Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The changing workforce
Critical elements of employee engagement
Critical elements of employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The changing workforce
Table of Contents
Executive Summary................................................................................................ 2
Section 1: Description of the change.......................................................................3 Section 2: Guiding force behind the change............................................................3 Section 3: Strategies Employed ..............................................................................4 Section 4: Barriers ...................................................................................................5
Section 5: Results of the change .............................................................................6 Section 6: Change agent’s role................................................................................6
…show more content…
We were a team of 15 people who were trained on a certain platform, called Citrix. The training for this platform was very intensive. It included formal training for about a month and you had to pass a certain series of tests, in order to officially complete the training. You were then placed under a subject matter expert, who reviewed each and every case you resolved. He/she then had to rate you. Any error during the process could not only get you cited but could also have an impact on your bonus. We were just getting eased to the process when we were suddenly told that my team was needed someplace else and we would now be trained on an another platform, called legacy. This meant going through the exhausting process all over again. The change was sudden and my team had not expected this.
Guiding force behind the change
American Express was undergoing some changes. There was a sudden rise in customer dispute cases that required the use of the legacy platform and there was a shortage of staff that was skilled in the same. Since our team was relatively new but was performing remarkably, the process manager along with senior management thought that taking our team off the old platform and training us on the new platform would be an easy transition.
Strategies
…show more content…
Becoming a dispute analyst was a long and tedious process. Our team had just gotten used to the whole process when we were told that we would need to be retrained on something entirely different. Everyone was angry and frustrated. Our process manager had not even thought that this would be a problem and that people would not be accepting of this change. He had not taken any measures to ease people into this change because for him there were not going to be any barriers to change. We were expected to readily accept the change.
Another major barrier to change was the lack of effective communication and support. We were just casually told that there has to be a change. There was no support provided for when our team wanted to talk about the change or had any complaints. It was almost like an order.
Another barrier to change was that everything happened so fast. The change of platforms happened within a week. There wasn’t enough time given to process the change. It was a sudden switch instead of a smooth
Elite Engineering has been unable to successfully implement change because they haven’t been able to get the employees to see the need for the change and to believe in the change. “It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things.” (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) Change is often met with resistance. When it comes down to it many people fear change. At Elite Engineering, the engineers were happy with the way things were being run. They enjoyed the billable work they were doing and did not want to take the time to collaborate with others, as it would take away time from their billable work. The engineers saw the billable work they were doing as a way to ensure they received their bonus at the end of the year. However, they were failing to see that the litigation business was going to begin to shrink and in order for them to remain competitive, changes needed to be made. Kotter and Schlesinger state that there are for common reasons that people resist change. The four reasons are the desire not to lose something of value, a misunderstanding of the change and its implications, a belief that the change does not make sense for the organization, and a low tolerance for change. (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008) At Elite Engineering, I think upper management was unsuccessful at implementing change because the employees didn’t want to lose their bonuses (something of value to them), they misunderstood the change, and they didn’t feel that the change made sense for the organization.
Hughes, M 2006, 'Strategic change', in M Hughes (ed.), Change management: a critical perspective, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, pp. 52-63.
Spector, B. (2013). Implementing organizational change: theory into practice. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ
“The Heart of Change,” by John Kotter and Dan S. Cohen can act as a diagram for any organization facing challenges that come with implementing change. In the 21st Century in order to stay competitive with your competitors you have to implement changes, new systems and approaches to keep the organization relevant. With changes there comes errors that a company may encounter, sometimes these errors if not fixed can make the change within the organization impossible. Employees are reluctant and can’t see the views or their leader, and this makes change unsuccessful. That’s where Kotter’s eight step change model can give an organization a guideline and understanding of some of the challenges that they may encounter with change. Comparing Kotter’s
Next, create a right vision and strategies for the change process and make sure that the change becomes success. A clear vision and strategy can guide them to a good direction and do not waste time and resources.
Mr. Nardelli could have spent more time demonstrating why the changes were necessary and why the urgency. Taking a look at the communication strategies (discussed later in this paper), there appeared to have been a great deal of one way communication, but less collaboration and some employees could have felt their opinions did not matter. As such, not everyone agreed with the changes, however, he did place a sense of urgency.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
Managing Change: Who Moved my Cheese? Darrin Ruble National University Managing Change: Who Moved my Cheese? Rashid-Al-Abri (2007) claims that change in the healthcare industry has been a dramatic phenomenon that requires the personnel to accept changes or they will be surpassed by them. Therefore, there is the need to follow the steps of change: evaluation, planning, implementation, and management. The characters are different, but the individual control that these characters display plays a fundamental role in the acceptance and the administration of change.
The community may not like the change. Many people are resistant to any change. “Perception is everything.” One of the founding principles of our company. We need to focus on ways to improve the way others “feel” about the new division.
In business, when we approach change, whether it is about cost reduction, merger or supporting a new technology we need to treat it as a seriously disruptive and stressful activity for all involved especially those leading the change.
Change usually comes with resistance in any workplace because change disrupts the employees’ sense of safety and control (Lewis, 2012). Kurt Lewin (1951) created a three step process for assisting employees with organizational Change (Lewis, 2012). The three stages are Unfreeze, Change and Refreeze. These are the steps to a smooth transition for change within organizations. Further, these steps are not possible without good communication from upper Management through line staff. Communication was consistently listed as an issue in surveys conducted by the department.
... Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11) is two significant factors that make the organization’s change difficult. Management systems are designed affects every level in the organization structures and processes when make change. On the other hand, people rewarded for stability impact organizational change seriously because people like working in a stability environment and they resist change. It is very difficult for organization to make changes in those two areas.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
Change Management is not impossibly difficult. It need detailed planning, including everyone affected, frequent interaction, accomplish a perspicuous target for the change and a method of measuring success, complete the plan, and strengthen the change once it is in place.
Force of change is a positive factor that an organization must put in place in order to drive and develop the entire organization’s environment. In this process of change more of resistance factors will try to hinder the change. The organization in this case experiences a repulsive force which absolutely adheres to reserve the existing ways of handling of issues. In the process the firm faces the competitive challenges from other organization and in meanwhile diseconomies of scale. Organizational change process is the progression of a given institution, far from its present state and towards some desired prospects to propagate its performance effectiveness. The organization’s work strategy persistently changes for better. Afterwards, the members’ organization must acclimatize to organization’s forces of change in a bid to conserve its relevancy and effectiveness. Lewin’s force field theory of change serves as a convenient model in understanding the change process. The role of the organization leader is both intense and diverse. For the organization to propel in its management processes, the organization leader must adhere to his increasing responsibilities of change. The leader must be the primary catalyst to speed up the mechanism used to assure the members of positivity effect of change and the expected period of its existence.