death occurred while Trevor intended armed robbery and was accused of felony murder and will spend the rest of his life in prison. Jacob Ind was sentenced to life without parole. At the age of fifteen, he killed his mother and stepfather in order to put an end to the all kinds of abuse they were putting him through. The jury did not recognize the fact that it was primarily self-defense and accused him of first degree murder, which carries a mandatory life sentence. These are the cases of only three kids who got life without parole but there are so many more. These kids miss out on so many things in life because they will spend most of it locked in a cell. One accident or mistake can ruin their lives forever. That is why I think juveniles should be tried in juvenile
Thousands of kid criminals in the United States have been tried as adults and sent to prison (Equal Justice Initiative). The debate whether these kids should be tried as adults is a huge controversy. The decision to try them or to not try them as an adult can change their whole life. “Fourteen states have no minimum age for trying children as adults” (Equal Justice Initiative). Some people feel that children are too immature to fully understand the severity of their actions. People who are for kids to be tried as adults feel that if they are old enough to commit the crime, then they are old enough to understand what they are doing. There are people who feel that children should only be tried as adults depending on the crime.
If children are too young to vote, drink alcohol, drive, and go watch rated R movies, why should they be tried as adults? It has always been an issue if whether an adolescent, under the age of eighteen, convicted of violent crimes should be tried as an adult or not. There are children as young as eleven years old that are being sent to adult prisons (Krikorian 2003). In such cases the jury does not take into consideration the fact that they are too young to stand trial, their brains are not fully developed, and that they are capable of rehabilitating.
Kids should be subjected to the measures of punishment that our judicial system is giving to them. Kids who show lots of enmity should be tried as adults. It is the only way to protect the innocent children. These kids know right from wrong, but they choose to do the wrong things and violence is wrong. As the laws have gotten stricter on discipline the kids have gotten wilder. When we let society tell us how to discipline our children then violent children is the result.
Based on my recent study of the adolescent brain and cognitive development, I don't think anyone under the age of 24 should be trialed as an adult. Even though 18 is the age when teens become adults and get jobs, our brain is so vulnerable as teens. The pressure added on by society telling 18 year olds to suddenly grow up and be an adult is overwhelming. With that stress of growing up is also stress to make the right decisions and meet expectations of others. During teenage years the adolescent brain is at it’s most crucial stage in development. Being trialed during this developmental stage hinders proper development. After viewing the case studies on the 5 teens from colorado I concluded that most trials take weeks and months at a time. During
Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person.
"Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." -- David Grusin and Morgan Ames Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult. Those who commit capital crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Age should not be a factor in the case of serious crimes.
once the minor has committed a violent crime, they are no longer a kid. The minor had the ability to know right from wrong, but he still chose to commit the heinous crime anyway. Choosing to commit this violent crime means that the minor chose to act as an adult and must be held accountable. Once the minor has made the decision to act as an adult, they must be treated as an adult. If we do not teach minors that what they did has consequences they will never learn. Arguments can be made that minors should not be treated as adults and while these arguments do have merit, they are not my beliefs. In my opinion, minors who commit violent crimes need to be tried as adults. Justice does not discriminate when it comes to age. Right is right, and wrong is wrong and the wrong should be punished equally.
In conclusion, juvenile offenders should be tried as adults. Adult classification enables the judicial system to punish offenders to the fullest extent of the law. Juveniles should be held responsible for their actions because they have values and morals and are able to realize consequences just as well as adults. The tougher punishments given by adult courts discourage other young people from committing crimes and help to keep society safer fro everyone. Justice is served for criminal and victim when the punishment allowed by adult courts compensates for the crime committed. When juveniles are tried as adults in the criminal justice program, society as a whole benefits.
Ivan Quiroz ERWC, Period 5 Roberts 17 May 2024 Why Juveniles Should Not Be Tried As Adults. The age-old debate over trying juveniles as adults in criminal courts has sparked controversy over the moral and legal implications. Proponents argue that treating juveniles as adults can deter them from committing crimes and hold them accountable. However, this overlooks the complex nature of adolescence and fails to consider developmental differences. Trying children as adults neglects rehabilitation and redemption.
Today?s court system is left with many difficult decisions. One of the most controversial being whether to try juveniles as adults or not. With the number of children in adult prisons and jails rising rapidly, questions are being asked as to why children have been committing such heinous crimes and how will they be stopped. The fact of the matter is that it is not always the children's fault for their poor choices and actions; they are merely a victim of their environment or their parents. Another question asked is how young is too young. Children who are too young to see an R rated film unaccompanied are being sent to adult prisons. The only boundaries that seem to matter when it comes to being an adult are laws that restrain kids from things such as alcohol, pornography, and other materials seen as unethical. Children that are sent to adult prison are going to be subjected to even more unprincipled ideas and scenes. When children can be sent to jail for something as minor as a smash and grab burglary, the judicial system has errors. The laws that send juveniles to adult prisons are inhumane, immoral, and unjust. Kids are often incompetent, which leads to unfair trials. Adult prisons are also very dangerous for minors, and in many cases this leads to more juvenile crimes.
The United States has been affected by a number of crimes committed by juveniles. The juvenile crime rate has been increasing in recent years. Everyday more juveniles commit crimes for various reasons. They act as adults when they are not officially adults. There is a discussion about how juveniles should be punished if they commit heinous crimes. While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such.
Whether or not they should be tried as adults, how big the crime is and age. Various points of views and further thoughts and facts. However, a person of age, a minor is paying the price for the crime by doing time in prison. It may never change the fact that they created and did the crime, but it can change them as a person as they serve their time in prison or once they're out, with that being said, a second chance is needed for juveniles to comprehend what has happened and make a better out of themselves. Equally to prisoners who are adults and do get the chance to get a second shot at life, juveniles as well should get that
One reason why juvenile offenders should not be tried as adult is because they are far from adulthood. Many teenager who have committed a crime has a different background. For example, they have suffered sex abused, their parents have been drug addicted , or have been in prison for many years. There are many factors